Answer to case of the month #109. Retrorectal cystic hamartoma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Wyse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This report summarizes the clinical and socioeconomic characteristics of the first 542 patients entered into the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) trial. AVID is a multicenter trial comparing a strategy of initial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement to initial antiarrhythmic drug therapy in preventing death in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest who were not taking amiodarone and who did not have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in place at the time of the index event. These patients were randomly assigned to immediate defibrillator placement or to "best" medical therapy. Clinical and socioeconomic histories were collected by interview using standard terms developed for the study. Patients without (group 1) and with (group 2) a history of prior cardiac arrest were compared. The mean age of the 542 patients was 65 +/- 10 years, most were men, white, had coronary disease, and were highly functional despite the fact that only a minority were employed. Almost all had some form of health insurance. At the time of the index event, few were taking any therapy to prevent cardiac arrest, even in the group of patients with a history of previous cardiac arrest. Thus, the clinical and socioeconomic profile of patients resuscitated from sudden cardiac death entered into the AVID study is generally as expected. There is a striking absence of any attempt at chronic therapy to prevent cardiac arrest in most patients with a prior ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation.
The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial is a prospective, randomized study of treatment for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Patients who are eligible for the main trial but who are not enrolled for any reason are followed in a registry. The objective of the present study was to determine whether there are identifiable patient characteristics among these registry patients that may influence whether a patient is treated with an implantable defibrillator. The 914 patients in the registry were divided into 2 groups according to whether the primary treatment was an implantable defibrillator. The mean age of defibrillator patients was 60 years, compared with 65 years in the nondefibrillator group (p <0.001). Only 11.2% of defibrillator recipients were minorities, whereas the percentage of minorities in the nondefibrillator group was 18.7% (p <0.003). A history of recurrent ventricular fibrillation was more likely in the group treated with defibrillators (8.9% vs 4.4%, p <0.01), whereas a history of atrial fibrillation or diabetes mellitus were both significantly more likely in the nondefibrillator group. Among defibrillator patients, a higher proportion had ventricular fibrillation as the index arrhythmia; patients with ventricular tachycardia were significantly more likely to be treated without devices. In this prospective but nonrandomized cohort of patients treated for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, older age, minority status, and comorbidity reduced the chances that a patient would be treated with a defibrillator.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Currently, research does not agree as to the extent to which medical content and problem-solving processes underlie clinical problem-solving. The results of research in this area fall into two categories: (1) clinical problem-solving is primarily dependent upon medical content specific within the case, and (2) clinical problem-solving is a skill, or series of skills, which can be applied to all clinical problems. In the study reported in this paper, seventy-one second-year medical students who had completed a 2-year, body-systems oriented curriculum were given an examination designed to measure clinical problem-solving. The results indicated that gathering data on patient history and hypotheses generation were specific skills common to clinical problem-solving, while hypotheses refinement, identification of relevant physical examinations, ordering laboratory investigations and making a diagnosis were case-related.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Merkel cell cancer (MCC) is an uncommon neuroendocrine skin cancer occurring predominantly in elderly Caucasians. It tends to metastasize to regional lymph nodes and viscera and is sensitive to chemotherapy but recurs rapidly. AIM: To report one such case, its response to chemotherapy and briefly review the literature. METHODS: A 73-year-old male with a fungating primary lesion on his left knee and ulcerated inguinal lymph nodes was diagnosed with MCC and treated with chemotherapy. The two largest case series and reviews of case reports were summarised. RESULTS: His ulcer healed after two cycles of carboplatin and etoposide with improvement in quality of life. Overall response rates of nearly 60% to chemotherapy are reported but median survival is only nine months with metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy should be considered for fit elderly patients with MCC who have recurrent or advanced disease.
BACKGROUND: Lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma is a rare tumour type. The optimal treatment for this disease is not known. No effective therapies are described in the literature. AIMS: This report describes a case of lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma and documents a therapeutic strategy which has proved effective. RESULTS: The patient was initially treated with a common platinum-based chemotherapy regimen incorporating a taxane (Carbplatin and Docetaxel). Disease stabilization initially occurred but the patient soon progressed. The patient was then treated with VIP chemotherapy and had a complete response. CONCLUSION: VIP chemotherapy appears to be an effective therapeutic strategy in lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma.