Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Worrall

Publications and source records attributed to G Worrall.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

One hundred earaches. Family practice case series.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether watchful waiting was an appropriate strategy for patients with earache, when there was no clear indication to prescribe antibiotics at the first visit. DESIGN: Case series of consecutive patients with unilateral earache. SETTING: Rural family practice clinic and walk-in centre. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients with unilateral earache. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who clearly needed antibiotic treatment were given it; others were advised about symptom relief and were followed up as necessary. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether patients returned to the clinic, and whether antibiotics were subsequently prescribed. RESULTS: Two patients were prescribed antibiotics at the first visit. Of the remaining 98 people, only four returned to the clinic because of earache, and two of these were prescribed antibiotics. Thus, of 100 people with earache, four received antibiotic prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Most people who present to primary care physicians with earache do not need antibiotics for what appears to be a mostly self-limiting condition. Both physicians and patients should be educated about this.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Effectiveness of an educational strategy to improve family physicians' detection and management of depression: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Depression, a common disorder often treated by family physicians, may be both underdiagnosed and undertreated. The objective of this study was to determine whether the diagnosis and treatment of depression by family physicians could be improved through an educational strategy. METHODS: In this study, conducted between July and December 1997, 42 family physicians in Newfoundland were randomly assigned to an intervention group (3-hour case-based educational session on clinical practice guidelines [CPGs] for depression and access to a psychiatrist for consultation) or to a control group (receipt of CPGs without educational session or access to the psychiatrist). Physicians were asked to keep a log of patients with newly diagnosed depression and to record information on severity of depression, medications and referrals to mental health professionals. Patients were asked to complete the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale before treatment and after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the "gain" score (difference between first and last CES-D scores). RESULTS: During the study period physicians in the intervention group diagnosed 91 new cases of depression (mean 4.1 per physician) and those in the control group diagnosed 56 (mean 2.8 per physician); the difference was not significant. Most patients (91.2% in the intervention group and 89.3% in the control group received a prescription for an antidepressant on their first visit. Similar proportions (46.2% in the intervention group and 37.5% in the control group) took their medication for the full 6 months; however, significantly more patients in the intervention group were taking an antidepressant at the 6-month follow-up (56% v. 39.3%, p = 0.02). The mean number of visits per patient was similar in the 2 groups (7.7 in the intervention group and 7.6 in the control group). Physicians in the intervention group consulted the psychiatrist 9 times. The overall rate of referrals to psychiatrists and other mental health professionals was 10.9%; however, referrals were significantly higher in the intervention group (15.4% v. 3.5%, p = 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, a significant difference in gain scores was detected between the intervention and control groups for both the patient's self-rated CES-D scores (mean gain score 19.3 v. 15.5 respectively, p = 0.04) and the physicians' ratings of depression severity before treatment and at 6 months (mean gain 1.1 v. 0.7 respectively, p = 0.02). INTERPRETATION: The educational strategy had a modest beneficial effect on the outcomes of patients with depression, but there are still concerns regarding the low rates of drug treatment and referral to mental health professionals by family physicians.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Clinical practice guidelines: questions family physicians should ask themselves.

Family physicians increasingly are being pressured to use clinical practice guidelines. This article reviews the methods of developing, disseminating and implementing guidelines, and suggests a list of questions that family physicians should ask themselves before accepting any clinical practice guidelines.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1999

No psychiatry? Assessment of family medicine residents' training in mental health issues.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the mental health component of the family medicine residency program at Memorial University of Newfoundland, which contains no formal mental health training with psychiatrists, adequately prepares residents for practice, and to assess which aspects of their training enhanced their mental health skills most. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: A 2-year family practice residency program with a focus on training for rural practice offering integrated and eclectic multidisciplinary mental health training rather than formal psychiatry experience. PARTICIPANTS: Graduates of the family practice residency program, 1990 to 1995. Completed questionnaires were returned by 62 of 116 physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Confidence of respondents in dealing with 23 mental health problems. RESULTS: Respondents felt prepared to address most of the mental health needs of their patients. Higher levels of confidence were associated with lower referral rates. There was no significant relationship between time spent in practice and confidence in dealing with mental health problems. Graduates' confidence correlated with areas in the program identified as strong. CONCLUSIONS: The program appears to train family doctors effectively to meet the mental health needs of their patients.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1998

The fatigue of cancer.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1998

Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of prenatal ultrasonography (PNU) in western Labrador in 1994, assess the appropriateness of the ultrasound examinations according to current guidelines and determine whether there was any relation between number of PNU examinations and patient management and obstetric outcomes. DESIGN: Review of all obstetric charts and PNU requisition forms for all deliveries in one hospital in 1994. SETTING: Labrador City and Wabush, Newfoundland. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 103 singleton deliveries, and these mothers underwent a total of 225 PNU studies (mean 2.16 studies per delivery). More than half (53.3%) of the examinations were classified as inappropriate. There were no significant differences in the number of studies between low- and high-risk pregnancies or between uncomplicated deliveries and those in which induction or instrumental or operative delivery occurred, nor was there any relation between number of PNU examinations and maternal or neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Compared with PNU use as recommended by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, this type of examination was overused in Labrador City and Wabush, although the rate of use was comparable to that reported in other Canadian studies. This overuse was not associated with any identifiable effect on maternal or neonatal outcome or on the management of pregnancy and labour. More judicious use of PNU, in accordance with evidence-based guidelines, is recommended.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence for the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in improving patient outcomes in primary care. DATA SOURCES: A search of the MEDLINE, HEALTHPLAN, CINAHL and FAMLI databases was conducted to identify studies published between Jan. 1, 1980, and Dec. 31, 1995, concerning the use of guidelines in primary medical care. The keywords used in the search were "clinical guidelines," "primary care," "clinical care," "intervention," "randomized controlled trial" and "effectiveness." STUDY SELECTION: Studies of the use of CPGs were selected if they involved a randomized experimental or quasi-experimental method, concerned primary care, were related to clinical care and examined patient outcomes. Of 91 trials of CPGs identified through the search, 13 met the criteria for inclusion in the critical appraisal. DATA EXTRACTION: The following data were extracted, when possible, from the 13 trials: country and setting, number of physicians, number of patients (and the proportion followed to completion), length of follow-up, study method (including random assignment method), type of intervention, medical condition treated and effect on patient outcomes (including clinical and statistical significance, with confidence intervals). DATA SYNTHESIS: The most common conditions studied were hypertension (7 studies), asthma (2 studies) and cigarette smoking (2 studies). Four of the studies followed nationally developed guidelines, and 9 used locally developed guidelines. Six studies involved computerized or automated reminder systems, whereas the others relied on small-group workshops and education sessions. Only 5 of the 13 trials (38%) produced statistically significant results. CONCLUSION: There is very little evidence that the use of CPGs improves patient outcomes in primary medical care, but most studies published to date have used older guidelines and methods, which may have been insensitive to small changes in outcomes. Research is needed to determine whether the newer, evidence-based CPGs have an effect on patient outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

Care of patients with type II diabetes: a study of family physicians' compliance with clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with type II diabetes mellitus receive care by family physicians. The goals of this study were to determine the level of diabetes care provided by family physicians; to assess family physicians' compliance with the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) guidelines; and to examine relationships between various aspects of diabetes care and glycemic control. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted of 118 patients with type II diabetes mellitus in 10 family practice clinics in Newfoundland. The study population consisted of 55 male and 63 female patients with a mean age of 64 (range 29 to 88) years. Using standardized forms based on the CDA guidelines, information about plasma glucose and lipid levels, presence of diabetes complications, and physician management practices were extracted from patient charts. The main outcome measure was glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. RESULTS: Only 53% patients had HbA1c measurements done in the previous year; these persons had a significantly longer duration of diabetes that those who did not have their HbA1c measured. Eighty-seven percent of patients had optimal or good plasma glucose levels. Compliance with CDA guidelines by physicians was poor; physicians were doing about half the recommended checks and procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the present study seem to suggest that family physicians are doing a good job of providing care for their patients with type II diabetes. The results, however, should be interpreted with caution until further research is done to replicate our findings because of the limitations of this small retrospective study.

Adult↗