Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Vauquelin

Publications and source records attributed to G Vauquelin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

G protein-coupled receptors: a count of 1001 conformations.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were initially regarded to adopt an inactive and an active conformation and to activate a single type of G protein. Studies with recombinant cell systems have led to a more complex picture. First, GPCRs can activate distinct G protein species. Second, GPCR multistate models have been invoked to explain their complex behaviour in the presence of agonists, antagonists and other binding partners. The occurrence of intermediate receptor conformational states during GPCR activation and antagonist binding is suggested by fluorescence measurements and studies with constitutively active receptor mutants and insurmountable antagonists. Different agonists may trigger distinct effector pathways through a single receptor by dictating its preference for certain G proteins (i.e. 'agonist trafficking'). Structural modification and exogenous and endogenous (e.g. other cellular proteins, lipids) allosteric modulators also affect ligand-GPCR interaction and receptor activation. These new developments in GPCR research could lead to the development of more selective therapeutic drugs.

Allosteric Regulation↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation of bioactive saponins and triterpenoidal aglycons for their binding properties on human endothelin ETA and angiotensin AT1 receptors.

Different types of triterpenes including saponins and aglycons were evaluated for their ability to inhibit [3H] BQ-123 and [3H] angiotensin II binding to the human endothelin 1 ETA and angiotensin II AT1 receptors, respectively. Selectivity for only one of the two receptors was exhibited by asiatic acid and its saponins (ETA) and oleanolic acid (AT1). To a lesser extent betulinic acid, beta-amyrin and friedelin also showed selectivity for the ETA receptor. To address the question whether the effect of saponins on cell membranes might interfere with the normal binding of specific radioligands to their receptors, the activity of saponins with different haemolytic properties were compared. Highly haemolytic saponins such as alpha-hederin and beta-escine showed partial (60%) inhibition of radioligand-binding to the ETA receptor and complete inhibition (100%) to the AT1 receptor. Moreover, the haemolytically inactive kryptoescine, at the same concentration, caused complete inhibiton of radioligand-binding to both receptors, indicating that inhibition of receptor binding was not related to the membrane-interacting properties of saponins.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

AT1 receptor antagonists.

Type 1 receptors (AT1) for the peptide hormone angiotensin II play a crucial role in the cardiovascular homeostasis. In this regard, several selective, orally active non-peptide antagonists have been developed for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. Pre-clinically, they have been routinely tested for their ability to inhibit angiotensin II induced contraction of rabbit aorta strips. This led to the distinction between surmountable antagonists, which only produce a parallel rightward shift of the angiotensin II concentration- induced response curve, and insurmountable antagonists that also decrease the maximal response. The molecular mechanism that is responsible for insurmountable antagonism has been extensively investigated in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells transfected expressing the human AT1 receptor. These experiments revealed that all biphenyltetrazole-countering AT1 receptor antagonists are competitive with angiotensin II and that the insurmountable behaviour of some of them is related to the formation of a long lasting/tight binding state of the antagonist-receptor complex. This may contribute to their long lasting clinical effect. This paper also focuses on the influence of a number of methodological approaches used to study AT1 receptor antagonists on their observed in vitro receptor binding properties.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2002

New insights in insurmountable antagonism.

Antagonists that produce parallel rightward shifts of agonist dose-response curves with no alteration of the maximal response are traditionally classified as surmountable, while insurmountable antagonists also depress the maximal response. Although the longevity of the antagonist-receptor complex is quoted in many studies to explain insurmountable antagonism, slowly interconverting receptor conformations, allosteric binding sites, and receptor internalization have been evoked as alternative explanations. To complicate matters even further, insurmountable antagonism is not only drug-related; it may also depend on the tissue, species and experimental design. For the sake of drug development, it is important to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of insurmountable antagonism. New experimental approaches, such as intact cell studies and the use of computer-assisted simulations based on dynamic receptor models, herald the advent of better insight in the future.

Allosteric Regulation↗
PubMed2001

Tight binding of the angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonist.

Angiotensin II induces angiotensin AT(1) receptor internalization via Clathrin coated pits formation. We investigated whether insurmountable inhibition by the non-peptide antagonist 2-ethoxy-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) biphenyl-4-yl) methyl]-1H-benzimidazoline-7-carboxylic acid (candesartan) was related to receptor internalization. Mild acid treatment can discriminate between internalized and cell surface bound [(3)H]angiotensin II. In contrast, it provides no information about the subcellular localization of bound [(3)H]candesartan since this binding is acid resistant. The internalization of [(3)H]angiotensin II is rapidly inhibited in the presence of 0.4 M sucrose. Yet, no such rapid effect was noticed for [(3)H]candesartan. [(3)H]candesartan displays insurmountable/long lasting binding to the vast majority of both wild type and L(314) truncated rat angiotensin AT(1A) receptors with impaired receptor internalization. In agreement with previously published AT(1) angiotensin receptor visualization experiments, the present data suggest that non-peptide antagonist-angiotensin AT(1) receptor complexes remain at the cell surface. Insurmountable antagonism of candesartan is therefore independent from receptor internalization via clathrin-coated pits.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2001

A two-state receptor model for the interaction between angiotensin II type 1 receptors and non-peptide antagonists.

The interaction between non-peptide antagonists and the human angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor in CHO-K1 cells was investigated by incubating the cells with antagonist, followed by a brief exposure to angiotensin II and measurement of the resulting inositol phosphate accumulation. The experimental data, expressed either as angiotensin II concentration-response curves or as antagonist concentration-inhibition curves, were in good agreement with computer-generated data according to a single-state model for the surmountable antagonist losartan and according to a two-step, two-state receptor model for the insurmountable antagonists candesartan, EXP3174, and irbesartan. Experimental and computer-generated data concerning the simultaneous exposure of the receptors to EXP3174 and losartan indicated that losartan produced a concentration-dependent restoration of the maximal response (angiotensin II concentration-response curves) as well as a rightward shift of the insurmountable portion of the EXP3174 inhibition curves, thus counteracting the higher-affinity EXP3174 binding. In conclusion, these findings provide further support for the concept that insurmountable and surmountable AT1 antagonists are mutually competitive and that insurmountable antagonist-receptor complexes may adopt different states.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2001

Biological screening of selected medicinal Panamanian plants by radioligand-binding techniques.

Nineteen plants from the Republic of Panama were selected by their traditional uses in the treatment of hypertension, cardiovascular, mental and feeding disorders and 149 extracts were screened using radioligand-receptor-binding assays. The methanol:dicloromethane extracts of the bark and leaves of Anacardium occidentale L., the leaves of Begonia urophylla Hook., the roots of Bocconia frutescens L., the stems and leaves of Cecropia cf.obtusifolia Bertol., the branches of Clusia coclensis Standl., the bark of Cochlospermum vitifolium (Willd.)Spreng., the roots of Dimerocostus strobilaceus Kuntze, the bark of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam., the leaves of Persea americana Mill. and the branches of Witheringia solanaceae L'Her. inhibited the [3H]-AT II binding (angiotensin II AT1 receptor) more than 50%. Only extracts of the roots of Dimerocostus strobilaceus Kuntze and the stems of Psychotria elata (Sw.) Hammel were potent inhibitors of the [3H] NPY binding (neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor) more than 50% and the ethanolic extracts of the leaves of Cecropia cf. obtusifolia Bertol., the leaves of Hedyosmum bonplandianum H.B.K., the roots of Bocconia frutescens L., the stem of Cecropia cf. obtusifolia Bertol. and the branches of Psychotria elata (Sw.) Hammel showed high inhibition of the [3H] BQ-123 binding (endothelin-1 ET(A) receptor) in a preliminary screening. These results promote the further investigation of these plants using the same assays.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Effects of BIBP3226 and BIBP3435 on cytosolic calcium in neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells and wild type CHO-K1 cells.

The NPY Y1-receptor selective antagonist BIBP3226 exerts a dual control on the cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in NPY Y1 receptor-transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells (CHO-Y1 cells). It is a potent inhibitor of the NPY-evoked increase in [Ca2+]i. This can be ascribed to its antagonistic properties for the NPY Y, receptor since its less active stereoisomer, BIBP3435, is much less potent. However, when its concentration exceeds 1 microM, BIBP3226 produces a large increase in [Ca2+]i on its own. This effect is mimicked by BIBP3435 and it also occurs in wild type CHO-K1 cells. These latter cells do not contain high affinity binding sites for [3H]NPY and [3H]BIBP3226 and, hence, no endogenous NPY Y1 receptors. It is concluded that, at moderately high concentrations, the NPY Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP3226 and its entantiomer BIBP3435 are able to increase the [Ca2+ ]i in CHO cells either by stimulating another receptor or by directly affecting cellular mechanisms that are involved in calcium homeostasis.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

How can the differences among AT1-receptor antagonists be explained?

Over the last few years we have seen a new class of antihypertensive drug evolve, the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonists. Hypothetically, all substances in this class should have the same effect on blood pressure and on end-organ damage as they all block the AT1 receptor. However, there are distinctions between them that may explain the significant and clinically important differences that seem to exist within this class of drug. An explanation for the differences may be found in receptor-antagonist kinetics. The receptor-antagonist interaction may be fitted to a two-state, two-step model which determines how large a part of the binding that will be surmountable and how large a part that will be insurmountable. The proportion of surmountable/insurmountable binding fits nicely to the duration of binding of the antagonist to the receptor, which may be translated into efficacy for the antagonist as outlined in the following review.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists. Why do some of them produce insurmountable inhibition?

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human recombinant angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptors offer a useful experimental system in which antagonist binding and inhibition of AT-induced inositol mono-, bis-, and trisphosphate accumulation can be measured under identical experimental conditions. The major conclusions of the current work are: All investigated AT(1) antagonists are competitive with respect to AT. They bind to a common or overlapping binding site on the receptor in a mutually exclusive way. Reduction of the maximal angiotensin II response, i.e. insurmountable inhibition, is observed only when the cells are preincubated with candesartan, EXP3174, or irbesartan and is strictly related to the dissociation rate of the antagonist-receptor complex. On the other hand, inhibition by losartan is fully surmountable by AT, and its dissociation is very rapid. With respect to the binding kinetics, the antagonist-receptor complex can adopt a fast and a slow reversible state. The equilibrium between both states, which is dependent upon the nature of the antagonists, determines the extent of insurmountable inhibition. Consequently, the dissociation rate of the different antagonists correlates with the amount of insurmountable inhibition. In addition to the relatively slow dissociation of candesartan, reassociation to the receptor, which is measurable in CHO-AT(1) cells, likely contributes to its long-lasting blood pressure lowering effect in vivo.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2000

Reversible and syntopic interaction between angiotensin receptor antagonists on Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing human angiotensin II type 1 receptors.

Evidence for a competitive type of interaction between angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) antagonists on Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human AT(1) receptor (CHO-AT(1)) was obtained by analyzing the binding of [(3)H]-2-ethoxy-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]-1H- ben zimidazoline-7-carboxylic acid ([(3)H]candesartan) and by measuring the AT-induced production of inositol phosphates. The AT(1) antagonists candesartan, 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]+ ++imid azole-5-carboxylic acid (EXP3174), or 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxymethyl-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)bip hen yl- 4-yl)methyl]imidazole (losartan) produced a concentration-dependent increase in the apparent K(d) values of [(3)H]candesartan in saturation binding experiments, while the B(max) values were unchanged. Furthermore, the dissociation rate of the radioligand initiated by 1 microM unlabelled candesartan was not changed in the presence of 10 microM losartan, 10 microM EXP3174, or 10 microM irbesartan (2-n-butyl-4-spirocyclopentane-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)b iph enyl-4-yl) methyl]2-imidazolin-5-one)). Preincubation of the CHO-AT(1) cells with candesartan, EXP3174, and irbesartan caused a reduction in the maximal AT-induced inositol mono-, bis-, and trisphosphate production. This insurmountable effect was reversed in the presence of 1 microM losartan. In line with this finding, the insurmountable antagonist concentration-inhibition curves at 10 microM AT were shifted to the right in the presence of losartan. For candesartan this effect was concentration-dependent, yielding a pK(B) value for losartan of 7.7, which is similar to the pK(B) from previously obtained AT concentration-response curves. Finally, the dissociation rate of candesartan, EXP3174, irbesartan, and losartan was determined by measuring the recovery of AT responses after antagonist pretreatment and washing of the cells with medium containing 1 microM losartan to prevent re-association of the insurmountable antagonists. In addition, similar kinetic data were obtained from the slowing of the [(3)H]candesartan association rate to antagonist preincubated cells.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Inhibition of angiotensin II-induced inositol phosphate production by triacid nonpeptide antagonists in CHO cells expressing human AT1 receptors.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present work is to describe the inhibitory properties of LY301875 and LY303336, two polysubstituted 4-aminoimidazole AT1 receptor antagonists, on CHO cells expressing human recombinant AT1 receptors. METHODS: The binding of [3H]-angiotensin II to intact cells as well as to angiotensin II induced inositol phosphate accumulation is measured. RESULTS: Both antagonists inhibit specific [3H]-angiotensin II binding to AT1 receptors in these cells, with IC50 values of 5.9 and 5.2 nM, respectively. Preincubation of the cells with LY301875 results in a decline of up to 80% of the maximal angiotensin II-stimulated inositol phosphate (IP) production. A near complete decline of the maximal response is observed for LY303336. This insurmountable inhibition is attenuated for both antagonists when losartan is included during the preincubation of the cells. CONCLUSIONS: Functional recovery experiments, in which antagonist-preincubated cells are washed and exposed to fresh media, suggest that the insurmountable inhibition by LY301875 and LY303336 is related to their relatively slow dissociation from the AT1 receptors. As already described for losartan and the derived insurmountable AT1 antagonists candesartan. EXP3174, and irbesartan, coincubation experiments reveal that LY301875 and LY303336 interact with the AT1 receptor in a manner that is competitive with angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2000

Binding characteristics of [(3)H]-irbesartan to human recombinant angiotensin type 1 receptors.

The aim of the present work was to investigate the binding properties of the selective AT(1)-receptor antagonist irbesartan to human AT(1)-receptors by direct radioligand binding. For this purpose the specific binding of [(3)H]-irbesartan to intact Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing human recombinant AT(1)-receptors was determined. Specific binding of [(3)H]-irbesartan rapidly reached equilibrium and was saturable with a KD of 1.94 +/- 0.12 to a homogeneous class of binding sites. Its binding was inhibited by other AT(1) antagonists (AIIAs) with the same potency order as previous results from [(3)H]-angiotensin II and [(3)H]-candesartan binding to human AT(1)-receptors. Whereas the dissociation rate of [(3)H]-irbesartan was essentially independent of the radioligand concentration, it was much slower at 12 degrees C when compared with 37 degrees C. Moreover, the dissociation rate was similar, as determined in washout experiments in the absence or presence of unlabelled AT(1) antagonists. At 37 degrees C the dissociation rate constant corresponded to a half-life of approximately seven minutes, which is sufficient to explain the partially insurmountable inhibition by irbesartan in previous studies. In contrast, other phenomena such as the plasma half life and tissue-related factors are necessary to explain its sustained in vivo antihypertensive effect.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Lys(199) mutation of the human angiotensin type 1 receptor differentially affects the binding of surmountable and insurmountable non-peptide antagonists.

Many slow dissociating (insurmountable) non-peptide angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonists contain,besides the acidic biphenyltetrazole substructure of losartan, a second acidic group to stabilise antagonist-receptor complexes. To investigate the involved basic amino-acids of the human AT1-receptor, wild-type and mutant receptors were transiently transfected in CHO-K1 cells and characterised by [3H]candesartan binding. Lys199-->Gln substitution decreased the affinity 45-fold for candesartan (95% insurmountable),18-fold for EXP3174 (70% insurmountable), 10-fold for irbesartan (40% insurmountable) and 5-fold for losartan (surmountable). His256 -->Ala substitution had only minor effects. This suggests that Lys199 is important for the tight binding of non-peptide antagonists.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1999

Identification of I1 and I2 imidazoline receptors in striatum membranes from different species.

The alpha 2-adrenergic agonist [3H]clonidine and antagonist [3H]idazoxan also label I1 and I2 imidazoline receptors in striatum membranes. They are investigated here in striata from the dog, rat, mouse, rabbit, calf, monkey, and human. I1 receptors were barely detected in the dog, rat, and mouse and only further examined by competition binding experiments in calf, rabbit, and human. I2 receptors were further examined in all species. The centrally acting vasodilators clonidine and rilmenidine were more potent than moxonidine at the I1 receptors. They displayed low potency for the I2 receptors in all species except the rat. In all species examined, the nonsubstituted imidazoline derivatives idazoxan and RX801077 displayed high affinity for the I1 and I2 receptors. Conversely, both stereoisomers of the alkoxy-substituted imidazoline-derivative efaroxan displayed low affinity. The matching binding characteristics of these compounds further stress the structural similarity of the ligand binding sites of I1 and I2 receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Insurmountable angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists: the role of tight antagonist binding.

Angiotensin II increased the inositol phosphates production (EC50 = 3.4+/-0.7 nM) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the cloned human angiotensin AT1 receptor (CHO-AT1 cells). Coincubation with angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists produced parallel rightward shifts of the concentration-response curve without affecting the maximal response. The potency order is 2-ethoxy-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]-1H-benz imidazoline-7-carboxylic acid (candesartan) > 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]i midazole-5-carboxylic acid (EXP3174) > 2-n-butyl-4-spirocyclopentane-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphe nyl-4-yl)methyl]2-imidazolin-5-one (irbesartan)> of 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxymethyl-1-(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)bipheny l-4-yl)methyl]imidazole (losartan). Additionally, preincubation with these antagonists depressed the maximal response, i.e., 95%, 70%, 30% of the control response for candesartan, EXP3174 and irbesartan and not detectable for losartan. Increasing the antagonist concentration or prolonging the preincubation time did not affect this depression. Furthermore, these values remained constant for candesartan and EXP3174, when the angiotensin II incubation time varied between 1 and 5 min. Our data indicate that antagonist-receptor complexes are divided into a fast reversible/surmountable population and a tight binding/insurmountable population at the very onset of the incubation with angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed1999

Binding of the antagonist [3H]candesartan to angiotensin II AT1 receptor-transfected [correction of tranfected] Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Binding of the non-peptide angiotensin II AT1 antagonist [3H](2-ethoxy-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]- H-benzimidazoline-7-carboxylic acid ([3H]candesartan) to human angiotensin II AT1 receptor-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-AT1) cells was inhibited to the same extent by angiotensin II and non-peptide angiotensin II AT1 antagonists. No binding was observed in control CHO-K1 cells. Dissociation was slow (k(-1) = 0.0010+/-0.0001 min(-1)) after removal of the free [3H]candesartan but increased 5-fold upon addition of supramaximal concentrations of angiotensin II AT1 antagonists. Angiotensin II responses recovered equally slow from candesartan-pretreatment. When washed and further incubated, these angiotensin II responses also recovered more rapidly in the presence of 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxymethyl-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphen yl-4-yl)methyl]imidazole (losartan), indicating that unlabelled ligands prevented reassociation. [3 H]candesartan saturation binding experiments required a long time to reach equilibrium. Therefore, the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd = 51+/-8 pM) was calculated from the association and dissociation rate constants. Our findings indicate that the insurmountable nature of candesartan in functional studies is related to its slow dissociation from the receptor.

Angiotensin II↗