Biomedical subjects

G Vanerio

Publications and source records attributed to G Vanerio.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1991

Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: clinical characteristics, management, and outcome.

Of 125 patients prepared to receive implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) with the patch-patch configuration of the difibrillating electrodes, 23 (18%) had high (greater than or equal to 25 joules) defibrillation thresholds (DFTs). These patients had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (27 +/- 12 vs 34 +/- 13; p less than 0.03) and a higher incidence of previous heart surgery (47% vs 19%; p less than 0.01) than patients with normal DFTs but did not differ in age, type of heart disease, incidence of concomitant heart surgery, or use of antiarrhythmic medication. Defibrillators were implanted in 18 of these 23 patients, 12 during the initial surgery and six after repeat DFT testing 2 weeks later. After 22 +/- 11 months of follow-up, four patients with ICDs died (two suddenly, and two of nonsudden cardiac causes). Two patients without ICDs died of nonsudden cardiac causes. Appropriate shocks were received by five patients (29%) including both who died suddenly later. A high DFT may be more common than previously stated. It is associated with poor ventricular function and previous heart surgery. Repeated DFT testing may be useful in some patients. A high DFT does not preclude successful ICD shocks, but other therapies may provide better results.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

DDIR versus VVIR pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) in particular those with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome and patients undergoing atrioventricular nodal ablation procedures for refractory paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (PAT), are candidates for single chamber (VVIR mode) or dual chamber rate responsive (DDIR mode) systems. To evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of each pacing mode we retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with a history of frequent PAT who received a VVIR (22 patients); or a DDDR pacemaker (11 patients) programmed to the DDIR mode. The mean follow-up time was 25 and 18 months, respectively. Preimplant left atrial diameter was significantly smaller in the DDIR group. Chronic atrial fibrillation developed in 54% of the VVIR patients and 27% of the DDIR group, but this difference was not significant. Complications of patients with VVIR pacemakers included new mitral and tricuspid insufficiency, stroke, pacemaker intolerance and aggravated congestive heart failure. Patients with DDIR pacemakers had a lower incidence of symptoms and complications. However, this group received more antiarrhythmic medication, required a closer follow-up, and their pacemakers needed frequent reprogramming. Our findings suggest that VVIR is a poor choice for patients with SND, congestive heart failure, and PAT, and that DDIR may be an acceptable alternative.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed1991

Early clinical experience with a minute ventilation sensor DDDR pacemaker.

UNLABELLED: The new DDDR pacemaker META DDDR utilizes a minute ventilation sensor based on transthoracic impedance measurements. The sensor determines the metabolic indicated interval, the atrioventricular (AV) delay and the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). The baseline PVARP must be carefully selected to define nonphysiological tachycardias. If a P wave falls within the PVARP the pacemaker will automatically switch to the VVIR mode. This behavior prevents tracking of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (PAT). Twenty-eight patients with sinus node dysfunction (n = 20), AV junction ablation (n = 5), complete or intermittent AV block (n = 3); who received a META DDDR pacemaker were studied. The mean age was 65 +/- 13 years. RESULTS: mode switching (reversion) to VVIR was observed in 57% of the patients. Forty-two percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a stress test, four related to PAT, and seven to sinus tachycardia. Fifty percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a 24-hour Holter, four related to PAT, three to retrograde P wave sensing, and two to sinus tachycardia. At the last follow-up, 20 of the 26 patients initially programmed to the DDDR mode remained in the DDDR mode, while five were reprogrammed to the DDD and one to the VVIR mode. Mode switching has a high sensitivity but a low specificity for PAT. It appears to be a useful approach to prevent rapid tracking of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Careful PVARP programming is critical to appropriate reversion behavior, but further modifications of the algorithm are needed to improve its performance.

Aged↗

PubMed1990

The effects of percutaneous catheter ablation on preexisting permanent pacemakers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Determine the effect of percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) on permanent pacemakers. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Twenty-three patients who underwent CA at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation from September 1983 to January 1990, and had a previously implanted pacemaker were studied. Electrocardiographic data during the CA procedure and clinic data including pacemaker evaluations were analyzed. Fifty-two percent (12/23) of the pacemakers malfunctioned: five developed transient ventricular loss of capture; two undersensing; one oversensing; three could not be interrogated or programmed, and one did not respond to the magnet test. Four patients developed syncopal episodes and two severe dizziness after the procedure. All had their pacemakers replaced. In total, seven were explanted. Destructive analysis by the individual manufacturer identified pacemaker circuitry failure in five. Unipolar pacemakers and anodal ablation procedures had more frequent and severe malfunctions, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Pacemaker malfunction is frequent during CA. It may be prevented by programming the pacemaker, when possible, to the nonfunctioning mode (000 mode). Temporarily disconnecting the pacemaker during ablation requires further evaluation as an alternative approach. Close follow-up can detect pacemaker malfunction and prevent complications.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Atrial pacemaker leads compared.

In order to analyze the impact of different polarity and electrode designs on the acute pacing and sensing characteristics of pacemaker leads, 80 patients with complete heart block or sinus node dysfunction undergoing pacemaker implantation received eight different leads from five manufacturers. Once the leads were positioned, volt and current thresholds, P wave, peak-to-peak, and slew rate were assessed prospectively. There was no statistically significant difference between acute pacing thresholds, sensing characteristics, or unipolar and bipolar pacing thresholds. Active fixation leads allow atrial mapping and lead placement in areas generally inaccessible to tined tip leads. This is an advantage, especially for patients with a history of open heart surgery.

Electrodes, Implanted↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Moricizine: pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and therapeutic profile of a new antiarrhythmic.

Moricizine (Ethmozine) is a phenothiazine derivative recently approved in the United States for the treatment of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Moricizine closely resembles group IA antiarrhythmic agents in the intensity of its effect on the sodium channel, but it differs from the IA subclass in that it shortens the action potential duration in ventricular tissue. Moricizine suppresses frequent ventricular premature depolarizations and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 60% to 70% of patients, and it suppresses induced ventricular tachycardia in 15% to 25% of patients. It is well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse effects. The suggested dosage is 600 to 900 mg per day in three divided doses. Treatment of arrhythmias with prognostic significance should be initiated in the hospital, and monitored with electrophysiologic studies. Additional clinical experience is needed to better define moricizine's role in antiarrhythmic therapy.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗