Biomedical subjects

G Trummlitz

Publications and source records attributed to G Trummlitz.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

COX-2 selectivity and inflammatory processes.

Increasing amounts of experimental and clinical data support the role of selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibition in anti-inflammatory processes and the involvement of COX-1 inhibition in the side effects associated with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. This review will focus on the differences in the structure of the COX-1 and COX-2 molecules, particularly the active site and how they are bound by various NSAIDs to achieve COX-2 selectivity. This COX-2 selectivity will then be characterized in pharmacological assays in vitro and in animal models in vivo. Finally, clinical information available for this new class of selective inhibitors will be discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Differential inhibition of cyclooxygenases-1 and -2 by meloxicam and its 4'-isomer.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Two structurally related compounds, meloxicam (Mel) and its structural 4'-isomer (4'-Mel), were compared to examine the role of a slightly different chemical structure on cyclooxygenase (COX) selectivity in in vitro and in vivo experimental models. MATERIAL OR SUBJECTS: In vitro studies were performed using human whole blood obtained from healthy volunteers, in vivo studies were performed in rats. TREATMENT: A concentration-response curve was obtained in the whole blood assay for Mel, 4'-Mel, indomethacin, piroxicam and diclofenac. These were used to calculate the respective IC50 values of either prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) or thromboxane B2 (TxB2). Similarly, a dose-response curve was obtained for Mel, 4'-Mel and piroxicam when measuring in vivo prostaglandin production, anti-inflammatory activity and gastric tolerance to determine the dose resulting in a 50% reduction of the each parameter. METHODS: COX selectivity was investigated in vitro using a human whole blood assay. PGE2 synthesis in vivo was measured in inflammatory exudate, in the stomach and kidneys of rats. Anti-inflammatory effects were measured in an adjuvant arthritis model and gastric tolerance was tested in an ulcerogenicity model in vivo in rats. RESULTS: In the human whole blood assay, the ratio of IC50 values for COX-1 vs. COX-2 inhibition was 13 for Mel and 1.8 for 4'-Mel. In inflammatory exudate in rats, Mel and 4'-Mel inhibited PGE2 synthesis to a similar extent, ID50 values approximately 0.3 mg/kg. In contrast, Mel was a weaker inhibitor of PG synthesis than 4'-Mel in the rat stomach and in the rat kidney. Paw swelling was reduced by 50% with 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg for Mel and 4'-Mel, respectively, in the rat adjuvant arthritis model. Gastric tolerance (UD50) was 2.4 mg/kg for Mel and 0.4 mg/kg for 4'-Mel. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profile of meloxicam is structurally dependent and that minor structural changes can lead to significant differences in the selectivity for COX-1 and COX-2 in vitro and to different profiles in vivo suggesting different therapeutic potential.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Effect of structural modification of enol-carboxamide-type nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on COX-2/COX-1 selectivity.

Meloxicam (5), an NSAID in the enol-carboxamide class, was developed on the basis of its antiinflammatory activity and relative safety in animal models. In subsequent screening in microsomal assays using human COX-1 and COX-2, we discovered that it possessed a selectivity profile for COX-2 superior to piroxicam and other marketed NSAIDs. We therefore embarked on a study of enol-carboxamide type compounds to determine if COX-2 selectivity and potency could be dramatically improved by structural modification. Substitution at the 6- and 7-positions of the 4-oxo-1,2-benzothiazine-3-carboxamide, alteration of the N-methyl substituent, and amide modification were all examined. In addition we explored several related systems including the isomeric 3-oxo-1,2-benzothiazine-4-carboxamides, thienothiazines, indolothizines, benzothienothiazines, naphthothiazines, and 1,3- and 1,4-dioxoisoquinolines. While a few examples were found with greater potency in the COX-2 assay, no compound tested had a better COX-2/COX-1 selectivity profile than that of 5.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed1995

Meloxicam: metabolic profile and biotransformation products in the rat.

1. The metabolic fate of 14C-labelled meloxicam was investigated in the urine and bile of rat following oral and intraduodenal administration. Structural elucidation of metabolites was performed by nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry (electron impact and fast atom bombardment). 2. A mean total of 76.3% 14C-radioactivity was recovered in urine over 96 h, with the remainder in the faeces. The metabolic pattern in the excreta was independent of dose (1 versus 10 mg/kg) and collection period (0-8 versus 24-48 h). In bile one of the main metabolites was absent. 3. Meloxicam underwent extensive metabolism with only small amounts of unchanged drug recovered in the urine (< 0.5%) or bile (4.5%). Principal routes of biotransformation were: oxidation of the 5-methyl group of the N-heteroaryl-carbamoyl side chain to yield the 5'-hydroxymethyl derivative (33% of metabolites in urine, 22% in bile) and the 5'-carboxy derivative (16% in urine, 49% in bile). Oxidative cleavage of the benzothiazine-ring yielded an oxamic acid metabolite in urine (23.5%), which was not present in bile. 4. The introduction of a methyl-group into the N-heteroaryl-carbamoyl side chain increased lipophilicity and facilitated metabolic excretion compared with structurally related compounds.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Biological activity of the main metabolites of meloxicam.

Meloxicam (Mel) is a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) which was selected with regard to its remarkable efficacy in adjuvant arthritis of the rat. Similar to the situation in man, three main metabolites were identified in rat urine which are rapidly excreted since they are not detectable in blood, where only the parent compound was found. The latter is practically not eliminated in urine. Since it has been proposed that the nephrotoxicity of NSAIDs is due to inhibition of prostaglandin E2 (PG) biosynthesis, the aim of the study was to determine whether the metabolites can contribute to the known effects of the parent compound in this pathway. For this purpose, PG-biosynthesis was measured in vitro using a radiochemical technique with an enzyme preparation from bull seminal vesicles. In an in vivo assay the effect of the compounds against kaolin-induced oedema in the rat hind paw was determined. In the test systems described, the efficacy of Mel has been demonstrated. In contrast to this finding, the metabolites in relevant doses showed neither in vitro nor in vivo effects. From the results it can be concluded that the metabolites do not change renal blood flow and therefore have no capability for nephrotoxicity. These findings are in accordance with the observations in the rat kidney during subacute and chronic toxicity studies, where no nephrotoxic effects could be detected after therapeutic doses.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Tricyclic compounds as selective muscarinic receptor antagonists. 3. Structure-selectivity relationships in a series of cardioselective (M2) antimuscarinics.

On the basis of the cardioselective muscarinic receptor antagonist AF-DX 116 (2), a series of 11-substituted pyridobenzodiazepinones (9-35) was prepared and screened for their binding affinity to muscarinic receptors located in cardiac (M2) and glandular (M3) tissue. The ratio of IC50 values of the test compounds in the two different tissues was taken as a measure of cardiac (M2) receptor selectivity. Qualitative structure-selectivity relationships point to the fact that it is the spatial orientation of the protonated side-chain nitrogen atom in relation to the tricycle that is the main determinant for receptor subtype recognition and hence is important for the achievement of cardiac (M2) selectivity.

Animals↗

PubMed1988

Tricyclic compounds as selective antimuscarinics. 2. Structure-activity relationships of M1-selective antimuscarinics related to pirenzepine.

In order to gain some insight into those structural features that control M1 selectivity, a selected set of pirenzepine analogues has been studied in which both the tricyclic ring system and the basic side chain have been varied. Binding studies were conducted in rat tissue homogenates from cerebral cortex (M1) and gastric fundus (M2). The ratio of IC50 values of the test compounds in the two different tissues was taken as a measure of M1 receptor selectivity. Several derivatives, especially those with flexible side chains, i.e. high degree of freedom of rotation around single bonds, proved to be nonselective. Among semirigid compounds only those containing 6-membered ring systems (11, 13, 14, and 15) showed significant M1 selectivity. Principles of structure-activity and structure-selectivity are discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1987

Tricyclic compounds as selective antimuscarinics. 1. Structural requirements for selectivity toward the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in a series of pirenzepine and imipramine analogues.

The M1-selective antiulcer drug pirenzepine (1) is a tricyclic compound with close resemblance to tricyclic psychotropic agents such as imipramine (2). Despite this fact, pirenzepine is devoid of any psychotropic effects, exhibiting measurable antagonistic effects in biochemical assays and receptor binding studies only toward the muscarinic receptor system. To understand how different groups in these tricyclic molecules affect binding affinities, a set of nine compounds structurally related to pirenzepine (1) and imipramine (2) has been selected for analysis, comprising three different tricycles and three different side chains. The compounds were tested for their affinity to the imipramine and muscarinic receptors in homogenized rat cortex tissue. The result of these studies suggests that it is the nature and placement of accessory groups that determine the differences in receptor recognition and the binding process. In the case of pirenzepine (1), preferential binding toward the muscarinic receptor is brought about by the endocyclic amide group, by the positioning of the protonated N atom of the side chain, and to a minor extent by the exocyclic amide group. From these findings a putative model for the explanation of selective binding of pirenzepine (1) to the muscarinic receptor has been derived.

Animals↗

PubMed1985

Conformational studies of two histamine H2-receptor antagonistic phenylformamidines: mifentidine and its guanidinothiazole analogue DA 4643.

Two histamine H2-receptor antagonists of the phenylformamidine type, mifentidine (N-isopropyl-N'-(4-1H-imidazol-4-yl-phenyl) formamidine dihydrochloride; I) and DA 4643 (N-methyl-N'-(3-(2-guanidinothiazol-4-yl)-phenyl) formamidine dihydrochloride; II), have been investigated by experimental physico-chemical studies and theoretical conformational analysis. PKa determinations on the two molecules I and II show that these substances exist at physiological pH (7.4) predominantly as their monoprotonated forms at the formamidine moiety. Semiempirical quantum mechanical (MNDO, CNDO/2) and molecular mechanics (MMPI) calculations show a preference of the nearly planar conformations for I and of different low energy rotamers for II. The energy of these conformers is a function of two important torsion angles, one around the bond joining the imidazole, or the guanidinothiazole, and the phenyl ring and the other around the bond joining the phenyl ring and the formamidinium cation. When the distances between crucial parts present in I and II are considered, it results that the relatively higher flexibility of II allows accommodation of amidine pairs present in the latter at a distance similar to that found for correspondent pairs in the conformationally more restricted I. Conformational aspects of I and II are discussed with reference to a recently described conformation of cimetidine determined by X-ray method. A hypothesis of binding of H2-receptor antagonists of the phenylformamidine type is advanced with reference to electrostatic potential maps calculated for crucial part structures of I, II and cimetidine. The present work supports the hypothesis that both mifentidine and DA 4643 interact with the histamine H2-receptor at the same site, utilizing in the binding process the same, or closely similar, receptor structural features.

Chemical Phenomena↗

PubMed1984

Conformational analysis of the antiulcer drug pirenzepine. X-ray investigations, molecular mechanics and quantum mechanical calculations and comparisons with structurally or pharmacologically related compounds.

The crystal structures of the antiulcer drug 5,11-dihydro-11-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl) acetyl]-6H-pyrido[2,3-b] [1,4]benzodiazepin-6-one dihydrochloride (pirenzepine dihydrochloride, L-S 519 CL 2, Gastrozepin) and its monoprotonated form (pirenzepine monohydrochloride, L-S 519 CL) were determined by X-ray analysis. Molecular mechanics (MMPI) and semiempirical quantum chemical (MNDO) calculations showed that the calculated minimum energy conformations of the tricycle and of the exocyclic amide group are in agreement with the crystal structures. The conformational energies of pirenzepine as a function of four important torsional angles were calculated using different semiempirical quantum chemical methods with the CNDO/2 (complete neglect of differential overlap)-, MNDO (modified neglect of diatomic overlap)- and PCILO (perturbative configuration interaction using localized orbitals)-approximations. The conformation of one local energy minimum corresponds closely to the crystal structure of pirenzepine monohydrochloride. This conformation has a spatial arrangement which is analogous to a single consistent conformation known from the literature of 24 anticholinergic agents determined from their crystal structures by a computer graphics analysis. On the other hand there are no structural relationships of any low energy conformation of pirenzepine to conformations of other classes of tricyclic compounds which could rationalize their antidepressant, neuroleptic or antihistaminic activity. This finding explains the absence of any central effect of pirenzepine following intracerebral application. The computational elucidation of the conformational requirements for the interaction with the muscarinic receptors may be helpful for the interpretation of the selectivity of pirenzepine within the muscarinic system.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗

PubMed1975