Clinical implications of genetic polymorphisms on stomach cancer drug therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Toffoli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: To determine if protracted low-dose oral idarubicin (IDA), feasible in a previous dose-finding study, would result in similar activity and a better toxicity profile in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Elderly women (> or=65 years) with metastatic breast carcinoma were treated with 7.5 mg/day for 21 consecutive days, every 4 weeks. After the first fourteen patients, due to excessive toxicity, the protocol was amended to 5 mg/day. IDA and Idarubicinol (IDOL) plasma concentrations (C(trough)) were investigated in all patients. RESULTS: Between April 1999 and June 2004, 47 elderly patients were accrued in this two-part study (14 and 33 patients respectively). The median age was 74 and 75 years respectively. Visceral involvement was present in most patients. A partial response was noted in 7/31 patients (22%; 95% CI, 9.6-41.1%). Eleven patients had stable disease (33%). At the dose of 5 mg/day the treatment was well tolerated. Neutropenia grade 4 was present in only 6% of patients; alopecia > grade 1 and cardiotoxicity did not occur. The median time to progression was 3 months and the median overall survival was 17 months. IDA C(trough) and IDOL C(trough) levels were significantly associated with haematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: This study shows that idarubicin at the dose of 5 mg/day for 21 consecutive days is feasible and effective in elderly breast cancer patients but do not demonstrate an improvement in efficacy. A determination of the IDA and IDOL plasma levels (C(trough)) is predictive for toxicity.
Seventeen elderly patients with advanced progressive non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with oral etoposide at the daily dose of 100 mg for 14 days every 3-4 weeks with pharmacokinetic monitoring. One partial response and 6 stabilizations were documented with a median overall duration of 13 weeks (range 8-32). The median survival was 24 weeks with an apparent advantage for non-progressive patients (40 weeks vs. 18 weeks). The treatment was well tolerated especially by those patients without concomitant illness, suggesting the crucial role of a careful selection of the geriatric population. Toxicity was not related to the etoposide plasma level, but was clearly dependent on comorbidity. A geriatric assessment rather than chronological age therefore appears to be more reliable in the selection of elderly patients for clinical trials. The easy self-management, favorable toxicity profile and synergy with other compounds makes oral etoposide suitable for further clinical-pharmacological studies in elderly patients.
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) increases the toxic effect of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin (DOX) and prednisone (CHOP) in HIV-patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). To ascertain the cause of increased toxicity, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of DOX in HIV-patients with NHL treated with CHOP with and without HAART. METHODS: Complete pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic analysis was determined in 19 patients during 38 cycles of chemotherapy: 19 cycles with CHOP and 19 CHOP + HAART in a crossover-designed study. HAART included protease inhibitors indinavir (IDV) in nine patients, saquinavir (SQV) hard gel in six patients and nelfinavir (NFV) in four patients. RESULTS: No significant effects of HAART on pharmacokinetics parameters of DOX were observed. Similarly, no differential effect on DOX pharmacokinetics among IDV, SQV, and NFV was evidenced. Significant associations (P=0.012) were observed between DOX AUC0-infinity (area under the concentration curve) and G3-G4 WHO haematologic toxicity, in patients treated with CHOP alone, but not in those treated with CHOP + HAART (P = not significant). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that HAART therapy has no significant effect on DOX pharmacokinetics. DOX AUC appears to be a predictor of toxicity only in patients treated with CHOP alone. Other factors beside DOX plasma levels are detrimental for toxicity after CHOP + HAART. Therefore, pharmacodynamic interactions between HAART and DOX should be considered.
The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of idarubicin (IDA) and its active metabolite idarubicinol (IDOL) after chronic oral and continuous intravenous (i.v.) IDA administration in order to establish the oral doses needed to reach the i.v. equiactive plasma drug exposure. The pharmacokinetic profile of IDA and IDOL was investigated in 23 patients receiving 12 mg/m2 IDA by 120-h i.v. infusion (2.4 mg/m2/day) combined with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and prednisone in comparison to 28 patients receiving oral IDA doses ranging from 2 to 10 mg/day for 21 days in a phase I study. We found that IDA AUC24h/dose/m2 was 4.7-fold greater during i.v. than oral administration, whereas IDOL AUC24h/dose/m2 was only about 2-fold higher after i.v. administration. The metabolic ratio between IDOL AUC24h and IDA AUC24h in plasma was about 3-fold higher after oral administration. Based on these results we were able to estimate that equiactive plasma drug exposure was reached with an approximately 2.5-fold greater oral dose/m2 of IDA than the corresponding i.v. dose.
Pharmacogenetics could be a useful tool for performing tailored anticancer chemotherapy. Several polymorphisms potentially affecting enzymes responsible for metabolism, transport and mechanism of action of irinotecan, fluoropyrimidines and antifolate agents have been investigated and sometimes associated with toxicity and response. In particular, uridine diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) enzyme is responsible for detoxification of irinotecan active metabolite, SN38. A polymorphic structure in the promoter region (UGT1A1*28) may affect irinotecan toxicity and SN38 plasma level. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key enzyme in the folate cycle, presenting two common polymorphisms (677C>T and 1298 A>C) which have impact on toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil.
Pharmacogenetics focuses on intersubjects variation in therapeutic drug effects and toxicity depending on genetic polymorphisms. This is particularly interesting in oncology since anticancer drugs usually have a narrow margin of safety. Irinotecan [7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin] is used in cancer chemotherapy as a topoisomerase I inhibitor and it is characterised by a sometimes unpredictable severe toxicity. It is mostly intestinal with nausea, vomit and diarrhoea or haematologic with leuko-thrombocytopenia. Its complex metabolism involves many proteins. Human carboxylesterase isoforms 1 and 2 (hCE1, hCE2) activate irinotecan to its metabolite SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin); cytochrome P450 isoforms 3A4 and 3A5 (CYP3A4, CYP3A5) mediate the oxidation of the parental compound to irinotecan; uridino-glucuronosil transferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1) catalyses glucuronidation of SN-38; the multi-resistance protein isoform 2 (MRP2) allows the cellular excretion of the SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) and the multi-drug resistance gene (MDR1), encoding for P-glycoprotein, is responsible for the excretion of irinotecan from the cell. Polymorphic structures in the genes encoding for all these proteins have been described. In particular, the UGT1A1*28 allele has been associated with an increased toxicity after irinotecan chemotherapy. Classical parameters used in the clinic, such as body-surface area, have no longer a meaningful correlation with clinical outcome. Hence it emerges the importance of studying the individual genotype to predict the toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan and to individualise therapy. In this review, we summarise the new developments on the study of the pharmacogenetics of irinotecan, stressing its importance in drug cytotoxic effect.
In the last years, the main topoisomerase I inhibitors (TP1-I) (i.e. topotecan and irinotecan) have been used in combination chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Several drugs (also alternative to cisplatin) have been used in combination with TP1-I, but to date the higher remission rate obtained with combinations is not translated into a more prolonged survival in comparison with TP1-I given alone. On the other hand, the toxicity of TP1-I combinations is greater than those of TP1-I used alone. The superior efficacy of combinations versus TP1-I used alone remains an open question. Furthermore, the best schedule for TP1-I has not been completely elucidated. Randomised studies are few (only two phase III trials) and only controlled studies will be able to clarify the best TP1-I combination regimen.
AIMS: To study the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide in patients with solid tumours. METHODS: A prospective, open label, cross-over, bioavailability study was performed in 50 adult patients with miscellaneous, advanced stage solid tumours, who were receiving oral (100 mg capsules) etoposide for 14 days and i.v. (50 mg) etoposide on day 1 or day 7 in randomised order during the first cycle treatment. Total and unbound etoposide concentration were assayed by h.p.l.c. Population PK parameters estimation was done by using the P-Pharm software (Simed). Haematological toxicity and tumour response were the main pharmacodynamic endpoints. RESULTS: Mean clearance was 1.14 l h(-1) (CV 25%). Creatinine clearance was the only covariable to significantly reduce clearance variability (residual CV 18%). (CL = 0.74 + 0.0057 CLCR; r(2) = 0.32). Mean bioavailability was 45% (CV 22%) and mean protein binding 91.5% (CV 5%). Exposure to free, pharmacologically active etoposide (free AUC p.o.) was highly variable (mean value 2.8 mg l(-1) h; CV 64%; range 0.4-9.5). It decreased with increased creatinine clearance and increased with age which accounted for 9% of the CV. Mean free AUC p.o. was the best predictor of neutropenia. Free AUC50 (exposure producing a 50% reduction in absolute neutrophil count) was 1.80 mg l(-1) h. In patients with lung cancer, the free AUC p.o. was higher in the two patients with responsive tumour (5.9 mg l(-1) h) than in patients with stable (2.1 mg l-1 h) or progressive disease (2.3 mg l-1 h) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to free etoposide during prolonged oral treatment is highly variable and is the main determinant of pharmacodynamic effects. The population PK model based on creatinine clearance is poorly predictive of exposure. Therapeutic drug monitoring would be necessary for dose individualization or to study the relationship between exposure and antitumour effect.
The detrimental effect of chronic administration of carbamazepine (CBZ) on serum and erythrocyte folates of patients has been extensively analyzed. However, at present, no data have been reported on the effect of CBZ on the intracellular content and activity of antimetabolite cytotoxic agents that can be used together with CBZ in the treatment of cancer patients. To investigate this issue, we chronically exposed in vitro the human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV-3 (grown under physiological folate concentrations) to CBZ, thus selecting SKOV-CBZ clones (SKOV-CBZ-50-2, SKOV-CBZ-50-5 and SKOV-CBZ-100-2) able to grow in the continuous presence of the antiepileptic drug. All of the SKOV-CBZ clones were more resistant to methotrexate (MTX) than the parental cells. MTX resistance index, as determined by the ratio between MTX concentrations inhibiting cell growth by 50% (MTX IC(50)) in SKOV-CBZ clones and in the parental cells, ranged between 3- and 5-fold. This resistance was related to a reduced intracellular content of MTX. No alteration activity of the cellular enzymes directly involved in MTX cytotoxicity (dihydrofolate reductase, thymidylate synthase [TS] and folylpolyglutamate synthetase) was observed. SKOV-CBZ clones were cross-resistant to the TS inhibitors tomudex and CB3717, but not to the TS inhibitor 5-fluoro-deoxy uridine and other antineoplastic drugs (cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine and taxol), whose cellular uptake is derived from transmembrane transport mechanisms different from folate receptor alpha (FRalpha) or reduced folate carrier (RFC). FRalpha mRNA and protein levels were significantly lower in SKOV-CBZ clones than in the parental cells. The reduced level of FRalpha in SKOV-CBZ clones was associated with a decreased binding capacity of folic acid. No variation of mRNA RFC expression in the SKOV-CBZ clones as compared to the parental cells was observed. Thus, after chronic exposure to CBZ, SKOV-CBZ clones develop resistance towards MTX due to defective MTX uptake.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Oral idarubicin (IDA) is an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, but its role in the management of this tumor is yet not established completely. To investigate a new modality of IDA administration, a dose-finding study was designed with hyperfractionated doses. The purpose was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the pharmacokinetics of this schedule. IDA was administered twice daily as outpatient therapy in cycles of 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest. Thirty-one patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer and pretreated with chemotherapy (including epirubicin and doxorubicin) were enrolled. DLT was defined as G4 hematological toxicity or any other toxicity G3 or higher (Bloom and Richardson grading). Inter- and intrapatient dose increases were studied. Pharmacokinetics of IDA and its metabolite idarubicinol (IDOL) were evaluated. IDA dose was increased from 2 mg/day to 10 mg/day, by steps of 1 mg/day, with the larger dose given in the evening. MTD was reached at 10 mg/day. Overall, the therapy cycles were 69 (median/patient, 2; range, 1-6). DLTs were G4 neutropenia associated with leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in one patient and G3 diarrhea in another of the 5 patients in the 10 mg/day cohort. The two patients developing DLT at the daily dose of 10 mg received a dose normalized for body surface of 6.85 and 5.65 mg/m2/day, respectively. We considered 5.5 mg/m2/day to be the MTD. Other toxicities were nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and diarrhea, grades G1 to G2. By univariate analysis, significant correlations were observed between absolute neutrophil count at nadir and IDA area under the curve (P = 0.022; r = -0.33), IDA Cmax (P = 0.0067; r = -0.38), IDOL area under the curve (P = 0.0009; r = -0.43), and IDOL Cmax (P = 0.0016; r = -0.41), respectively. By multivariate analysis, IDA Cmax was the strongest determinant for neutropenia (R2 = 0.14; P = 0.01). Among the 21 patients evaluable for response, 3 (14.3%) had partial response (lasting 3, 6, and 8 months, respectively), and 6 (28.6%) had a complete arrest of disease progression (lasting 2-6 months). In conclusion, the MTD of this schedule is 10 mg/day and the DLTs are neutropenia and diarrhea. Tolerance was good, and the treatment is feasible as home therapy. Some objective measurable responses were documented in this group of anthracycline-pretreated patients. IDOL could have a role for the pharmacological effect. Further evaluation of this schedule is warranted to assess the activity and toxicity of prolonged oral IDA administration.
Etoposide dosage in patients with liver dysfunction remains controversial. Since etoposide has a hepatic component to its clearance (CL) and shows a high degree of protein binding, hepatic impairment could affect etoposide disposition. However, the empiric recommendation that the dose of etoposide be decreased in such patients may reduce systemic exposure and be detrimental to its antitumor activity. To address these issues we studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) of etoposide in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and underlying cirrhosis (n = 17) treated with daily oral etoposide. Unbound etoposide was obtained by ultrafiltration. Etoposide concentrations (total and free drug) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and analyzed by noncompartmental equations. The patients had mild or moderate liver dysfunction. Albuminemia was in the normal range for all the patients. Creatininemia was normal in all but two patients. PK results (mean and range) showed that etoposide disposition was unchanged in patients with liver dysfunction. We found slightly high etoposide bioavailability [F, 61% (17-95%)] and clearance [CL, 1.1 (0.7-2.3)l h(-1) m(-2)] resulting in a normal degree of systemic exposure (AUC(oral) 27 microg h ml(-1)). Normal protein binding [PB 93.2% (84.4-98.1%)] contributed to a normal level of exposure to free drug (AUC(f, oral) 1.9 microg h ml(-1)). The distribution volume [V(SS) 8.4 (6.1-13.2) l/m2] and the effective half-life [t1/2eff, 5.1 (3.0-9.6) h] were normal. Median CL and protein binding did not differ in the seven patients with total bilirubin value of > 1.2 mg/dl as compared with the ten patients with total bilirubin levels of < or = 1.2 mg/dl (1.3 versus 1.01 h(-1) m(-2) and 92.5% versus 93.4%, respectively). In agreement with this PK finding, we observed no clinical evidence of increased toxicity in patients with hyperbilirubinemia as compared with patients with normal bilirubinemia (mean WBC decrease 38% versus 47%). The only case of severe (grade 4) hematological toxicity was observed in one patient with reduced glomerular filtration. Since the pharmacological effects of etoposide correlate with the level of systemic exposure to the free drug, our data suggest that no dose reduction is needed in patients with HCC. It is even possible to increase the dose intensity in patients with favorable PK parameters under appropriate hematological and therapeutic drug monitoring.
We investigated the effect of cyclosporin A (CSA) on protein binding of teniposide (VM26) in 16 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving i.v. VM26 alone over 24 h (total dose, 200 mg/m2) and in association with CSA (5 mg/kg/2 h followed by 30 mg/kg/48 h i.v.). CSA was used in an attempt to overcome multidrug resistance. The unbound fraction (%fu) of VM26 was significantly (p=0.04) higher in the cycles with CSA (median 0.8; range 0.4-1.9) than in the cycles with VM26 alone (median 0.5; range 0.1-1.6). Both total VM26 area under curve concentration (AUC0-infinity) and free VM26 AUC0-infinity increased after treatment with CSA, but the median increase in free AUC0-infinity was higher (2.7-fold) than total AUC0-infinity (1.5-fold) (p = 0.04). Bilirubin was significantly (p<0.01) increased after CSA but no association was observed between bilirubin level and %fu of VM26. Albumin was in the normal range after both VM26 alone and VM26 plus CSA. The nadir of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) after VM26 plus CSA (median 700/microl, range <100-2860/microl) was lower than after VM26 alone (median 1900/microl, range 200-6000/microl) (p = 0.0007). The median percentage of ANC compared to the pretreatment value (ANC nadir/ANC pretreatment x 100) was 39.0% (range 3.1-98.8%) in the cycles with VM26 alone and 16.9% (range 1.4-97.9%) (p = 0.007) after VM26 plus CSA. Percentage change of neutrophils significantly correlated with free AUC0-infinity VM26 in the cycles with VM26 alone and VM26 plus CSA (p = 0.04, r = -0.53 and p = 0.04, r = -0.52, respectively). Only a trend which failed to reach significance was observed between total AUC0-infinity VM26 and percentage change of neutrophils in the cycles with VM26 alone and in association with CSA (p = NS, r = -0.33 and p = 0.055, r = -0.49, respectively). In conclusion, patients treated with CSA had higher systemic exposure to unbound VM26.
The effect of tamoxifen (TAM) on the pharmacokinetics of oral administration of etoposide (VP-16) in patients with nonoperable hepatocellular carcinoma was investigated. The pharmacokinetics of VP-16 was studied by using a validated limited sampling strategy. The pharmacokinetic parameters of VP-16, such as area under curve (AUC), free AUC and protein binding, were determined from drug plasma concentrations at 1 and 4 h after VP-16 administration on the first day (day -1) and at the end of the chemotherapy cycle (day -21) for VP-16 alone and VP-16+TAM, respectively. When VP-16 was administered in association with TAM, the median total systemic exposure was not significantly (p = NS) different from that observed when VP-16 was administered alone [33.74 (range 11.19-56.58) versus 32.97 (range 20.23-119.28) mg/l/h]. Moreover, TAM did not affect significantly (p = NS) the levels of protein binding of VP-16 [median 94.6 (range 87.7-98.2) versus median 94.9 (range 91.6-98.0)% for VP-16+TAM and VP-16 alone, respectively] and the systemic exposure of the free drug (free AUC) [1.86 (range 0.21-4.57) versus median 1.78 (range 0.59-3.73) mg/l/h for VP-16+TAM and VP = 16 alone, respectively]. These results indicate a lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between VP-16 and TAM, and suggest that the increased hematological toxicity observed when TAM is given in combination with VP-16 could be related to pharmacodynamic interactions.
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed at evaluating the pharmacokinetic, cardiovascular, and metabolic effects of high-dose verapamil continuous intravenous infusion in cancer patients. DESIGN: Prospective clinical and pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a Cancer Research Institute. PATIENTS: Nine patients (age range 31 to 57 yrs) with progressive cancer disease and without cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic dysfunctions. INTERVENTIONS: After a loading dose (0.15 mg/kg followed by 12 hrs of continuous intravenous infusion at 0.20 mg/kg/hr), the infusion rate of verapamil was increased every 24 hrs (0.25, 0.30, 0.35, and 0.40 mg/kg/hr). The highest rate was maintained for 48 hrs. Doxorubicin was given from the 60 th to the 108 th hr. Hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/day) and potassium (36 mmol/day) were given orally. Altogether, 17 courses were completed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Steady state concentration (C(SS) and systemic clearance of verapamil and nor-verapamil (active metabolite) for each infusion rate were calculated. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), heart rate (HR), PR, QT and QTc intervals, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured, as well as daily body weight, blood glucose and potassium. C(SS) of verapamil and nor-verapamil increased more than proportionally to the infusion rate (p<.001). Systemic clearance of verapamil decreased over the range of the infusion rate (p<.005). MAP and HR decreased at the 12th hr (p<.001) and then plateaued. CVP increased (p<.01). The relationship between MAP, HR, CVP, and verapamil plasma concentrations was significant (r2 = .25, .14, and .35, respectively; p<.0001). LVEF did not change. Six patients (11 courses) developed junctional rhythm. Three patients (six courses) showed a PR interval increase (p<.05). Patients with junctional rhythm had higher Css of verapamil (p<.009). Overall, QT and QTc intervals increased (p<.01). A linear relationship was observed between verapamil plasma concentrations and QT intervals (r2 = .09, p<.01). Cardiovascular side effects did not determine treatment withdrawal in any patient. Body weight, blood glucose, and potassium did not show significant changes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a capacity-limited clearance of high-dose verapamil. In the absence of heart disease, following a step by step increase of the dosage, the high plasma verapamil concentrations (617 to 2970 ng/mL) produce frequent but well tolerated hemodynamic and electrocardiogram changes.
Overexpression of the folate binding protein (FBP) is a common feature in epithelial ovarian cancer, but its prognostic significance is not clearly understood. We investigated whether FBP in epithelial ovarian cancer specimens is a predictor of response to chemotherapy and survival. Between 1990 and 1995, 99 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer underwent primary surgery and were treated with chemotherapeutic regimens including platinum derivatives. First-line chemotherapy was performed in 58 patients with residual disease and in 41 patients without residual disease after primary laparotomy. FBP expression level was determined in frozen specimens by cyto-fluorimetric assay using the MOv 18 monoclonal antibody (MAb). Association of FBP fluorescence index (FI) with clinical characteristics, response to chemotherapy, and survival was studied by univariate and multivariate analysis. In the 58 patients with residual disease after primary surgery, failure to respond to chemotherapy (complete or partial remission) was about 15-fold higher (95% confidence interval, 2.96-77.43) when tumors had FBP FI above the median value (FBP FI = 3.25). FBP FI was not a predictor of survival in the entire series of tumors (99 patients). However, in the subgroup of 58 patients with residual disease after primary surgery, survival analysis confirmed the disadvantage observed with respect to response to chemotherapy in patients expressing FBP FI above the median value (hazard ratio 2.01; 95% confidence interval 0.95-4.24). In conclusion, higher levels of FBP expression might be a predictor of chemotherapy response failure in ovarian cancer. In patients with residual disease after primary surgery, FBP FI could represent a valuable prognostic marker for survival.
PURPOSE: At least in some European Countries, there is still considerable controversy regarding the choice between surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with early laryngeal-glottic carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred and forty-six patients with laryngeal-glottic neoplasms, Stage I-II, were treated with radical radiotherapy. Before radiotherapy the patients were evaluated to determine the surgical procedure of choice. Either 66-68.4 Gy (33-38 fractions) or 63-65 Gy (28-29 fractions) of radiation therapy (RT) were administered. The overall disease free survival was determined for each subgroup of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant prognostic variables. RESULTS: Five- and 10-year overall survival rates were 83 and 72%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 6 years 204 patients are alive and disease free. No patient developed distant metastases. One patient died of a large local recurrence, 38 patients died of causes unrelated to their tumor, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. The multivariate analysis confirmed that performance status (PS), macroscopic presentation of the lesion, and persistence of dysphonia after radiotherapy are significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: According to the multivariate analysis, the patients with PS > 80 and with exophytic lesions are eligible for radical RT. The surgical procedure proposed for each patient was not found to be an independent prognostic factor.