Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G T Everson

Publications and source records attributed to G T Everson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Chronic albumin infusions to achieve diuresis in patients with ascites who are not candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

While transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a common therapy for cirrhotic patients with diuretic-resistant or diuretic-refractory ascites, some patients are unsuitable for the procedure for technical or medical reasons. We report our experience with the use of chronic intravenous albumin infusions to achieve diuresis in this difficult patient population and review the historic experience of chronic albumin infusions as a treatment for ascites. Nineteen patients with cirrhosis and diuretic-resistant or diuretic-refractory ascites who were deemed unsuitable for TIPS received outpatient intravenous albumin infusions (50 g) weekly for at least 4 weeks. The following endpoints were retrospectively recorded: serum sodium, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, hematocrit, bilirubin, albumin, international normalized ratio, body weight, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The contraindications for TIPS included the following: portal vein thrombosis, two; advanced age, one; encephalopathy, nine; hyperbilirubinemia, five; and other, two. Compared to pretreatment, posttreatment weight decreased in 17 patients, remained unchanged in 0 patients, and increased in 2 patients. The overall mean change in body weight (before vs. after therapy) was 8 lb (P < 0.05). The only significant change in biochemistry was an increase in serum albumin from 2.5 g/dl before therapy to 3.5 g/dl after therapy (P < 0.05). We conclude that (1) recurrent intravenous weekly albumin infusions resulted in significant loss of edema and ascites as measured by loss of body weight, and (2) clinicians may want to consider chronic albumin infusions for selected patients with refractory ascites who are not candidates for TIPS.

Albumins↗

Laparoscopic palliation of polycystic liver disease.

The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of polycystic liver disease (PCLD) is not well defined. The authors hypothesized that laparoscopic fenestration for PCLD relieves symptoms caused by polycystic liver disease. In this study, 11 patients underwent 20 laparoscopic cyst fenestration operations as treatment for symptoms of their PCLD. Symptoms leading to surgery were pain and pressure in 15 (75%) and early satiety in 12 (60%) patients. The median hospital stay was 1 day. The symptoms resolved postoperatively in all the patients. An additional laparoscopic fenestration was required in six (55%) patients for recurrent symptoms. The average time to reoperation was 22 +/- 16 months. Two patients required hepatic transplantation. Initial symptom resolution occurred in all the patients undergoing redo fenestration. The authors conclude that laparoscopic fenestration for PCLD is safe, results in minimal "down" time and relieves the symptoms caused by PCLD. Symptomatic relief usually is temporary, and repeat surgery is required for recurring symptoms in half of the patients.

Adult↗

Immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

This article highlights the currently available immunosuppressive medications that are used to prevent or treat hepatic allograft rejection. Currently-available immunosuppressive medications are highly effective in prevention of allograft rejection, graft loss, and patient death. However, side effects of medications are common, usually dose-related, and specific to the administered drug. Maintenance immunosuppression which has been primarily based upon calcineurin inhibitors (Cyclosporine, CsA, or tacrolimus, Tac) is commonly modified to reduce metabolic complications of therapy. Toxic consequences of steroids may be ameliorated by steroid withdrawal without risk of acute rejection or immunologic graft loss. Calcineurin-sparing regimens may include use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus, and allow reduction in doses and plasma levels of CsA and Tac. Recurrence of hepatitis C is universal after liver transplantation and progresses rapidly, compared to its natural history in non-immunocompromised patients. Unfortunately, no single immunosuppressive agent or strategy has yet been shown to convincingly modify the course of post-transplant recurrence. Most centers manage recurrenc hepatitis C by either steroid avoidance, reduction in immunosuppression, or institution of antiviral therapy. Ongoing advances in immunosuppressive and antiviral medications will allow tailoring of the immunosuppressive prescription, which undoubtedly will benefit current and future liver recipients.

Calcineurin Inhibitors↗

Benign focal lesions of the liver.

This article focuses on the origin, diagnosis, and management of focal benign lesions of the liver. The most common lesions include cavernous hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. A number of less frequent occurring lesions are also discussed. In general, the common lesions can be diagnosed by radiologic imaging, but occasionally biopsies are required, and surgical removal is often needed.

Adenoma↗

Liver transplantation using sirolimus and minimal corticosteroids (3-day taper).

At our center, we have performed liver transplantation since 1995 with a rapid-taper steroid protocol (weaning steroids by day 14 posttransplantation). Beginning in 2000, we further reduced the use of corticosteroids to 3 days and added sirolimus to our immunosuppressive regimen. We report our experience with 39 patients who underwent liver transplantation with either tacrolimus or cyclosporin A (Neoral; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Summit, NJ) and sirolimus, with a 3-day tapered dose of corticosteroids. Thirty-two patients received a cadaveric graft and 7 patients received a right hepatic lobe from a living donor. All patients initially were administered either tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/d) or cyclosporin A (10 mg/kg/d) and sirolimus (6 mg/d for 1 day, followed by 2 mg/d), in addition to methylprednisolone on the first 3 days (1, 0.5, and 0.5 g/d) after transplantation. Patients were administered corticosteroids for presumptive or biopsy-proven evidence of acute cellular rejection (methylprednisolone, 1, 0.5, and 0.5 g on 3 successive days). Seventeen patients were administered tacrolimus and 22 patients were administered cyclosporin A. Six patients were excluded from analysis because they were administered sirolimus for less than 2 weeks. Mean duration of follow-up was 124 days. Patient survival was 36 of 39 patients (92%), and graft survival was 35 of 39 grafts (89%). Ten of 33 patients (30%) experienced 12 episodes of rejection (7 biopsy proven, 5 presumptive) compared with 70% in historical controls (P <.01). OKT3 was required in 1 of 33 patients (3%) compared with 37% in controls (P <.01). Twenty-six of 33 patients (79%) were not administered prednisone, and 7 of 33 patients (21%) were administered prednisone for reasons other than rejection. Posttransplantation, there was no significant change in values for creatinine, glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, cholesterol, and white blood cell counts. Platelet counts were significantly reduced, and hematocrits were significantly elevated (P <.05). Liver transplantation may be successfully performed with minimal use of corticosteroids by using sirolimus and either tacrolimus or cyclosporin A. Despite the absence of prednisone from our immunosuppressive protocol, the incidence of rejection and OKT3 use was lower than in historical controls. Patient and graft survival rates were identical to those of historical controls. The findings in this report will serve as the basis for a formal trial evaluating the efficacy of sirolimus in liver transplantation.

Cyclosporine↗

Right hepatic lobe donation for living donor liver transplantation: impact on donor quality of life.

Adult right hepatic lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has rapidly gained widespread acceptance as an effective procedure for selected patients with end-stage liver disease. However, there are currently no published data on the effect of this procedure on the quality of life of donors. We report the results of a survey of our living liver transplant donors to determine the effect of right hepatic lobe donation on quality of life. We have performed 30 LDLTs since 1997; 24 of these have a follow-up of 4 months or longer. In August 2000, these patients were sent a questionnaire (including a Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Survey) regarding psychosocial outcomes and symptoms after surgery. Major complications occurred in 4 of 24 patients (16%), and minor complications, in 4 of 24 patients (16%). Complete recovery occurred in 75% of patients at a mean time of 3.4 months. Ninety-six percent of patients returned to the same predonation job after a mean time of 2.4 months, and 66% of patients required a period of light-duty work for a mean of 2.8 months before returning to full-duty work. A change in body image was reported in 42% of patients, and 71% reported mild ongoing symptoms (primarily abdominal discomfort) that they related to the donor surgery for which 29% sought evaluation by a physician. The donor's relationship with the recipient was the same or better in 96% of donors, and the relationship with the donor's significant other was the same or better in 88% of donors. Mean out-of-pocket expenses incurred by donors were $3,660. Sixty-three percent of donors reported experiencing more pain than anticipated. All patients would donate again if necessary, and 96% benefited from the donor experience. In conclusion, (1) all our donors are alive and well after donation; (2) almost all donors were able to return to predonation employment status within a few months; (3) most donors have mild persistent abdominal symptoms, and some donors had a change in body image that they attribute to the donor surgery; and (4) this information should be provided to potential donors so they may better understand the impact of donor surgery.

Adult↗

Orlistat maintains biliary lipid composition and hepatobiliary function in obese subjects undergoing moderate weight loss.

OBJECTIVES: Orlistat, an intestinal lipase inhibitor, has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of obesity. The effects of orlistat on hepatobiliary function have not been previously defined. A 4 wk study was performed involving modest weight loss in obese subjects to observe any short-term hepatobiliary responses that occur after initiating treatment with orlistat and a hypocaloric diet. METHODS: A total of 23 obese (BMI 30-41 kg/m2) subjects were randomized to a double blind t.i.d. treatment with 120 mg of orlistat or a placebo in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet (1200-1500 kcal/day). The study was designed to achieve similar modest weight loss in both groups in order to be able to directly assess the effects of orlistat. Cholesterol saturation, bile composition, and gallbladder motility were measured. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment period, mean weight loss of 3.8 kg was achieved in the orlistat group (vs 2.3 kg with placebo, p = NS). Total bile acid concentration decreased significantly with placebo (-18.57 +/- 6.99 mmol/L; 95% CI = -32.26 to -4.87), but not with orlistat. Biliary phospholipid concentration decreased significantly with placebo (-4.38 +/- 1.91 mmol/L; 95% CI = -8.13 to -0.64) but not with orlistat. Mean changes from the baseline in cholesterol saturation index and gallbladder motility were similar in both groups. Microscopy of bile failed to reveal cholesterol microcrystals before or after treatment in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a primary initial effect of weight loss is a reduction in biliary bile acids and phospholipids. Orlistat blocks these adverse changes in biliary lipid composition and maintains hepatobiliary function. We speculate that the risk of formation of gallstones during weight loss may actually be lowered with orlistat.

Adult↗

Fatal transfer of malignant melanoma from multiorgan donor to four allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: In this report we describe the transfer of malignant melanoma from a single donor to four solid organ transplant recipients, all of whom died from metastatic melanoma. METHODS AND CASE HISTORIES: The donor of a heart, liver, and two kidneys to four separate recipients died of intracerebral hemorrhage. The donor had no history or clinical evidence of melanoma. All four recipients, treated with standard immunosuppression protocols, developed metastatic malignant melanoma within 1 year after transplantation Three patients died within 14 months after transplantation, although the fourth, whose immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued, died of metastatic melanoma 30 months after renal transplantation. FINDINGS: Tumors from all recipients were histologically identical. Donor origin of tumor cells was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA analysis for polymorphic short tandem tetrameric repeats (Geneprint STR, Promega Corp., Madison, WI). DNAs from nontumorous donor tissue and tumor tissue available from three recipients tested positive for CSF1P0 alleles 10 and 12 and for TH01 alleles 6 and 7, although DNAs from nonneoplastic recipient tissues all exhibited different allelotypes. INTERPRETATION: Transmission of fatal or potentially fatal malignant tumors, notably malignant melanoma, from donor to recipient is an uncommon complication of solid organ transplantation. PCR-based genetic analysis permits definitive assignment of the source of posttransplant tumors.

Adult↗

Evaluation of 100 patients for living donor liver transplantation.

The initial success of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States has resulted in a growing interest in this procedure. The impact of LDLT on liver transplantation will depend in part on the proportion of patients considered medically suitable for LDLT and the identification of suitable donors. We report the outcome of our evaluation of the first 100 potential transplant recipients for LDLT at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Denver, CO). All patients considered for LDLT had first been approved for conventional liver transplantation by the Liver Transplant Selection Committee and met the listing criteria of United Network for Organ Sharing status 1, 2A, or 2B. Once listed, those patients deemed suitable for LDLT were given the option to consider LDLT and approach potential donors. Donors were evaluated with a preliminary screening questionnaire, followed by formal evaluation. Of the 100 potential transplant recipients evaluated, 51 were initially rejected based on recipient characteristics that included imminent cadaveric transplantation (8 patients), refusal of evaluation (4 patients), lack of financial approval (6 patients), and medical, psychosocial, or surgical problems (33 patients). Of the remaining 49 patients, considered ideal candidates for LDLT, 24 patients were unable to identify a suitable donor for evaluation. Twenty-six donors were evaluated for the remaining 25 potential transplant recipients. Eleven donors were rejected: 9 donors for medical reasons and 2 donors who refused donation after being medically approved. The remaining 15 donor-recipient pairs underwent LDLT. Using our criteria for the selection of recipients and donors for LDLT gave the following results: (1) 51 of 100 potential transplant recipients (51%) were rejected for recipient issues, (2) only 15 of the remaining 49 potential transplant recipients (30%) were able to identify an acceptable donor, and (3) 15 of 100 potential living donor transplant recipients (15%) were able to identify a suitable donor and undergo LDLT. Recipient characteristics and donor availability may limit the widespread use of LDLT. However, careful application of LDLT to patients at greatest risk for dying on the waiting list may significantly reduce waiting list mortality.

Adult↗

Efficacy of interferon treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C: comparison of response in cirrhotics, fibrotics, or nonfibrotics.

Chronic hepatitis C patients (472 patients) were treated with consensus interferon (CIFN) or interferon (IFN) alfa-2b for 6 months in a large multicenter trial. Efficacy was assessed by clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (<100 copies/mL), normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and histological improvement. The purpose of these analyses was to compare these efficacy parameters in nonfibrotics, fibrotics, and cirrhotics. Patients with chronic HCV and cirrhosis showed the same benefit from IFN treatment as noncirrhotic patients when efficacy was assessed by clearance of serum HCV RNA or by histological benefit. Sustained HCV RNA response rates were similar when measured among nonfibrotic (11%), fibrotic (13%), and cirrhotic (11%) patients. Improvement in histologic activity index (HAI) scores was noted among all 3 groups. Cirrhotic patients had a lower sustained ALT response rate (12%) than did nonfibrotic patients (23%). Ninety percent of nonfibrotics, but only 71% of fibrotics and 67% of cirrhotics, who sustained a virological response normalized their ALT. This suggests that cirrhotic patients may clear the hepatitis C virus without normalization of ALT levels. The pattern of both HCV RNA clearance over time and ALT decrease was similar among nonfibrotics, fibrotics, and cirrhotics. Tolerability to IFN therapy was similar among the 3 groups except that more cirrhotics required dose reduction because of thrombocytopenia. In patients with cirrhosis, ALT levels may be a less appropriate endpoint in the measurement of response to therapy. We conclude that liver cirrhosis should not be a reason for excluding patients from therapy because both cirrhotic and fibrotic HCV patients benefit from IFN therapy not only by clearance of virus but by improvements in liver histology.

Adult↗

Endoscopic stenting of the gallbladder for symptomatic gallbladder disease in patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation.

Cholecystectomy in patients with advanced cirrhosis is associated with excessive morbidity and mortality. Because open cholecystectomy in patients with Child's class C cirrhosis has a reported mortality rate as high as 83%, symptomatic gallbladder disease in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) poses a unique clinical problem. The goal of this study is to determine whether the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease with endoscopic stenting of the gallbladder effectively reduces biliary symptoms and complications or the need for cholecystectomy. Thirteen patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease with and without cholelithiasis and advanced cirrhosis who were candidates for OLT underwent placement of a biliary stent from the gallbladder to the duodenum at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. In each patient, biliary symptoms and complications ceased after stent placement. Seven patients underwent successful OLT 1 to 24 months after the procedure. One patient subsequently became a noncandidate for OLT and died of diabetes complications 3 years after the procedure. Five others are awaiting OLT (6 to 28 months postprocedure). One patient had recurrent pericholecystic fluid collection requiring percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy 8 months after the procedure. No patient has had recurrent symptoms, and currently all patients are free of complications. None required surgical intervention of the gallbladder or biliary tree. We conclude that endoscopic stenting of the gallbladder is the preferred treatment for symptomatic gallbladder disease in patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting OLT. This approach is noninvasive, safe, and effective in preventing potential morbidity and mortality.

Adult↗

Successful withdrawal of prednisone after adult liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis.

Corticosteroid withdrawal after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) represents an attractive therapeutic option for ameliorating post-OLT metabolic complications, although several reports suggest patients who undergo transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may have a greater incidence of acute and chronic rejection when withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success of corticosteroid withdrawal in patients with AIH after OLT. Twenty-six patients underwent successful OLT for AIH. In 21 of these patients, stable maintenance immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone (n = 20) or tacrolimus (TAC) and prednisone (n = 1). In this group, a trial of prednisone withdrawal was initiated when patients were 6 months or more post-OLT, with normal liver function, and receiving an average prednisone dosage of 10 mg/d. Five additional patients treated with either TAC (n = 4) or CSA (n = 1) plus mycophenolate mofetil underwent a 14-day taper of prednisone. Overall, 17 of 25 patients (68%) were successfully withdrawn from corticosteroids, with a mean follow-up of 22 months (range, 1 to 34 months). Of the remaining 8 patients, 5 patients received a lower dosage of prednisone or required prednisone to control inflammatory bowel disease. Only 3 patients remained dependent on prednisone to maintain stable liver allograft function. Withdrawal from 10 to 5 mg of prednisone (n = 21) resulted in four episodes of steroid-responsive and two episodes of steroid-resistant rejection in 3 patients, and 18 of 21 patients (86%) were rejection free. Withdrawal from 5 to 0 mg prednisone (n = 17) resulted in eight episodes of steroid-responsive and no episodes of steroid-resistant rejection in 4 patients; 13 of 17 patients (76%) were rejection free. Of the 5 patients in the 14-day prednisone-taper group, 3 patients had steroid-responsive rejection and 1 patient required OKT3. Seventeen of 21 patients (81%) with AIH were successfully withdrawn from corticosteroids. It is notable that corticosteroid withdrawal was associated with a reduction in serum cholesterol levels, decreased use of antihypertensive agents, and reduced need for insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents. We propose corticosteroid withdrawal should be attempted in patients with underlying AIH who undergo OLT because most will benefit without significantly jeopardizing the liver allograft.

Adult↗

Role of TIPS as a bridge to hepatic transplantation in Budd-Chiari syndrome.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a bridge to transplantation for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients (five women, three men) with a mean age of 49.8 years (range, 20-61 years) were diagnosed with BCS by means of computed tomography, hepatic venography, and liver biopsy. One patient had acute liver failure, with subacute or chronic failure in seven. TIPS placement was attempted in all eight patients. Clinical follow-up and portograms were obtained in all patients until death or transplantation. RESULTS: TIPS placement was completed in seven of eight patients (87.5%). During the follow-up period, TIPS occlusion occurred in four patients. TIPS revision in this patient, although successful, was complicated by hemorrhage and multiorgan failure, and the patient died. Assisted patency rate, excluding the technical failure, was 100%. Mean follow-up in the six survivors with TIPS was 342 days (range, 19-660 days). All six survivors had complete resolution of their ascites. Albumin levels improved an average of 0.43 g/dL (range, 0.3-1.4 g/dL). Bilirubin levels improved in five of six patients (83%), decreasing by an average of 5.6 mg/dL (range, 3.0-15.2 mg/dL). Of the six survivors, three underwent elective liver transplantation, one is awaiting transplantation, and one has been removed from the transplantation list because of clinical improvement. One patient was a candidate for transplantation but declined to be put on the list. CONCLUSION: Hepatic synthetic dysfunction improves markedly after TIPS placement in patients with BCS. Significant improvement in ascites can also occur. TIPS can be an effective bridge to transplantation for patients with BCS.

Acute Disease↗