Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Ryge.
A total of 96 composite resin restorations were placed in primary molars. After 4 years, 44 restorations were examined. The wear rate was similar to that of enamel in primary molars. The material had excellent radiopacity and color-matching properties.
The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 6, 12, and 24 months by two trained examiners. In the system used, the highest, most desirable rating is Alfa. Of the restorations evaluated at 24 months, 99% had Alfa ratings for color match, 87% had Alfa ratings for no discoloration at cavosurface margins, and 86% had Alfa ratings for no loss of anatomic form. In addition, 75% of the restorations had Alfa ratings for margin adaptation, and 91% had Alfa ratings for no recurrent caries at the 24-month evaluation. In conclusion, the light-cured composite resin restorative material functioned well at the 12- and 24-month evaluation periods, when used in primary molars.
A group of 150 patients who had received extensive restorative treatment 5 years prior to this study was selected at random from the Swedish Dental Insurance System records in Malmo. Of the 133 respondents to a questionnaire, 109 participated in a clinical evaluation of 891 restorations including 498 crowns, 232 pontics, 6 removable partial dentures, and 155 adjacent or opposing metallic restorations. The clinical evaluation was performed by two trained examiners by means of the CDA quality evaluation for dental care. Ninety percent of the crowns and pontics, 80% of the adjacent or opposing metallic restorations, and all six partial dentures were rated satisfactory. Twenty-three percent of the crowns, 49% of the pontics, 17% of the adjacent or opposing restorations, and half the partial dentures rated in the range of excellence. Not acceptable ratings for crowns included 3.4% T ratings and 6.6% V ratings. For pontics, the corresponding percents were 9.5% and 0.4%, respectively. T ratings were in most cases indicative of overcontouring, whereas V ratings for crowns were usually given because of secondary caries. Marginal periodontitis was mainly associated with not acceptable ratings but was also observed in connection with satisfactory restorations. Only 2% of the restorations had been lost during the 5-year period after insertion.
The present study assessed the predictive value of an indirect metric method for the early detection of margin defects of amalgam restorations, relative to results using a direct clinical method. The material consisted of plaster casts of amalgam restorations taken at 1- and 2-yr examinations of four different amalgam-treatment combinations. The widest margin defect of each restoration was measured in a dissection microscope equipped with a metric scale in the ocular. The ranking order obtained from the metric measurements of the different amalgam-treatment combinations after 1 and 2 yr was compared with that obtained from the direct clinical evaluation after 2 yr. Finally, the rank order of those restorations rated Alfa (no visible evidence, along the margin, of a crevice (ditch) into which an explorer will penetrate) at the 2-yr clinical examination was studied in relation to the 1-yr metric measurements. For the total material, the rank order based on the metric measurements of the margin defects of the four amalgam-treatment combinations agreed with that obtained with the clinical rating. In the 1-yr data, where the metric technique was applied only on the restorations rated Alfa at the 2-yr clinical evaluation, the order of two neighboring combinations was reversed; otherwise the same rank order was obtained. It is recommended that the clinical performance of new brands of amalgam alloy are tested in short-term, small-scale studies using the metric evaluation technique, before more extensive field studies over longer periods are instituted, in order to sort out unsatisfactory materials and treatment techniques at an early stage.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
One hundred and forty-three patients ranging in age from 5 to 8 years participated in a pit and fissure sealant study using a half-mouth design. At the end of 18 months, for all permanent first molars, there was a 75.9% effectiveness with a net gain of 82, which was statistically significant. The sealant was present on the surfaces to which it was applied in 74% of the teeth. Application time was 8 minutes per quadrant and 5.5 minutes per tooth. The effect of treatment was similar to that reported for an unfilled BIS-GMA sealant in patients with similar teeth and similar ages. Loss of sealant from the permanent maxillary first molars did not appear to contribute to the initiation of dental caries. However, in 6 of 38 mandibular tooth surfaces, sealant loss may have been a factor.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.