[Gastric scintigraphy with I-131. Clinical and experimental findings].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Roncari.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In anaesthesia and in the intensive care unit, benzodiazepines have proven safe and effective agents for the induction and maintenance of sedation for a variety of therapeutic goals. However, in these contexts, or in benzodiazepine overdose, it is often desirable to be able to terminate or interrupt sedation without waiting for the effect of the benzodiazepine to become dissipated by normal metabolism and excretion. Flumazenil, a 1,4-imidazobenzodiazepine, is a highly effective, specific benzodiazepine antagonist which is indicated for use when the effect of a benzodiazepine must be attenuated or terminated at short notice. It acts by displacing other benzodiazepines from the receptor site by competitive inhibition. The onset of effect after intravenous administration occurs within 1 to 3 minutes. The optimal dosage is determined for each patient by a dose titration procedure and lies in the range 0.2 to 1.0mg in anaesthesiology, and 0.1 to 2.0mg in intensive care use. Despite its short elimination half-life of around 1 hour, after general anaesthesia or conscious to moderate sedation for short procedures, a single dose of flumazenil is usually sufficient to attain and maintain the desired level of consciousness. After intoxication with high benzodiazepine doses, the duration of effect of a single dose of flumazenil is not expected to exceed 1 hour. In such cases, the period of wakefulness can be prolonged as necessary by repeated low intravenous doses of flumazenil or by infusion (0.1 mg/hour). Flumazenil is well tolerated both systemically and locally. The only adverse events seen with greater frequency after flumazenil compared with placebo were nausea and/or vomiting after general anaesthesia, although the incidence of actual vomiting was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Since these effects were virtually absent in studies of intensive care patients and after sedation for short procedures, and were not seen in tolerability studies in healthy volunteers receiving intravenous bolus doses of up to 100mg, there may be a link between these symptoms and the other agents used in general anaesthesia, some of which have well-known emetic properties. Thus, flumazenil provides a safe and effective means of attenuating or reversing the CNS-depressant effects of benzodiazepines whenever indicated, e.g. following benzodiazepine-induced general anaesthesia, conscious sedation, or after benzodiazepine overdose, either alone or in combination with other agents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We investigated the role of tumor markers CEA, NSE, TPS and CYFRA 21.1 in lung cancer diagnosis and staging in 169 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer (43 SCLC and 126 NSCLC). In SCLC patients NSE and CYFRA 21.1 showed the highest sensitivity and their combination improve significantly the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy. In NSCLC patients CYFRA 21.1 showed the highest sensitivity and global accuracy and no markers association was as effective as CYFRA 21.1 alone. Based on data from our study it can be concluded that in patients with suspected lung cancer the serum NSE and CYFRA 21.1 assay is a suitable association to confirm the clinical hypothesis. NSE in SCLC and CYFRA 21.1 in NSCLC are useful in the evaluation of disease extent and successive treatment planning.
NSE is a biochemical marker for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) diagnosis and management. CYFRA 21.1 is a newly developed immunoassay to detect the serum fragments of cytokeratin 19 which are also expressed in SCLC with or without neurofilaments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and prognostic role of the two markers in SCLC and their contribution to chemotherapy monitoring and patient follow-up. We studied 62 patients with pathologically proven SCLC: 28 with limited disease (LD) and 34 with extensive disease (ED), and 100 patients with non-malignant pulmonary disease. Immunoradiometric assays (IRMA) were employed to test NSE and CYFRA 21.1 in patients and control subjects. For each patient subset results were expressed as median and interquartile distribution range. NSE and CYFRA 21.1 sensitivity was 0.52 (33/62) and 0.56 (35/62), respectively. In the group of patients with LD, NSE and CYFRA 21.1 sensitivity was 0.42 (12/28) and 0.54 (15/28) and in patients with ED, NSE and CYFRA 21.1 were positive in 0.62 (21/34) and 0.59 (20/34) of cases, respectively. Combining the two markers, a sensitivity of 0.78 (22/28) in LD, 0.82 (28/34) in ED and a global sensitivity of 0.80 (50/62) was obtained. Only NSE was significantly linked to the extension of disease (Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.002) while CYFRA 21.1 did not correlate. The analysis of survival and the evaluation of the two markers at diagnosis showed CYFRA 21.1 to be strongly linked to the patients' outcome, independently of both clinical prognostic factors and NSE levels (log rank and Cox's model). The markers' performance during chemotherapy was tested in a group of 33 patients with at least one marker above cut-off. NSE can be considered a reliable marker of tumor mass modifications under chemotherapy, while CYFRA 21.1 expression seems to be relatively independent of tumor volume modifications. An applicable model of biomarkers in SCLC could be the concurrent assay of NSE and CYFRA 21.1 in pre-therapeutic assessment and therapy planning. CYFRA 21.1 does not play an important role during therapy monitoring and follow-up; in these phases NSE alone may be employed.
UNLABELLED: This experimental study investigated the potential role of Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen (TPS) in comparison with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) in the diagnosis and the clinical and pathological staging of prostate cancer. Serum TPS and PSA levels were determined in 128 patients (pts) with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH; Group 1) and in 92 pts with prostate cancer (Group 2). TPS was also measured in a control group of 100 healthy subjects. Normal cutoff values of 85 U/l for TPS and 4 ng/ml for PSA were determined on the basis of ROC curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 49%, 95% and 76% for TPS, and 84%, 90% and 87% for PSA. The combination of the two markers provided a higher accuracy (88%), improving the sensitivity of PSA, since 47% of patients with normal PSA had pathological levels of TPS. TPS showed an increase in sensitivity from low to higher stages of disease and, in patients with skeletal involvement, from small to larger numbers of bone metastases (Kruskal Wallis p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, TPS serum levels are not useful in the clinical staging of prostate cancer as they have a poorer performance than PSA. TPS was ineffective (ROC curve area = 0.68) in predicting extraprostatic disease and demonstrated a reduced ability (area = 0.78) to identify skeletal involvement. Moreover, the combination of the two markers did not significantly improve the performance of PSA alone. The serum concentration of TPS in patients with localized tumors was not related to the degree of tumor cell differentiation evaluated by the Gleason score. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience suggests that TPS in association with PSA may be useful at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, these preliminary data have to be confirmed by larger clinical trials and the role of this association in the clinical setting needs to be analyzed with an adequate evaluation of the cost-effectiveness ratio.
Intestinal calcium absorption was studied using orally administered 47Ca and whole body counting. Using this method, we examined 82 patients suffering from recurrent calcium urolithiasis associated with idiopathic hypercalciuria, to evaluate the incidence of elevated intestinal absorption of this ion. An oral dose of 111 kBq (3 microCi) of 47Ca chloride, together with 250 mg of stable calcium as carrier, was given to each patient. Two hours and one week later, the total body radioactivity of each subject was measured. The retention of 47Ca, as percentage of the administered dose, was then calculated. The measurements were performed with a whole body counter consisting of a two-crystal moving system with shadow shield. Forty age-matched healthy volunteers were also examined. The whole body retention of 47Ca resulted significantly higher (p less than 0.0002) in the group of patients than in the control sample, whose m +/- SD was 22.0 +/- 6.0%. In particular, by defining the normality range as 10-34% (m +/- 2SD of control results), enhanced intestinal absorption of calcium was found in 28% of the examined patients. The use of this simple examination seems to be helpful in the physiopathologic assessment of subjects suffering from calcium urolithiasis and idiopathic hypercalciuria and consequently, in their appropriate management.
Conflicting results are reported in the literature concerning the changes in intestinal calcium absorption in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the present work, intestinal calcium absorption was studied in 27 postmenopausal women with RA, using whole body counting as the study method and orally administered Ca-47 as the tracer. Nobody was on corticosteroid therapy, but all received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hydroxy chloroquine or gold compounds. The mean calcium absorption was 22.3% of the dose administered, with a standard deviation of 8.0%. The results obtained were not significantly different from those of 40 age- and sex-matched controls (mean +/- SD: 22.0% +/- 6.0%). Our findings seem to exclude the hypothesis of calcium malabsorption as one of the causes leading to osteoporosis in RA.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.