Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Rodrigo

Publications and source records attributed to G Rodrigo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Heliox for nonintubated acute asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Helium and oxygen mixtures (heliox), have been used sporadically in respiratory medicine for decades. Their use in acute respiratory emergencies such as asthma has been the subject of considerable debate. Despite the lapse of more than 60 years since it was first proposed, the role of heliox in treating patients with severe acute asthma remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the addition of heliox to standard medical care on the course of acute asthma, as measured by pulmonary function testing and clinical endpoints. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register. In addition, we contacted primary authors and experts and searched reference lists of articles. Searches are current to August 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: 1) randomised, single or double blind, controlled trials; 2) children or adults with a clinical diagnosis of acute asthma seen in emergency departments or equivalent acute care settings; and 3) compared treatment with inhaled heliox to placebo (oxygen or air). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion and quality assessment; disagreement was resolved by a third review author and consensus. MAIN RESULTS: This review has been updated in 2006 to include four new trials giving atotal of ten trials involving 544 acute asthma patients. Seven studies involved adults and three studies dealt solely with children. Three were assessed as high quality (Jadad score > 3). Pulmonary function tests were recorded during heliox administration (15 to 60 min). Pooling of the eight trials contributing data to this review showed no significant group differences (standardised mean differences -0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.56 to 0.01). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. Heliox use did improve pulmonary function only in the subgroup of patients with the most severe baseline pulmonary function impairment; however, this conclusion is based on a small number of studies. There were no significant differences between groups when adults versus children, and high versus low heliox dose studies were compared. Finally, at the end of treatment, participants treated with heliox showed no significant different risk of admission to hospital (RR 0.83 (95%CI 0.66 to 1.08, P = 0.17, I(2) = 0%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence does not provide support for the administration of helium-oxygen mixtures to all ED patients with acute asthma. At this time, heliox treatment does not have a role to play in the initial treatment of patients with acute asthma. Nevertheless, new evidence suggests certain beneficial effects in patients with more severe obstruction. Since these conclusions are based upon between-group comparisons and small studies, they should be interpreted with caution.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Heliox for treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Due to its low density properties, helium-oxygen mixtures have the potential to decrease the work of breathing and possibly avoid the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients with respiratory failure. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the addition of helium/oxygen mixtures (heliox) to standard medical care during ventilated and nonventilated acute exacerbations of COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group asthma Register. Primary authors and experts were contacted. References from included and excluded studies, known reviews and texts were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were selected for inclusion if they compared treatment with heliox to placebo (oxygen or air) in randomized controlled trials in adults with an exacerbation of COPD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from all trials were combined using the Review Manager (version 4.1). We planned to perform: 1) random effects weighted mean difference (WMD), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 2) Homogeneity of effect sizes with the Dersimonian and Laird method with p<0.1 as the cut point for significance, and 3) sensitivity analysis on different helium-oxygen mixtures (80/20 vs 70/30), and 4) methodological quality (Jadad score >2 vs. <3). MAIN RESULTS: Four studies, all published between 1997 and 2000 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies compared heliox-oxygen vs. air-oxygen in decompensated COPD patients who were not ventilated. One study was performed in mechanical ventilated patients and one in patients undergoing noninvasive pressure support (NIPSV) ventilated patients. Data could be obtained for only two of the studies. One was a randomized crossover study of 70:30 helium-oxygen vs air-oxygen that involved nineteen patients with acute severe COPD, hospitalized in an intensive care unit for NIPSV. In the patients receiving heliox, arterial PCO2 fell more; WMD 0.8 kPa (95% CI 0.26, -1.34). The second was a randomized trial involved 47 patients with acute COPD, who presented to an Emergency Department randomized to receive updraft nebulization of albuterol and ipratropium bromide using 80% helium and 20% oxygen or compressed air as the driving gas. Treatments were administered at 0, 20, 40, and 120 minutes after randomization. There were no significant differences in the change of FEV1 and FVC between the two groups by either the 1 or 2 hours point. although a small improvement in FEF 25-75 was significantly greater in the heliox group than in the air group. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of helium-oxygen mixtures to treat acute exacerbations of COPD in either ventilated or nonventilated patients. Suitably designed randomised controlled trials with the endpoint being the avoidance of mechanical ventilation may be justified.

Helium↗
PubMed2001

Helium-oxygen mixture for nonintubated acute asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Helium and oxygen mixtures (heliox), have been used sporadically in respiratory medicine for decades. Their use in acute respiratory emergencies such as asthma has been the subject of considerable debate. Despite the lapse of more than 60 years since it was first proposed, the role of heliox in treating patients with acute severe asthma is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the addition of heliox to standard medical care on the course of acute asthma, as measured by pulmonary function testing and clinical endpoints. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma Register which is a compilation of systematic searches of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL and hand searching of the 20 most productive respiratory care journals. In addition, primary authors and experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. References from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized, single or double blind, controlled trials; 2) children or adults with a clinical diagnosis of acute asthma seen in emergency departments or equivalent acute care settings; 3) compared treatment with inhaled heliox compared with a control (oxygen or air). Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and quality assessment; disagreement was resolved by a third reviewer and consensus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data from all included trials were combined using weighted mean differences (WMD), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in a random effects model. Homogeneity of effect sizes were tested with the Dersimonian and Laird method with p<0.1 as the cut point for significance. Sensitivity analyses were performed on age (adults vs. children), different helium-oxygen mixtures and methodological quality. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 4 randomized controlled trials were selected for inclusion with a total of 288 acute asthma patients. Three studies involved adults and one study dealt solely with children. Two were of low quality. The main outcome variable was spirometric measurements (PFT % predicted) in all trials. Pooling the four trials showed no significant differences (WMD = -1.61; 95% CI: -6.64 to 3.41). All pulmonary function tests were recorded during heliox administration (15 to 60 min). There was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies. There were no significant differences between groups when adults vs. children, high vs. low quality, and high vs. low heliox dose studies were compared. The findings were the with a fixed effects model. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence does not provide support for the administration of helium-oxygen mixtures to patients presenting to the emergency department with moderate to severe acute asthma. Heliox treatment does not have a role in the initial treatment of patients with acute asthma. These conclusions are based upon between-group comparisons and small studies. Additional research in this setting may be warranted.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy of magnesium sulfate in acute adult asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

The purpose of this article was to review of the literature to determine whether MgSO4 provides an additive improvement in adults with acute asthma in the emergency department (ED). English-language published and unpublished studies (1968-1998) were retrieved using MEDLINE, SCIENCE CITATION INDEX, CURRENT CONTENTS, bibliographic reviews of primary research, review articles, consultation with experts, and the register of Medical Editors' Trial Amnesty. Meta-analysis of randomized, placebo controlled trials. The five selected trials included 374 patients with acute asthma (mean age 38.3 +/- 13.4 years, 30% men, 70% women). The main outcome measure was pulmonary function; admission rate was evaluated as a secondary goal. Individual and pooled effect sizes (ES) were determined for pulmonary function data. Binary outcome (admission rate) was combined and reported as odds ratio (OR). The overall summary ES (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the five trials satisfying all inclusion criteria, weighted by sample size was nonsignificant (ES = 0.02, -0.20 to 0.24, P = .84). This pooled ES was equivalent to 1.7%, 95% CI: -9.8 to 13.1%) greater in pulmonary function the MgSO4 compared with the control group. On the other hand, four studies addressed the effect of MgSO4 administration on hospital admissions. Pooled results revealed that MgSO4 did not decrease significantly admission rates (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.15). The existing evidence reveals that the addition of MgSO4 to ED patients with moderate to severe asthmatic exacerbations does not alter treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, the number and size of studies being pooled remain small.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

DNA replication but not nucleotide excision repair is required for UVC-induced replication protein A phosphorylation in mammalian cells.

Exposure of mammalian cells to short-wavelength light (UVC) triggers a global response which can either counteract the deleterious effect of DNA damage by enabling DNA repair or lead to apoptosis. Several stress-activated protein kinases participate in this response, making phosphorylation a strong candidate for being involved in regulating the cellular damage response. One factor that is phosphorylated in a UVC-dependent manner is the 32-kDa subunit of the single-stranded DNA-binding replication protein A (RPA32). RPA is required for major cellular processes like DNA replication, and removal of DNA damage by nucleotide excision repair (NER). In this study we examined the signal which triggers RPA32 hyperphosphorylation following UVC irradiation in human cells. Hyperphosphorylation of RPA was observed in cells from patients with either NER or transcription-coupled repair (TCR) deficiency (A, C, and G complementation groups of xeroderma pigmentosum and A and B groups of Cockayne syndrome, respectively). This exclude both NER intermediates and TCR as essential signals for RPA hyperphosphorylation. However, we have observed that UV-sensitive cells deficient in NER and TCR require lower doses of UV irradiation to induce RPA32 hyperphosphorylation than normal cells, indicating that persistent unrepaired lesions contribute to RPA phosphorylation. Finally, the results of UVC irradiation experiments on nonreplicating cells and S-phase-synchronized cells emphasize a major role for DNA replication arrest in the presence of UVC lesions in RPA UVC-induced hyperphosphorylation in mammalian cells.

Cell Line, Transformed↗
PubMed1999

A meta-analysis of the effects of ipratropium bromide in adults with acute asthma.

PURPOSE: To review the literature to determine whether inhaled ipratropium bromide provides additive benefits to adults with acute asthma who are being treated with beta-agonists in an emergency department. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: English-language studies, both published (1978 to 1999) and unpublished, were retrieved using Medline, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, bibliographic reviews of primary research, review articles, consultation with experts, and the register of Medical Editors' Trial Amnesty. Only randomized, double-blind, controlled trials that enrolled patients having an exacerbation of asthma were included. The main outcome measure was pulmonary function; hospital admission rate was also evaluated. RESULTS: Ten studies including 1,483 adults with acute asthma were selected (mean age 32 +/- 13 years, 36% men). The overall effect size in SD units of pulmonary function showed a significant benefit from ipratropium (effect size 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04 to 0.24, P = 0.008). Study-specific effect sizes ranged from 0.03 to 0.63. This pooled effect size was equivalent to a 10% (95% CI: 2% to 18%) increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or peak expiratory flow in the ipratropium group compared with the control group. Analysis of the four studies that included patients with extreme obstruction (FEV1 or peak flow <35% of predicted at presentation) showed substantial improvement with ipratropium therapy (effect size 0.38, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.67). In the five trials (1,186 patients) that studied the effect of ipratropium administration on hospital admissions, pooled results revealed that ipratropium reduced admission rates significantly (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.88, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ipratropium to beta-agonist therapy offers a statistically significant, albeit modest, improvement in pulmonary function, as well as a reduction in the rate of hospital admissions.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Subarachnoid hemorrhage following permissive hypercapnia in a patient with severe acute asthma.

In this article, we describe a case of a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in an acute severe asthma patient following mechanical hypoventilation. A 49-year-old man was admitted to an Intensive Care Unit with an acute exacerbation of asthma. After 3 days of mechanical ventilation (hypercapnia and normoxaemia), it was noted that his right pupil was fixed, dilated, and unreactive to light. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed localized SAH within the basilar cisterns and diffuse cerebral swelling. On the fourth day, a new CT scan showed hemorrhage resorption and a cerebral swelling decrease. In the following days, the patient's condition continued improving with no detectable neurological deficits. A review of similar published reports showed that all patients performed respiratory acidosis, normoxaemia, and hypercapnia. The most frequent neurological sign was mydriasis, and all subjects showed cerebral edema. Since normoxaemic hypercapnia has been associated with absence, or less cerebral edema, we considered additional factors to explain cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension causes. Thus, intrathoracic pressures due to patient's efforts by forcibly exhaling, or during mechanical ventilation, would further increase intracranial pressure by limiting cerebral venous drainage. This case emphasizes the fact that patients with acute severe asthma who have developed profoundly hypercarbic without hypoxia before or during mechanical ventilation, may have raised critical intracranial pressure.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Corticosteroids in the emergency department therapy of acute adult asthma: an evidence-based evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature to determine the benefits of corticosteroids (CCSs) (oral, IM, IV, or inhaled) in the treatment of adult patients with acute asthma presenting at an acute-care setting. SEARCH STRATEGY: A MEDLINE search was conducted using the following terms: (1) Asthma OR Wheez, AND (2) Glucocorticoids OR Steroids, AND (3) Acute OR Emerg. Other sources were the CURRENT CONTENTS database, review articles, reference sections of located studies, and a manual search of the top 15 journals for respiratory and emergency medicine. SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients were selected for the study by the following criteria: (1) English language; (2) adult patients with asthma whose acute exacerbations were the primary reason for assessment; (3) involvement in randomized, controlled trials conducted in an emergency care setting; (4) patients had participated in a study investigating a primary research question involving treatment with CCSs; and (5) outcomes based on results of pulmonary function tests and on hospital admission rates. RESULTS: At the 3-h assessment, only high doses of inhaled CCSs significantly improved pulmonary function compared with placebo (effect size [ES], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.97). On the other hand, after receiving IV CCSs, patients required at least 6 to 24 h to show moderate but nonsignificant improvements of pulmonary function (6-h ES, 0.44 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.89]; 12-h ES, 0.54 [95% CI, -0.08 to 1.17]; and 24-h ES, 0.53 [95% CI, -0.39 to 1.45]). The data from the six studies that we used to pool information on admission rate outcome showed a 32% reduction in favor of the use of IV CCSs (relative risk [RR], 0.68 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.99]; number needed to treat, 12.5 [95% CI, 7.1 to 50]). However, the pooled effect of the three high-quality studies showed no difference between groups (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.18). Oral CCSs provided a similarly beneficial effect on pulmonary function when compared with parenteral administration (ES, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.82 to 0.31. Finally, the results showed a nonsignificant favorable trend toward improved outcome with medium or high doses of CCSs. CONCLUSIONS: This evidence-based evaluation suggests that the administration of parenteral CCSs to the patient on arrival at the emergency department (ED) neither improves airflow obstruction nor reduces the need for hospitalization. Parenteral CCSs probably require >6 to 24 h to begin to act. Comprehensible conclusions about admission rates in the ED setting are difficult to make. At the 3-h assessment, only high doses of inhaled CCSs (in one study) significantly improved pulmonary function compared with placebo. IV and oral CCSs appear to have equivalent effects, and there is a tendency toward improvement in pulmonary function with medium or high doses.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[DNA-dependent protein kinase: a major protein involved in the cellular response to ionizing radiation].

DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a DNA-activated nuclear serine/threonine protein kinase. DNA-PK consists of a regulatory sub-unit, the heterodimeric Ku protein (composed of a 70- and a 86-kDa subunit) which binds DNA ends and targets the catalytic sub-unit, DNA-PKcs to DNA strand breaks. DNA-PK plays a major role in the repair of double-strand breaks induced in DNA after exposure to ionizing radiation as shown by the extreme radiosensitivity of cells with mutations in Ku86, Ku70 or DNA-PKcs genes. Cells deficient in DNA-PK activity also exhibit hypersensitivity to genotoxic drugs such as cisplatin and nitrogen mustards. In the first part of this review, the current knowledge on the biochemical characteristics of DNA-PK, its mechanism of action in DNA repair and the phenotype of DNA-PK deficient cells is summarized. These results suggest that DNA-PK might play a role in the acquisition of a resistant phenotype of human tumors to radiotherapy, chemotherapy using genotoxic drugs or to both treatments. In the second part of this review, the studies devoted to inhibition of DNA-PK in order to enhance cancer therapy by DNA-damaging agents are presented.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed1998

Salbutamol treatment of acute severe asthma in the ED: MDI versus hand-held nebulizer.

The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of salbutamol delivered by either metered-dose inhaler plus spacer (MDI-spacer) or by wet nebulization (NEB), and to determine the relationships between physiologic responses and plasma salbutamol concentrations. Asthmatic patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute severe asthma (forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1] less than 50% of predicted) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The MDI-spacer group received salbutamol, delivered via MDI into a spacer device, in four puffs actuated in rapid succession at 10-minute intervals (2.4 mg/h). The NEB group was treated with nebulized salbutamol, 1.5 mg, via nebulizer at 15-minute intervals (6 mg/h). Doses were calculated on the basis of the percentage of total dose that reaches the lower airway with both methods. The protocol involved 3 hours of this treatment. Mean peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and FEV1 improved significantly over baseline values for both groups (P=.01). However, there were no significant differences between both groups for PEFR and FEV1 at any point studied. The examination of the relationships between cumulative dose of salbutamol and change in FEV1 showed a significant linear relationship (P=.01) for both methods (MDI r=.97; NEB r=.97). The regression equations showed that for every 1 mg of salbutamol by MDI-spacer, 2.5 mg are needed from nebulization to have equal therapeutic response. At the end of treatment, the salbutamol plasma levels were 10.1+/-1.6 ng/ml for the MDI-spacer group and 14.4+/-2.3 ng/ml for the NEB group (P=.0003). Both groups showed a nonsignificant heart rate decrease. A significant group-by-time interaction means that differences between groups increased with time (P=.04). Additionally, the NEB group presented a higher incidence of tremor (P=.03) and anxiety (P=.04), reflecting larger systemic absorption of salbutamol. These data indicate that when doses used are calculated on the basis of the percentage of total drug that reaches the lower airway, there was equivalent bronchodilatation after salbutamol administered by either MDI-spacer or nebulization in patients with acute severe asthma. However, nebulizer therapy produced greater side effects related to the increase in salbutamol absorption and higher plasma level.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Inhaled flunisolide for acute severe asthma.

This randomized, double-blind trial was designed to determine the benefit of high and cumulative doses of flunisolide added to salbutamol in patients with acute asthma in the emergency room (ER). Ninety-four patients who presented to an ER for treatment of an acute exacerbation of asthma were assigned in a randomized, double-blind fashion to receive salbutamol and placebo (n = 47) or salbutamol combined with flunisolide (n = 47). Both drugs were administered successively through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-min intervals for 3 h (400 microg of salbutamol and 1 mg of flunisolide every 10 min). In both groups, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) improved significantly over baseline values (p < 0.01). Results in the flunisolide group were significantly different from those in the placebo group at 90, 120, 150, and 180 min. Data analyzed separately in accord with the duration of the attack before presenting at the ER (< 24 or > or = 24 h) showed that the placebo > or = 24 h group produced a significantly lower FEV1 at 120, 150, and 180 min (p = 0.041) than did the remaining groups. Our data support the theory that high and cumulative doses of inhaled flunisolide administered by metered-dose inhaler with spacer and added to salbutamol are an effective therapy for patients with acute asthma and a prolonged duration of symptoms before ER presentation.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Therapeutic response patterns to high and cumulative doses of salbutamol in acute severe asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine the main therapeutic response patterns to high doses of salbutamol and to determine the factors that contribute to outcome in acute severe asthma. SETTING: The emergency department (ED) of a large, urban hospital with primary and referral care responsibilities. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with acute exacerbations of asthma were enrolled in the trial, using a prospective sequential design. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were treated with salbutamol delivered with a metered-dose inhaler into a spacer device in four puffs (400 microg) at 10-min intervals. The protocol involved 3 h of this treatment (1,200 microg each 30 min). MEASURES AND RESULTS: A dose-response increase in pulmonary function was found, but only 70% improved sufficiently to be discharged. Of these, almost 70% required < or =2.4 mg of the drug within 1 h to reach the discharge threshold, whereas the remainder 30% need > or =3.6 mg. In 30% of subjects, salbutamol was ineffective. These patients were characterized by a more severe disease as judged by previous beta2-agonist use, larger duration of attack before ED visit, and a more severe obstruction at presentation. However, the most important predictors of outcome were peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) as percent of predicted, PEFR as liters per minute, and PEFR variation over baseline value, all at 30 min. CONCLUSIONS: This study described two different therapeutic response patterns to salbutamol. Almost 70% of patients were sensitive to salbutamol (good response pattern), and in this group, 2.4 to 3.6 mg represents optimal treatment. In the remainder 30% of patients (poor response pattern), salbutamol in high doses had little effect. However, the outcome was not determined by the intensity of the initial symptoms or by the value of the presenting PEFR, but rather by the early (30 min) short-term response to treatment.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Early prediction of poor response in acute asthma patients in the emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop an acute asthma index for utilization in the early differentiation between patients with poor and good therapeutic response in the emergency department (ED) setting. SETTING: The ED of a large tertiary-care hospital in Montevideo, Uruguay. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: The study included 145 consecutive adult patients (mean age [+/- SEM], 33.4+/-0.97) who presented to an ED (analysis sample). The inclusion criteria were: (1) age between 18 and 50 years; (2) a peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) or FEV1 below 35% of predicted; and (3) no history of chronic cough or cardiac, hepatic, renal, or other medical disease. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were treated with salbutamol delivered by metered-dose inhaler into a spacer device in four puffs actuated at 10-min intervals. The protocol involved 3 h of this treatment. After that time, patients with poor response received hydrocortisone, 500 mg IV. The outcome was defined as the FEV1 after 3 h of treatment in a dichotomized form: < or =45% of predicted = poor response, and >45% of predicted = good response. RESULTS: Biserial correlations between different variables and the outcome showed that PEFR as percent of predicted and PEFR variation over baseline, both measured at 30 min, were the most important predictors of a good or poor response after 3 h of treatment. Next, we developed an acute asthma index using these predictive measures. A comparison of index sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve across different cutoff scores indicates that a score of 4 results in the least error of classification (sensitivity = 0.79; specificity = 0.96; area under the ROC curve = 0.87; positive predictive value = 0.94; and negative predictive value = 0.86). To validate the developed index, we prospectively studied a second sample of 77 consecutive patients (mean age 32.6+/-1.22 years) who presented for treatment of acute asthma (validation sample). The area under the ROC for the analysis sample was not greater than the validation sample area (p = 0.24). Thus, the validation sample showed similar levels of sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the ROC curve (0.80, 0.88, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.89, respectively), indicating the stability of the model. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested the predictive accuracy of a two-item bedside index. This acute asthma index provides a tool for assessing acute asthma severity using objective criteria easily accessible to the ED physician.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

A new index for early prediction of hospitalization in patients with acute asthma.

Data from studies using the factor analysis technique have shown that asthma appears to be multidimensional and that most of the subjective and objective measures utilized in the assessment of asthma patients represent a much smaller number of underlying dimensions. Additionally, several investigators have emphasized that evaluation of acute asthma is an ongoing process, as the degree and time course of the response to therapy vary considerably between patients. The aim of this study was to examine the usefulness of the most common clinical and objective measures in the evaluation of acute asthma in the emergency department (ED) for predicting the outcome of acute episodes in adults. In an effort to identify variables that can predict the outcome of patients with acute asthma, 184 adults (age 32.4 +/- 11.6 [mean +/- SD]) (analysis sample) who presented to an ED were studied. The inclusion criteria were: (1) age between 18 and 50 years; (2) a peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) or forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) below 50% of predicted; and (3) no history of chronic cough or cardiac, hepatic, renal, or other medical disease. All patients were treated with salbutamol delivered with metered-dose inhaler (MDI) into a spacer device in 4 puffs actuated at 10-minute intervals and 500 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone. The multivariate statistical technique of discriminant analysis was utilized to develop the index, and after this, a new sample (n = 91), the validation sample, was studied to validate the index. In the analysis sample 163 patients (89%) were discharged (relapse rate within 7 days = 10%) and 21 (11%) were hospitalized (mean duration of hospital stay = 5.75 +/- 2.81 days). The discriminant analysis identified three independent variables that make the greatest contribution in discriminating between the two groups studied: PEFR variation over baseline, PEFR as percent of predicted, and accessory muscle use, all measured at 30 minutes after the beginning of treatment. A multifactorial index using these three variables presented a sensitivity of 0.86, a specificity of 0.96, a positive predictive value of 0.75, and a negative predictive value of 0.98. The validation sample index sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 0.83, 0.97, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively. In conclusion, a predictive index has been developed for evaluating patients with asthma who present to an ED. This simple and brief three-item index can facilitate an early decision (30 minutes of treatment) to hospitalize patients with severe asthma.

Acute Disease↗