Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Ranieri

Publications and source records attributed to G Ranieri.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Differential expression of two ICAM-1 epitopes and LFA-1 chains in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (B-NHL) and B-cell areas of reactive lymphadenopathies were investigated immunohistochemically for expression of two distinct ICAM-1 epitopes, Me14/D12 and P3-58, and the LFA-1 alpha and beta chains. Partial or total loss of expression of one or both epitope(s) and/or chain(s) was evident in all B-NHL in function of increasing Working Formulation (WF) malignancy grade, with most defects in the high-grade tumors, namely the lowest detectability of the ICAM-1 Me14/D12 and LFA-1 alpha chain, the lowest co-expression of ICAM-1 epitopes and LFA-1 chains, and the most frequent simultaneous loss. The ICAM-1 and LFA-1 profiles overlapped within the low- and intermediate-grades, whereas striking differences between the high-grade subtypes were detected. Specifically, Burkitt's and lymphoblastic tumors always lost both epitopes and both chains. Large cell, immunoblastic tumors occasionally did so, and also showed either uncoordinated expression or co-expression of these constituents. It is suggested that expression defects of this type may help differentiate malignant from benign lymphoproliferations, and also be involved in the progression of B-NHL, since most are observed in high-grade tumors, whose ICAM-1 and LFA-1 profiles indicate that their subtypes are the expression of distinct normal B-cell differentiation stages.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1993

Forearm arterial distensibility in patients with hypertension: comparative effects of long-term ACE inhibition and beta-blocking.

Fifty patients with mild or moderate hypertension were assessed for the influence on peripheral hemodynamics of 10 months of treatment with lisinopril (25 patients) or metoprolol (25 patients). Two-dimensional Doppler flowmetry was used for the evaluation. Responding patients (blood pressure < 150/90 mm Hg) were monitored for another 4 weeks after treatment withdrawal to determine whether changes in forearm hemodynamics, if any, persisted. Twenty-two patients from either group (88%) were considered to be responders. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients receiving lisinopril dropped by 6% and 15%, respectively (p < 0.001), in those receiving metoprolol the decrease was 5.9% and 14%, respectively (p < 0.001). Forearm hemodynamics was not significantly different before treatment and improved in patients receiving lisinopril, with increased compliance (p < 0.001) and lower vascular resistance (p < 0.001). No significant changes were observed with metoprolol. After withdrawal, blood pressure returned to baseline values in both groups. However, improvement in forearm hemodynamics persisted in the lisinopril group. Hemodynamics changes were statistically different on lisinopril versus metoprolol both after treatment and after withdrawal. Lisinopril, but not metoprolol, seems capable to induce regression of functional and/or structural changes of large arteries in patients with hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Effects of atenolol and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive diabetic patients.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of enalapril and atenolol in decreasing the severity of proteinuria in hypertensive patients suffering from insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. We studied 20 hypertensive patients. All patients had proteinuria (> 3 g/24 h) and were receiving insulin treatment. Proteinuria was measured monthly in the run-in period (3 months) and during the active drug treatment (8 months). Glomerular filtration rate, effective renal plasma flow, filtration fraction, and total renal resistance were determined after the run-in and treatment periods. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with enalapril 20 mg/day or atenolol 100 mg/day for 8 months. In both groups blood pressure decreased significantly. After 8 months' treatment, severity of proteinuria significantly decreased both in the enalapril-treated group and in the group receiving atenolol. Glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow significantly increased, while total renal resistance decreased in the patients given enalapril, whereas glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, and total renal resistance significantly decreased in the patients given atenolol. The results of this study show that enalapril and atenolol reduce proteinuria in hypertensive diabetic patients by a mechanism related to their antihypertensive effects; furthermore, the beneficial effects of enalapril might be also linked to intrarenal effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Glucose and lipid metabolism in essential hypertension: effects of diuretics and ACE-inhibitors.

Various aspects of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism were studied in two groups of patients with mild hypertension before and after 6 months' treatment with either lisinopril (n = 10) or hydrochlorothiazide (n = 10). A significant reduction of arterial blood pressure was seen after both treatment regimens. Circulating plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide and triglyceride concentrations were measured at hourly intervals from 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. in patients on an isocaloric diet (35 cal/kg/day). Plasma glucose concentrations remained unchanged, while insulin and C-peptide concentrations were higher in association with hydrochlorothiazide treatment. Conversely, lisinopril-treated patients had lower C-peptide concentrations after treatment. The changes in daylong plasma glucose and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake increased after hydrochlorothiazide treatment and decreased following lisinopril. Lastly, plasma cholesterol concentrations did not change after lisinopril therapy, whereas plasma high density cholesterol decreased as a result of hydrochlorothiazide treatment.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed1993

[Antihypertensive action of nicardipine retard in 24 hours and its effect on stress].

Thirty-six patients (17 males and 19 females), aged between 40 and 70 years old (mean age 55.9), suffering from slight or moderate arterial hypertension, were monitored for four weeks after 14 days of placebo treatment. In a double-blind and random study 24 patients were treated with Nicardipine Retard (40 mg twice a day) whereas a further 12 received placebo twice a day. Sphigomanometric controls carried out after two and four weeks showed a significant reduction in arterial pressure only in those patients receiving active treatment. 24-hour out-patient monitoring of arterial pressure, carried out using Spacelabs 5300, showed a reduction in both systolic and diastolic arterial pressure throughout the day in subjects treated with calcium-antagonists compared to the placebo group. The normal physiological 24-hour trend of arterial pressure was always taken into account. The pressure response to a cold pressor test, mental arithmetic test, isometric and dynamic effort tests, measuring using a cycloergometer, was not modified by anti-hypertensive treatment, thus confirming the preservation of normal physiological behaviour during daily activities. There was no significant change in heart rate and the drug was well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

[Slow-release nicardipine in the treatment of arterial hypertension: comparative study vs. an ACE inhibitor].

The anti-hypertensive activity and influence on some forms of stress of slow-release Nicardipoine and Captopril were compared using a randomized 2:1 protocol. Thirty-six patients, mean age 55.9 years, suffering from slight or moderate arterial hypertension were treated with either 40 mg of Nicardipine retard twice a day (b.i.d.), or Captopril in a dose of 25 mg (b.i.d.) for 8 weeks. A significant reduction was observed in arterial pressure, both in orthostatism and clinostatism, following both treatments in comparison to the placebo period, but the group treated with slow-release Nicardipine showed a greater and statistically significant reduction in arterial pressure. No significant change in heart rate was reported using either drug. Non-invasive out-patient monitoring of arterial pressure, performed using Spacelabs 5300, showed a significant reduction in arterial pressure using both drugs and the conservation of the normal circadian rhythm of arterial pressure. The pressure response to the cold pressor test (CPT), mental arithmetic test (MAS), and to dynamic and isometric effort was positive with both drugs, thus revealing a degree of protection offered by treatment using these two substances. In overall terms, the two drugs were well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of once-a-day trandolapril by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The Italian Trandolapril Study Group.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of trandolapril on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a washout period of 4 weeks, 42 patients were randomized to receive 2 mg of trandolapril once daily and 20 to receive placebo in a double-blind fashion for 6 weeks. This was followed by a second washout period of 4 weeks. At the end of each period, clinic blood pressure was assessed at 24 hours after the last dose and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was measured noninvasively, taking blood pressure readings every 15 minutes during the day and every 20 minutes during the night. Two patients were dropped out before any blood pressure evaluation under treatment. Analysis of ambulatory blood pressure was performed in 48 patients who met the criteria for the minimal number of ambulatory blood pressure data (2 values per hour during the day and 1 value per hour in the night). In the trandolapril-treated group (n = 41) clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 159.8 +/- 2.0/102.4 +/- 0.8, 146.8 +/- 2.3/94.8 +/- 1.1, and 155.7 +/- 2.0/99.2 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in the pretreatment, treatment, and post-treatment periods, respectively. The corresponding values for 24-hour mean blood pressure (n = 31) were 139.5 +/- 1.9/91.2 +/- 1.5, 131.0 +/- 2.0/84.3 +/- 1.2, and 139.7 +/- 1.8/90.9 +/- 1.1 mmHg. The differences between the lower treatment, versus the higher pre- and post-treatment, values were all statistically significant (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Large artery compliance in essential hypertension. Effects of calcium antagonism and beta-blocking.

This study used 2D Doppler flowmetry to assess the effects on peripheral hemodynamics of effective treatment with nicardipine or atenolol in 40 patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. Two groups of 20 patients received treatment with nicardipine or atenolol, respectively, for 8 months. Consequently, those patients considered to be responders (blood pressure less than 150/90 mm Hg) were monitored for another 4 weeks after the therapy was suspended in order to determine whether the changes, if any, in arterial compliance persisted. Following the 8-month therapy, four patients from each group were excluded from the study because of unsatisfactory blood pressure levels. After the treatment, there was a decrease in blood pressure in both groups (P less than .01). In the nicardipine group, there was a significant increase in diameter and compliance (P less than .01), whereas pulse wave velocity and resistance decreased (P less than .01). In the atenolol group, these parameters did not change significantly. After therapy was ended, blood pressure returned to baseline values in both groups. However, in the nicardipine group, the observed improvement in forearm hemodynamics persisted. This result may indicate that nicardipine is able to induce a regression of functional and/or structural changes in the large arteries of hypertensive patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1992

Cardiovascular effects of cigarette smoking.

The risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is greatly affected by cigarette smoking. In order to study the pressor response to smoking, 10 normotensive and 10 mild or moderate essential-hypertensive smokers (> 20 cigarettes daily) were compared with 2 comparable groups of non-smokers. All subjects were asked to smoke 4 cigarettes during 1 h; blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored beat-to-beat by a non-invasive device (Finapres Ohmeda) during the smoking period and during the immediately preceding non-smoking hour. Furthermore, all subjects underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. In all groups, each cigarette induced a similar and statistically significant increase from baseline for both BP and HR. The recovery from the marked rise in BP and HR was very slow so that in the smoking hours BP and HR were persistently higher than in non-smoking hours; there were no statistically significant differences between the four groups. During 24-hour ambulatory monitoring both normo- and hypertensive smokers showed higher BP values and higher BP variability in comparison with the respective non-smokers' group. In conclusion, smoking habits were associated with a persistent increase in BP in each group we studied, possibly contributing to a smoking-related cardiovascular risk.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1991

Comparison of the effects of nicardipine and metoprolol on lipid and glycidic metabolism in hypertensive subjects.

Various aspects of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism have been studied in two groups of patients with mild hypertension before and after six months of treatment with either nicardipine (n = 10) or metoprolol (n = 10). A significant reduction of the arterial blood pressure was seen with both treatment regimens. Circulating plasma glucose, insulin, C peptide and triglyceride concentrations were measured at hourly intervals from 08 h 00 to 17 h 00, in patients on an isocaloric diet (35 kcalth/kg/die). Plasma glucose concentrations were unchanged and insulin and C peptide concentrations were higher in association with metoprolol treatment. In contrast, nicardipine-treated patients had similar plasma insulin, but lower plasma glucose, C peptide and triglyceride concentrations after treatment. The changes in day-long plasma glucose and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake had increased in association with metoprolol treatment and decreased following nicardipine. Finally plasma cholesterol concentrations did not change following metoprolol therapy, whereas plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol increased in association with nicardipine treatment. The data seem to indicate that the negative effect of nicardipine on secretion of insulin is balanced by an improvement in glucose uptake.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

[Netilmicin in single daily doses for the bacterial bronchopulmonary complications in patients with advanced bronchogenic carcinoma].

In 40 patients with bacterial bronchopulmonary complications during polychemotherapy for advanced bronchogenic carcinoma, once-daily netilmicin (4.5 mg/kg every 24 h) brought about complete resolution of the infective process in 90% of the cases and eradication of the responsible pathogen in 82%. This result must be considered good in view of the patients' precarious condition due to their advanced neoplastic disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Changes in blood pressure and thermographic values resulting from use of a beta-blocker plus diuretic and of an alpha-beta-blocker plus diuretic.

Changes in arterial blood pressure and in thermographic values were evaluated in two groups of 15 hypertensive patients, each of which was treated, on a random basis, with a combination of atenolol plus chlorthalidone or a combination of labetalol plus chlorthalidone. Both combinations produced a statistically significant reduction in blood pressure values (p less than 0.01) with no changes in heart rate. Telethermographic investigations revealed the presence of hypothermia of the hands before treatment in all the hypertensive patients examined, but not in the control group (10 normal subjects with no vascular and/or hyperthermic disease). After one month of treatment, no changes in peripheral vascularization were observed in the group treated with atenolol plus chlorthalidone, except for 4 cases showing mild improvement, probably due to a reduction in peripheral resistance as a result of the treatment and to a consequent increase in blood flow in the area investigated. In the group treated with labetalol plus chlorthalidone, on the other hand, a substantial recovery of vascular flow was observed in 12 patients as a result of the treatment, while the remaining 3 patients showed a fair degree of improvement (2 degrees C). Both preparations lent themselves to simplified administration regimens with good patient compliance and no adverse reactions.

Adult↗