Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G R Weiss

Publications and source records attributed to G R Weiss.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Deoxyspergualin: phase I clinical, immunologic and pharmacokinetic study.

Deoxyspergualin (DSG) is an analog of the polyamine spergualin with preclinical evidence of activity in murine and human tumor models. This phase I study examined a 120 h continuous infusion schedule in 56 patients with refractory solid tumors at doses ranging from 80 to 2792 mg/m2/day. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible hypotension and appeared to be associated with plasma levels of DSG > 4 micrograms/ml. Other dose-dependent effects noted were pruritus and circumoral paresthesias. Myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicities were mild and sporadic. Two patients with refractory head and neck cancer had minor responses. The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is 1800 mg/m2. Additional monitoring to identify immunologic properties included immunophenotyping of peripheral lymphocytes and cytotoxic activity by means of standard 51Cr-release assays. These studies revealed a non-dose-dependent increase in the number of cells expressing T cell antigens predominantly the T suppressor (CD8) phenotype posttreatment. In three patients, a mild increase in LAK activity was noted post-treatment without a consistent relationship to dose or change in cell surface antigens. Pharmacokinetic studies were completed on 26 patients ranging from doses of 80 to 2792 mg/m2. The average plasma concentration ranged from 0.07 to 7 micrograms/ml. DSG was rapidly cleared from the plasma with a mean terminal half-life of 1.9 h. Mean total body clearance was 25.24 l/h/m2. Further in vivo immunologic studies should be pursued while the agent is studied in fixed dosage phase II clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A phase II trial of DaunoXome, liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin, in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon.

CONTEXT: Liposomal encapsulation of drugs can potentially ameliorate toxicities and improve acute and chronic tolerance. The increased uptake of liposomes by colon adenocarcinoma cell lines may enable DaunoXome to circumvent the p-glycoprotein-mediated anthracycline resistance of colon cancer cells. PURPOSE: To determine if DaunoXome, liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin, has clinical activity in patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon who failed treatment with a 5-fluorouracil containing regimen. METHOD: In a Phase II trial, patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon, whose disease has progressed after receiving one 5-fluorouracil-containing regimen, were treated with DaunoXome 100 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In this trial 16 patients received 45 courses of therapy. No objective tumor responses were seen. Hematologic toxicities consisted of neutropenia (grade 3 and 4), grade 2 anemia, and grade 2 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild and manageable. Of the 16 patients, 5 experienced flushing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and back pain during DaunoXome infusion, which resolved with infusion interruption, diphenhydramine, and meperidine. CONCLUSIONS: DaunoXome is generally well tolerated at a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Toxicities are mild and reversible. On this schedule DaunoXome does not have significant clinical activity in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon who have progressed after one 5-fluorouracil-containing regimen.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Phase I clinical trial of ormaplatin (tetraplatin, NSC 363812).

Ormaplatin is a platinum analog that was developed because of an altered toxicity profile and non-cross resistance to cisplatin in both in vitro and in vivo models. To determine the toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of ormaplatin on a daily times five schedule, patients with refractory solid tumors received ormaplatin on five consecutive days at nine dose levels ranging from 1.0 to 15.0 mg/m2/day. A total of 35 patients received 70 cycles of therapy. Nausea and vomiting and myelosuppression were moderate and not dose-limiting. Dose-limiting neurotoxicity, consisting of a sensory peripheral neuropathy, was seen in all five patients who received cumulative doses greater than or equal to 165 mg/m2. This neurotoxicity was symptomatic in all patients and caused significant functional impairment in four patients with inability to walk in two patients. A sensitive atomic absorption spectroscopy analysis performed for one patient at the 13.0 mg/m2/day dose level showed a Cpmax of 163 ng/ml and a t1/2 of 10.9 min for free platinum. A phase II dose could not be determined due to the onset of peripheral neuropathy at low cumulative doses and not at absolute dose levels.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A phase II clinical trial of interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Patients (n = 22) with metastatic or unresectable colorectal carcinoma were treated with interleukin (IL)-2 and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells in a phase II study conducted by the IL-2/LAK Working Group (ILWG). Eligibility criteria for the study included bi-dimensionally measurable disease, performance status 0 or 1, and normal function of all vital organs. The median age of patients was 49 (range, 28-61) years. Eight (36%) patients had never received prior treatment other than their initial surgery; eight (36%) had received prior radiotherapy, and 12 (55%) chemotherapy. No patients had received prior immunotherapy. Treatment consisted of IL-2, 600,000 IU/kg administered by 15-min intravenous infusion every 8 h on days 1-5 and 12-16. Patients underwent 4-h leukapheresis on days 8-12, and cells were placed in in vitro culture with IL-2 for 3-4 days and the activated LAK cells were infused over 1 h on days 12, 13, and 15. All doses of IL-2 and LAK cells were administered to patients in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The mean +/- SD number of IL-2 doses administered during days 1-5 was 13.4 +/- 1.2, the mean number of LAK cells reinfused was 6.8 +/- 2.2 x 10(10), and the mean number of IL-2 doses administered during the last phase was 9.8 +/- 2.5. Nineteen patients completed the IL-2 priming phase and received at least one LAK cell infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Phase II trials of high-dose interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated killer cells in advanced breast carcinoma and carcinoma of the lung, ovary, and pancreas and other tumors.

Treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) used alone or in combination with lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells is known to be an active therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and melanoma. To further explore the activity of IL-2/LAK cell therapy in patients with advanced cancer of various primary sites, the Extramural IL-2/LAK Working Group (ILWG) initiated two phase II trials of high-dose IL-2/LAK therapy: one in patients with advanced breast carcinoma, and one in patients with advanced cancer arising in other sites. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, colorectal carcinoma, and lymphoma (Hodgkin's and B-cell non-Hodgkin's) were not eligible for the latter trial, but were treated on other ILWG trials that have been reported previously. Sixty-nine patients received high-dose IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg administered by a 15-min intravenous infusion every 8 h) on days 1-5 and days 11-15. Leukapheresis was performed for collection and ex vivo expansion of LAK cells on days 7-10, and the LAK cells were reinfused on days 11, 12, and 14. The studies were designed to determine whether treatment with IL-2/LAK resulted in at least a 40% response rate, a level of activity that was believed to be sufficient to justify the toxicity and cost of IL-2/LAK therapy. An adequate number of patients with carcinoma of the breast (N = 12), pancreas (N = 8), ovary (N = 7), and lung (non-small cell; N = 6) were accrued to assess response; most of these patients had prior chemotherapy that had failed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Multiinstitutional phase II trial of intensive combination chemoimmunotherapy for metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of combined high-dose cisplatin, dacarbazine (DTIC), and tamoxifen chemotherapy and high-dose bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic melanoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and normal organ function were enrolled onto this multiinstitutional Cytokine Working Group trial. Patients received intensive chemoimmunotherapy consisting of cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and DTIC (350 mg/m2) intravenously (IV) on days 1 to 3 and 43 to 45, IL-2 600,000 IU/kg IV every 8 hours on days 12 to 16 and 26 to 30 (maximum, 28 doses), and tamoxifen 20 mg orally each day. Patients were evaluated for response at day 63 of each cycle, and responding patients were given a second cycle of therapy beginning on day 71 to 85. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were entered onto this study. Toxicities were as expected for the chemotherapy and immunotherapy components of this regimen. Overlapping toxicity consisted primarily of thrombocytopenia (76% of patients required platelet transfusions), neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and weight loss. Despite these cytopenias, bleeding and infectious complications were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths. Three patients achieved a complete response (CR; 8%), and 13 achieved a partial response (PR). The overall objective response rate was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 58%). Six additional patients had greater than 50% tumor reduction at day 63, which did not persist until a subsequent evaluation. The median duration of response was 5 months (range, 2 to 20+), and the median survival duration was 11 months. CONCLUSION: This intensive treatment regimen appears to possess activity in metastatic melanoma comparable, but not superior, to that of other less intensive cisplatin- and IL-2-based chemoimmunotherapy regimens. Although the toxicity and complexity of this regimen make it unsuitable for phase III testing and impractical for more widespread use, the results of this study support a potential favorable interaction between IL-2 and chemotherapy in this disease and highlight the need for appropriately designed phase III trials.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

A randomized phase I trial of chronic oral etoposide with or without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced malignancies.

Data from an in vitro human tumor-cloning assay suggested synergistic cytotoxicity when etoposide (VP16) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were combined. To explore this potential, we undertook a prospectively randomized three-arm trial in a phase I setting with various schedules of VP16 and GM-CSF. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the three-arm trial. Arm A consisted of oral VP16 daily for up to 21 days with cycles repeated every 35 days. Arm B included oral VP16 daily for up to 21 days plus concomitant GM-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg/day s.c. days 1-10. Arm C included oral VP16 daily for up to 21 days plus pretreatment with GM-CSF at the same dose for 5 days (days -6 to -2). VP16 was begun at 25 mg/m2/day on level 1 and increased to 50 mg/m2/day on level 2. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for toxicity, nine on each arm (six patients on each arm on level 1, three patients on each arm on level 2). Neutropenia on arm B (concomitant VP16 and GM-CSF) was earlier and more profound than on arm A or C. The median absolute neutrophil count and day of nadir for arms A, B, and C were 3295, 988, and 1600/mm3 and days 23, 15, and 26, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was generally uncommon except on arm C level 2, where the median platelet count was 26,000/mm3. One partial response (arm B) in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer was seen. Dose intensity favored arm A. Neither concomitant therapy with VP16 and GM-CSF (arm B) nor pretreatment with GM-CSF (arm C) improved dose intensity over VP16 alone (arm A), and arms B and C were complicated by increased neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the oral and the oral/intravenous administration of menogaril.

Thirty-five patients with advanced refractory cancer were enrolled on this phase I study of menogaril administered orally every 4 weeks at dosages ranging from 85 mg/m2 to 625 mg/m2. An additional 12 patients received alternating oral and IV doses of menogaril (250 mg/m2 IV; 250-500 mg/m2 oral) with accompanying blood and urine sampling for pharmacokinetics analysis. Nausea and vomiting were the dose-limiting toxicities at the 625 mg/m2 dosage level; vomiting was inadequately relieved by prophylactic antiemetics at this dosage level. Other toxicities included sporadic leukopenia at all dosage levels; at dosages of 500 mg/m2 and 625 mg/m2, leukopenia < 3000/microliters occurred in 7 of 24 patients. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were much less frequent toxicities. Among the patients receiving IV menogaril, peripheral vein phlebitis, leukopenia and anemia were the predominant toxicities. No antitumor responses were observed, yet one patient with non-small cell lung cancer experienced a 30% reduction in metastatic tumor nodules. For the patients receiving alternating oral and IV menogaril, comparative pharmacokinetic analyses were performed by HPLC. After oral administration, maximum plasma concentrations were achieved in an average of 6 hours; maximum plasma concentrations were less than one-quarter of those achieved after intravenous administration. The harmonic mean (+/- SD) terminal disposition half-life after oral dosing was 29.3 +/- 9.2 hours; mean systemic bioavailability was 33.6 +/- 10.5% after oral dosing. Forty-eight hours after an oral dose, mean cumulative urinary excretions of menogaril and the primary metabolite, N-demethylmenogaril, were 4.00 +/- 0.96% and 0.44 +/- 0.16%, respectively. Because of the poor tolerance of oral menogaril and minimal evidence of biological activity, this schedule of drug administration is not recommended for phase II evaluation. Based on this and other published studies of oral menogaril, frequent chronic low-intermediate dosages of the drug may be given orally with potentially better tolerance and antitumor activity.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

Randomized phase III trial of treatment with high-dose interleukin-2 either alone or in combination with interferon alfa-2a in patients with advanced melanoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the response rate, survival, and toxicity of treatment with high-dose intravenous (IV) bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha) with high-dose IL-2 alone in patients with advanced melanoma in a randomized phase III trial design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with advanced melanoma were randomly assigned to receive IL-2 6 X 10(6) U/m2 per dose every 8 hours as tolerated for a maximum of 14 doses on days 1 through 5 and 15 through 19, or IL-2 4.5 X 10(6) U/m2 per dose, plus IFN-alpha 3 X 10(6) U/m2 using an identical schedule. A planned interim analysis was performed after 85 patients were entered, which forms the basis for this report. RESULTS: Partial response (PR) occurred in two of 44 patients (5%; 95% confidence interval, 1% to 15%) receiving IL-2 alone, compared with four of 41 patients (10%; 95% confidence interval, 3% to 23%) receiving IL-2/IFN-alpha (P = .30). There were no complete responses (CRs). The median duration of response was 11.5 months (range, 2.0 to 15.7+). There was no significant difference in the median survival duration for patients receiving IL-2 alone (10.2 months) compared with patients receiving IL-2/IFN-alpha (9.7 months). The median and mean number of doses of IL-2 were equivalent in both groups, as was toxicity. There were three treatment-related deaths, two in the IL-2-alone arm and one in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm. The trial was terminated after the first interim analysis based on predefined early-stopping rules, which included termination if the response rate in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm was less than 25%. CONCLUSION: Using the preparation, dose, and schedule of IL-2 in our trial, IFN-alpha failed to enhance significantly the response rate to high-dose IL-2 in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly CPT-11.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of CPT-11 (irinotecan) to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 32 patients with CPT-11 administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion every week for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. Dose levels ranged from 50 to 180 mg/m2/wk. We determined concentrations of the lactone (active) and total (lactone plus carboxylate) forms of CPT-11 and its metabolite, SN-38, in the plasma and urine of selected patients during and after drug infusion. RESULTS: Grade 4 diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the 180-mg/m2/wk dose level. Other toxicities attributed to CPT-11 included dehydration, nausea, vomiting, and asthenia. Hematologic toxicity was mild in most patients. The terminal plasma half-life for CPT-11 (total) was 7.9 +/- 2.8 hours, for CPT-11 (lactone) 6.3 +/- 2.2 hours, for SN-38 (total) 13.0 +/- 5.8 hours, and for SN-38 (lactone) 11.5 +/- 3.8 hours. We observed significant correlations between drug dose and peak plasma concentration (Cpmax) and between drug dose and area under the concentration curve (AUC) for CPT-11, but not for SN-38. CONCLUSION: The MTD for CPT-11 in this patient population was 150 mg/m2/wk when administered on a weekly-times-four schedule repeated every 6 weeks. At dose levels greater than 150 mg/m2/wk, diarrhea is dose-limiting.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Randomized phase II trial of high-dose interleukin-2 either alone or in combination with interferon alfa-2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine better the activity of high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) either alone or in combination with interferon alfa-2b (IFN; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the IL-2 Working Group initiated a randomized phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either IL-2 (Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA) 1.33 mg/m2 (approximately 600,000 IU/kg) alone or IL-2 0.8 mg/m2 and IFN 3 x 10(6) U/m2 administered by bolus intravenous injection every 8 hours, days 1 to 5 and 15 to 19 (maximum, 28 doses). All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and normal organ function. After 28 patients were entered onto each arm, the IL-2/IFN arm was closed because of a failure to meet predetermined efficacy criteria. An additional 43 patients (total, 71) were assigned to receive IL-2 alone. RESULTS: Toxicities were similar for both study arms. Hypotension requiring pressors was the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity. Only 11 of 99 patients experienced severe toxicity; there were no irreversible side effects or treatment-related deaths. Responses were seen in three of 28 patients (11%) on IL-2/IFN (three partial responses [PRs] lasting 14, 7, and 7 months) and 12 of 71 patients (17%) on IL-2 alone (four complete responses [CRs] and eight PRs). Six of the partial responders on IL-2 and two on IL-2/IFN experienced greater than 90% reduction in tumor mass. Ten of the 12 responders to IL-2 have ongoing responses of 12+ to 26+ months in duration. CONCLUSION: We conclude that both IL-2 and IL-2/IFN therapy have activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In particular, therapy with high-dose IL-2 alone produces meaningful and durable responses with manageable and reversible toxicity. This study supports the contention that high-dose IL-2 represents the treatment of choice in selected patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

An intergroup phase III randomized study of doxorubicin and dacarbazine with or without ifosfamide and mesna in advanced soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Doxorubicin alone or with dacarbazine (DTIC; AD) is considered the best available therapy for metastatic adult sarcomas. Ifosfamide is active in sarcomas that have failed to respond to a doxorubicin-based regimen. This study was designed to determine if ifosfamide added to doxorubicin and DTIC (ADI) significantly effects toxicity, response rate, and survival. Patients with measurable metastatic or unresectable sarcoma were randomized to receive AD or ADI. Patients with chondrosarcomas, fibrosarcomas, and other sarcomas of bone were eligible, although those with osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and mesothelioma were excluded, as were patients with prior chemotherapy for sarcoma or prior doxorubicin. RESULTS: Between 1987 and 1989, 340 eligible patients were randomized. Significantly more myelosuppression, a higher response rate (17% v 32%; P < .002) and longer time to progression (4 v 6 months; P < .02) were observed for patients who received ifosfamide. An overall survival advantage for the two-drug regimen (12 v 13 months; P = .04) was not significant by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In all three randomized trials of doxorubicin with and without ifosfamide (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC], and this study), the response rate was higher for the ifosfamide-containing arm, significantly so in this and the ECOG studies. An improved response rate may be particularly important for the preoperative management of high-grade, borderline resectable lesions or pulmonary metastases, particularly in younger patients. In older patients, or for low-to intermediate-grade lesions, doxorubicin and DTIC followed by ifosfamide on progression is preferred.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Phase IB clinical trial of anti-CD3 followed by high-dose bolus interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma and advanced renal cell carcinoma: clinical and immunologic effects.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of an anti-CD3 antibody, OKT3, in combination with high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), and to determine whether OKT3 can enhance the expansion of CD3+, CD25+ (IL-2 receptor alpha [IL-2R alpha])-expressing T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma receiving high-dose IL-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a phase IB trial of a murine monoclonal anti-CD3 antibody (OKT3) with high-dose IL-2 in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Fifty-four patients were enrolled, with cohorts of 10 or more patients receiving escalating doses of OKT3 at 75, 200, 400, and 600 micrograms/m2 on day 1 followed by IL-2 at an initial dose 0.45 and then 1.33 mg/m2 every 8 hours on days 2 through 6 and 16 through 20 (maximum, 28 doses). An additional cohort of 14 patients received high-dose IL-2 (1.33 mg/m2 per dose) alone. Circulating CD3+, CD25+ cells were monitored before therapy and following the initial week of IL-2. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were enrolled. The MTD for OKT3 was defined as 400 micrograms/m2 based on a reduction in the number of IL-2 doses that could be administered. Increases in CD3+, CD25+ cells were observed within all cohorts; however, the increase was not OKT3 dose-dependent. On the other hand, we found that 60% (nine of 15) of patients tested at OKT3 dose levels of 200, 400, and 600 micrograms/m2 had increases in serum sCD25 (soluble IL-2R alpha) to more than 100,000 U/mL, while none of 10 patients who received IL-2 alone or with OKT3 at the 75-micrograms dose had increases greater than 60,000 U/mL. Of 29 patients with renal cell carcinoma who received OKT3 with IL-2 (1.33 mg/m2), there were three objective tumor responses (all partial responses). In the 16 patients with melanoma who received OKT3 plus IL-2, there was a single objective response (complete response). CONCLUSION: The doses of OKT3 administered on this schedule failed to enhance significantly the number of circulating CD3+, CD25+ T cells and did not appear to increase the antitumor activity of IL-2 alone, which underscores the need for other approaches to enhance the efficacy of IL-2 therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions and toxicity criteria.

The Southwest Oncology Group, in cooperation with the National Cancer Institute and the other major cooperative oncology groups, has participated in the development of new toxicity criteria for reporting the results of cancer clinical trials. The new criteria (NCI Common Toxicity Criteria) respond to a recognized need to: (1) report toxicities consistently among cooperative groups, particularly for shared 'intergroup' clinical trials; (2) strive for comparability in toxicity reporting among clinical trials; and (3) recognize new toxicities accompanying new classes of anticancer treatment modalities. The Southwest Oncology Group has extended the toxicity criteria, incorporating additional new criteria for biological agents, radiation therapy, surgery, and hormonal agents. In addition, endpoint definitions and response criteria are discussed. These have been developed in response to previous uncertainties in clinical trials objectives, to limitations in the resolution of imaging methods, and to demands for greater rigor in response and endpoint definitions. Toxicity criteria, endpoint definitions, and response criteria are tabulated.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1992

A randomized phase II trial of trimetrexate or didemnin B for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Southwest Oncology Group trial.

Patients with measurable metastatic or recurrent squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix who had failed prior surgery or radiation therapy were enrolled on this randomized phase II study. Twenty-seven eligible patients were assigned to receive didemnin B at either 2.6 mg/m2 iv every 28 days (sixteen patients) or at 5.6 mg/m2 (eleven patients). Sixteen patients were assigned to receive 12 mg/m2/day iv trimetrexate for 5 days, repeated every 21 days. Toxicity for didemnin B was characterized by nausea and vomiting (78% of patients), anemia (59%), mild diarrhea (11%), and episodic hypersensitivity (three patients). Toxicity for trimetrexate included nausea and vomiting (69%), leukopenia (51%), mild thrombocytopenia (38%), anemia (63%), and diarrhea (31%). No antitumor responses were observed for either agent. Neither trimetrexate nor didemnin B at these doses and schedules is recommended for the treatment of advanced squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Antineoplastic Agents↗