Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G R Mohn

Publications and source records attributed to G R Mohn.

70 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Influence of subcellular fractions of mammalian testes on the mutagenic activity of nitrofurans toward Escherichia coli; presence of a co-mutagen-like factor.

The activation of nitrofurans to mutagenic intermediates by testicular tissue was investigated. AF-2 and nitrofurazone were tested in a microsomal suspension assay with strain E. coli K-12 343/113 as indicator and subcellular fractions from rabbit testes. Different mutation patterns were observed in the presence or absence of testicular homogenate, indicating the presence of different mutagenic intermediates. The frequency of arg+ reversion increased proportionally to the homogenate concentration suggesting that the nitrofurans were activated by testicular components to intermediates that induced base-pair substitutions. Other experiments showed that a component of low molecular weight, present in the soluble fraction of homogenates of testes from rabbits, rats and monkeys, was responsible for the increased mutation frequency. It is concluded that this "co-mutagen-like" factor either alters the metabolism of nitrofurans in E. coli and/or promotes the formation of base-pair substitution-type mutations. This direct interaction between a nonenzymic component of mammalian testes and the mutation induction/expression process in E. coli suggests the role of co-mutagen-like factors in the sensitivity of testes to nitrofurans.

Animals↗

Comparison of the genetic activity of aflatoxins B1 and G1 in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The ability of aflatoxins B1 and G1 to induce back mutations to arg+ in Escherichia coli K-12/343/113 was compared with the induction of mitotic gene conversion to ade+ in the diploid yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4, ade-2. In analogy to previous results with other microorganisms, the compounds were not genetically active per se, indicating that under the experimental conditions employed none of the tester strains were able to activate the compounds to mutagenic products. In experiments using liver homogenates (S-9 fraction) of male Golden Syrian hamsters previously treated with phenobarbital, aflatoxin B1 exhibited strong genetic activity both in E. coli and in S. cerevisiae, whereas the mutagenic activity of aflatoxin G1 was markedly lower and could be detected only in the E. coli tester strain. These results correlate the findings that aflatoxin G1 is a less potent carcinogen and mutagen than aflatoxin B1.

Aflatoxins↗

Quantitative comparative mutagenesis in bacteria, mammalian cells, and animal-mediated assays. A convenient way of estimating genotoxic activity in vivo?

The accumulation of environmental compounds which exhibit genotoxic properties in short-term assays and the increasing lag of time for obtaining confirmation or not in long-term animal mutagenicity and carcinogenicity tests, makes it necessary to develop alternative, rapid methodologies for estimating genotoxic activity in vivo. In the experimental approach used here, it was assumed that the genotoxic activity of foreign compounds in animals, and ultimately humans, is determined among others by exposure level, organ distribution of (DNA) dose, and genotoxic potency per unit of dose, and that knowledge about these 3 parameters may allow to rapidly determine the expected degree of genotoxicity in various organs of exposed animals. In view of the high degree of qualitative correlation between mutagenic activity of chemicals in bacteria and in cultured mammalian cells, and their mutagenic and carcinogenic properties in animals, and in order to be able to distinguish whether mutagenic potency differences were due to differences in (DNA) dose rather than other physiological factors, the results of mutagenicity tests obtained in the present experiments using bacteria and mammalian cells were compared on the basis of DNA dose rather than exposure concentrations, with the following questions in mind: Is there an absolute or a relative correlation between the mutagenic potencies of various ethylating agents in bacteria (E. coli K12) and in mammalian cells (V79 Chinese hamster) after treatment in standardized experiments, and can specific DNA adducts be made responsible for mutagenicity? Is the order of mutagenic potency of various ethylating agents observed in bacteria in vitro representative of the ranking of mutagenic potency found in vivo? Since the answer to this last question was negative, a further question addressed to was whether short-term in vivo assays could be developed for a rapid determination of the presence (and persistence) of genotoxic factors in various organs of mice treated with chemicals. In quantitative comparative mutagenesis experiments using E. coli K12 and Chinese hamster cells treated under standardized conditions in vitro with 5 ethylating agents, there was no indication of an absolute correlation between the number of induced mutants per unit of dose in the bacteria and the mammalian cells. The ranking of mutagenic potency was, however, identical in bacteria and mammalian cells, namely, ENNG greater than ENU greater than or equal to DES greater than DEN congruent to EMS, the mutagenic activity of DEN being dependent on the presence of mammalian liver preparations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Alkylating Agents↗

Evaluation of the DNA-repair host-mediated assay. I. Induction of repairable DNA damage in E. coli cells recovered from liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and the blood stream of mice treated with methylating carcinogens.

The DNA-repair host-mediated assay was further calibrated by determining the genotoxic activities of 4 methylating carcinogens, namely, dimethylnitrosamine (DMNA), 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (SDMH), methyl nitrosourea (MNU) and methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) in various organs of treated mice. The ranking of the animal-mediated genotoxic activities of the compounds was compared with that obtained in DNA repair assays performed in vitro. The differential survival of strain E. coli K-12/343/113 and of its DNA-repair-deficient derivatives recA, polA and uvrB/recA, served as a measure of genotoxic potency. In the in vitro assays and at equimolar exposure concentrations, MMS and MNU are the most active chemicals, followed by DMNA, which shows a slight genotoxic effect only in the presence of mouse liver homogenate; SDMH has no activity under these conditions. In the host-mediated assays, the order of genotoxic potency of the compounds was quite different: those carcinogens which require mammalian metabolic activation, namely, DMNA and SDMH, show strong effects in liver and blood, a lesser effect in the lungs and kidneys and the least effect in the spleen. The activity of MNU, a directly acting compound, is similar in all organs investigated, but it is clearly lower than that of DMNA and SDMH. MMS, also a directly acting carcinogen, causes some (barely significant) effect at the highest dose tested. A similar order of potency was observed when the compounds were tested in intrasanguineous host-mediated assays with gene mutation as an endpoint. DMNA and SDMH induce comparable frequencies of L-valine-resistant mutants in E. coli K-12/343/113 recovered from liver and spleen of treated mice, the effect in the liver being the strongest. MNU is mutagenic only at a higher dose, while MMS shows no effect. The results are discussed with respect to the literature data on organ-specific DNA adduct formation induced by the compounds. It is concluded that qualitatively there is a good correlation between the degree of genotoxic activity found in the DNA repair host-mediated assay and DNA adduct formation in the animal's own cells. This is exemplified by the finding that the relative order of genotoxic activity of the 4 methylating agents in bacteria recovered from various organs (DMNA approximately equal to SDMH greater than MNU greater than MMS) is reflected by the same order of magnitude in DNA alkylation in corresponding mammalian organs. Quantitatively, the indirectly acting agents DMNA and SDMH seem to induce fewer genotoxic effects in bacteria present in the liver than would be expected on the basis of DNA-adduct formation data.

Alkylating Agents↗

Comparison of the genetic activity of 5-nitroimidazole derivatives in Escherichia coli, Neurospora crassa, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster.

5-nitroimidazoles, including metronidazole (compound 1) and 3 analogues (compounds 2, 3 and 4) of actual or potential chemotherapeutic use were assayed for genetic activity in test systems detecting forward and back mutations in Escherichia coli K-12/343/113, forward mutations in Neurospora crassa heterokaryon 12, mitotic gene conversion in the heteroallelic diploid yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4 and sex-linked recessive lethals in Drosophila melanogaster. Whereas metronidazole exhibits moderate mutagenic activity in E. coli, two of the analogues, compounds 2 and 3 are strongly mutagenic even at concentrations that do not inactive the colony forming ability of the cells. The analogue compound 4 does not show any effect toward E. coli under the present experimental conditions. Similar results were obtained with N. crassa, with S. cerevisiae and with Drosophila in which compound 2 exhibits the highest effect, while compound 4 is non-mutagenic in all assays. These biological effects have been partly explained on the basis of differences in the chemical structure of the compounds.

Animals↗