Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G R Barber

Publications and source records attributed to G R Barber.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Direct observations of surgical wound infections at a comprehensive cancer center.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the rate of surgical site infection and risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with cancer and to evaluate antibiotic use patterns on surgical oncology services. DESIGN: Criterion standard. SETTING: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, a comprehensive cancer center at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Over a 15-month period, 1226 patients undergoing 1283 surgical procedures performed by the Breast, Colorectal, and Gastric-Mixed Tumor surgical services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Direct observation of surgical sites was performed by a single, surgeon-trained member of the hospital's Infection Control Section, adhering to an established protocol for grading of the surgical site. RESULTS: Operative procedures accounted for the following traditional wound class distributions: class I (clean), 630 cases; class II (clean-contaminated), 577 cases; class III (contaminated), 29 cases; and class IV (dirty-infected), 47 cases. Surgical site infection rates were 3.8% in class I; 8.8% in class II; 20.7% in class III; and 46.9% in class IV procedures. The mean (+/- SD) age was 57.7 +/- 14.3 years and the Anesthesiology Society of America physical assessment score, 2.3 +/- 0.7. The mean (+/- SD) operation time was 145 +/- 104.9 minutes. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated several risk factors for surgical site infection: obesity (P < .0001); a contaminated or dirty-infected surgical procedure category (P < .0001); operation time greater than 4 hours (P = .0004); Anesthesiology Society of America physical assessment score of 3 or greater (P < .01); and preoperative length of stay of 3 or more days (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with cancer are similar to those found in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. However, as an individual risk factor among our patient population, obesity contributed as strongly as the surgical procedure category to a patient's likelihood of acquiring a surgical site infection. In addition to Anesthesiology Society of America status, length of the surgical procedure, and surgical procedure category, obesity should warrant consideration as an individual risk factor for surgical site infection.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Catheter-related Malassezia furfur fungemia in immunocompromised patients.

PURPOSE, PATIENTS, AND METHODS: Malassezia furfur has usually been described as a cause of catheter-related sepsis in neonates receiving intravenous lipid emulsion. We report seven cases of catheter-related M. furfur fungemia that occurred in seven immunocompromised patients including four adults and three children who were not neonates. Only two of these patients were receiving concurrent intravenous lipid emulsion. RESULTS: All positive blood cultures were obtained from a central venous access device, one of which was a port device. Quantitative M. furfur colony counts ranged from 50 cfu/mL to greater than 1,000 cfu/mL. All seven patients were treated with amphotericin B. Blood drawn through the central lines of three patients yielded additional organisms. One central venous access device required removal due to persistently positive M. furfur blood cultures despite treatment with amphotericin B. CONCLUSION: We conclude that catheter-related M. furfur fungemia occurs in immunocompromised patients with central venous access devices whether or not they are receiving intravenous lipids. Prompt, aggressive treatment with amphotericin B (1 mg/kg/d) may spare patients removal of their central venous access device. Further studies are needed to determine the role of endogenous lipids in the development of catheter-related M. furfur fungemia and to determine if there is a seasonal incidence in populations other than neonates, since all of our cases occurred between late March and July.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Surveillance of surgical wound infections in cancer patients.

Despite the increasing number of therapeutic options available to cancer patients, surgery represents a mainstay of treatment. Surgical wound infections (SWIs) account for frequent patient morbidity, and the true incidence of these infections is probably underestimated. Little data exist that identify SWI rates among patients with cancer. Due to their disease, intensive treatment regimens, or both, profound immunosuppression is an all too frequent occurrence among cancer patients. Thus these patients may have a higher intrinsic risk for acquiring an SWI. Surveillance of SWIs coupled with reporting of wound infection rates has been shown to reduce these infectious complications. Surveillance of SWIs as well as other nosocomial infections is often accomplished through combined methodologies. Multidisciplinary communication is essential for accurate reporting. Additionally, proper use of antibiotics for prophylactic or therapeutic purposes must be maintained and periodically evaluated hospital-wide. Prescribing, dispensing, and administrating antimicrobials warrant the strong consideration of all healthcare professionals who are responsible for carrying out orders for these agents.

Humans↗