Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Pontoriero

Publications and source records attributed to G Pontoriero.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Technical-economic management models in dialytic treatment: an evolving reality. The Italian experience.

Health care organisations and financial factors (particularly treatment reimbursement rates) may influence the management of ESRD. We analysed the organisation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Italy, focusing on RRT population trends, patient distribution by treatment modality and provision, reimbursement rates, accreditation and quality control. Data from the Italian Dialysis and Transplant Registry and market research studies indicate that Italy has one of the highest dialysis and treatment acceptance rates in Europe. There is a high rate of hemodialysis (HD) and good use of peritoneal dialysis (PD), whereas the prevalence of transplanted patients is lower than the European mean. Dialytic treatment in private centers is limited by law to HD (mainly in Central-Southern Italy) and covers nearly 25-30% of the demand for RRT which means that, although Italy has a public national health care system, the provision of RRT is based on a "mixed" model. Regions with a higher prevalence of "private" dialysis have more dialysis centers, but a lower prevalence of PD since it is not permitted in private facilities, and fewer transplanted patients. The "public" system is not an automatic guarantee of quality and efficacy, and the "private" system is not necessarily a synonym of poor quality treatment due to its need to make a profit. The coexistence of private and public facilities (if well balanced and integrated) may in fact help overcoming bureaucracy in the public administration in relation to the demand for innovation and improving performances by means of fair competition.

Accreditation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Clinical dialysis: new problems and new prospects].

The main problem nephrologists have to face today is the very high patient morbidity and mortality. A number of traditional and non-traditional risk factors have a role; among these anaemia, hypertension, dislipidemia, abnormalities in calcium-phosphate metabolism, hyperhomocysteinemia and endothelial dysfunction. An important innovation in the field of hemodialysis has been the availability of high-permeable and high-flux membranes, characterized by a high biocompatibility and ultrafiltration coefficient. The development of automatic systems to control ultrafiltration has enabled the utilisation of these membranes in the clinical setting (high-flux hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration). It is common opinion that high-flux membranes can positively influence cardiovascular instability, but this has not been confirmed by clinical trials. Although preliminary data indicated a favorable effect on the correction of anemia in patients treated with high-permeable membranes, randomized trials have not shown a significant effect. Better control of anemia could be possible by means of on-line treatments, given their higher removal of medium- and large molecules and reduced microbiological and pyrogenic contamination of the dialysate. A number of analyses showed a lower incidence of bone cysts and/or carpal tunnel syndrome in patients treated with high-flux membranes compared to low-flux ones. High-flux treatments could reduce morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. However, despite its large sample size, the HEMO Study has not been capable of showing a statistically significant effect of higher dialysis dose and high-flux membranes on survival and morbidity. The MPO study has been expressively designed to do a prospective evaluation of the long-term effect of membrane permeability on clinical outcomes. These results are greatly awaited.

Amyloidosis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Water quality cuts down the chronic inflammatory risk: how to obtain it and keep it over time].

BACKGROUND: Every week, approximately 400 liters of water used for dialysate production come into direct contact, through the semi-permeable membrane of the dialyzer, with the dialysis patient's blood stream. Therefore, submitting municipal water to an adequate depuration process before its use for dialysis becomes necessary. METHODS: Problems related to the implementation, updating and management of a dialysis water treatment system are analyzed. The results of the most recent multicenter studies on dialysis fluids quality are also reviewed. RESULTS: The best approach to plan, implement and manage a dialysis water treatment system, first, consists of defining the standards of chemical and microbiological water quality. The most diffused and commonly accepted standards are those recommended by the Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the European Pharmacopea (EP), which allow a maximum bacterial growth of, respectively, 200 CFU/ml and 100 CFU/mL and a maximum endotoxin concentration of 2 IU/mL and 0.25 IU/mL. A modern dialysis water treatment system provides a final purification process, mainly by reverse osmosis (RO), together with different pre-treatment levels and a hydraulic distribution circuit. Therefore, as RO produces water of optimal chemical and microbial quality, all efforts in the dialysis unit must be aimed at keeping this quality as constant as possible over time, by carrying out effective maintenance strategies and system disinfection. Nevertheless, several multicenter studies reported that 7-35% of water samples exceed a bacterial growth of 200 CFU/mL and that 44% of them display endotoxin concentrations >5 IU/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The results of multicenter studies indicate that the microbial quality of dialysis fluids is, unfortunately, still an often neglected problem. Evidence of a possible relationship between dialysis fluid contamination and patient morbidity, as well as the availability of systems and machines allowing purity levels that were unimaginable only a few years ago, must be a stimulus for modifying clinical practices and starting the improvement processes aimed at maximally reducing the risk of microbial contamination in the dialysis water, as already done with chemical contamination.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Guidelines on water and solutions for dialysis. Italian Society of Nephrology].

The National Society of Nephrology has promoted the development of specific Italian Guidelines for dialysis fluids. Two previous national inquiries showed a wide variety in the type and frequency of both microbiological and chemical controls concerning dialysis water, reinforcing the need for specific standards and recommendations. An optimal water treatment system should include tap water pre-treatment and a double reverse osmosis process. Every component of the system, including the delivery of the treated water to the dialysis machines, should prevent microbiological contamination of the fluid. Regular chemical and microbiological tests and regular disinfection of the system are necessary. 1. Chemical quality (Table: see text). Treated tap water used to prepare dialysis fluid should be within European Pharmacopoeia limits at the water treatment system inlet and at the reverse osmosis outlet. In addition dialysate, concentrate and infusion fluids must comply with specific Pharmacopoeia limits. The physician in charge of the dialysis unit is advised to institute a multidisciplinary team to evaluate the requirement for added chemical controls in the presence of local hazards. 2. Microbiological quality (Table: see text). High microbiological purity of dialysis fluid--regularly verified--is a fundamental prerequisite for dialysis quality and every dialysis unit should aim as a matter of course to obtain "ultra-pure" dialysate (microbial count <0.1 UFC/mL, endotoxins <0.03 U/mL). On-line dialysate ultrafiltration and regular disinfection of dialysis machines greatly enhance microbiological purity. On-line dialysate reinfusion requires specific devices used according to corresponding instructions and to more frequent microbiological tests. Dialysis fluids for home dialysis should comply with the same chemical and bacteriological quality. The appendix reports the water treatment system's technical characteristics, sampling and analytical methods, monitoring time-tables, as well as the origin and effects of the main toxic substances. Suggestions and questions concerning these guidelines are welcome to nefrologia@sin-italy.org.

Colony Count, Microbial↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): results of the Italian cohort].

BACKGROUND: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) is an international prospective, longitudinal, observational study examining the relationship between dialysis unit practices and outcomes for hemodialysis (HD) patients in seven developed countries France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, Japan and the United States. Results of the DOPPS in Italy are the subject of this report. METHODS: A national representative sample of 20 dialysis units (21 in Germany) was randomly selected in each of the European DOPPS countries (Euro-DOPPS). In these units, the HD in-center patients were included on a facility census, and their survival rates continuously monitored. A representative sample of incident (269 in Italy, 1553 in the Euro-DOPPS) and prevalent (600 in Italy, 3038 in the Euro-DOPPS) patients was randomly selected from the census for more detailed longitudinal investigation with regard to medical history, laboratory values and hospital admission. RESULTS: Comparing the Italian and Euro-DOPPS cohorts we found comparable mean age for prevalent patients (61.4 vs. 59.5 yrs), but incident patients were older in Italy. Italian prevalent patients had less cardiovascular disease, more satisfactory nutritional status and more frequent use of native vascular access. These data were associated with a comparable mortality (15.7 vs. 16.3 deaths/100 patient yrs), but morbidity was lower in Italy. Kt/V levels were comparable in the two cohorts (1.32 vs. 1.37), but 35% of Italian patients showed a Kt/V below the recommended target. Moreover, hemoglobin levels were below 11 g/dL in 60% of Italian patients. CONCLUSIONS: The DOPPS results bring to light several positive aspects and the opportunity for further possible improvements for Italian patients, but at the same time highlight some critical points that could represent a risk for dialysis quality.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Maintenance and monitoring of water treatment system].

Water treatment systems must be submitted to maintenance, disinfections and monitoring periodically. The aim of this review is to analyze how these processes must complement each other in order to preserve the efficiency of the system and optimize the dialysis fluid quality. The correct working of the preparatory process (pre-treatment) and the final phase of depuration (reverse osmosis) of the system need a periodic preventive maintenance and the regular substitution of worn or exhausted components (i.e. the salt of softeners' brine tank, cartridge filters, activated carbon of carbon tanks) by a competent and trained staff. The membranes of reverse osmosis and the water distribution system, including dialysis machine connections, should be submitted to dis-infections at least monthly. For this purpose it is possible to use chemical and physical agents according to manufacturer' recommendations. Each dialysis unit should predispose a monitoring program designed to check the effectiveness of technical working, maintenance and disinfections and the achievement of chemical and microbiological standards taken as a reference. Generally, the correct composition of purified water is monitored by continuous measuring of conductivity, controlling bacteriological cultures and endotoxin levels (monthly) and checking water contaminants (every 6-12 months). During pre-treatment, water hardness (after softeners) and total chlorine (after chlorine tank) should be checked periodically. Recently the Italian Society of Nephrology has developed clinical guidelines for water and dialysis solutions aimed at suggesting rational procedures for production and monitoring of dialysis fluids. It is hopeful that the application of these guidelines will lead to a positive cultural change and to an improvement in dialysis fluid quality.

Disinfection↗