Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Parati

Publications and source records attributed to G Parati.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Twenty-four hour blood pressure variability: clinical implications.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring techniques have allowed quantification of blood pressure variations occurring over a 24 hour time. The evaluation of these phenomena has not only allowed us to investigate the mechanisms responsible for cardiovascular regulation, but it has also provided information of clinical value. In particular there is evidence that blood pressure variations are significantly related to cardiovascular complications of hypertension. Progress in technology may allow us to extend these observations by means of non-invasive continuous blood pressure recordings to all those conditions where intra-arterial methods are not allowed.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1991

Reproducibility of non-invasive and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring: implications for studies on antihypertensive treatment.

Ambulatory blood pressure has been shown to be more reproducible than office blood pressure and thus to be more suited for studying the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs. In 34 untreated essential hypertensive subjects, we measured office and 24-h non-invasive or intra-arterial blood pressure twice over a 4-week interval; 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure was obtained by the Oxford method whereas 24-h non-invasive blood pressure was obtained by the automatic SpaceLabs 5300 device, with a 10 min (daytime) or 20 min (night-time) interval between measurements. The standard deviation of the mean difference (s.d.d.) between blood pressures obtained in each recording was taken as the reciprocal of blood pressure reproducibility. The s.d.d. was highest for office blood pressure and for single blood pressure readings taken from 24-h non-invasive recordings. The s.d.d. fell when the two 24-h average non-invasive blood pressures were considered. The fall was progressively greater as the number of ambulatory readings on which the average was calculated increased from two to 24, no further fall being observed when more than 24 values were considered. The maximal reduction in s.d.d. was 59% (systolic) and 42% (diastolic) as compared with the office s.d.d. The two 24-h mean values obtained by the intra-arterial approach were slightly more closely correlated than those obtained non-invasively. However, at comparable sampling rates, the s.d.d. was not substantially lower with 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure and including in the calculation the average of the thousand readings provided by this approach did not cause any further improvement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Effect of placebo on 24-h non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure.

Twenty-four-hour mean ambulatory blood pressure has been shown to be devoid of a placebo effect. However, whether this is the case for different periods within the 24 h has not been established. In 27 essential hypertensive outpatients, blood pressure was measured in the doctor's office and by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after a 3-week wash-out period from antihypertensive treatment (Control) and following 4 weeks of placebo administration. Office systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced by placebo (-9.6 +/- 2.6 and -3.1 +/- 1.7 mmHg, P less than 0.01, respectively), whereas 24-h mean blood pressure values did not show any significant change. This was not the case for all 24-h subperiods, however, because during the initial 8h, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were slightly (-4.1 +/- 9.2 and -2.5 +/- 6.4 mmHg) but significantly (P less than 0.05) lower during placebo than during control. Similar findings were obtained in 14 additional essential hypertensive patients in whom neither placebo nor any other treatment was employed between the two office and 24-h blood pressure measurements. Thus, placebo treatment is associated with a blood pressure reduction in the initial portion of the ambulatory blood pressure profile, probably because of an attenuation of an initial transient alerting response to the procedure. Although so small as to leave the 24-h blood pressure mean unaffected, this may lead to some overestimation of the antihypertensive effect of treatment during an appreciable portion of the circadian blood pressure tracing.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

24-hour blood pressure monitoring in hypertension.

It has been recognized for some time that blood pressure is highly variable over a 24-h period. A number of studies have demonstrated that the extent and severity of target-organ damage associated with hypertension can be correlated more closely with blood pressure values monitored continuously for 24 h than with individual values recorded sphygmomanometrically. A great deal of interest is focused on whether absolute values of diastolic or systolic blood pressure, values during the day or night, or the rate of change of blood pressure such as the rapid increase that occurs in the early morning are more or less important factors contributing to the mortality and morbidity associated with hypertension. Work from our own unit provides evidence of the importance of two features in the variability of blood pressure. Blood pressure decreases during the night, but remains higher in hypertensive patients than in normotensive subjects. The mean nighttime blood pressure was shown to correlate with hypertension-related target-organ damage almost as closely as the mean daytime blood pressure. Using 24-h blood pressure monitoring, we have shown that the higher the mean 24-h blood pressure, the greater the extent and severity of target-organ involvement. In addition, for patients with comparable mean 24-h blood pressure values, larger degrees of blood pressure variability throughout the monitoring period were associated with more target-organ damage. Taking the available evidence into account, it is probably important that treatments used for hypertension should provide control of blood pressure for a full 24-h period confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1991

Role of sinoaortic afferents in modulating BP and pulse-interval spectral characteristics in unanesthetized cats.

Sinoaortic denervation (SAD) is accompanied by an increase in blood pressure (BP) and a reduction in pulse-interval (PI) variance. Little is known, however, about the effect of SAD on the complex BP and PI variability pattern, which is identified by spectral analysis. In nine unanesthetized cats in which intra-arterial BP was monitored before and 7-10 days after SAD, spectral powers (estimated by fast Fourier transform) were calculated for the low frequency (LF, 0.025-0.07 Hz), midfrequency (MF, 0.07-0.14 Hz), and high frequency (HF, 0.14-0.60 Hz) band. The very low frequency (VLF) BP and PI components (VLF less than 0.025 Hz) were also estimated. SAD increased systolic BP variance and decreased PI variance. The reduction of PI variance was paralleled by significant and marked reductions in all PI powers including the VLF components. In contrast, the increase in systolic BP variance was accompanied by a marked increase in LF power, a decrease in MF power, and no change in HF power. The VLF BP components increased after SAD for frequencies between 0.025 and 0.0012 Hz, whereas a sudden marked reduction was observed below 0.0012 Hz. Similar results were obtained for diastolic BP powers. Thus the reduction in PI variance induced by SAD is paralleled by a reduction in all PI fluctuations identified by spectral analysis. This is not the case for the SAD-related increase in BP variance, which is accompanied by an increase, no change, or even a reduction in the different BP spectral components.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1991

Methodological problems in evaluation of cardiovascular effects of stress in humans.

Cardiovascular effects of stress in humans are often assessed by application of physical or emotional stimuli in a laboratory environment. Although this method provides important information, these procedures have several limitations. First, blood pressure and heart rate responses to laboratory stressors are characterized by a limited within-subject reproducibility. Second, there is poor correlation between blood pressure and heart rate responses to different stressors, which implies that individual reaction to stress may be estimated differently according to the test used. Finally, these responses bear only a limited relation to 24-hour or daytime blood pressure variability, that is, they reflect to only a limited extent the tendency of blood pressure to vary during daily activities. If assessed by techniques that allow blood pressure to be continuously recorded for 24 hours in ambulatory subjects, blood pressure variability represents a possible approach to observation of cardiovascular reactivity away from an artificial laboratory environment. However, whether blood pressure variability should be expressed as a percentage or in absolute values is controversial. Furthermore, although naturally occurring stress may markedly increase blood pressure, 24-hour blood pressure variations also depend on factors that are not related to emotional stimuli. Thus, the study of cardiovascular responses to stress in humans encounters several problems, regardless of the method used.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1991

Effect of stress on diagnosis of hypertension.

Blood pressure assessment by a physician elicits an alerting reaction and a pressor response in the patient. The magnitude and time course of this response are described for a large number of hypertensive subjects in whom the assessments were performed during ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring. In nearly all of the subjects, the physician's visit was accompanied by blood pressure and heart rate increases that peaked within 4 minutes and then declined. The response was characterized by a relatively high average value; a large between-subject variability; no relation with patient age, baseline hemodynamic values, and responses to laboratory stressors; and no attenuation with multiple repetition of the physician's visit. On the other hand, the increase in blood pressure was considerably less when blood pressure assessment was made by a nurse than when it was made by a physician; in both instances, a 10-minute wait was associated with marked reduction of the initial response. Thus, the stress inherent in usual blood pressure-measuring procedures is responsible for considerable overestimations of patients' blood pressures. There are means by which this can be minimized, although a residual error is likely to remain in most subjects. Whether the stress-devoid blood pressure is a better prognostic index than the stress-related one remains unknown.

Blood Pressure Determination↗
PubMed1991

Testing the accuracy of blood pressure monitoring devices in ambulatory conditions.

In recent years technological progress has improved the construction of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices. This has resulted in devices able to measure blood pressure continuously and non-invasively, and also in lighter, less noisy and more accurate intermittent blood pressure monitors. The accuracy of monitors, however, is still tested by taking blood pressure measurements at rest, and testing against intra-arterial blood pressure values, in true ambulatory conditions, is very seldom used. When evaluated by the latter approach, devices such as SpaceLabs 5300 and the Sandoz SPS 1558 recorders can be substantially inaccurate. Newer devices such as the SpaceLabs 90202 and 90207 are also somewhat inaccurate, particularly when diastolic blood pressure is considered. However, hour-to-hour changes in blood pressure obtained by the SpaceLabs 90202 and 90207 monitors are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those obtained by invasive methods. This makes it possible to describe the 24-h blood pressure profile more accurately.

Blood Pressure Determination↗
PubMed1991

Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has both advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. The structural and functional organ abnormalities associated with hypertension are more closely correlated to 24-h blood pressure mean values than to clinic or other conventional sphygmomanometric blood pressures. Furthermore, an additional relationship can be seen between the incidence and severity of these abnormalities and the magnitude of day and night blood pressure changes or 24-h blood pressure variability. However, controlled prospective studies are still required to demonstrate that ambulatory blood pressure data are superior or add to the prognostic value of clinic blood pressure. Moreover, ambulatory blood pressure normalcy has not yet been properly defined. This suggests caution in the practical use of this technique, which should be limited to special groups of subjects (those with a possible alerting reaction to conventional blood pressure assessments, in whom home blood pressure measurements are unreliable) and should only be used by clinicians with expertise in the field.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1990

Sequential spectral analysis of 24-hour blood pressure and pulse interval in humans.

Blood pressure and pulse interval are characterized not only by erratic variations but also by rhythmic fluctuations at low-, mid-, and high-frequency (0.025-0.07, 0.07-0.14, and 0.14-0.35 Hz, respectively). However, information on these phenomena has largely been derived from analysis of short-term recordings taken in standardized laboratory conditions. In seven normotensive and 10 untreated mild essential hypertensive subjects, power spectrum analysis was performed on the intra-arterial blood pressure and pulse interval signal collected over a 24-hour period using the fast Fourier transform algorithm and splitting the recording into contiguous segments of 256 beats. About 70% of the segments were suitable for the analysis; the segments excluded for a nonstationary signal amounted to only 30%. All powers were characterized by a high segment-to-segment variability, but in each subject the mid- and high-frequency powers of diastolic blood pressure and the mid-frequency power of systolic blood pressure were markedly reduced during the night as compared with the daytime period, whereas the opposite occurred for the low- and high-frequency powers of the pulse interval. Over the 24-hour period, mid- and high-frequency powers of blood pressure were positively correlated to each other, but both accounted for less than 25% of the 24-hour blood pressure variance. No difference between mean normalized power values of normotensive and hypertensive subjects was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Early 24-hour blood pressure elevation in normotensive subjects with parental hypertension.

Subjects with a family history of parental hypertension are reported to have a slightly higher office blood pressure in the prehypertensive stage. Whether this reflects a hyperreactivity to blood pressure measurement or a more permanent blood pressure elevation, however, is not known. In the present study, blood pressure was measured in 15 normotensive subjects whose parents are both hypertensive (FH++), 15 normotensive subjects with one hypertensive parent (FH(+)-), and 15 normotensive subjects whose parents are not hypertensive (FH--); among the three groups, subjects were matched for age, sex, and body mass index. The measurements were made in the office during a variety of laboratory stressors and during a prolonged resting period, and for a 24-hour period (ambulatory blood pressure monitoring). Office blood pressure was higher in the FH++ group than in the FH-- group (p less than 0.05). The pressor responses to laboratory stressors were similar in the two groups, but the FH++ group had higher prolonged resting and 24-hour blood pressure than the FH-- group; the difference was always significant (p less than 0.05) for systolic blood pressure. The FH++ group also had a greater left ventricular mass index (on echocardiographic examination) than the FH-- group (p less than 0.01). The blood pressure values and echocardiographic values of the FH(+)- group tended to be between those of the other two groups. Thus, the higher blood pressure shown by individuals in the prehypertensive stage with a family history of parental hypertension does not reflect a hyperreactivity to stress but an early permanent blood pressure elevation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1990

Cardiovascular effects of smoking.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) increases with smoking and this factor interacts with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension in raising the incidence of this condition in a greater than linear fashion. This can be explained by the adverse effect of smoking on plasma fibrogen, platelet turnover and lipid profile. It may also be accounted for, however, by the acute bradycardia, increase in blood pressure and generalized vasoconstriction accompanying smoking, due to a nicotine-dependent activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These effects (which in heavy smokers can raise blood pressure permanently) are only partly offset by beta-blockers and can only be abolished by opposing the cardiac and vascular sympathetic influences by alpha and beta-blockade combined.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1990

Blood pressure and heart rate response to repeated smoking before and after beta-blockade and selective alpha 1 inhibition.

In normotensive volunteers who habitually smoked more than 20 cigarettes a day, 1-h beat-to-beat blood pressure recordings were taken. Measurements were made using a non-invasive finger device when the subjects were not smoking (1 h, control) and during an hour in which the subjects were asked to smoke four cigarettes, one every 15 min. The first cigarette smoked produced a marked increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and the heart rate. The peak blood pressure and heart rate values observed for the first cigarette did not change when the remaining three cigarettes were smoked, indicating that the responses were neither attenuated nor increased by repeated smoking. However, after each cigarette, the pre-smoking values did not return to baseline, but were successively greater for the second, third and fourth cigarettes, indicating that blood pressure and the heart rate undergo a persistent increase during smoking. Compared with the hour-long non-smoking period, mean values over the smoking period were 18.8%, 14.0% and 29.7% higher for systolic and diastolic blood pressure and the heart rate, respectively. Cigarette smoking also increased the blood pressure and heart rate standard deviations around the mean, thereby increasing the variability. The effects of atenolol and doxazosin on the blood pressure and heart rate responses to smoking were investigated in two placebo-controlled, single-blind, randomly allocated, crossover studies. Compared with placebo, atenolol (50-100 mg given once a day for 4 days) significantly attenuated the smoking-induced increase in the heart rate but not the increase in systolic or diastolic blood pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗