Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Parati

Publications and source records attributed to G Parati.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Effect of sinoaortic denervation on frequency-domain estimates of baroreflex sensitivity in conscious cats.

In animals and humans, baroreceptor modulation of the sinus node in daily life can be studied by identification of the number of sequences in which systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse interval (PI) linearly decrease or increase for several beats. It is also studied by power spectral analysis of SBP and PI in regions where their powers are coherent, although, in contrast to the sequence method, whether this frequency-domain method specifically reflects the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex has not been adequately tested. We recorded intra-arterial BP for approximately 3.5 h in eight conscious cats, first intact and then 7-10 days after sinoaortic denervation (SAD). Sensitivity of baroreceptor-heart rate reflex was assessed in 120-s segments by the square root of the ratio of PI and SBP spectral powers (alpha) in the regions around 0.1 (MF) and 0.3 (HF) Hz, and coherence between PI and SBP spectral powers in MF and HF regions was computed. SAD increased overall SBP variability and reduced PI variability throughout the frequency range examined. SAD markedly reduced (P < 0.01) both alpha-MF (-65.6%) and alpha-HF (-79. 9%) and consistently reduced the number of coherent segments [i.e., where coherence (K2) > 0.5] and average coherence values in the MF region. In the HF region, however, SAD did not alter the number of coherent segments, and although average coherence value throughout the HF band was reduced, in restricted portions of the band (different between animals), a high coherence value survived denervation. No significant changes were seen in any measured variables in five sham-operated cats. Thus the frequency-domain method specifically reflects baroreflex modulation of heart rate in the MF region only. In the HF region, in contrast, baroreflex and nonbaroreflex influences on the sinus node both contribute to a variable degree to determination of heart rate responses to BP oscillations. If used to study baroreflex function in daily life, this method should use the coefficient derived from MF data.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Broad-band spectral analysis of 24 h continuous finger blood pressure: comparison with intra-arterial recordings.

The present study compares the spectral characteristics of 24-h blood pressure variability estimated invasively at the brachial artery level with those estimated by measurement of blood pressure at the finger artery using the non-invasive Portapres device. Broad-band spectra (from 3x10(-5) to 0.5 Hz) were derived from both finger and intra-brachial pressures recorded simultaneously for 24 h in eight normotensive and twelve hypertensive ambulant subjects. At frequencies lower than 0.07 Hz, higher spectral estimates were obtained by Portapres than by intra-brachial measurements. The maximum overestimation occurred in systolic pressure at around 10(-2) Hz, where the amplitude of the oscillations was two times greater when measured by Portapres. A less pronounced overestimation was found for diastolic pressures. The maximum overestimation was greater during daytime than during night-time. At around 0.1 Hz, invasive and non-invasive spectra were similar. At the respiratory frequencies (0.15-0.50 Hz), the power spectra were overestimated by Portapres during daytime, and underestimated at night. These results provide reference information for the correct interpretation of Portapres data in the estimation of 24-h blood pressure spectral power.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure: role of 24-h mean values and variability in the determination of organ damage.

An increasing amount of data suggests that systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) may more closely relate to and thus favour the atherogenic process than does diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The baseline data from the ongoing European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA) recently indicated that carotid artery atherosclerosis in normocholesterolaemic patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension is more closely related to SBP and more so PP than to DBP and lipid variables. Other new data point to the effects of hypertension on arterial compliance, as well as the effects of 24-h blood pressure variability on arterial compliance and distensibility. When viewed in their entirety, these data present a compelling case for the closer monitoring of SBP and PP with respect to arterial compliance, and the need for aggressive blood pressure treatment to control and perhaps reverse the underlying pathological changes in arterial structure and function in hypertensive patients.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1998

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and postprandial hypotension in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (SYST-EUR) Trial Investigators.

The present analysis was undertaken to evaluate postprandial (PP) changes in blood pressure (BP) assessed with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) on conventional measurement. A total of 530 patients (335 women and 195 men, aged 60-100 years, median 70 years) who performed an ABPM during the placebo run-in period of the Syst-Eur trial were included into the analysis. The PP changes in BP and heart rate (HR) were calculated by subtracting the mean systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and HR in the 2 h preceding the main meal from the corresponding means covering the 2 h after the meal. The reproducibility of the postprandial fall in BP and heart rate (PPH) was assessed by contrasting the first and second ABPM in a subgroup of 147 patients who performed two ABPM's during the placebo run-in period. The mean SBP and DBP decreased and reached the nadir 2 h after the main meal while HR did not change. When PPH was assessed by comparing BP in the 2 h before and after the meal, both SBP and DBP decreased significantly (respectively -6.6 mm Hg, -5.4 mm Hg; P < 0.001). In 67.6% of all patients a decrease in SBP was observed and in 24.1% it exceeded 16 mm Hg. The corresponding values for DBP were 71.3% and 24.5% (DBP decreased more than 12 mm Hg). A greater fall in DBP was associated with a greater decrease in HR (r = 0.20, P < 0.001), while changes in SBP and HR were not interrelated. Regression analysis did not identify any significant covariate of PPH. Group means of PPH could be reproduced without significant changes in their values, but the within-subject reproducibility of the PP changes was low. There were no differences in PPH according to the place of residence of the patients. In conclusion, the descriptive analysis of the meal-induced changes in ABPM in elderly subjects with ISH showed that in every day circumstances most of them experience falls in both SBP and DBP within 2 h after the meal.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Limitations of the difference between clinic and daytime blood pressure as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat' effect. Syst-Eur investigators.

BACKGROUND: The difference between clinic and ambulatory average daytime blood pressures is frequently taken as a surrogate measure of the 'white-coat effect' (i.e. the pressor reaction triggered in the patient by the physician's visit). OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of this difference and its relationship with clinic and average ambulatory daytime blood pressure levels. DESIGN AND METHODS: These issues were addressed with two large groups of subjects in whom both clinic and ambulatory blood pressures were measured, namely 783 outpatients with systolic and diastolic essential hypertension [Group 1, aged 50.8+/-9.4 years (mean +/- SD)], participating in standardized Italian trials of antihypertensive drugs, and 506 elderly patients (group 2, age 71+/-7 years) with isolated systolic hypertension, participating in the European Syst-Eur trial. RESULTS: The clinic-daytime blood pressure difference for the essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients (group 1) was 13.6+/-14.3 mmHg for systolic and 9.1+/-8.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P always < 0.01). This difference for the elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (group 2) was 21.2+/-16.0 mmHg for systolic and only 1.3+/-10.2 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In both studies little or no systematic clinic-daytime difference could be observed for heart rate. The reproducibility of the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference, tested for 108 essential systolic and diastolic hypertensive patients from group 1 and 128 isolated systolic hypertensives from group 2, was invariably lower than that both of daytime and of clinic blood pressure values. Finally, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference was progressively higher for increasing levels of clinic blood pressure and progressively lower for higher levels of ambulatory daytime blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the clinic-daytime blood pressure difference has a limited reproducibility; depends not only on clinic but also on daytime average blood pressure, which means that its size is a function of the blood pressure criteria employed for selection of the patients in a trial; and is never associated with a systematic clinic-daytime difference in heart rate, which further questions its use as a reliable surrogate measure of the true pressor response induced in the patient by the doctor's visit.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Reproducibility and clinical value of nocturnal hypotension: prospective evidence from the SAMPLE study. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether modifications in the nighttime blood pressure fall caused by antihypertensive treatment predict the regression of end-organ damage of hypertension. METHODS: The analysis was performed in patients with essential hypertension and echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy involved in the SAMPLE study. For each patient, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass index were performed at the end of a 4-week wash-out pretreatment period, after 3 and 12 months of treatment with lisinopril or with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and after a final 4-week placebo period. For each ambulatory blood pressure monitoring the 24 h average, daytime average (0600-2400 h), night-time average (2400-0600 h) and day-night difference was computed. The percentages of dipper and non-dipper patients (i.e. the patients with night blood pressure falls greater and less than 10% of the daytime average, respectively) were also computed. RESULTS: The reproducibility of the day-night difference was low, both for comparison of the pretreatment and final placebo periods (n = 170) and for comparison of the third and the 12th month of treatment (n = 180). The reproducibility of the dipper-non-dipper dichotomy was also low, 35-40% of patients becoming non-dippers if they were dippers and vice versa, both with and without treatment The changes in left ventricular mass index after 12 months of treatment were significantly (P<0.01) related to the changes in 24 h, daytime and night-time blood pressure (r always > 0.33), but this was not the case for the treatment-induced modification of the day-night difference (r= -0.03 and -0.008 for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that day-night blood pressure changes and the classification of patients into dippers and non-dippers are poorly reproducible over time. It also provides the first prospective evidence that treatment-induced changes in day-night blood pressure difference are not related to treatment-induced regression of left ventricular mass index, thus having a limited clinical significance.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The smoothness index: a new, reproducible and clinically relevant measure of the homogeneity of the blood pressure reduction with treatment for hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new method, the smoothness index, for assessing the homogeneity of 24 h blood pressure reduction by antihypertensive treatment and to compare it with the trough : peak ratio; and to assess the ability of both indices to predict a reduction in the left ventricular mass index induced by treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 174 patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, enrolled in the Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation (SAMPLE), aged 20-65 years, we measured clinic blood pressure, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure and the left ventricular mass index (echocardiography) before and after treatment with lisinopril at 20 mg with the addition of 12.5 or 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide as needed to reach a sufficient blood pressure reduction. The following parameters were computed for systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure: (1) hourly and 24 h blood pressure averages (+/- SD) at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of treatment; (2) hourly blood pressure changes from baseline after 3 and 12 months of treatment, and their average (+/- SD) over 24 h; (3) the trough : peak ratio after 3 and 12 months of treatment; and (4) the smoothness index after 3 and 12 months of treatment Similar calculations were also performed at the end of a final study month during which active treatment was withdrawn and placebo was substituted (n = 164). RESULTS: The smoothness index for systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure computed after 3 months of treatment was more closely related to its corresponding values after 12 months of treatment than the trough : peak ratio values computed after the same time periods were (r = 0.68 versus 0.38 for systolic and 0.68 versus 0.42 for diastolic blood pressure, respectively). The smoothness index showed an inverse correlation with the 24 h standard deviation of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = -0.25 and -0.16, P < 0.01 and < 0.05, respectively, for 12 months of treatment), while the trough : peak ratio did not (r = -0.01 to -0.12, NS). A treatment-induced reduction in the left ventricular mass index was related to the smoothness index for systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = -0.35 and -0.32, P< 0.001 with 12 months of treatment), but not to the corresponding trough : peak ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The smoothness index identifies the occurrence of a balanced 24 h blood pressure reduction with treatment and correlates with the favourable effects of treatment on left ventricular hypertrophy better than the commonly used trough : peak ratio.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Hemodilution reduces clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in polycythemic patients.

Limited information is available for humans on whether blood viscosity affects total peripheral resistance and, hence, blood pressure. Our study was aimed at assessing the effects of acute changes in blood viscosity on both clinic and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) values. In 22 normotensive and hypertensive patients with polycythemia, clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BPs were measured before and 7 to 10 days after isovolumic hemodilution; this was performed through the withdrawal of 400 to 700 mL of blood, with concomitant infusion of an equivalent volume of saline-albumin solution. Hematocrit, plasma renin activity, plasma endothelin-1, right atrial diameter (echocardiography), and blood viscosity were measured under both conditions. Plasma renin activity and right atrial diameter were used as indirect markers of blood volume changes. Plasma endothelin-1 was used to obtain information on a vasomotor substance possibly stimulated by our intervention, which could counteract vasomotor effects. Isovolumic hemodilution reduced hematocrit from 0.53+/-0.05 to 0.49+/-0.05 (P<.01). Plasma renin activity, plasma endothelin-1 and right atrial diameter were unchanged. Clinic blood pressure was reduced by hemodilution (systolic, 144.3+/-5.4 to 136.0+/-3.9 mm Hg[mean+/-SEM]; diastolic, 87.0+/-2.8 to 82.1+/-2.6 mm Hg, P<.05 for both) and a reduction was observed also for 24-hour average ABP (systolic, 133.6+/-2.9 to 129.5+/-2.7 mm Hg; diastolic, 80.0+/-2.0 to 77.3+/-1.7 mm Hg, P<.05 for both). The reduction was consistent in hypertensive patients (n = 12), whereas in normotensive patients (n = 10) it was small and not significant. Both clinic and 24-hour average heart rates were unaffected by the hemodilution. Thus, in polycythemia, reduction in blood viscosity without changing blood volume causes a significant fall in both clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BPs; this is particularly true when, as can often happen, blood pressure is elevated. This emphasizes the importance this variable may have in the determination of blood pressure and the potential therapeutic value of its correction when altered.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1998

Difference between clinic and daytime blood pressure is not a measure of the white coat effect.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the difference between blood pressure measured in the clinic or physician's office and the average daytime blood pressure accurately reflects the blood pressure response of the patient to the physician ("white coat effect" or "white coat hypertension"). We studied 28 hypertensive outpatients (mean age, 41.8+/-11.2 years; age range, 21 to 64 years) of 35 consecutive patients attending our hypertension clinic, in whom (1) continuous noninvasive finger blood pressure was recorded before and during the visit, (2) blood pressure was measured according to the Riva-Rocci-Korotkoff method (mercury sphygmomanometer) with the patient in the supine position, and (3) daytime ambulatory blood pressure was monitored with a SpaceLabs 90207 device. The peak blood pressure increase recorded directly during the visit was compared with the difference between clinic and daytime average ambulatory blood pressures. Compared with previsit values, peak increases in finger systolic and diastolic blood pressures during the visit to the clinic were 38.2+/-3.1 and 20.7+/-1.6 mm Hg, respectively (mean+/-SEM, P<.01 for both). Daytime average systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 135.5+/-2.5 and 89.2+/-1.9 mm Hg, with both lower than the corresponding clinic blood pressure values (146.6+/-3.6 and 94.9+/-2.2 mm Hg, P<.01). These differences, however, were <30% of the peak finger blood pressure increases during the physician's visit, to which these increases showed no relation. Although the visit to the physician's office was associated with tachycardia (9.0+/-1.6 bpm, P<.01), there was no difference between clinic and daytime average heart rates. These data indicate that the clinic-daytime average blood pressure difference does not reflect the alerting reaction and the pressure response elicited by the physician's visit and thus is not a reliable measure of the white coat effect.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Estimation of blood pressure variability from 24-hour ambulatory finger blood pressure.

Portapres is a noninvasive, beat-to-beat finger blood pressure (BP) monitor that has been shown to accurately estimate 24-hour intra-arterial BP at normal and high BPs. However, no information is available on the ability of this device to accurately track ambulatory BP variability. In 20 ambulatory normotensive and hypertensive subjects, we measured 24-hour BP by Portapres and through a brachial artery catheter. BP and pulse interval variabilities were quantified by (1) the SDs of the mean values (overall variability) and (2) spectral power, computed either by fast Fourier transform and autoregressive modeling of segments of 120-second duration for spectral components from 0.025 to 0.50 Hz or in a very low frequency range (between 0.00003 and 0.01 Hz) by broadband spectral analysis. The 24-hour SD of systolic BP obtained from Portapres (24+/-2 mm Hg) was greater than that obtained intra-arterially (17+/-1 mm Hg, P<0.01), but the overestimation was less evident for diastolic (3+/-1 mm Hg, P<0.01) and mean (3+/-1 mm Hg, P<0.01) BP. The BP spectral power <0.15 Hz was also overestimated by Portapres more for systolic than for diastolic and mean BPs; similar findings were obtained by the fast Fourier transform, the autoregressive approach, and focusing on the broadband spectral analysis. BP spectral power >0.15 Hz obtained by the Portapres was similar during the day but lower during the night when compared with those obtained by intra-arterial recordings (P<0.01). No differences were observed between Portapres and intra-arterial recordings for any estimation of pulse interval variabilities. The overestimation of BP variability by Portapres remained constant over virtually the entire 24-hour recording period. Thus, although clinical studies are still needed to demonstrate the clinical relevance of finger BP variability, our study shows that Portapres can be used with little error to estimate 24-hour BP variabilities if diastolic and mean BPs are used. For systolic BP, the greater error can be minimized by using correction factors.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Conventional and ambulatory measurements of blood pressure in old patients with isolated systolic hypertension: baseline observations in the Syst-Eur trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinic and am measurements of blood pressure in old patients with isolated systolic hypertension and their reproducibilities. PATIENTS: In total 610 patients aged >/= 60 years with isolated systolic hypertension detected by clinic measurement were monitored during the placebo run-in phase of the Syst-Eur trial. METHODS: The time-weighted 24 h blood pressure, clock-time day and night blood pressures, the cumulative-sum-derived crest and trough blood pressures and the high and low blood pressure levels according to the square-wave model were computed. The daily alteration between the high and low spans of blood pressure was quantified using the day-night difference, the cumulative-sum-derived magnitude of circadian alteration, the Fourier amplitude and the difference between the high and low blood pressure levels of the square-wave model. RESULTS: The daytime am systolic blood pressure was, on average, 21 mmHg lower than the clinic systolic blood pressure, whereas diastolic pressure was, on average, similar with both techniques of measurement. Clinic levels of blood pressure in the 141 patients who underwent repeat measurements and the parameters describing the difference between the daily high and low spans of blood pressure were equally reproducible. However, both were less reproducible than the ambulatory blood pressure levels. The reproducibility coefficients, expressed as percentages of near maximum variation, were 49 and 50% for the clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures, 30 and 32% for the mean 24 h systolic and diastolic blood pressures and 45-55% for the parameters describing the daily alteration between the high and low spans of blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Values of blood pressure in old patients with isolated systolic hypertension were more reproducible for ambulatory than they were for clinic measurements. Levels in patients selected because they have a high clinic blood pressure may be substantially higher with conventional than they are with daytime ambulatory measurement. The prognostic significance of this difference for the present patients is currently under investigation.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

The trough:peak ratio and the smoothness index in the evaluation of control of 24 h blood pressure by treatment in hypertension.

The duration and homogeneity of the antihypertensive effect of a drug are commonly quantified by computation of the trough:peak ratio (T/P) from 24 h ambulatory blood pressure recordings [i.e. the ratio of the reduction in blood pressure at the end of the interval between doses (trough) and the reduction in blood pressure at the time of the maximal effect of a drug (peak)]. Although it is widely employed, this index has a lot of limitations: it makes use of only a small portion of a 24 h blood pressure recording; individual T/P values do not have a normal distribution, unless responders at peak are selected; it bears no relation to 24 h blood pressure variability; peak changes in blood pressure are affected by a placebo effect and thus T/P needs correction for effects of placebo; peak and trough changes in blood pressure are reproducible over time but T/P is not; and, finally, it was shown in the SAMPLE study that T/P is not correlated to changes in left ventricular mass induced by treatment, and thus has a limited clinical value.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

Early and late sympathetic activation in hypertension.

In several experimental animal models of hypertension, sympathetic factors have been shown to be involved in the development and/or maintenance of high blood pressure. Although the information available on this issue in man is more scarce, recent evidence clearly indicates the participation of adrenergic mechanisms in the early and late phases of the hypertensive process. In addition, several cardiovascular risk factors frequently associated with hypertension, such as obesity, insulin-resistance, cigarette smoking, and the atherogenic process, are also characterized by alterations in sympathetic cardiovascular drive. This contributes to a further activation of the sympathetic nervous system thus favoring the development of the end organ damage (e.g. cardiac and vascular hypertrophy) associated with the hypertensive state.

Animals↗