Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G P Currie

Publications and source records attributed to G P Currie.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an update.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic lung condition of uncertain aetiology that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who experience breathlessness, cough and reduced exercise tolerance. IPF is characterized histologically by the presence of usual interstitial pneumonia, and often has typical radiological appearances. Long-term successful management options are limited and frequently unsuccessful; as the disease progresses, palliation of symptoms becomes the mainstay of treatment. In a minority of patients, lung transplantation provides the only hope of long-term survival. The median survival of patients with IPF is approximately 3 years, which in turn emphasizes the need for further investigation into its pathogenesis and potential disease-modifying pharmacological therapies.

Acute Disease↗

Therapeutic modulation of allergic airways disease with leukotriene receptor antagonists.

Although asthma is one of the most common chronic respiratory conditions, it often remains unrecognized and undertreated, while patients are often reluctant to comply with regular inhaled anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator therapy. Allergic rhinitis co-exists with asthma in as many as 40% of patients, and can be regarded as a continuum of the same inflammatory disease process. Corticosteroids are the 'gold standard' first-line treatment for both conditions, and have a significant impact upon underlying inflammation, symptoms and long-term outcome. Cysteinyl leukotrienes are potent airway inflammatory mediators, suggesting that treatment antagonizing their effects could play a role in disease management. In recent years, leukotriene receptor antagonists have provided a further therapeutic option in the management of allergic airways disease. These drugs are orally active, can be administered once daily, and provide a systemic approach to the management of patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis. We review the pharmacology of leukotriene receptor antagonists, their potential role in clinical practice in patients with allergic airways disease, and likely areas for further research.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Effects of low dose fluticasone/salmeterol combination on surrogate inflammatory markers in moderate persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive surrogate markers provide valuable information on the asthmatic inflammatory process. We wished to examine the effects of low dose fluticasone/salmeterol combination on different commonly used inflammatory markers in moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: Twenty-five moderate persistent atopic asthmatics were enrolled of whom 20 completed an open label study. Following an initial 4 week steroid washout period in which patients took salmeterol 50 microg dry powder inhaler 1 puff BD, they received the addition of fluticasone as fluticasone 100 microg/salmeterol 50 microg combination dry powder inhaler 1 puff BD for the next 2 weeks. Exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, methacholine PD20, sputum/blood eosinophils and sputum/serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were measured following the salmeterol only and fluticasone/salmeterol combination treatment periods. RESULTS: Compared to salmeterol alone (i.e. after the steroid washout), the use of fluticasone/salmeterol combination conferred significant improvements (P < 0.05) in all surrogate markers of inflammation apart from serum ECP. Geometric mean fold changes were 4.3-fold/1.3-fold for sputum/blood eosinophils, 2.2-fold/1.2-fold for sputum/serum ECP, 2.3-fold for methacholine PD20 and 1.8-fold for exhaled nitric oxide. CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate markers apart from serum ECP may be used as a guide to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of low dose inhaled corticosteroids. Sputum markers tend to be more sensitive than blood when assessing the anti-inflammatory response.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and adenosine monophosphate.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli is a useful noninvasive tool in the evaluation of asthma and its treatment. We investigated the putative relationship in AHR between inhaled adenosine monophosphate and mannitol. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate atopic asthmatics were evaluated. On two separate screening days, the threshold AMP concentration and threshold mannitol dose to provoke a given fall in FEV1 were measured. RESULTS: For AMP PC20vs. mannitol PD15, the Pearsons correlation coefficient was 0.80, P < 0.001. For AMP PC15vs. mannitol PD15 and AMP PC10vs. mannitol PD10 corresponding values were 0.83, P < 0.001 and 0.68, P = 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: There was a highly significant association between the threshold concentration of AMP and dose of mannitol causing a given fall in FEV1. Further studies are required to evaluate the relationship between inhaled mannitol and other surrogate inflammatory markers.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Effects of mediator antagonism on mannitol and adenosine monophosphate challenges.

BACKGROUND: Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to indirect stimuli is a useful non-invasive surrogate inflammatory marker in the evaluation of asthma, while histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are important inflammatory mediators. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate AHR to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli and time taken to recover following single doses of montelukast 10 mg and desloratadine 5 mg in combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatics completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Patients received encapsulated montelukast 10 mg/desloratadine 5 mg combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo, 10-14 h prior to challenge on two separate occasions. The mannitol threshold dose, AMP threshold concentration and recovery times after challenge were measured along with lung function. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, montelukast/desloratadine conferred improvements (P < 0.05) in adenosine monophosphate (AMP) threshold concentration and mannitol threshold dose: a 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.2-4.6) and 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.7-3.3) difference, respectively, while compared to montelukast this amounted to a 2.0-fold (95% CI 1.2-3.4) and 1.5-fold (95% CI 1.1-2.4) improvement, respectively. Montelukast was not significantly different from placebo. Both montelukast/desloratadine and montelukast compared to placebo, shortened recovery following both challenges (P < 0.05): a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 29-min (95% CI 20-36) reduction, respectively, for AMP, and a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 26-min (95% CI 17-35) reduction, respectively for mannitol. CONCLUSION: The dissociated effects of single doses of montelukast alone but not montelukast/desloratadine combination on AHR and recovery time, highlights the relative roles of histamine in initiating the bronchoconstrictor response and cysteinyl leukotrienes in sustaining it. Similar improvements in AHR and recovery time were observed following both indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli.

Acetates↗

Butterbur, a herbal remedy, attenuates adenosine monophosphate induced nasal responsiveness in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Butterbur (BB) or Petasites hybridus, a herbal remedy, exhibits in vitro inhibition of cysteinyl leukotriene biosynthesis. However, no placebo-controlled studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of BB on objective outcomes such as nasal provocation testing in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). METHODS: Twenty patients with grass-pollen-sensitized SAR were randomized in a double-blind, cross-over manner to receive for 2 weeks either BB 50 mg twice daily or placebo (PL) twice daily during the grass pollen season. Nasal adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge (the primary outcome) was administered as a single 400 mg/mL dose after each randomized treatment. RESULTS: Spontaneous recovery following AMP challenge (area under the response time profile curve as % x min+/-SEM) was significantly attenuated (P=0.028) with BB (584+/-289) compared to PL (1438+/-240); mean difference: 854 (95% CI 95-1614), and the maximum % peak nasal inspiratory flow reduction from baseline following AMP challenge was significantly blunted (P=0.036) with BB (30+/-4) compared to PL (43+/-5); mean difference: 13 (95% CI 1-25). CONCLUSIONS: BB exhibited protection against AMP-induced nasal responsiveness during the grass pollen season in sensitized patients. This is turn may explain its potential clinical efficacy in patients with SAR.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Allergen sensitization and bronchial hyper-responsiveness to adenosine monophosphate in asthmatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Indirect bronchoprovocation using adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is related to atopic phenotype expression. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the putative relationship between skin prick allergen sensitization and bronchial hyper-responsiveness to AMP in a retrospective cross-sectional database analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated two groups of non-smoking asthmatics (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV)1>/=60% predicted) who were reactive (responders) or unreactive (controls) to inhaled AMP. The main outcome measure was the difference in sensitization to individual allergens and the total atopic load according to the presence or absence of bronchial hyper-responsiveness. RESULTS: We initially identified 180 (44%) non-smoking asthmatics with PC20</=200 mg/mL, while 233 (56%) had PC20>/=1600 mg/mL. For those who had a skin prick test, the responders (n=151) and controls (n=151) were found to be matched for age, sex, inhaled corticosteroid dose and number of patients using inhaled corticosteroids. There were significant differences in the number of responders vs. controls in terms of sensitization to house dust mite (77% vs. 62%, P=0.004), aspergillus (19% vs. 9%, P=0.014), cat (61% vs. 48%, P=0.028), total atopic load (493 vs. 380 positive tests, P<0.001) and forced mid-expiratory flow (60% vs. 68% predicted, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Sensitization to common aeroallergens increased the likelihood of bronchial inflammation as reflected by bronchial hyper-responsiveness to inhaled AMP, independently of both FEV1 or inhaled corticosteroid use. This in turn suggests an association between allergen exposure and AMP responsiveness in asthmatics. Further prospective long-term evaluation is indicated to assess whether allergen avoidance strategies can modify the airway response.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Airway-stabilizing effect of long-acting beta2-agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The protection afforded by long-acting beta(2)-agonists against bronchoconstrictor stimuli can be regarded as a surrogate for their stabilizing effects on airway smooth muscle. AIM: To determine the magnitude of residual bronchoprotection after chronic dosing with long-acting beta(2)-agonists. DESIGN: Retrospective meta-analysis. METHODS: Medline, BIDS and Cochrane Library databases were searched from 1990. A meta-analysis was then performed of 13 eligible randomized placebo-controlled trials (596 patients) in which second-line treatment with a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (salmeterol or formoterol) was used for 1 week or more. The residual protection against bronchoconstrictor stimuli as doubling dose/dilution shift was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Data were assessed according to Quorum criteria. Combining the results of the meta-analysis, the overall estimated protection amounted to a 0.79 (95%CI 0.63-0.96) doubling dose/dilution shift from placebo. Subgroup analysis showed greater protection at peak vs. trough, but no difference between formoterol vs. salmeterol, or between direct vs. indirect challenge. There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity across all the studies, or within any of the subgroups. DISCUSSION: When used as second-line treatment, the overall additive protective effect of long-acting beta(2)-agonists amounts to a 0.8 doubling dose/dilution shift. This stabilizing effect on airway smooth muscle may explain their beneficial effects on exacerbations.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗