Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Marwell

Publications and source records attributed to G Marwell.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1979

Geographic constraints on women's careers in academia.

Male and female academics have very different residence patterns. Women are more concentrated in our largest urban centers; also, wherever they reside, women are less likely than men to change communities when changing institutions. Much of this sex difference is attributable to the constraints under which married academic women must manage their careers, in particular the requirements of two-career households. The authors argue that the status difference between men and women in academia is attributable, in part, to the geographic limitations on the locations of married women, as these prevent making strategic job changes to advance career prospects.

Career Mobility↗
PubMed1971

Taking and the disruption of cooperation.

Subjects could either cooperate or respond on a lower-paying individual task. In Exp. I and II, either subject could make a response that took $1.00 of the other's earnings whenever subjects chose to cooperate. The two experiments differed as to whether taking responses were effective continuously or intermittently. Both experiments showed that the opportunity to take disrupted cooperative behavior. Experiment III indicated that if taking was possible regardless of whether the subjects cooperated or responded on the individual task, subjects either cooperated or terminated the experiment.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1971

Avoidance of risk as a determinant of cooperation.

Pairs of subjects could either cooperate or respond on a lower paying individual task. Whenever both subjects chose to cooperate, either subject could make a response that took $1.00 of the other's earnings. In Exp. I, a stimulus signalled when a "take" response had been made. Either subject could avoid the loss by switching to the individual task within 5 sec after the stimulus appeared. Rates of cooperation were high when losses could be avoided but decreased again when the avoidance condition was removed. In Exp. II, a response prevented "takes" from occurring for a specified time interval after the response. This procedure also maintained cooperation. When each avoidance response subtracted from earnings, both avoidance responding and cooperation were eliminated.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1968

Stimulus control in the experimental study of cooperation.

The cooperative responses of pairs of human subjects were reinforced under several stimulus conditions in two settings designed to require a "social" response, i.e., where at least one of the two persons is responding to the behavior of the other. The first task, designed by Lindsley and Cohen, required individual responses within 0.5 sec of one another for reinforcement. The second (modified) task required a delay of 3 sec between individual responses. To determine dependence of cooperation on social stimuli, rates of cooperative behavior on these tasks were compared in the presence and absence of a stimulus indicating to each subject the other's response and a stimulus which indicated the duration of the timeout after reinforcement. The results indicated that only in the modified task was a high rate of cooperation always contingent upon the presence of the social stimuli.

Humans↗