Biomedical subjects

G M Zucco

Publications and source records attributed to G M Zucco.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1991

Olfactory deficits in elderly subjects and Parkinson patients.

Two groups of subjects, 8 Parkinson patients and 16 normal elderly people, were examined on a matching and a naming olfactory task. On the former, subjects had to recognize among four a previously sniffed odour, while on the latter they had to label an odour by choosing among four alternatives proposed by the examiner. Analysis indicated different trends for the two groups, Parkinson patients being more efficient in naming than in matching, and the elderly people showing the opposite pattern. Data are discussed with reference to the loss of dopamine in Parkinson patients and the decline of memory processes in elderly people.

Aged↗

PubMed1990

Interference with visual short-term memory.

Working memory (Baddeley and Hitch 1974) incorporates the notion of a visuo-spatial sketch pad; a mechanism thought to be specialized for short-term storage of visuo-spatial material. However, the nature and characteristics of this hypothesized mechanism are as yet unclear. Two experiments are reported which examined selective interference in short-term visual memory. Experiment 1 contrasted recognition memory span for visual matrix patterns with that for visually presented letter sequences. These two span tasks were combined with concurrent arithmetic or a concurrent task which involved manipulation of visuo-spatial material. Results suggested that although there was a small, significant disruption by concurrent arithmetic of span for the matrix patterns, there was a substantially larger disruption of the letter span task. The converse was true for the secondary visuo-spatial task. Experiment 2 combined the span tasks with two established tasks developed by Brooks (1967). Span for matrix patterns was disrupted by a visuo-spatial task but not by a secondary verbal task. The converse was true for letter span. These results suggest that the impairment in short-term visual memory resulting from secondary arithmetic reflects a small general processing load, but that the selective interference due to mode of processing is by far the stronger effect. Results are interpreted as being entirely consistent with the notion of a specialized visuo-spatial mechanism in working memory.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Hemispheric differences in odour recognition.

Two experiments were designed in order to study hemispheric differences in odour recognition in normal subject. In the first experiment subjects first smelled an odour and then a visual stimulus (a picture or a word related or unrelated to the odour) was flashed either to the left or to the right hemisphere for 150 milliseconds. Subjects had to press a key if the two stimuli (olfactory and visual) matched and another key if they did not. Reaction time analysis showed that the responses were faster when the second stimulus (either picture or word) was presented to the right hemisphere. In a second experiment the first stimulus was auditory rather than olfactory. Subjects were instructed to listen to names of odorants and then to respond to pictures or written names as in the first experiment. In this case a left hemisphere advantage emerged, presumably related to the priming of the left hemisphere by the auditorially presented verbal stimulus.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1989

Cognition and olfaction: a review.

Examines research in cognitive psychology, which has in the past paid little attention to the olfactory modality. But there is now a significant body of literature on the role of the olfactory system in memory and cognition. Human beings possess an excellent ability to detect and discriminate odors, but they typically have great difficulty in identifying particular odorants. This results partly from the use of an improverished and idiosyncratic language to describe olfactory experiences, which are normally encoded either in a rudimentary sensory form or as part of a complex but highly specific biographical episode. Consequently, linguistic processes play only a very limited role in olfactory processing, whereas hedonic factors seem to be of considerable importance.

Cognition↗