Cancer, crash sites, and the new genetics of neoplasia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Biomedical subjects
G M Petersen
Publications and source records attributed to G M Petersen.
Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis methods for quantitative determination of glycyrrhizinic acid in pharmaceutical preparations.
A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) and a capillary electrophoretic (CE) method have been developed for the determination of glycyrrhizinic acid in pharmaceuticals. The two methods have been validated and have been compared with respect to their suitability for the said purpose as well as in relation to requirements from the legal authorities. The HPLC method provide a repeatability of the quantitative analysis of glycyrrhizinic acid below 1% relative standard deviation (RSD) which makes the method suitable when the legal authorities requires the content to be within +/-5% of the declaration. The repeatability of the CE method is in the order of 3-5% RSD when using internal standardization. However, using internal standardization as well as peak normalisation (peak area/migration time) indicate that the RSD may be reduced to about 1%. The CE method is suitable as a stability indication method as the degradation product glycyrrhetinic acid can be determined simultaneously.
Anti-Infective Agents↗
Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: survey of relatives of colon cancer patients.
OBJECTIVES: Various studies have identified psychosocial factors that may influence attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing. Whereas family history of colon cancer has been associated with interest in gene testing, this has not been examined extensively. We hypothesized that the strength of family history of colon cancer is associated with risk perception and willingness to undergo gene testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing among persons who had at least one first-degree relative with colon cancer. A total of 2680 at-risk relatives in 863 kindreds were identified and mailed an extensive survey regarding sociodemographic variables, family history, health behaviors and knowledge, and willingness to take a colon cancer gene test. A total of 56.6% of persons completed and returned surveys. We conducted a brief telephone survey of a random sample of 200 persons who did not respond to the mail survey. RESULTS: The combined study sample of 1373 people was 42% male, had a mean age of 55 +/- 15 years, was 96% white, and had moderate-to-high SES. A total of 77.4% were very likely to take the gene test, and 92.4% were somewhat or very likely to take the gene test. A total of 78% of the sample perceived a higher colon cancer risk, although patterns of risk perception and worry differed significantly between mail survey and telephone survey respondents. More of the telephone survey respondents were also somewhat unlikely or very unlikely to take the gene test compared to the mail survey respondents (13.7% versus 6.9%). In the combined sample, concern about developing colon cancer and risk perception increased with number of relatives with colon cancer (P < 0.0001). Eight percent expressed no concern about developing colon cancer; 4.8% felt their chance of developing colon cancer was lower than others of the same age, sex, and race; and 3.3% felt that they were very unlikely to develop colon cancer in their lifetime. However, there was strong interest in gene testing regardless of the number of affected relatives, and persons with more affected relatives were generally willing to pay more for the gene test (up to $1000). CONCLUSIONS: The strength of family history of colon cancer is associated with risk perception but not with willingness to undergo gene testing.
Aged↗
Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake.
OBJECTIVES: Genetic discoveries in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) have made possible genetic testing to determine susceptibility to this form of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study measured the uptake of genetic testing for HNPCC among first-degree relatives of CRC patients and conducted a preliminary analysis of the predictors of test uptake. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 77 test acceptors and 181 decliners on demographic, medical history, and psychological characteristics, controlling for distance from the testing center. The psychological factors studied were risk perception for CRC, frequency of cancer thoughts, and perceived ability to cope with unfavorable genetic information. RESULTS: In the final regression model, after accounting for all variables, the significant predictors of test uptake were increased risk perception, greater perceived confidence in ability to cope with unfavorable genetic information, more frequent cancer thoughts, and having had at least one colonoscopy. The association between risk perception and uptake was dependent on frequency of cancer thoughts. Among those who thought about getting CRC more often, the probability of testing increased as perceived risk increased to approximately 50% likelihood of getting CRC and then leveled off. In contrast, among those who never or rarely thought about getting CRC, risk perception was unrelated to testing decision. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with the associations reported between psychological factors and other cancer screening behaviors.
Adaptation, Psychological↗
Familial pancreatic cancer.
BACKGROUND: For many years anecdotal case reports have suggested that pancreatic cancer aggregates in some families. METHODS: Two recent advances have established that this is in fact the case. First, large registries, such as the National Familial Pancreas Tumor Registry (NFPTR) at Johns Hopkins, have identified a number of families in which multiple family members have been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. As a result, the patterns of inheritance of pancreatic cancer can now be studied on a scale not possible before. Second, advances in molecular genetic techniques make it possible to test members of these families for germline mutations in known candidate cancer causing genes. As a result, some of the genetic alterations responsible for the familial aggregation of pancreatic cancer have been identified in some families. RESULTS: The NFPTR has enrolled 362 families in which at least one family member has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. These include 151 families in which at least two first-degree relatives have been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Analysis of these families has revealed that even second-degree relatives of patients from these families are at increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. In addition, a number of kindreds which exhibit aggregation of cancer have been tested for germline mutations in known cancer causing genes. Germline mutations in BRCA2 have been shown to predispose to both breast and pancreatic cancer, germline mutations in p16 to melanoma and pancreatic cancer (the FAMMM syndrome), and genetic mutations in STK11/LKB1 to pancreatic cancer in patients with the Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer aggregates in some families, and relatives of patients with pancreatic cancer have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer themselves. The genetic basis for the familial aggregation of pancreatic cancer has been shown to be germline mutations in known cancer causing genes in some of these families.
BRCA2 Protein↗
Pathogenesis of adenocarcinoma in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by intestinal hamartomatous polyps, mucocutaneous melanin deposition, and increased risk of cancer. Families with PJS from the Johns Hopkins Polyposis Registry were studied to identify the molecular basis of this syndrome and to characterize the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal hamartomas and adenocarcinomas in PJS patients. Linkage analysis in the family originally described by Jeghers in 1949 and five other families confirmed linkage to 19p13.3 near a recently identified gene responsible for PJS. Germ-line mutations in this gene, STK11, were identified in all six families by sequencing genomic DNA. Analysis of hamartomas and adenocarcinomas from patients with PJS identified loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of 19p markers near STK11 in 70% of tumors. Haplotype analysis indicated that the retained allele carried a germ-line mutation, confirming that STK11 is a tumor suppressor gene. LOH of 17p and 18q was identified in an adenocarcinoma but not in hamartomas, implying that allelic loss of these two regions corresponds to late molecular events in the pathogenesis of cancer in PJS. The adenocarcinomas showing 17p LOH also demonstrated altered p53 by immunohistochemistry. None of the 18 PJS tumors showed microsatellite instability, LOH on 5q near APC, or mutations in codons 12 or 13 of the K-ras proto-oncogene. These data provide evidence that STK11 is a tumor suppressor gene that acts as an early gatekeeper regulating the development of hamartomas in PJS and suggest that hamartomas may be pathogenetic precursors of adenocarcinoma. Additional somatic mutational events underlie the progression of hamartomas to adenocarcinomas, and some of these somatic mutations are common to the later stages of tumor progression seen in the majority of colorectal carcinomas.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Cost analysis of alternative approaches to colorectal screening in familial adenomatous polyposis.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The commercial availability of gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) represents an important advance in screening for inherited colon cancer. We investigated the financial impact of this diagnostic tool on colorectal screening for FAP. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to compare per-person costs with third-party payers of three colorectal screening strategies used to diagnose FAP in at-risk persons. The strategies included conventional serial flexible sigmoidoscopy and two different APC gene testing approaches. RESULTS: For 1 at-risk relative who begins screening at age 12 years, average screening costs are $2625 when genotyping the proband first, $2674 when genotyping the at-risk relative first, and $3208 for conventional sigmoidoscopy. The cost advantage of genotyping increases as the pedigree size increases. For a pedigree of 5 at-risk relatives, sigmoidoscopy would have to cost less than $85.60 (professional plus facility fee) for conventional screening to compete with genotyping. The cost advantage of genotyping is diminished for at-risk relatives who begin FAP screening at older ages. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of least expensive FAP screening strategy depends on the cost of flexible sigmoidoscopy, patient age when screening starts, and pedigree size. Genotyping can substantially reduce the cost of FAP screening and, when possible, should start with the proband.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
Missense mutations in disease genes: a Bayesian approach to evaluate causality.
The problem of interpreting missense mutations of disease-causing genes is an increasingly important one. Because these point mutations result in alteration of only a single amino acid of the protein product, it is often unclear whether this change alone is sufficient to cause disease. We propose a Bayesian approach that utilizes genetic information on affected relatives in families ascertained through known missense-mutation carriers. This method is useful in evaluating known disease genes for common disease phenotypes, such as breast cancer or colorectal cancer. The posterior probability that a missense mutation is disease causing is conditioned on the relationship of the relatives to the proband, the population frequency of the mutation, and the phenocopy rate of the disease. The approach is demonstrated in two cancer data sets: BRCA1 R841W and APC I1307K. In both examples, this method helps establish that these mutations are likely to be disease causing, with Bayes factors in favor of causality of 5.09 and 66.97, respectively, and posterior probabilities of .836 and .985. We also develop a simple approximation for rare alleles and consider the case of unknown penetrance and allele frequency.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
Variable phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis in pedigrees with 3' mutation in the APC gene.
BACKGROUND: Germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene on chromosome 5 causes familial adenomatous polyposis. "Attenuated" phenotype has been reported with mutation in the 5' end of the gene (5' to codon 158), but genotype-phenotype relations at the 3' end (3' to codon 1596) have not been described fully. AIMS: To describe and compare colorectal and extracolonic phenotypes in a case series of families with mutation in the 3' end of the APC gene. METHODS: Thirty one at risk or affected members from four families with a mutation in the APC gene located at codon 1979 or 2644 were evaluated. RESULTS: Variable intrapedigree colorectal phenotype was observed: some members at older age had oligopolyposis (fewer than one hundred colorectal adenomas) whereas other members had classic polyposis at young age. Colorectal cancer was diagnosed at older mean age (50 (7) years) in the four families than in classic FAP pedigrees (39 (14) years). Extracolonic lesions characteristic of FAP occurred with 3' APC mutations, but variability in intrapedigree and interpedigree extracolonic phenotype and dissociation of severity of extracolonic manifestations from number of colorectal polyps was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Families with 3' mutations of the APC gene exhibit variable intrapedigree phenotype similar to the heterogeneity noted in families with proximal 5' mutations. Genotyping of FAP and oligopolyposis pedigrees can guide appropriate surveillance of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract in affected members.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
Genetics of pancreatic cancer. From genes to families.
Cancer of the pancreas is a genetic disease. Sporadic cancers of the pancreas are frequently associated with the activation of an oncogene, K-ras, and the inactivation of multiple tumor suppressor genes, including p53, DPC4, p16, and BRCA2. An improved understanding of the genetics of pancreas cancer should lead to new tests to screen for this disease and novel rational gene-based therapies.
Genes, Suppressor↗
Phenotypic expression of disease in families that have mutations in the 5' region of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene.
BACKGROUND: Germline mutation in a gene on chromosome 5 (the adenomatous polyposis coli gene) causes familial adenomatous polyposis of the colorectum. Phenotypic manifestations of this condition vary, but the exact relation of the phenotype to the mutation site along the gene has not been fully described. OBJECTIVE: To determine how the location of mutations along a gene that is associated with multiple colorectal polyps (the adenomatous polyposis coli gene) is related to the phenotypic expression of the syndrome in families. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Polyposis registry. PATIENTS: 20 patients from 7 families that had mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene that were located toward the 5' end of codon 158 (proximal 5' families), were compared with 52 patients from 7 families that had mutations downstream from codon 158, in codons 179 to 625 (distal 5' families). MEASUREMENTS: Sex, age at diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis, number of polyps at first examination of the colon, distribution of polyps, age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and location of colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Mutations that were proximal to codon 158 were found in 7 of 112 families (6%). At the first examination of the colon, 8 of 17 (47%) patients in proximal 5' families and 9 of 48 (19%) patients of similar ages in distal 5' families were found to have fewer than 100 adenomas (P = 0.029). The distribution of polyps was frequently right-sided in patients in proximal 5' families (P = 0.001). The cumulative probability of survival without colorectal cancer was greater for patients in proximal 5' families (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Families with adenomatous polyposis that have proximal 5' mutations of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene are more likely to have a heterogeneous phenotype with delayed development of colonic polyposis and colorectal cancer than are families with distal 5' mutations of the gene. Management should include genotyping of patients who are at risk, colonoscopic surveillance of genotypically positive persons, and prophylactic colectomy if several adenomas are found.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis.
BACKGROUND: The use of commercially available tests for genes linked to familial cancer has aroused concern about the impact of these tests on patients. Familial adenomatous polyposis is an autosomal dominant disease caused by a germ-line mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene that causes colorectal cancer if prophylactic colectomy is not performed. We evaluated the clinical use of commercial APC gene testing. METHODS: We assessed indications for APC gene testing, whether informed consent was obtained and genetic counseling was offered before testing, and the interpretation of the results through telephone interviews with physicians and genetic counselors in a nationwide sample of 177 patients from 125 families who underwent testing during 1995. RESULTS: Of the 177 patients tested, 83.0 percent had clinical features of familial adenomatous polyposis or were at risk for the disease-both valid indications for being tested. The appropriate strategy for presymptomatic testing was used in 79.4 percent (50 of 63 patients). Only 18.6 percent (33 of 177) received genetic counseling before the test, and only 16.9 percent (28 of 166) provided written informed consent. In 31.6 percent of the cases the physicians misinterpreted the test results. Among the patients with unconventional indications for testing, the rate of positive results was only 2.3 percent (1 of 44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent genetic tests for familial adenomatous polyposis often received inadequate counseling and would have been given incorrectly interpreted results. Physicians should be prepared to offer genetic counseling if they order genetic tests.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
Evidence against genetic anticipation in familial colorectal cancer.
Anecdotal reports of hereditary colorectal cancer suggest that genetic anticipation (earlier appearance in successive generations) occurs, but ascertainment bias and cohort effects confound this interpretation. Using approaches that correct for such biases, we examined the age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer from family history questionnaires completed by subjects in the Johns Hopkins Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry; 475 parent-offspring pairs in 308 pedigrees were studied. We observed the expected cohort effect among offspring, in that the mean ages at diagnosis of those born before 1921, between 1921 and 1930, and after 1930 were 63 +/- 13 (SD), 57 +/- 10, and 42 +/- 10 years, respectively, while their parents' mean ages were 65 +/- 14, 66 +/- 14, and 58 +/- 15 years, respectively. In the cohort born before 1921, in which observation periods for both parents and offspring were comparable, there was no difference in age at diagnosis by pairwise comparison or life table analysis (P = 0.15 and 0.23, respectively; r = 0.32). Subgroup analysis of 67 pairs from 38 families that met the International Collaborative Group (ICG) criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and of 14 pairs from 7 families with known germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes also showed no significant differences (mean age at diagnosis: 56 +/- 14 years for parents and 57 +/- 16 years for offspring from ICG families, and 45 +/- 10 years for parents and 44 +/- 12 years for offspring in families with known mutations). We also found no evidence for effect of parental gender on age at diagnosis in offspring of either gender, nor a secular trend toward younger onset colorectal cancer in this sample. In conclusion, there is no evidence for genetic anticipation or genomic imprinting of age at diagnosis in this sample of colorectal cancer families. Apparent anticipation appears to reflect a birth cohort bias of ascertainment.
Adult↗
Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC.
Approximately 130,000 cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) are diagnosed in the United States each year, and about 15% of these have a hereditary component. Two well-defined syndromes, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), account for up to 5% of the total new cases of CRC. Truncating APC mutations are responsible for FAP, and defective mismatch repair genes cause HNPCC. However, the genes responsible for most of the familial cases are unknown. Here we report a mutation (T to A at APC nucleotide 3920) found in 6% of Ashkenazi Jews and about 28% of Ashkenazim with a family history of CRC. Rather than altering the function of the encoded protein, this mutation creates a small hypermutable region of the gene, indirectly causing cancer predisposition.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
APC gene mutations and extraintestinal phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis.
BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by germline mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene on chromosome 5q. AIMS: This study assessed genotype-phenotype correlations for extraintestinal lesions in FAP. METHODS: Mutations of the APC gene were compared with the occurrence of seven extraintestinal manifestations in 475 FAP patients from 51 families. The frequency of manifestations was adjusted for different ages of patients using person years of exposure. In pedigrees without identified APC gene mutation, analysis of linkage to chromosome 5q and/or assessment of neoplasms for replication errors characteristic of mutation in mismatch repair genes were performed. RESULTS: FAP patients from the 42 families (82%) with identified mutations of the APC gene had more frequent expression of extraintestinal manifestations than affected individuals without identified mutations (risk ratio 1.2-4.0; significant difference for cutaneous cysts). The presence of a cutaneous cyst or extraintestinal cancer significantly increased the likelihood of detection of a mutation in the APC gene (94% and 92% respectively; p < 0.05). In patients without identified APC gene mutation, linkage to the APC gene was found in one large family (lod = 5.1, theta 0.01), and replication error phenotype was absent in all 24 neoplasms from 16 members of these nine pedigrees. Expression of pigmented ocular fundus lesions was strongly associated with mutations in codons 541-1309, but no other extraintestinal manifestations were related to mutation position. Multiplicity of extraintestinal manifestations was high with mutation in codons 1465, 1546, and 2621. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with the colorectal phenotype of FAP but no extraintestinal manifestations may have non-truncating mutations of the APC gene or mutation in a gene other than APC or mismatch repair genes. The site of APC gene mutation is associated with pigmented ocular fundus lesions (codons 542-1309) and predisposition to multiplicity of extraintestinal manifestations (codons 1465, 1546, and 2621).
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
Germline BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic carcinomas.
Germline mutations in BRCA2 predispose carriers to the development of breast, ovarian, and a variety of other cancers. The original localization of the BRCA2 gene was aided by its homozygous deletion in a pancreatic carcinoma; indeed, an excess of pancreatic carcinoma has been seen in some BRCA2 cancer families. To determine the involvement of BRCA2 in pancreatic carcinomas, we screened for BRCA2 alterations in an unselected panel of 41 adenocarcinomas of the pancreas (30 pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts and 11 pancreatic cancer cell lines). Of the 15 (27%) that had allelic loss at the BRCA2 locus, 4 (9.8%) had abnormalities in the second allele upon screening of the entire BRCA2 gene by in vitro synthesized protein assay. Three of the four mutations were considered germline in origin (7.3% overall; two were confirmed in normal tissue, and one was the 6174delT mutation from the pancreatic cancer cell line CAPAN-1, for which normal tissue was unavailable). The identification of two 6174delT mutations in this series prompted us to evaluate the prevalence of this mutation in an overlapping consecutive series of 245 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Sequence analysis of this limited region of the gene identified two additional mutations: (a) one additional germline 6174delT mutation (2 of 245, 0.8% overall); and (b) a second nearby germline 6158insT mutation. One of the patients with a germline mutation had a single relative with breast cancer, and another had a single relative with prostate cancer. None had a family history of pancreatic cancer. The incidence of germline BRCA2 mutations in apparently sporadic pancreatic cancer may be at least as high as in breast or ovarian cancer. Our results suggest that some familial risks for carcinoma will be evident only through a population-based application of gene screening techniques because a low disease penetrance of the germline mutations in some families often evades clinical suspicion.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Genetic counseling and predictive testing for colorectal cancer risk.
In contrast to our rapidly increasing knowledge of the genetic basis of colorectal cancer and new molecular technologies, we are only in the early stages of characterizing the impact that this information will have on patients, their families and society. From our research and clinical experience with hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, we have developed a framework for risk assessment that includes criteria for identifying those at higher genetic risk and guidelines for genetic counseling, predictive genetic testing and follow-up management. More research is needed to optimally translate this framework into wider clinical practice, including characterizing genetic heterogeneity and phenotype correlations, documenting the efficacy of screening and surgical interventions, and maximizing the awareness of health professionals on genetic counseling and the promise and limitations of gene tests.
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis↗
Genetic testing for cancer in children. Short-term psychological effect.
OBJECTIVE: To study the psychological effect of genetic testing in children. DESIGN: We evaluated the psychological effect of predictive genetic testing through surveys of children at risk for familial adenomatous polyposis. Their psychological state was assessed before testing and 3 months later. SETTING: A research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: A volunteer sample of 41 children, aged 6 to 16 years, and their parents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report inventories of depression, anxiety, behavior problems, and competence. RESULTS: Nineteen children were found to have a gene mutation (mutation-positive) and 22 did not (mutation-negative). Their depression, anxiety, and behavior problem and competence scores remained in the normal range after testing. Also, parents' depression scores remained within normal limits at follow-up. There were subclinical changes, however. Mutation-positive children with affected mothers had significantly higher depression scores at follow-up. Also, regardless of test results, children with affected mothers had significantly increased anxiety scores after testing. In families with mutation-positive and mutation-negative children, familial adenomatous polyposis-unaffected parents experienced significantly increased depressive symptoms at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive testing of children at risk for familial adenomatous polyposis did not lead to clinically significant psychological symptoms in tested children or their parents. However, it is premature to conclude that long-term follow-up will be equally favorable. Additional study will be needed to determine the families' understanding of the genetic information and the effect of the information on familial relationships.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗