Nitric oxide: linking space and time in the brain.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G M Edelman.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We describe the general design, operating principles, and performance of a neurally organized, multiply adaptive device (NOMAD) under control of a nervous system simulated in a computer. The complete system, Darwin IV, is the latest in a series of models based on the theory of neuronal group selection, which postulates that adaptive behavior is the result of selection in somatic time among synaptic populations. The simulated brain of Darwin IV includes visual and motor areas that are connected with NOMAD by telemetry. Under suitable conditions, Darwin IV can be trained to track a light moving in a random path. After such training, it can approach colored blocks and collect them to a home position. Following a series of contacts with such blocks, value signals received through a "snout" that senses conductivity allow it to sort these blocks on the basis of differences in color associated with differences in their conductivity. Darwin IV represents a new approach to synthetic neural modeling (SNM), a technique in which large-scale computer simulations are employed to analyze the interactions among the nervous system, the phenotype, and the environment of a designed organism as behavior develops. Darwin IV retains the advantages of SNM while avoiding the difficulties and pitfalls of attempting to simulate a rich environment in addition to a brain.
Contact between the developing forebrain and the ingrowing central processes of the olfactory, vomeronasal and terminal nerves is preceded by a migration of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM)-immunoreactive cells from the epithelium of the olfactory pit and the formation of an NCAM-immunoreactive cellular aggregate in the mesenchyme between the olfactory pit and the forebrain. The axons of the olfactory, vomeronasal, and terminal nerves, also NCAM-immunoreactive, grow into the cellular aggregate, which as development proceeds, becomes continuous with the rostral tip of the forebrain. The lateral and more rostral part of the cellular aggregate receives the ingrowing axons of the olfactory nerves and becomes the olfactory nerve layer of the olfactory bulb. The medial, more caudal part receives the central processes of the vomeronasal and terminal nerves. The vomeronasal nerve ends in the accessory olfactory bulb. The central processes of the terminal nerve end in the medial forebrain. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-immunoreactive neurons, like the vomeronasal and terminal nerves, originate from the medial part of the olfactory pit. These LHRH cells migrate into the brain along and within a scaffolding formed by the NCAM-immunoreactive axons of the vomeronasal and terminal nerves, and they are never seen independent of this NCAM scaffold as they cross the nasal lamina propria. The results suggest that: (1) NCAM is likely to be necessary for scaffold formation, and (2) the scaffold may be essential for the subsequent migration of LHRH neurons into the brain. Because they aggregate, migrating LHRH-immunoreactive neurons, on which we did not detect NCAM immunoreactivity, may interact via other cell adhesion molecules (CAM). Inasmuch as the interaction between the LHRH-immunoreactive neurons and the NCAM-immunoreactive scaffold is heterotypic, the possibility of a heterophilic (NCAM to other CAM) interaction is not ruled out. These findings focus our attention on the functional role of NCAM in this migratory system.
The genomic sequences encoding a chicken Ca(2+)-dependent cell adhesion molecule (K-CAM) were recently found to be located approximately 600 base pairs upstream from the translation initiation site of a homologous protein, liver CAM. The sizes of 11 exons of the K-CAM gene are almost identical to those in the L-CAM (liver cell-adhesion molecule) gene with exon-intron junctions occurring at exactly equivalent positions. The sizes and sequences of most introns were, however, much more dissimilar. More detailed comparisons of these two genes reveal that the sequences of the last two exons (exons 15 and 16) are far more alike than are any of the other exons; they are, in fact, almost identical. The introns that separate these exons in the two genes likewise resemble one another far more than do any other corresponding introns. This degree of similarity appears to be far greater than can be accounted for by selection for protein structure, and it strongly suggests that a gene conversion event occurred between these two genes subsequent to their duplication and divergence to perform different biological functions.
In an effort to determine whether homeobox genes modulate the activity of the promoter of the mouse neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) gene, we have carried out a series of cotransfection experiments using NIH 3T3 cells. Plasmids were constructed containing Xenopus laevis Hox-2.5 and -2.4 coding sequences linked to a human cytomegalovirus promoter (CMV-Hox-2.5 and CMV-Hox-2.4). A 4.9-kilobase DNA fragment containing 5' flanking and first exon sequences of the mouse N-CAM gene was linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene (N-CAM-Pro-CAT). Cotransfection with CMV-Hox-2.5 and N-CAM-Pro-CAT resulted in a strong induction of CAT activity. The N-CAM promoter contained two potential homeodomain binding sites (sites I and II) within a 47-base-pair segment (512-559 base pairs upstream of the ATG codon in the first exon of the N-CAM gene). This segment was linked to a minimal promoter (simian virus 40 early) and a downstream CAT gene. Although this construct was transcriptionally active at a low level in NIH 3T3 cells, cotransfection of CMV-Hox-2.5 resulted in CAT activity that was greatly elevated. Mutational studies revealed that it was the homeodomain binding site II sequence that was required for this regulation. In contrast, cotransfection with CMV-Hox-2.4 eliminated the CAT activity that was driven by the CMV-Hox-2.5 construct. Thus, the products of two related Hox genes, which are located adjacent to each other in the Hox-2 complex, can differentially modulate transcription from the promoter of a cell adhesion molecule gene. The results suggest that the N-CAM gene is likely to be a target for regulation by Hox gene products.
Cytotactin is a morphoregulatory molecule of the extracellular matrix affecting cell shape, division, and migration that appears in a characteristic and complex site-restricted pattern during embryogenesis. The promoter region of the gene that encodes chicken cytotactin contains a variety of potential regulatory sequences. These include putative binding sites for homeodomain proteins and a phorbol 12-O-tetradecanoate 13-acetate response element (TRE)/AP-1 element, a potential target for transcription factors thought to be involved in growth-factor signal transduction. To determine the effects of homeobox-containing genes on cytotactin promoter activity, we conducted a series of cotransfection experiments on NIH 3T3 cells using cytotactin promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene constructs and plasmids driving the expression of mouse homeobox genes Evx-1 and Hox-1.3. cotransfection with Evx-1 stimulated cytotactin promoter activity whereas cotransfection in control experiments with Hox-1.3 had no effect. To localize the sequences required for Evx-1 activation, we tested a series of deletions in the cytotactin promoter. An 89-base-pair region containing a consensus TRE/AP-1 element was found to be required for activation. An oligonucleotide segment containing this TRE/AP-1 site was found to confer Evx-1 inducibility on a simian virus 40 minimal promoter; mutation of the TRE/AP-1 site abolished this activity. To explore the potential role of growth factors in cytotactin promoter activation, chicken embryo fibroblasts, which are known to synthesize cytotactin, were first transfected with cytotactin promoter constructs and cultured under minimal conditions in 1% fetal bovine serum. Although the cells exhibited only low levels of CAT activity under these conditions, cells exposed for 12 h to 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum showed a marked increase in CAT activity. Cotransfection with Evx-1 and cytotactin promoter constructs of cells cultured in 1% fetal bovine serum was sufficient, however, to produce high levels of CAT activity. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that Evx-1, a homeobox-containing gene, may activate the cytotactin promoter by a mechanism involving a growth-factor signal transduction pathway. More generally, the results support the hypothesis that the place-dependent expression of morphoregulatory molecules may depend upon local cues provided by homeobox genes and their encoded proteins.
The binding of the glial glycoprotein, cytotactin, to a variety of purified glycolipids was examined. Clear-cut evidence was found for binding of radiolabeled cytotactin to sulfatides purified from bovine brain, but the molecule did not bind to gangliosides or cerebrosides. The sulfatide binding was sensitive to pH and ionic strength and was dependent on the presence of divalent cations. Binding was inhibited by purified unlabeled cytotactin, by polyclonal antibodies to cytotactin, and by several monosaccharides and polysaccharides. It was not inhibited by fibronectin, a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, or the HNK-1 monoclonal antibody, all of which are known to bind to cytotactin. These findings raise the possibilities that sulfated glycolipids may function as cellular receptors for cytotactin and that binding by sulfatides may modulate the varied effects of cytotactin on cellular processes.
Two major lines of research in developmental biology should help us to understand the bases of morphogenesis. The first is the analysis of the morphogenetic effects of local expression of various adhesion molecules. The second is the analysis of cascades of regulatory genes that interact during development. Of particular significance are regulatory interactions involving homeobox-containing genes which are expressed in a place-dependent manner in the embryo. Success in connecting these two lines of research would help to resolve the puzzle of how species-specific tissue patterns can arise and be maintained. In this article, we focus on cytotactin, a morphoregulatory molecule of the extracellular matrix that exhibits sharply restricted spatiotemporal patterns of expression during development. Recent experiments indicate the promoter of the cytotactin gene contains target regions that appear to respond to homeodomain proteins. These observations, and those on other morphoregulatory molecules, suggest a possible connection between their effects on cell patterning and control by homeobox-containing genes.
Nr-CAM is a membrane glycoprotein that is expressed on neurons. It is structurally related to members of the N-CAM superfamily of neural cell adhesion molecules having six immunoglobulin-like domains and five fibronectin type III repeats in the extracellular region. We have found that the aggregation of chick brain cells was inhibited by anti-Nr-CAM Fab' fragments, indicating that Nr-CAM can act as a cell adhesion molecule. To clarify the mode of action of Nr-CAM, a mouse fibroblast cell line L-M(TK-) (or L cells) was transfected with a DNA expression construct encoding an entire chicken Nr-CAM cDNA sequence. After transfection, L cells expressed Nr-CAM on their surface and aggregated. Aggregation was specifically inhibited by anti-Nr-CAM Fab' fragments. To check the specificity of this aggregation, a fusion protein (FGTNr) consisting of glutathione S-transferase linked to the six immunoglobulin domains and the first fibronectin type III repeat of Nr-CAM was expressed in Escherichia coli. Addition of FGTNr to the transfected cells blocked their aggregation. Further analysis using a combination of cell aggregation assays, binding of cells to FGTNr-coated substrates, aggregation of FGTNr-coated Covaspheres and binding of FGTNr-coated Covaspheres to FGTNr-coated substrates revealed that Nr-CAM mediates two types of cell interactions: a homophilic, divalent cation-independent binding, and a heterophilic, divalent cation-dependent binding. Homophilic binding was demonstrated between transfected L cells, between chick embryo brain cells and FGTNr, and between Covaspheres to which FGTNr was covalently attached. Heterophilic binding was shown to occur between transfected and untransfected L cells, and between FGTNr and primary chick embryo fibroblasts; in all cases, it was dependent on the presence of either calcium or magnesium. Primary chick embryo glia or a human glial cell line did not bind to FGTNr-coated substrates. The results indicate that Nr-CAM is a cell adhesion molecule of the nervous system that can bind by two distinct mechanisms, a homophilic mechanism that can mediate interactions between neurons and a heterophilic mechanism that can mediate binding between neurons and other cells such as fibroblasts.
Evidence that excitatory amino acids act via N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors to evoke the release of catecholamines from axonal terminals and synaptosomes has been used to argue for the presence of pre-synaptic NMDA receptors. NMDA receptor agonists also generate nitric oxide (NO) which rapidly diffuses through neural tissue. We find that exogenously applied NO evokes [3H]-dopamine release from cultured neurons. This release is not blocked by the NMDA antagonist MK-801 nor by tetrodotoxin. Both NG-nitroarginine which inhibits NO synthesis, and hemoglobin which binds extracellular NO, block NMDA-evoked [3H]-dopamine release from striatal slices. A major role of endogenously-synthesized NO may be to evoke neurotransmitter release in local volumes of neural tissue.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Genomic sequences immediately upstream of the translational start site for the chicken liver cell adhesion molecule (L-CAM) gene contain a second closely related gene, which, because of its location, we have designated the K-CAM gene. Less than 700 base pairs separate the presumed poly(A) site in the K-CAM gene from the translation initiation site for L-CAM. The sizes of exons 4-15 of the K-CAM gene are almost identical to those in the L-CAM gene and the exon/intron junctions occur at exactly equivalent positions in both genes. Exon 16, which includes the 3' untranslated region, is much shorter in the K-CAM gene and intron sizes and sequences are not generally conserved between the two genes. Probes from the K-CAM gene hybridized to a 3-kilobase mRNA that was present at high levels in embryonic skin, at lower levels in kidney, heart, and gizzard, and at still lower levels in brain and liver, as determined by Northern blotting. The sequence of the predicted gene product was nearly identical to that of the chicken B-cadherin cDNA, although the distribution of the K-CAM gene transcript differed from that reported for the cadherin. The proximity and identical overall structure of the K-CAM and L-CAM genes strongly suggest that they arose by gene duplication and raise the possibility that genes for other calcium-dependent CAMs may be located in clusters. Moreover, the tandem arrangement of the genes may have important implications for the regulation of their expression.
The calcium-independent neural cell adhesion molecule N-CAM is expressed transiently during development in many tissues, including epithelia. The three naturally occurring principal isoforms of N-CAM differ in the way in which they associate with the membrane and in their cytoplasmic domains. These isoforms are generated by developmentally regulated alternative splicing of a single gene: the large cytoplasmic domain (ld) form (relative molecular mass 180,000 (Mr 180K] is specific for post-mitotic neurons; the 120K small cytoplasmic domain (ssd) and 140K small surface domain (sd) forms also occur on other cell types. One function of the different isoforms could be to specify cellular localization; for example, glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-membrane anchoring acts as a targeting signal for expression on the apical surface of polarized epithelial cells. Neurons and epithelial cells may use similar mechanisms for polarizing their plasma membrane proteins. We have therefore investigated the targeting of GPI-anchored (ssd N-CAM, 120K) and transmembrane forms of N-CAM (sd N-CAM, 140K; ld N-CAM, 180K) by comparing the expression of each after transfection of the appropriate complementary DNAs into polarized epithelial cells. We find that isoforms with alternative modes of membrane association are targeted to different surfaces of polarized epithelial cells: ssd N-CAM is expressed on the apical surface, whereas sd and ld N-CAM are expressed on the basolateral surface. These results suggest that the different isoforms of N-CAM determine their own diverse cellular destinations. They also support the hypothesis that the GPI anchor acts as an apical targeting signal in epithelia.
The spatiotemporal expression of the extracellular matrix protein cytotactin/tenascin during somitogenesis suggests that it plays a role in the morphogenetic events that give rise to the pattern of neural crest (NC) development. In the present study, the spatial distribution and molecular forms of cytotactin in somites were examined using in situ hybridization, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry during normal development and after injury. In situ hybridization showed that prior to NC cell invasion cytotactin mRNA was restricted to the caudal half of the newly formed epithelial somites. As each epithelial somite matured, giving rise to a sclerotome and dermamyotome, the mRNA was first restricted to the dermamyotome and later restricted to the rostral protion of the sclerotome, consistent with the previously reported protein distribution. Immunocytochemical analysis of the distribution of cytotactin and NC cells in embryos with ablations that removed NC cells, or with simple wounds that left NC cells in place, demonstrated that the presence of NC cells is neither necessary nor sufficient for the correct positioning of cytotactin. Immunoblotting analysis showed that cytotactin synthesized by sclerotomes in the absence of NC cells was of similar molecular mass to that produced in their presence. These findings are in accord with the notion that the abnormalities of cytotactin distribution are related to the wounding process. We conclude that, contrary to the suggestion of Stern et al. [Stern, C. D., Norris, W. E., Bronner-Fraser, M., Carlson, G. J., Faissner, A., Keynes, R. J. & Schachner, M. (1989) Development 107, 309-319], there is no causal link between the presence of NC cells and the distribution and molecular mass of sclerotomal cytotactin.
An immunohistochemical study of the localization of cytotactin and cytotactin-binding (CTB) proteoglycan throughout embryonic development of the anuran Xenopus laevis reveals that both appear in a restricted pattern related to specific morphogenetic events. CTB proteoglycan expression is first detected during gastrulation at the blastopore lip. Later, it is seen in the archenteron roof around groups of cells forming the notochord, somites and neural plate. Cytotactin first appears after neurulation, and is restricted to the intersomitic regions. Both molecules appear along the migratory pathways of neural crest cells in the trunk and tail. Later, cytotactin is present at sites where neural crest cells differentiate, around the aorta and in the smooth muscle coat of the gut; CTB proteoglycan is absent from these sites. In the head, cytotactin is initially restricted to the regions between cranial somites, while CTB proteoglycan is distributed throughout the cranial mesenchyme. The expression of both molecules is later associated with key events in chondrogenesis during the development of the skull. After chondrogenesis, CTB proteoglycan is distributed throughout the cartilage matrix, while cytotactin is restricted to a thin perichondrial deposit. Both molecules are expressed in developing brain. These findings are compared to studies of the chick embryo and although distinct anatomical differences exist between frog and chick, the expression of these molecules is associated with similar developmental processes in both species. These include mesoderm segmentation, neural crest cell migration and differentiation, cartilage development, and central nervous system histogenesis.
During metamorphosis of Xenopus laevis the extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins cytotactin and cytotactin-binding (CTB) proteoglycan and the cell adhesion molecules N-CAM and Ng-CAM, appear in highly restricted patterns determined by immunofluorescence histology. During limb development, cytotactin appears from the earliest stages in a meshwork of ECM fibrils associated with migrating mesenchymal cells forming the limb bud. Cytotactin also appears in the ECM between the apical limb ectoderm and mesenchyme. Later, both cytotactin and CTB proteoglycan appear co-localized within the central (prechondrogenic) limb mesenchyme. During chondrogenesis in these areas, cytotactin becomes restricted to perichondrium, while CTB proteoglycan is expressed throughout the cartilage matrix. The premyogenic mesenchyme surrounding the chondrogenic areas expressed N-CAM. Later, N-CAM is concentrated at the myogenic foci where cytotactin appears at sites of nerve/muscle contact and in tendons. Expression of these molecules in the blastemas of regenerating limbs was also studied, and during development of the central nervous system, stomach, and small intestine. Analysis of the expression patterns of cytotactin and CTB proteoglycan throughout development and metamorphosis reveals several consistent themes. The expression of these molecules is highly dynamic, often transient, and associated with key morphogenetic events. Cytotactin appears at multiple sites where cells undergo a transition from an undifferentiated, migratory phenotype to a differentiated phenotype. One or both molecules appear at several sites of border formation between disparate cell collectives, and CTB proteoglycan expression is associated with chondrogenesis.
The neuron-glia cell adhesion molecule (Ng-CAM) mediates both neuron-neuron and neuron-glia adhesion; it is detected on SDS-PAGE as a predominant 135-kD glycoprotein, with minor components of 80, 190, and 210 kD. We have isolated cDNA clones encoding the entire sequence of chicken Ng-CAM. The predicted extracellular region includes six immunoglobulin-like domains followed by five fibronectin-type III repeats, structural features that are characteristic of several neural CAMs of the N-CAM superfamily. The amino acid sequence of chicken Ng-CAM is most similar to that of mouse L1 but the overall identity is only 40% and Ng-CAM contains a short fibronectin-like segment with an RGD sequence that has no counterpart in L1. These findings suggest that Ng-CAM and L1 may not be equivalent molecules in chicken and mouse. The amino-terminal sequences of the 210-, 190-, and 135-kD components of Ng-CAM are all the same as the predicted amino terminus of the molecule, whereas the 80-kD component begins within the third fibronectin repeat. The cDNA sequence is continuous across the junction between the 135- and 80-kD components, and a single 170-kD Ng-CAM polypeptide was isolated from tunicamycin-treated cells. In addition, all cDNA probes hybridized on Northern blots to a 6-kb RNA, and most hybridized to single bands on Southern blots. These results indicate that the Ng-CAM components are derived from a single polypeptide encoded by a single gene, and that the 135- and 80-kD components are generated from the 210/190-kD species by proteolytic cleavage. The 135-kD component contains most of the extracellular region including all of the immunoglobulin-like domains. It has no transmembrane segment, but it is tightly associated with the membrane. The 80-kD component contains two and a half type III repeats plus the RGD-containing segment, as well as the single transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. These structural features of Ng-CAM provide a framework for understanding its multiple functions in neuron-neuron interactions, neurite fasciculation, and neuron-glia interactions.