Biomedical subjects

G M Blake

Publications and source records attributed to G M Blake.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Multisite quantitative ultrasound: precision, age- and menopause-related changes, fracture discrimination, and T-score equivalence with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

This study evaluated the clinical utility of a new multisite ultrasound device capable of measuring speed of sound (SOS) at the phalanx, radius, tibia and metatarsal. The in vitro and in vivo short- and long-term precision were evaluated, reference data were collected for 409 healthy white women (236 premenopausal and 173 postmenopausal), and age and menopause related changes were calculated using linear regression. Fracture discrimination was evaluated using 109 women with vertebral fractures and the age-adjusted odds ratios calculated for each standard deviation decrease in SOS measurement. Correlations between SOS measurements and spine and femur bone mineral density (BMD) were calculated. T-score equivalence with BMD was also investigated together with the prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by the WHO criteria. The in vivo short-term precision standardized in T-score units ranged from 0.14 to 0.33 and long-term standardized precision was 0.35-0.65. Postmenopausal age-related bone loss expressed as the annual change in T-score ranged from 0.040 to 0.089 for SOS and 0.053 to 0.066 for BMD, whilst menopause-related annual loss ranged from 0.036 to 0.094 for SOS and 0.050 to 0.074 for BMD. Correlations between the different SOS sites ranged from r = 0.24 to 0.55, and between SOS and BMD from r = 0.12 to 0.47. The odds ratio (and 95% confidence intervals) for fracture per 1 SD decrease in SOS were 2.0 (1.22 to 3.23) for the phalanx; 1.5 (1.01 to 2.24) for the metatarsal; 1.4 (1.03 to 1.99) for the radius and 1.2 (0.87 to 1.66) for the tibia. Odds ratios for BMD in the same population ranged from 2.6 to 4.8 (1.70 to 8.29). The prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by T = <-2.5 in the age range 60-69 ranged from 7.1% to 20.6% for SOS and 6.4% to 12.1% for BMD. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that multisite ultrasound has adequate precision for investigating skeletal status, is capable of differentiating between pre- and postmenopausal women and women with vertebral fractures, has a T-score equivalence similar to that of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and appears to be a promising new technique for evaluating skeletal status at clinically relevant sites.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?

The widespread availability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and X-ray absorptiometry densitometers raises the question of whether a combination of QUS and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements could provide a clinically useful method of enhancing the prediction of fracture risk. The aim of this study was to examine whether a combination of axial BMD and calcaneal QUS measurements can enhance fracture discrimination compared with either method alone. The study population consisted of 154 postmenopausal women with a history of atraumatic fracture at the spine, hip or forearm and 221 healthy postmenopausal women with no clinical risk factors for osteoporosis. Subjects had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (THIP) and calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) measurements on the Hologic Sahara (SAH) and Osteometer DTUone (DTU). Z-scores were calculated using the mean and SD obtained from the healthy postmenopausal group. Logistic regression analysis yielded odds ratios for BMD measurements at the LS, FN and THIP of 2.2, 2.2 and 2.3, respectively. The odds ratios obtained for QUS measurements ranged from 2.5 for DTU BUA to 3.3 for SAH SOS. While these odds ratios for QUS measurements were higher than those obtained for BMD measurements, the differences were not statistically significant. When the odds ratios for QUS were adjusted for BMD at the spine and hip, the odds ratios remained significant in all cases indicating that QUS and BMD variables contribute independently to fracture discrimination. When the BMD-adjusted odds ratios were compared with those for QUS alone, they were slightly lower but not significantly so. When the QUS measurements were adjusted for THIP BMD, the odds ratios for QUS tended to be lower than when adjusted for LS and FN BMD. The Z-scores for each of the QUS measurement variables were combined with spine or hip Z-scores. Logistic regression analysis of the QUS and BMD combined Z-scores yielded slightly higher odds ratios of approximately 3.1 (compared with 2.9 obtained for QUS alone) and increases in the area under the curve of approximately 2%. However, these increases were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the combination of axial BMD and calcaneal QUS measurements did not significantly improve fracture discrimination compared with either method alone.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

The effect of season and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density in healthy women: a double-masked crossover study.

Vitamin D status is known to be an important determinant of bone mineral density (BMD). There is a significant seasonal variation in serum vitamin D, and some studies have reported an associated seasonal variation in BMD. The present study was devised to investigate whether a seasonal variation in BMD could be detected in healthy normal subjects, along with associated variations in serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), intestinal calcium absorption and biochemical markers of bone turnover. A second aim was to investigate whether, if such variations were identified, they could be suppressed by vitamin D supplementation. The subjects were 70 healthy female volunteers (mean age 47.2 years, range 24-70 years) recruited into a double-masked crossover study and followed over 2 years. During the first year 35 subjects received a daily oral supplement containing 800 IU (20 micrograms) cholecalciferol (group 1) and 35 subjects received a placebo preparation (group 2). During the second year the treatment each group received was reversed. Lumbar spine (L1-L4), left proximal femur and total body BMD were measured by DXA at 3-month intervals. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), serum PTH, bone markers (bone-specific ALP (BSAP) and urinary crosslinks (DYPD/creatinine)) and calcium absorption were also measured at each visit. Cholecalciferol treatment increased serum 25-OHD by 25.4 nmol/l (p < 0.001), while a reciprocal decrease in serum PTH of 6.6 ng/l (p = 0.011) was seen in subjects in the lowest quartile of baseline serum 25-OHD. The treatment had no significant effect on spine, femur or total body BMD, calcium absorption or bone markers. When Fourier analysis was used to analyze the data for seasonal effect (defined as twice the amplitude of the 1-year period variation) a highly significant effect for 25-OHD of 18 nmol/l (p < 0.001) was found. However, no effect was found for BMD, PTH, calcium absorption or bone markers. The analysis set a 95% confidence limit to the seasonal effect of less than 0.6% for spine, total hip and total body BMD. It was concluded that in the population of healthy women studied there was no evidence of seasonal variation in spine, femur or total body BMD, serum PTH, calcium absorption or bone markers. Vitamin D supplementation was found to have no effect on BMD.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Vertebral morphometry: a comparison of long-term precision of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography in normal and osteoporotic subjects.

Vertebral morphometry, the quantification of vertebral body shape, has proved a useful tool in the identification and evaluation of osteoporotic vertebral deformities in both epidemiologic surveys and clinical trials. Although conventionally it has been performed on lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine (morphometric radiography, MRX), it may now be accomplished on morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) scans, acquired on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines. In this study the long-term precision of vertebral height measurement using MXA and MRX was directly compared. Initially 24 postmenopausal women were recruited (mean age 67+/-5.8 years): 12 normal subjects (group 1) and 12 with osteoporosis and known vertebral deformities (group 2). Each subject attended for a baseline visit at which they had a MXA examination and lateral thoracic and lumbar radiographs. Twenty-one subjects then returned 1.7+/-0.4 years later (10 subjects from group 1 and 11 from group 2) for a follow-up visit to repeat both the MXA scans and conventional radiographs. The baseline MXA scans and conventional radiographs were each analyzed quantitatively by two observers in a masked fashion, using a standard six-point method. The follow-up images were then analyzed by the same observers. The MRX observers were masked to the baseline analyses, while the MXA observers utilized the manufacturer's 'compare' facility. On all scans and radiographs anterior (Ha), mid (Hm) and posterior (Hp) vertebral heights were measured and wedge (Ha/Hp) and mid-wedge (Hm/Hp) ratios calculated for each vertebral body, ideally from T4 to L4. MRX analyzed 129 of the 130 available vertebrae in group 1 at both visits and 141 of the 143 available in group 2, while MXA analyzed 124 vertebrae in group 1 at both visits and 127 in group 2. Intra- and inter-observer precision errors, particularly in terms of coefficient of variation (CV%), were larger for MXA than for MRX in both normal subjects and those with vertebral deformities. For example, intra-observer precision errors for vertebral height measurement were 0.62 mm (2.9%) for MXA compared with 0.63 mm (2.2%) for MRX in group 1 (normal) subjects and 0.82 mm (4.2%) for MXA compared with 0.85 mm (3.3%) for MRX for group 2 (osteoporosis and vertebral deformities) subjects. Both MXA and MRX inter-observer precision was clearly poorer than the intra-observer precision, a problem associated with any morphometric technique. This was particularly noticeable for MXA; for example, precision of vertebral height measurement in group 1 subjects was 0.62 mm (2.9%) for intra-observer compared with 0.99 mm (4.6%) for inter-observer analyses. MXA and MRX intra- and inter-observer precision was significantly poorer for subjects with vertebral deformities compared with those without, with the CV% for subjects with vertebral deformity approximately 50% greater than that of normal subjects. For example, MRX intra-observer precision for the midwedge ratio was 2.6% for group 1 subjects compared with 3.8% for group 2 subjects. The precision of vertebral height measurement on deformed vertebrae of group 2 subjects was poorer than that for normal vertebrae in the same subjects using both MXA and MRX, as a result of increased variability in point placement. For example, MXA intra-observer precision (RMS SD) for the wedge ratio precision was 0.037 (3.9%) for normal vertebrae compared with 0.060 (6.6%) for deformed vertebrae. We conclude that MXA precision was generally poorer than MRX, although both techniques were adversely affected by the presence of vertebral deformities and the use of more than one observer. Although precision errors for both techniques were substantially smaller than the 20-25% reduction in vertebral height frequently proposed to identify incident deformities, the poorer precision of MXA may lead to an increased risk of erroneous classification of vertebrae as normal or deformed.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate.

This article discusses methods for quantifying bone turnover based on tracer kinetic studies of the short-lived radiopharmaceuticals 99mTc-MDP and 18F-fluoride. Measurements of skeletal clearance obtained by using these tracers reflect the combined effects of skeletal blood flow and osteoblastic activity. The pharmacokinetics of each tracer is described, together with some of the quantitative tests of skeletal function that have been described in the literature. The physiologic interpretation of quantitative measurements of bone obtained with the use of short half-life radionuclides is discussed, and the advantages and limitations of 99mTc-MDP and 18F-fluoride are compared and contrasted. Currently, 18F-fluoride dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) is the technique of choice for physiologically precise quantitative studies of bone. However, comparable data could probably be obtained by using 99mTc-MDP if methods for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) quantitation were improved.

Bone Diseases, Metabolic↗

PubMed2001

Bone densitometry and the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Over the past decade, bone density scanning has come to be seen as an essential part of the evaluation of patients at risk of osteoporosis. Although dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the technique most associated with the recent growth in bone densitometry, several innovative devices for performing measurements at sites in the peripheral skeleton are also available. This article examines the question of whether there is any one method or measurement site that performs better than all the others at identifying patients at risk of fracture. Given that it is essential to make greater use of the small, low-cost peripheral devices if the many millions of women most at risk are to be identified and treated, what approaches to the interpretation of bone density scans can be adopted to ensure the greatest degree of consistency among different methods? Finally, does it matter if the imperfect correlation among different types of measurement results in different patients being selected for treatment on the basis of different techniques?

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

Monitoring treatment for osteoporosis by using bone densitometry.

In recent years, the range of treatments available for patients with osteoporosis has greatly increased. A decade ago, the only proven therapy was estrogen, but today the choices include bisphosphonates, selective estrogen-receptor modulators, calcitonin, and parathyroid hormone. Clinical trials involving bone mineral density (BMD) scans of the spine and femur have had an important role in the evaluation of these new therapies. In particular, the efficacy of treatments has now been verified in large studies powered to show reductions in fracture risk. In contrast with the use of BMD scans in research studies, their value for monitoring response to treatment in individual patients is less certain. In many cases, the increases in BMD are too small to reliably distinguish between true changes and measurement error. However, experience with estrogen and bisphosphonates suggests that these treatments have a beneficial effect on bone in most patients. Follow-up scans for patients taking these agents are therefore of limited value, apart from offering reassurance to the patient and the doctor. However, when new therapies are first introduced, follow-up scans have a useful role in building up the physician's experience and confidence.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

Quantitative studies of bone using (18)F-fluoride and (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate: evaluation of renal and whole-blood kinetics.

We report a study of the renal and whole-blood kinetics of (18)F-fluoride and (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-MDP) and their effect on the evaluation of the skeletal kinetics of the two bone tracers. Data were obtained during an investigation of postmenopausal women taking hormone replacement therapy who were compared with untreated, age-matched controls. After intravenous injection of 18F-fluoride (1 MBq), (99m)Tc-MDP (1 MBq), (51)Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (51Cr-EDTA) (3 MBq) and (125)I-human serum albumin ((125)I-HSA) (0.25 MBq), multiple blood samples and urine collections were taken between 0 and 4 h after injection. (51)Cr-EDTA data were used to evaluate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the completeness of each timed urine collection. (125)I-HSA data were used to evaluate the plasma volume and the red cell uptake of the other three tracers. At 4 h, the cumulative urine excretions (and standard deviations, SDs) were: (99m)Tc-MDP, 58.2% (4.8%); (18)F-fluoride, 36.1% (5.7%); (51)Cr-EDTA, 81.5% (4.5%). Plots of the renal clearance of (18)F-fluoride against urine volume showed that urine flow rates greater than 5 ml.min-1 were necessary to ensure a constant renal clearance of (18)F and hence stable conditions for the evaluation of bone tracer kinetics. In contrast, a low urine flow rate had no effect on the renal kinetics of (99m)Tc-MDP. For MDP, the evaluation of skeletal kinetics requires data on protein binding so that calculations can be performed for free MDP. In the present study, protein binding of MDP was evaluated from the ratio of total (99m)Tc-MDP renal clearance to GFR based on the principle that free (99m)Tc-MDP is a GFR tracer. Between 0 and 4 h after injection, the fractional protein binding of MDP increased linearly with time, changing from 21+/-5% immediately after injection to 58+/-5% at 4 h. Although red cell uptake of (99m)Tc-MDP was negligible, for (18)F-fluoride around 30% of circulating tracer was transported in red cells. In view of the data showing the rapid transport of (18)F-fluoride across the red cell membrane, bone kinetic data for (18)F are more accurately reported as whole-blood clearance rather than plasma clearance.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA) has recently been developed to assess vertebral deformity status using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines. In contrast to bone densitometry, a vertebral morphometry phantom is not supplied by any machine manufacturer. The aim of this study was to develop a suitable phantom to quantify the accuracy and precision of the vertebral measurement software on three DXA scanners in vitro and to perform a weekly quality control (QC) scan over a 30-month period to evaluate any drift or changes in measurement accuracy over time. The phantom was constructed from Perspex and aluminium to simulate soft tissue and bone, respectively. 13 aluminium rectangles (each 30 mm wide, 25 mm high and 3 mm thick, with edges ("endplates") 6 mm thick) were set into one side of a solid Perspex block to represent the vertebral bodies from the fourth thoracic (T4) to the fourth lumbar (L4). The phantom was scanned on both the Hologic QDR2000plus and the QDR-4500A as well as the Lunar Expert-XL. Three consecutive lateral MXA scans were acquired on the Hologic machines using each of the scan modes available. On the QDR-2000plus, the lateral scan modes available are fast, array and high definition, which are all dual energy modes. These three scan modes are also available on the QDR-4500A, with the addition of a single energy scan mode. Four lateral scans were acquired on the Expert-XL machine using the single scan mode available. Each MXA scan was analysed twice by a trained operator using the standard software supplied by each manufacturer. A QC scan was performed approximately weekly over a 30-month period on only the QDR-4500A machine, and total phantom height was measured from the inferior edge of L4 to the superior edge of T4. Accuracy of "vertebral" height measurement varied between the three DXA machines and between the scan modes available. All underestimated "true" vertebral height by between 0.4% and 8.6%, with the scan modes using finer collimation producing the most accurate results. Repeat analysis precision of vertebral height measurement was best on the QDR-4500A, followed by the Expert-XL, and was poorest on the QDR-2000plus. The QC scans acquired on the QDR-4500A suggested that it was a highly stable machine, little affected by even major repairs. It must be remembered that these in vitro phantom results may not be representative of the true in vivo situation. The MXA phantom appears to be a useful tool for documenting the stability of the mechanical instruments and for checking the long-term consistency of operator precision.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis.

Because resources do not allow all women to be screened for osteoporosis, clinical risk factors are often used to identify those individuals at increased risk of fracture who are then assessed by bone densitometry. The aim of this study was to compare calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and axial bone mineral density (BMD) T and Z scores in a large group of women, some with no clinical risk factors and others with one or more risk factors for osteoporosis. The study population consisted of 1115 pre- and postmenopausal women. A subgroup of 530 women was used to construct reference data for calculating T and Z scores. A total of 786 women was found to have one or more of the following risk factors: (i) atraumatic fracture since the age of 25 years, (ii) report of X-ray osteopenia, (iii) predisposing medical condition or use of therapy known to affect bone metabolism, (iv) premature menopause before the age of 45 years or a history of amenorrhea of longer than 6 months duration, (v) family history of osteoporosis, (vi) body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m2, and (vii) current smoking habit. Calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) measurements were performed on a Hologic Sahara and a DTUone and BMD was measured at the spine and hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The Z score decrements associated with the seven risk factors calculated using multivariate regression analysis were similar for QUS and BMD measurements. Z score decrements (mean of BMD and QUS measurements combined) associated with a history of atraumatic fracture (-0.67), X-ray osteopenia (-0.36), a family history of osteoporosis (-0.23), and a low BMI (-0.53) were all statistically significant compared with women with no risk factors. Z score decrements associated with a medical condition or use of therapy known to affect bone metabolism, a premature menopause or prolonged amenorrhea, or those who were current smokers were not significantly different from zero. As the number of risk factors present in each individual increased, the mean Z score decrements became more negative, increasing from -0.28 for women with one risk factor to -1.19 for those with four or more risk factors. QUS and BMD measurements yielded similar mean Z scores for women with one, two, three, or more than four risk factors. Using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to diagnose osteoporosis for BMD measurements and revised diagnostic criteria for QUS, approximately one-third of postmenopausal women aged 50+ years with clinical risk factors were classified as osteoporotic compared with only 12% of women without clinical risk factors. Over two-thirds of postmenopausal women with risk factors were classified as osteopenic or osteoporotic and approximately 28% were classified as normal. The proportion of women classified into each diagnostic category was similar for BMD and QUS. In conclusion, clinical risk factors for osteoporosis affected calcaneal BUA and SOS Z score measurements to the same extent as axial BMD Z score measurements. Provided revised diagnostic criteria are adopted for QUS, similar proportions of postmenopausal women are identified as osteopenic or osteoporotic as with BMD.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use?

Over the past decade, bone density scans have assumed an essential role in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Although dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the central skeleton remain widely used, a variety of different types of equipment for measuring peripheral sites is now available. However, the poor correlation between different types of measurement and a lack of consensus on how results from peripheral sites should be interpreted have proved a barrier to the more widespread use of these devices. These issues prompt the following questions: Which technique best identifies patients at risk of fracture? What approaches to scan interpretation ensure the closest agreement among different methods? Does it matter if different patients are selected for treatment on the basis of different techniques? The relative risk (RR)of fracture derived from prospective studies is a key parameter for comparing the clinical value of different techniques. Recent reports confirm the advantages of hip bone mineral density compared with peripheral measurements for predicting hip fracture risk, although for fractures at other sites the differences are inconclusive. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we show that the guidelines adopted for scan interpretation are of crucial importance for ensuring that the information provided is used effectively. The closest agreement among different techniques is achieved by setting thresholds for peripheral devices that target either the same percentage of the population or the same percentage of future fracture cases as femur DXA. Different methods select different groups of individuals from the total pool of patients who will later sustain a fracture, with the most successful technique being the one with the largest RR value. The emphasis placed by many studies on validating new techniques by studying their correlation with DXA may lead to the clinical value of peripheral devices being underestimated when the key datum is the RR value inferred from prospective fracture studies.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2000

Intermittent oral disodium pamidronate in established osteoporosis: a 2 year double-masked placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety.

The effect of oral pamidronate on bone mineral density and its adverse effect profile was investigated by a double-masked placebo-controlled study of 122 patients aged 55-75 years with established vertebral osteoporosis. Patients on active therapy received disodium pamidronate 300 mg/day (group A) for 4 weeks every 16 weeks, 150 mg/day (group B) for 4 weeks every 8 weeks or placebo (group C). All patients additionally received 500 mg of calcium and 400 IU vitamin D daily. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the spine, hip, forearm and total body were performed at baseline and 6-monthly for 2 years using a Hologic QDR 1000 device at two sites. Serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline were measured at the above visits and at 3 months. The percentage change (SEM) in spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 2 years based on intention-to-treat analysis was 4.64 (1.01) in group A, 6.10 (0.87) in group B and 1.13 (1.32) in group C. Analysis of variance showed significant increases in group A and B compared with placebo (p < 0.01). There were also significant rises in femoral neck BMD for group A (p = 0.005), trochanter BMD for groups A and B (p < 0.01) and total-body BMD for groups A and B (p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline for groups A and B (p < 0.01). There was an excess of gastrointestinal side-effects in the treated groups, particularly group A. We conclude that intermittent pamidronate therapy can prevent bone loss at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck in patients with established vertebral osteoporosis, although due to gastrointestinal side-effects the 300 mg dose in particular does not appear suitable for clinical usage.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2000

Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women.

The reproducibility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) is an important factor for longitudinal studies. We assessed the long-term precision of posteroanterior lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip BMD in 40 postmenopausal women who formed the control arm of a clinical trial of tibolone. BMD was measured at 0, 6 and 12 months and thereafter every 12 months up to 7 years. For each subject the trend of BMD with time was analyzed using linear regression. Each residual was expressed as the percentage difference from predicted BMD and the validity of assuming linear change with time was checked using the mean residuals for each visit number. For spine BMD a chi-squared test showed that the mean residuals were not statistically significantly different from zero. Although statistically significant deviations from linearity were found for the femoral neck and total hip sites the weighted root mean square residuals were small compared with the precision errors. When residuals were binned into histograms a statistical test for skewness was not significant for all three sites. However, a test for kurtosis yielded a statistically significant result for each histogram due to outlying residuals. To determine the standard deviation (SD) of the core gaussian distribution, outliers were trimmed using the method of Melton et al. For lumbar spine BMD outliers with residuals exceeding +/- 3 SD arose mainly from subjects with a body mass index (BMI) >28 kg/m(2) or from subjects who had undergone a large change in BMI during the study. For femoral neck BMD and total hip BMD the outliers were frequently due to inconsistent rotation of the hip. Results for long-term precision calculated from the standard deviation of residuals using the trimmed (untrimmed) data were: lumbar spine BMD, 1.12% (1.65%); femoral neck BMD, 2.21% (2.48%); and total hip BMD, 1.32% (1.57%). These errors were only slightly worse than short-term errors despite changes of DXA scanner during the course of the study. However, obesity may have an adverse effect on precision errors in individual patients and particular care is necessary to ensure reproducible patient positioning for femur scans.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2000

The effect of weight change on total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: results from a clinical trial.

In the past decade dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning has assumed an important role in the evaluation of new treatments for osteoporosis. Although the spine and hip are the sites usually chosen for monitoring bone mineral density (BMD) changes, total body DXA is also of interest because of the comprehensive view it gives of the whole skeleton. However, recent studies have reported anomalies in total body DXA in subjects undergoing weight change, suggesting that the technique may not be valid in this circumstance. The present study evaluated total body DXA in a trial of cyclical etidronate therapy in which many subjects underwent significant weight change. The study population was 152 postmenopausal women who had spine, hip and total body DXA scans performed at baseline, 1 and 2 years. The total body scans were analyzed using two software options referred to as 'standard' and 'enhanced'. The following variables were studied: total body BMD, total body bone mineral content (BMC), and subregional BMD values for the following seven sites: lumbar spine, thoracic spine, pelvis, head, ribs, arms and legs. The percentage change from baseline was analyzed in a multivariate regression analysis to derive the treatment effect (defined as the difference in changes between the etidronate and placebo groups) and a coefficient that described the effect of weight change on the total body DXA variable. Mean weight change after 2 years was +1.1 kg (range -9.3 to +16.8 kg). Results for the weight change coefficient were significantly different from zero for five of nine total body variables using the standard analysis and seven of nine for the enhanced analysis with values (and standard errors) that varied from +0.67 (0.04)%/kg for standard total body BMC to -0.32 (0.11)%/kg for enhanced arm BMD. Results for the treatment effect at 2 years were significantly different from zero for total body BMD, total body BMC and for the lumbar spine, thoracic spine and pelvis BMD subregions, but were not significant for head, rib, arm or leg BMD. Findings for the standard and enhanced analyses agreed closely and the size of the treatment effect was related to the proportion of trabecular bone at the measurement site. We conclude that in a randomized study the effects of weight change can be corrected and total body DXA can give useful information about the response to treatment across the whole skeleton.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2000

Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity.

The accurate identification of prevalent vertebral fractures is important in both the clinical and research setting as they are associated with increased risk of further fracture and irreversible clinical consequences. This study reports a direct comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification using X-ray absorptiometry (XA) scans, acquired on a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine, and conventional radiographs in a diverse group of 161 postmenopausal women, ranging from healthy subjects with normal bone mineral density (BMD) to osteoporotic subjects with multiple vertebral deformities. Deformities were identified by a trained operator by visual assessment of the XA scans (VXA) and semiquantitatively by an experienced radiologist on the conventional radiographs (XSQ). Subjects were recruited prospectively and were triaged according to their VXA results into normal, equivocal and definite deformity groups. VXA and XSQ demonstrated good agreement (96.3%, K = 0.79) in classifying vertebrae as normal or deformed in the 1978 of 2093 vertebrae deemed analyzable on both the XA scans and conventional radiographs. VXA showed good sensitivity (91.9%) in the identification of moderate/severe XSQ deformities and an excellent negative predictive value (98.0%) was produced when VXA was used to distinguish subjects without vertebral deformities from those with possible or definite deformities on a per subject basis. The majority of disagreement between the two methods resulted from different classification of mild wedge and endplate deformities and the poor visualization of upper thoracic vertebrae on the XA scans. Agreement improved, particularly on a per subject basis, when analysis was restricted to the vertebral levels from L4 to T7. Visual triage of XA scans by a trained operator would seem to be swift, convenient and cost-effective method, with excellent negative predictive value, to distinguish subjects with very low risk of vertebral deformities from those with possible deformities. These 'normal' subjects can then be excluded prior to performing conventional radiographs and further time-consuming and costly methods of vertebral deformity assessment such as XSQ by an experienced radiologist and/or quantitative morphometry. VXA may prove useful in the clinical evaluation of patients at risk of osteoporosis as an adjunct to BMD scans or in the selection of subjects for osteoporosis-related clinical trials.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2000

Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?

The aim of this study was to compare quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements obtained using a new calcaneal QUS imaging device with a conventional non-imaging device using fixed transducers. The study group consisted of 340 healthy women with no risk factors associated with osteoporosis (176 premenopausal and 164 postmenopausal) and 83 women with one or more vertebral fractures. All women had QUS measurements performed on the Osteometer DTU-one (imaging) and Walker-Sonix UBA575+ (non-imaging) devices and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements performed at the spine and hip. A subgroup of 81 women had additional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans at the calcaneus. Short-term standardized precision (SP = SD/young adult SD) based on duplicate measurements was significantly better on the DTU for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) (SP: DTU 0.15 vs UBA 0.21,p = 0.01) and speed of sound (SOS) (SP: DTU 0.14 vs UBA 0.18, p = 0.01). However, long-term SP of the DTU was comparable to or significantly poorer than the SP of the UBA device. The BUA and SOS measurements obtained on the DTU and UBA were significantly correlated (r = 0.76 and 0.89 for BUA and SOS measurements respectively). The correlations between QUS and BMD measurements were all significant, ranging from 0.53 to 0.72. No significant improvements in the correlation with axial or peripheral BMD were observed using the imaging device. All the QUS measurement parameters showed a significant negative relationship between age and years since menopause in the postmenopausal group. Annual losses were lower for the DTU for BUA (DTU 0.22 dB/MHz per year vs UBA 0.44 dB/MHz per year) but comparable for SOS (DTU 0.29 m/s per-year vs UBA 0.22 m/s per year). However, when these figures were standardized to take into account the clinical range, the annual losses were similar on the DTU and UBA. Age-adjusted odds ratios for each SD decline were similar on the DTU for BUA (DTU 3.2 vs UBA 3.3) and SOS (DTU 3.4 vs UBA 5.1). The corresponding odds ratios for BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip were 2.7, 2.9 and 3.3 respectively. Age-adjusted receiver-operating characteristics analysis yielded values for the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.74 to 0.83. The DTU BUA AUC of 0.83 was significantly greater than the AUC obtained for UBA BUA and BMD measurements at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Ultrasound imaging at the calcaneus was found to improve the standardized precision of BUA and SOS measurements in the short term but not in the long term. Neither the correlation with BMD nor the discriminatory ability of QUS was improved by utilizing QUS images at the calcaneus. The inconsistencies of the imaging system used for this study demonstrate that further development is required before it will be possible to show improvements in long-term precision.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2000

Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?

With the increasing number of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) devices in use worldwide it is important to develop strategies for the clinical use of QUS. The aims of this study were to examine the age-dependence of T-scores and the prevalence of osteoporosis using the World Health Organization Study Group criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis and to examine the T-score threshold that would be appropriate to identify women at risk of osteoporosis using QUS. Two groups of women were studied: (i) 420 healthy women aged 20-79 years with no known risk factors associated with osteoporosis; (ii) 97 postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures. All subjects had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the spine and hip and QUS measurements on three calcaneal ultrasound devices (Hologic Sahara, Hologic UBA575+, Osteometer DTUone). A subgroup of 102 (76 on the DTUone) healthy women aged 20-40 years was used to estimate the young adult mean and SD for each QUS and DXA measurement parameter to calculate T-scores. The age-related decline in T-scores for QUS measurement parameters was half the rate observed for the bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. The average T-score for a woman aged 65 years was -1.2 for QUS measurements and -1.75 for the BMD measurements. When osteoporosis was defined by a T-score < or = -2.5 the prevalence of osteoporosis in healthy postmenopausal women was 17%, 16% and 12% for lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip BMD respectively. When the same definition was used for QUS measurements the prevalence of osteoporosis ranged from 2% to 8% depending on which ultrasound device and measurement parameter was used. Four different approaches, based on DXA-equivalent prevalence rates of osteoporosis, were utilized to examine which T-score threshold would be appropriate for identifying postmenopausal women at risk of osteoporosis using QUS measurements. These ranged from -1.05 to -2.12 depending upon the approach used to estimate the threshold and on which QUS device the measurements were performed, but all were significantly lower than the threshold of -2.5 used for BMD measurements. In conclusion, the WHO threshold of T = -2.5 for diagnosing osteoporosis requires modification when using QUS to assess skeletal status. For the three QUS devices used in this study, a T-score threshold of -1.80 would result in the same percentage of postmenopausal women classified as osteoporotic as the WHO threshold for BMD measurements. Corresponding T-score thresholds for individual measurement parameters on the two commercially available devices were -1.61, -1.94 and -1.90 for Sahara BUA, SOS and estimated heel BMD respectively and -1.45 and -2.10 for DTU BUA and SOS respectively Additional studies are needed to determine suitable T-score thresholds for other commercial QUS devices.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2000

Cyclical etidronate therapy for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss: a 1-year open-label follow-up study.

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the pharmacological activity of cyclical etidronate therapy is sustained beyond the dosing period. A group of 121 postmenopausal women who had completed a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel study with etidronate or placebo (400 mg/day for 14 days every 3 months) and calcium agreed to participate in a 1-year open-label follow-up study to evaluate the effect of discontinuing etidronate treatment. Fifty-nine subjects in the former etidronate group and 62 in the placebo group received 500 mg/day of elemental calcium; 54/59 and 58/62 subjects, respectively, completed the study. Outcomes of the study were bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and biochemical markers of bone turnover (urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine and serum osteocalcin). To determine whether there was a residual effect of previous therapy we compared mean percentage changes from baseline (year 0) to year 3 for both spinal and femoral neck BMD and markers of bone turnover in the former cyclical etidronate and placebo groups. To evaluate the carryover effect of treatment we compared the percent change from year 2 to year 3 for the same variables. Mean percentage change (SEM) from year 2 to year 3 for spinal BMD in the former cyclical etidronate group was -2.87% (0.48%) versus -0.99% (0.36%) in the placebo group (P = 0.0022). In the femoral neck, the BMD changes were -0.86% (0.42%) versus -1.01% (0.41%) (NS). Biochemical markers increased within 6 months toward baseline levels. Mean percentage changes from baseline (year 0) in both spinal and femoral neck BMD were significantly different between groups 1 year after treatment discontinuation. No differences between groups were maintained in deoxypyridinoline and osteocalcin. It is concluded that following withdrawal of cyclical etidronate therapy bone loss resumes at a normal and moderately accelerated rate in the proximal femur and lumbar spine, respectively. A positive effect on BMD at both cortical and trabecular sites is maintained for 1 year after treatment withdrawal.

Amino Acids↗