Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G London

Publications and source records attributed to G London.

51 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

Increased bone aluminum deposition after subtotal parathyroidectomy in dialyzed patients.

Ten dialyzed patients underwent a systematic bone biopsy before and 19 +/- 9 months after subtotal parathyroidectomy (PTX). At the end of the follow-up period all the patients, except two, who complained of proximal myalgia, were asymptomatic. Compared to the bone biopsy specimen obtained prior surgery, decreased bone formation without mineralization impairment was observed after PTX. Despite an average decrease in aluminum gels intake after PTX, an increase in stained aluminum was observed (0.69 +/- 0.79 versus 1.20 +/- 0.95 mm/mm2, P less than 0.050). Aluminum accumulation depended on the pre-PTX bone aluminum load: pre- and post-PTX bone aluminum loads were correlated (r = 0.78, P less than 0.01). Bone aluminum accumulation was not related to the amount of aluminum gel intake after PTX; however, only two patients free of both bone aluminum deposit prior to PTX and aluminum gel intake after PTX had no stainable aluminum on the second bone biopsy after PTX. The only patient who had no decrease in bone formation after PTX had no increase in bone aluminum. Assuming that the patients had no aluminum deposit prior to dialysis, we measured the rate of bone aluminum accumulation. It rose from 0.11 +/- 0.09 mm/mm2/year prior to PTX to 0.40 +/- 0.25 mm/mm2/year after PTX (P less than 0.05) in the six patients who were maintained on phosphate binders and who had a decrease in bone formation after PTX. These six patients had unchanged aluminum gel intake.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Intravascular volume, extracellular fluid volume, and total body water in obese and nonobese hypertensive patients.

Intraarterial blood pressure, plasma volume, extracellular and interstitial (IFV) fluid volumes, and total and intracellular (IBV) body water were evaluated in 50 men: 16 obese hypertensive patients, 16 nonobese hypertensive patients, and 18 normal subjects of similar age. In obese hypertensive subjects, the IBW/IFV ratio was significantly increased (p less than 0.01) in comparison with both control subjects and nonobese hypertensive patients. After body weight reduction, blood pressure (p less than 0.01), heart rate (p less than 0.05), and the IBW/IFV ratio (p less than 0.01) significantly decreased. The decrease in the ratio was due to an absolute increase in the interstitial fluid volume, related to a shift of fluid volume from the intracellular to the interstitial space. Thus, obese hypertensive patients have an increased water cell content, causing an altered partition between the intracellular and the interstitial spaces.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Thromboxane B2 in borderline and essential hypertensive patients.

Thromboxane B2 (TxB2) was measured in the venous and arterial plasma and in the urine of 15 borderline and 15 sustained essential hypertensive patients, and in the plasma and urine of 12 control normotensive age-matched subjects. Plasma and urine thromboxane B2 were significantly higher in both the borderline and sustained hypertensives than in the control normotensives. There was a significant positive correlation between urinary (i.e. renal)TxB2 excretion and the glomerular filtration rate, and between urinary TxB2 excretion and sodium excretion in the hypertensive but not in the normotensive subjects. Thromboxane A2 participates in pressure natriuresis.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A prospective randomised European multicentre study of medium-long run mortality and morbidity comparing acetate-free biofiltration and bicarbonate dialysis.

In recent years, the progressive increase in the mean age of the population entering chronic dialysis treatment has been responsible, on the one hand, for the growing number of patients undergoing regular dialysis, and on the other, for the high number of "critical" patients, both as a result of their age and the presence of concomitant morbidity. Thus, dialysis treatment today is not only aimed at waste removal and water-electrolyte homeostasis, but also at a reduction in morbidity and mortality, and at improving the patients' quality of life, thanks to the use of biocompatible materials and the achievement of good cardiovascular tolerance to treatment. Consequently, diffusive-convective dialysis procedures have been on the increase, since they combine better depuration with the use of biocompatible high-flux membranes. Acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) is a diffusive-convective dialysis procedure which utilises a high-flux membrane, AN69, post-dilution infusion of a sodium bicarbonate solution (NaHCO3), and a dialysate which is completely free of any buffer, and thus also free of acetate, which may have various negative effects on the patient. A number of studies have already shown the better hemodynamic stability and the reduction of intradialytic side-effects during AFB. All these, however, were short-term studies. To verify the beneficial effects of AFB in the long run, a three year multicentre randomised European trial has been proposed to compare bicarbonate hemodialysis (BD), a technique used in nearly 80% of the world's dialysis population, and AFB. The specific aim of the investigation is to verify, in a large number of patients, the results of hemodialysis treatment in terms of morbidity, mortality and quality of life. The study involves 80 hemodialysis units across Italy, France, Germany, Spain, Slovenia and Croatia, with enrollment of about 400 patients considered "critical" for at least one of the following reasons: age, diabetes, dialysis cardiovascular instability. Fifty percent of the patients are to undergo AFB with the AN69 membrane and bicarbonate solution infusion (NaHCO3 145 or 167 mEq/lt), and the other fifty percent are to be treated by BD, with any membrane except the nonmodified cellulosic one. Biochemical, cardiological, and nutritional parameters will be considered throughout the study. Mortality, morbidity both in terms of intra- and interdialysis symptoms - and hospitalisation rate, as well as the patients' quality of life, evaluated by the SF36 questionnaire, will be analysed.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].

BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure (PP) corresponds to the difference between arterial systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Central PP seems to be a stronger coronary risk marker than brachial PP. Central PP can be estimated by aortic PP measured non invasively by aplanation tonometry of the carotid artery. The aim of this study was to compare 2 methods of estimation of aortic PP: estimation from Pulse Wave Velocities (PWV) and by aplanation tonometry of the carotid artery. Estimation from PWV is based on the non uniform transmission of the PP i.e. the amplification of PP from the aorta to brachial artery, through arteries of increasing impedance. METHODS: One hundred and fifty one subjects were included, 111 hemodialysis patients and 40 subjects free of cardiovascular treatment or cardiovascular organ damage, recruited in a preventive medicine setting. Central PP was measured by aplanation tonometry of the carotid artery. The following formula was used for the relationship between PP and PWV in the two arterial segments considered for pulse wave travel (waterhammer formula): [formula: see text] Where measurement of brachial PP (PPBr) and PWV at aortic (PWVAo) and brachial (PWVBr) gives an estimation of aortic PP (PPAo estimated). Carotid-femoral PWV was used for PWVAo and carotid-radial PWV was used for PWVBr. The two methods were compared by t-test and according to Bland and Altman's method. RESULTS: In the hemodialysis group (73 males, 44 +/- 12 years old), brachial PP was 56 +/- 15 mm Hg and central PP as measured at the carotid level was 47 +/- 15 mmHg. In the healthy group (29 males, 46 +/- 11 years old), these values were 46 +/- 10 mmHg and 35 +/- 10 mmHg respectively. Compared to carotid artery aplanation tonometry, PPAo estimated was larger than central PP by 2.9 +/- 6.3 mmHg in hemodialysis patients and by 5.4 +/- 6.6 mmHg in the healthy group. The difference was significantly larger in healthy subjects than in hemodialysis patients (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The PWV estimated PP is larger than the central PP measured at the carotid level by aplanation tonometry. The difference is larger in cardiovascular event free subjects than in patients on hemodialysis.

Adult↗