Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G L Myers

Publications and source records attributed to G L Myers.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.

CONTEXT: Better procedures are needed whereby national proficiency testing survey providers can assess and improve the accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry. SETTING: The 1994 College of American Pathologists Comprehensive Chemistry Survey. DESIGN: This study of matrix effects and the accuracy of laboratory measurements for 11 analytes linked the logistics of the Survey to definitive methods at the National Institutes of Standards and Technology, reference methods at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, proficiency testing materials, and a fresh frozen serum sample. The data were analyzed with a statistical model of laboratory measurements. RESULTS: (1) Matrix biases affected the results reported from 69% of the 644 peer group/survey specimen pairs evaluated. (2) Because of matrix biases, the reference value was the correct target value only 32% of the time; thus, the traceability established by definitive method and reference method value assignments on Chemistry Survey specimens did not assure accuracy on patient samples. (3) In contrast to matrix biases, the error caused by random matrix effects with proficiency testing samples was about the same as that caused by random specimen effects with fresh frozen serum, and both were less than within-run random analytic error. (4) Calibration biases occurred in 73% of the 180 peer groups evaluated, and, after matrix biases were removed, the total variance of interlaboratory measurements was due to peer group calibration bias (48%), within-peer-group random calibration error (31 %), within-run random error (14%), and random specimen effects (7%). CONCLUSIONS: An opportunity exists to improve method calibration accuracy in clinical chemistry. With improved design, national proficiency testing surveys can monitor and help reduce method calibration error by converting reported survey results to a true accuracy base that predicts accuracy on patient samples. For medical purposes, the correct target values on artificial (matrix-modified) chemistry materials are reference values adjusted for the matrix bias of each peer group. Matrix biases estimated by the use of fresh frozen serum can be used as factors to transfer the accuracy of definitive methods from artificial reference materials to patient samples.

Bias↗
PubMed1998

Assessment of current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for total cholesterol triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol measurements.

We examine the effect of systematic bias and random error, quality control, and intraperson biological variation on the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) clinical classifications for reported lipid measurements. We consider misclassification to occur if a true lipid homeostatic set point is within a desirable range but the reported lipid value is in a high-risk range, or if a true lipid homeostatic set point is in a high-risk range but the reported lipid value is in a desirable range. To evaluate the overall adequacy of the NCEP guidelines to ensure correct patient classification, we construct operating characteristic curves for total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We demonstrate that if laboratories are meeting the NCEP guidelines for inherent bias and analytic precision and are using standard quality-control (QC) procedures incorporating at least two QC samples per analytical run from each of two QC pools (for a total of 4 QC samples), the current NCEP guidelines are adequate to ensure (probability >0.90) correct patient classifications regardless of the size of the systematic bias of the laboratory or increased random analytic error. Thus we suggest that at least two concentrations of QC material be included in the QC scheme to ensure that the measurement system is operating within desired specifications across the entire range of desirable and high-risk lipid concentrations and to ensure with high probability that patients are correctly classified.

Chemistry, Clinical↗
PubMed1997

Point: status of lipid and lipoprotein standardization.

Cholesterol and triglyceride standardization procedures have been used extensively and continuously since the 1950s. Definitive and Reference Methods, as well as primary and secondary standards, have been developed and maintained as the basis for evaluating the accuracy of results by various methods in many laboratories. But, although standardization efforts for apolipoprotein A-I and B measurements have been reported in detail in the scientific literature, much less has been reported in the area of total and lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride standardization efforts. Standardized cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, determined in multiple large epidemiological and clinical studies, have been instrumental to the National Cholesterol Education Program panels that have assessed the lipoprotein values associated with risk of coronary disease, and have determined the cutpoints that are now used extensively by physicians to guide diagnosis and treatment of individual patients.

Apolipoproteins↗
PubMed1995

Evaluating lyophilized human serum preparations for suitability as proficiency testing materials for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the suitability of various commercial preparations for use by the College of American Pathologists as survey materials in assessing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement performance. DESIGN: Lyophilized human serum preparations from six vendors (vendors A through F) were evaluated to determine which material(s) best mimicked the commutability of fresh human serum. Two freshly collected unfrozen pools prepared from donor specimens were analyzed concurrently with the vendor materials to identify sources of variation and possible matrix bias. Each material was evaluated using 5 common precipitation reagents (phosphotungstate-magnesium, phosphotungstic acid, dextran sulfate [50K and 500K], and heparin-manganese). To evaluate how each reagent separates lipoproteins in each material, the lipoprotein separation patterns were profiled using high-pressure liquid chromatography and compared with separation patterns observed for the fresh human serum pools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Similarities in performance characteristics of vendor material(s) were compared with fresh human serum. RESULTS: Two of the six materials gave separation profiles for the lipoproteins similar to the typical patterns observed for human serum. Material from vendor B showed the best commutability across all of the precipitation reagents and had the best combination of low overall variability (10% for level 1 and 9.4% for level 2) and minimal concentration differences among reagents. CONCLUSIONS: Vendor B was selected by the College of American Pathologists to provide materials for use in assessing performance of lipid and lipoprotein testing in the 1994 Comprehensive Chemistry Surveys. This study demonstrates the great variability that different vendor preparations introduce into the measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. It also emphasizes the effort required to evaluate the suitability of processed materials for use in proficiency testing.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1994

Traditional lipoprotein profile: clinical utility, performance requirement, and standardization.

The lipid and lipoprotein parameters which are predominantly measured and effectively comprise the traditional lipoprotein profile include total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride. Total cholesterol is accepted as the initial entry point in a case finding approach such as that recommended by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). HDL cholesterol, known to be a strong inverse predicator of risk, is an additional measurement to total cholesterol to improve risk assessments. The evidence for triglyceride association remains mixed: although strong associations are found in some studies, the evidence as an independent risk factor is still incomplete. Triglyceride is therefore measured primarily for LDL estimation. Final classification and potential intervention is ultimately based on the measurement of LDL cholesterol. Reliability in the measurement of total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglyceride is especially important if the uniform decision points established by the NCEP are to be properly implemented. Attention must be placed on controlling preanalytical sources of variation, which can account for as much as 60% of the total measurement variability. The major analytical source of error comes from matrix effects, which results in problems of proper analytical calibration. Instrument system calibration should be verified by a comparison with an accuracy base using fresh patient specimens. CDC has established a network of reference method laboratories to provide access to these lipid and lipoprotein accuracy bases.

Coronary Disease↗
PubMed1994

Estimating and minimizing effects of biologic sources of variation by relative range when measuring the mean of serum lipids and lipoproteins.

Biologic intraindividual variation (CVb) is a major source of inaccuracy in current lipid and lipoprotein measurements. Metaanalysis has been used to estimate the average CVb of serum total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), and triglyceride (TG). These CVb values are larger than the National Cholesterol Education Program-accepted and -proposed analytic (CVa) goals. Measuring serial specimens reduces the error in determination of the mean concentration used in classification of the patient by cutoff points. We show (a) a convenient technique, based on the relative range, to qualitatively estimate and interpret biologic variation of TC, HDLC, LDLC, and TG, and (b) the number of serial specimens required to meet a total variation goal for measurements of mean lipid and lipoprotein values. A total variation goal has been selected that can be met by two serial specimens for a majority of individuals.

Cholesterol↗
PubMed1993

Assay instrument-dependent matrix effects in standardization of cholesterol measurements.

Human serum-based frozen reference materials have been used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program to improve the precision and accuracy of blood cholesterol measurements. Occasionally, laboratories in the program have had problems obtaining results for patients' fresh serum samples equivalent to those obtained with frozen CDC standardization pools. This incompatibility of sample, reagent, instrument, and assay characteristics has been labeled broadly as a "matrix effect," which usually is attributed to unknown characteristics of the processed pool material. In this study we showed that a large negative bias obtained with CDC pools was attributable to use of the sample blank mode on the Cobas-Bio analyzer. However, under the same conditions, fresh patients' serum samples were analyzed accurately. The use of a blank absorbance immediately after mixing sample and reagents (the "autoblank" mode) allowed the instrument to accurately analyze both fresh serum samples and CDC standardization pools and thus allowed the documentation of traceability of the cholesterol measurements to the National Reference System for Cholesterol.

Bias↗
PubMed1993

Matrix effects on proficiency testing materials. Impact on accuracy of cholesterol measurement in laboratories in the nation's largest hospital system.

The objective of this collaborative study with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), College of American Pathologists (CAP), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was to quantitate the matrix-induced biases of cholesterol measurements on the CAP Comprehensive Chemistry Surveys materials used in proficiency testing (PT). A total of 174 VA Medical Centers outpatient clinics and clinical laboratories participate in the VA-CDC National Cholesterol Standardization and Certification Program. This study was conducted in 112 VA laboratories that have been standardized for measuring cholesterol accurately (within +/- 3.0% of the CDC reference-method values) using fresh, unfrozen, unadulterated human serum samples. Fresh serum samples and 1990 CAP Surveys materials were sent by overnight mail, and the laboratories were asked to analyze them simultaneously in triplicate in a single analytic batch run. The results showed significant matrix-effect biases with the CAP Surveys materials with six of the eight major peer groups, despite the fact that accuracy of cholesterol measurements was maintained with fresh serum samples. The magnitude and direction (positive or negative) of the matrix-effect biases were instrument, reagent, and method specific using the following peer groups: du Pont Dimension (-8.9%); Beckman CX4, CX5, and CX7 (-5.5%); Kodak Ektachem 400, 500, and 700 (+4.4%); Instrumentation Laboratory Monarch (-3.1%); Baxter Paramax (-2.4%); Technicon SMAC and RA (+1.3%); Hitachi/BMD 704 through 747 (+0.4%); and Abbott Spectrum (-0.3%). The CAP PT materials used currently do not behave in a manner identical to fresh human serum when measuring cholesterol on many, but not all, analytic systems. The observed biases due to "matrix effects" with PT materials will cause incorrect conclusions about the accuracy of many laboratory procedures performed on fresh patient specimens. This matrix-effect phenomenon will severely hamper interlaboratory accuracy transfer, standardization efforts, and monitoring performance of a laboratory's testing accuracy with the use of the current survey materials used in PT programs. Collaborative efforts are needed to (1) improve PT fluids to analytically behave more like fresh, human serum; (2) improve instrument design and reagent formulation; and (3) select methods and methodologic parameters that are more "robust" and less sensitive to the exact character of processed calibrators, quality control, and PT materials.

Bias↗
PubMed1993

Matrix effects and the accuracy of cholesterol analysis.

We found evidence of bias due to matrix effect in 70% of 37 instrument/reagent-specific systems analyzing the total cholesterol content of a lyophilized proficiency testing material. We used a computational method to remove bias due to matrix effect from the proficiency testing database. After correction for matrix effect bias and when compared with the reference method, 92% to 93% of results for three lyophilized proficiency testing samples analyzed in 1989 and 1990 met the 1992 National Cholesterol Education Program total error goal of 8.9%, and 94% to 95% met the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88) goal of 10%. However, compared with the definitive method for total cholesterol, the calibration bias of 41% of 37 peer groups exceeded the 1992 National Cholesterol Education Program goal for bias of 3%. Because the calibration bias of the method is incorporated into the peer group mean, use of peer group means as target values to assess result acceptability hinders advancement of the state of the art in interlaboratory comparability and the clinical effectiveness of laboratory testing. The prevalence of matrix effects has prevented successful application of accuracy-based evaluation of cholesterol test proficiency. The establishment of predictable recovery, preferably complete recovery, of cholesterol from reference materials is an important priority for cholesterol test methods. However, adjustment of proficiency testing results to remove the average bias due to matrix effects can help assess the actual state of the art in cholesterol test accuracy.

Bias↗
PubMed1993

Biological variability in concentrations of serum lipids: sources of variation among results from published studies and composite predicted values.

To obtain the best estimates of the average intraindividual biological variability (CVb) in the concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), and triglyceride serum lipids in a person's blood, we evaluated results from 30 studies published from 1970 to 1992. The usually more applicable random-effects model estimated an average CVb of 6.1% for TC, 7.4% for HDLC, 9.5% for LDLC, and 22.6% for triglyceride. Composite estimates of the average CVb from all evaluated published studies by different models of estimation ranged from 6.0% to 6.4% for TC, from 6.2% to 7.5% for HDLC, from 7.0% to 9.6% for LDLC, and from 22.4% to 22.9% for triglyceride. Two important factors influenced the reported biological variation of the study subjects: (a) the magnitude of the variability of the analytical method used and (b) the design characteristics of the study--primarily the number of subjects, the sampling interval, and the number of measurements per subject. For TC, we found a statistically significant positive correlation between the reported mean CVb and both the number of study subjects and the analytical variation. For TC and LDLC we estimate CVb as a function of the study design features. The number of patient specimens required to obtain reliable estimates for serum lipid concentrations are determined from the CVb and the current analytical variation.

Cholesterol↗
PubMed1992

Blood lipid measurements. Variations and practical utility.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the magnitude and impact of the major biological and analytical sources of variation in serum lipid and lipoprotein levels on risk of coronary heart disease; to present a way to qualitatively estimate the total intraindividual variation; and to demonstrate how to determine the number of specimens required to estimate, with 95% confidence, the "true" underlying total cholesterol value in the serum of a patient. DATA SOURCES: Representative references on each source of variation were selected from more than 300 reviewed publications, most published within the past 5 years, to document current findings and concepts. Most articles reviewed were in English. STUDY SELECTIONS: Studies on biological sources of variation were selected using the following criteria: representative of published findings, clear statement of either significant or insignificant results, and acquisition of clinical and laboratory data under standardized conditions. Representative results for special populations such as women and children are reported when results differ from those of adult men. DATA EXTRACTION: References were selected based on acceptable experimental design and use of standardized laboratory lipid measurements. DATA SYNTHESIS: The lipid levels considered representative for a selected source of variation arose from quantitative measurements by a suitably standardized laboratory. Statistical analysis of data was examined to assure reliability. The proposed method of estimating the biological coefficient of variation must be considered to give qualitative results, because only two or three serial specimens are collected in most cases for the estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Concern has arisen about the magnitude, impact, and interpretation of preanalytical as well as analytical sources of variation on reported results of lipid measurements of an individual. Preanalytical sources of variation from behavioral, clinical, and sampling sources constitute about 60% of the total variation in a reported lipid measurement of an individual. A technique is presented to allow physicians to qualitatively estimate the intraindividual biological variation of a patient from the results of two or more specimens reported from a standardized laboratory and to determine whether additional specimens are needed to meet the National Cholesterol Education Program recommendation that the intraindividual serum total cholesterol coefficient of variation not exceed 5.0. A National Reference Method Network has been established to help solve analytical problems.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1991

A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques.

Sixty extracted human teeth were divided into three groups of 20 each. Apically extruded debris and irrigant were collected, dried, and weighed by the following three instrumentation techniques: (a) group 1, filing 1 mm short of the foramen; (b) group 2, Canal Master instrumentation to the foramen; and (c) group 3, filing to the foramen (for a relative comparison). The results indicated that all three groups were significantly different from one another. Group 1 had the least amount of debris extruded. Of the two groups instrumented to the foramen, group 3 had twice as much debris extruded as group 2. An apical dentinal plug was frequently found in group 1 and was probably a major reason why this group had the least amount of extruded debris. The significance of this dentinal plug and possible indications for instrumentation to the foramen are discussed.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1991

Establishment of reference methods for lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins.

Reference methods for lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins have been developed for use as part of an accuracy base for institutional, national, or international reference systems. A widely accepted reference method exists only for total cholesterol. Well described interim or institutional in-house reference methods have been established for the other lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins. The major criteria for a reference method are 1) scientific basis, 2) sound principles, 3) available calibration and control materials, 4) traceability to a definitive method or a point of reference, and 5) applicability to reference materials that provide traceability to clinical methods and transferability to other reference laboratories. The total cholesterol reference method of the U.S. National Reference System demonstrates how a reference method can be developed and applied. Reference methods now available can lead to an accepted international accuracy base for the clinically useful lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein measurements.

Apolipoprotein A-I↗
PubMed1991

Factors influencing the accuracy of the national reference system total cholesterol reference method.

Previous comparisons between the Reference and Definitive Methods for measuring serum cholesterol have demonstrated a small but persistent positive bias in the Reference Method, averaging about +1.6%. Here we describe the results of further investigations designed to better characterize the nature of this bias. Analysis of a well-characterized model serum sample (SRM 909) suggests that more than half of the difference in cholesterol values determined by the two methods is the result of small contributions from cholesterol precursor sterols and phytosterols, which are also measured for the Reference Method. An additional significant contribution may be from cholesterol oxidation products, particularly 7-hydroxycholesterol isomers, which are active in the Liebermann-Burchard reaction. The 7-hydroxycholesterol in SRM 909, most of which appeared to be already present in the serum rather than formed during saponification, may account for as much as 20% of the observed difference between the methods. Contributions from other possible sources, including impurities in the cholesterol standard and incomplete saponification of cholesteryl esters, are very small. Because the observed bias is both quite small and consistent among samples, the cholesterol Reference Method continues to meet all of the requirements generally expected for a dependable and effective Reference Method.

Carbon Isotopes↗