Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G L Barker

Publications and source records attributed to G L Barker.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Combined nebulization and spray-as-you-go topical local anaesthesia of the airway.

BACKGROUND: Twenty-five anaesthetists underwent awake fibreoptic intubation using a combination of nebulization and topical local anaesthesia. Plasma lidocaine concentrations were measured and the quality of the local anaesthesia was assessed. METHODS: After i.v. glycopyrrolate 3 microg kg(-1) and intranasal xylometolazone 0.1%, lidocaine 4% 200 mg was administered by nebulizer. Supplementary lidocaine to a maximum total of 9 mg kg(-1) was applied directly and via a fibreoptic endoscope. Nasotracheal intubation was performed once the vocal cords became unreactive. Heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure and oxygen saturation were recorded at 5-min intervals. Blood sampling commenced with a baseline sample and continued at 10 min intervals until 60 min after final administration of local anaesthetic. Subjects graded levels of anxiety, pain and coughing using written and visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Conditions for fibreoptic endoscopy and intubation were good. Seventeen received the maximum lidocaine dose of 9 mg kg(-1). The average dose used was 8.8 mg kg(-1). All plasma lidocaine concentrations assayed were below 5 mg litre(-1). Four volunteers reported feeling lightheaded after the procedure, despite normal blood pressure. Of these, two had the highest plasma lidocaine concentrations recorded: 3.5 and 4.5 mg litre(-1). Twenty-two of the 25 subjects found endoscopy and intubation acceptable, three found it enjoyable and no subject rated it as distressing. CONCLUSIONS: This method of airway anaesthesia was acceptable to this small group of unsedated subjects. It produced good conditions for fibreoptic intubation. A maximum calculated lidocaine dose of 9 mg kg(-1) did not produce toxic plasma concentrations of lidocaine.

Administration, Topical↗

Training course in local anaesthesia of the airway and fibreoptic intubation using course delegates as subjects.

BACKGROUND: We describe a practical method of training anaesthetists in the technique of awake fibreoptic intubation. This is performed on a training course using the delegates as subjects. METHODS: The first 15 subjects underwent cardiovascular monitoring during airway fibreoptic endoscopy performed by other course members. They were subsequently interrogated by use of a questionnaire. RESULTS: Evidence from questionnaires suggests this method of instruction is acceptable in this self-selected group of individuals. Gagging was the commonest unpleasant side-effect of airway endoscopy, although only one delegate rated this as uncomfortable. Fifty-four per cent of subjects found the procedure slightly painful; 46% reported no pain at all. Overall, the procedure was rated as acceptable by 85% of subjects and enjoyable by 15% of subjects. No delegate found endoscopy or intubation distressing. Cardiovascular monitoring revealed pulse rate and arterial pressure changes of less than 25% of baseline values. Paraesthesia developed in one individual and nasal bleeding in two cases, neither of which was clinically significant and did not interfere with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of course delegates as subjects for training was acceptable to anaesthetists and is associated with a low level of discomfort and morbidity.

Adult↗