Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G J Rinkel

Publications and source records attributed to G J Rinkel.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Rebleeding, secondary ischemia, and timing of operation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the time course of secondary ischemia and first rebleeding and the relation between the timing of operation and the time course of secondary ischemia in a consecutive series of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: Life table methods were used to assess the daily rates of ischemia and of rebleeding on day 0, day 1 to 3, day 4 to 10, day 11 to 14, and day 15 to 21. The authors compared the time course of secondary ischemia between patients operated within 4 days of SAH and those operated after 10 days. RESULTS: Of 346 patients included, 220 were operated, 131 within 4 days and 74 after 10 days. The rebleed rate was highest on the day of the initial hemorrhage, then diminished, and increased slightly again during the second week. The rate of secondary ischemia was highest on day 4, diminished after day 10, but peaked again from day 14 to 18 for patients who were operated later than 10 days after aneurysmal rupture. The peak rate of ischemia was much higher after early than after late operation. Although patients with early operation were in a better clinical condition on admission, with a relatively low risk of secondary ischemia, the overall rate of secondary ischemia was as high as in patients with delayed operation. From day 11 to 21 the rebleed rate was higher than the rate of secondary ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that operation is a risk factor for ischemia, especially when performed early. If operation is postponed, it should be planned soon after day 10, because of the relatively high rebleed rate from day 11 to 21.

Brain Ischemia↗

The relation between aneurysm size and outcome in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

The balance of risks of treatment for unruptured aneurysms might change if the prognosis after rupture depends on the size of the aneurysm. In a prospective series of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in whom aneurysmal size was measured by CT angiography performed on admission, poor outcome occurred more often in patients with large (> or =10 mm) aneurysms (63%) than in patients with small (<10 mm) aneurysms (41%; RR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.2). The relative risk remained essentially the same after adjustment for age, gender, location of the aneurysm, and amount of cisternal blood.

Age Factors↗

[Intracranial aneurysms and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease].

Three women aged 55, 47 and 40 years with polycystic kidney disease had several relatives with cystic kidneys, some of whom had died or been crippled after (presumably) a subarachnoid haemorrhage. Two of these patients had a haemorrhage from an aneurysm of a cerebral artery; after clipping of the vessel they recovered without sequelae. The third patient had magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed, which revealed no aneurysm. The prevalence of intracranial, saccular aneurysms in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is about 10%. ADPKD patients with questions about the risk of a subarachnoid haemorrhage should be informed about the need of blood pressure control and the possibility of screening by MR angiography. Diagnosed aneurysms can be treated neurosurgically or endovascularly. Since aneurysms develop in the course of life, screening as a rule is only necessary from the age of 20 years, and its repetition every 5 years should be considered.

Adult↗

Randomized pilot trial of postoperative aspirin in subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and feasibility of a clinical trial on the effectiveness of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). BACKGROUND: Several studies have indicated that increased platelet activity might be involved in the pathogenesis of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after SAH. METHOD: Fifty patients who had early surgery (< or =4 days) for a ruptured aneurysm were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Trial medication, consisting of suppositories with 100 mg ASA versus placebo, was started immediately after surgical clipping of the aneurysm and continued for 21 days. End points were functional outcome and quality of life at 4 months, clinical deterioration after operation, development of DCI, hypodense lesion on postoperative CT, and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: One-third of all patients with aneurysmal SAH were eligible for the trial. Fifteen of 26 patients receiving placebo deteriorated clinically versus 10 of 24 patients receiving ASA; 4 patients in each group deteriorated from DCI. Postoperative hypodensities on CT were observed in 27 patients, distributed equally in both groups. Functional outcome and quality-of-life scores were slightly in favor of patients who had received ASA, but not to a significant degree (p = 0.22). Two patients in the ASA group had an asymptomatic hemorrhagic complication, and one patient in the placebo group had a fatal and another a symptomatic hemorrhagic complication. CONCLUSION: This pilot study shows that a clinical trial of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is feasible and probably safe. The effectiveness of ASA on functional outcome and delayed cerebral ischemia has to be studied in a larger trial.

Aspirin↗

[Epilepsy, disturbances of behavior and consciousness in presence of normal thyroxine levels: still, consider the thyroid gland].

Three patients, one man aged 51 years, and two women aged 49 and 52 years, had severe fluctuating and progressive neurological and psychiatric symptoms. All three had normal thyroxine levels but elevated thyroid stimulating hormone levels and positive thyroid antibodies. Based on clinical, laboratory, MRI and EEG findings they were eventually diagnosed with Hashimoto's encephalopathy, associated with Hashimoto thyroiditis. Treatment with prednisone in addition to thyroxine suppletion resulted in a remarkable remission of their neuropsychiatric symptoms. The disease is probably under-recognized.

Autoantibodies↗

Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Rupture of an intracranial aneurysm causes bleeding into the subarachnoid space, which may lead to spasm of the cerebral arteries and ischaemic damage to the brain. Prophylactic use of calcium antagonists in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms might reduce the risk of ischaemic damage. OBJECTIVES: This review aimed to determine whether calcium antagonists improve outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (last searched: March 1999) plus hand searching and personal contacts with trialists and pharmaceutical companies marketing calcium antagonists. SELECTION CRITERIA: All completed, unconfounded, truly randomised controlled trials comparing any calcium antagonist with control, within ten days of SAH onset. Eleven trials that met the inclusion criteria were included in the overview. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Trialists were contacted to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS: We analysed 11 trials totalling 2804 randomized patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (1376 in the treatment and 1428 in the control group). The drugs analyzed were: nimodipine (eight trials, 1574 patients), nicardipine (two trials, 954 patients), and AT877 (one trial, 276 patients). In 92% of the patients aneurysms were confirmed by angiography or autopsy. Overall, calcium antagonists significantly reduce the risk of poor outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage: relative risk (RR) 0.82 (95% CI 0. 72-0.93); the absolute risk reduction was 5.1%, the corresponding number of patients needed to treat to prevent a single poor outcome event is 20. For oral nimodipine alone the RR was 0.69 (0.58-0.84). The RR of death on treatment with calcium antagonists was 0.94 (95% CI 0.80-1.10), that of ischaemic neurological deficits 0.67 (95% CI 0.59-0.76), and that of CT-scan documented cerebral infarction 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Calcium antagonists reduce the proportion of patients with poor outcome and ischemic neurological deficits after aneurysmal SAH; the risk reduction for case fatality alone is not statistically significant. The results for 'poor outcome' are statistically robust, but depend mainly on trials with oral nimodipine; the evidence for nicardipine and AT877 is inconclusive. The intermediate factors through which nimodipine exerts its beneficial effect after aneurysmal SAH remain uncertain.

Calcium Channel Blockers↗

Circulatory volume expansion for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who develop spasm of the cerebral arteries may suffer from delayed cerebral ischaemia. This may be exacerbated by reduced circulatory volume. Intravenous fluid therapy to expand the circulating volume might reduce the risk of delayed cerebral ischaemia and so reduce the risk of neurological disability. OBJECTIVES: The object of this review was to determine whether there is evidence that volume expansion therapy improves outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Stroke Group's Specialised Register was searched for trials relevant to this review (last searched: March 1999). Trialists were also contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials of volume expansion therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. Trialists were contacted to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials were identified. For one trial the decision about inclusion is pending because clinical data on follow up have not been provided yet. In the other trial, outcome assessment was done at the day of operation (7 to 10 days after subarachnoid haemorrhage); data on longer follow up have not been collected. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The effects of volume expansion therapy have not been studied properly in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. At present, there is no sound evidence for or against the use of volume expansion therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Humans↗

Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Re-bleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. This is probably due to dissolution of the clot by natural fibrinolytic activity. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effect of antifibrinolytic treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register and reference lists of articles. We also contacted drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing oral or intravenous antifibrinolytic drugs (tranexamic acid, epsilon amino-caproic acid or an equivalent) with control in people with confirmed subarachnoid haemorrhage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the data. All five reviewers assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Eight trials involving 937 patients were included. Based on 579 patients in two trials, antifibrinolytic treatment did not show any benefit for poor outcome (death, vegetative state or severe disability) with an odds ratio of 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.46. Death from all causes was not significantly influenced by treatment across all eight trials (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.26). Antifibrinolytic treatment reduced the risk of re-bleeding reported at the end of follow-up, with some heterogeneity between the trials (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.81). Treatment increased the risk of cerebral ischaemia in four trials (odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.40 to 2.94). Antifibrinolytic treatment showed no effect on the reported rate of hydrocephalus in four trials (odds ratio 1. 05, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.56). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Antifibrinolytic treatment does not appear to benefit people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. However, the trials were all done more than 10 years ago. New strategies may counteract the ischaemia-inducing potential of antifibrinolytic treatment and lead to improved outcome. A trial of combined antifibrinolytic and anti-ischaemia treatment is underway.

Antifibrinolytic Agents↗

Acute confusional state as presenting feature in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: frequency and characteristics.

In many patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) there is a delay between the onset of symptoms and admission to hospital. An important cause for the delay is an initially erroneous diagnosis. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency of acute confusional state (ACS) as a presenting symptom of SAH and to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of these patients. We studied all 717 patients registered from January 1989 to July 1997 in the SAH database of the University Medical Center Utrecht. For patients who presented with ACS we reviewed the computed tomography scans for baseline characteristics: the amount of cisternal blood, intraventricular or intracerebral hemorrhage, and hydrocephalus. Details about features of onset were known for 646 patients. Nine patients (1.4%) presented with ACS. In five patients ACS was either preceded by a period of loss of consciousness or accompanied by severe headache. Subtle focal deficits were found at initial neurological examination in four patients. Computed tomography demonstrated a frontal hematoma in three patients and hydrocephalus in four. The site of the ruptured aneurysm was at the anterior communicating artery in four patients, at the internal carotid artery in two, and at the basilar artery in two. In our series, one per 70 patients with SAH presents with ACS. Keys to early diagnosis of SAH in patients presenting with ACS are a preceding period of loss of consciousness and severe headache on neurological assessment.

Acute Disease↗

Treatment and outcome of severe intraventricular extension in patients with subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of the literature.

Severe intraventricular hemorrhage caused by extension from subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage leads to hydrocephalus and often to poor outcome. We conducted a systematic review to compare conservative treatment, extraventricular drainage, and extraventricular drainage combined with fibrinolysis. We carried out a search in Medline of the literature between January 1966 and December 1998 and an additional hand-search from January 1990 to December 1998. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted to gather unpublished data. We reviewed the reference lists of all relevant articles. Two authors independently assessed eligibility of the studies and extracted data on characteristics of study design, patients, and treatment. Patients with primary intraventricular hemorrhage were excluded. Main outcome measures were death and poor outcome (defined as death or dependency) at the end of follow-up. No randomized clinical trial has yet been conducted so far, and we therefore reviewed only observational studies. The case fatality rate for conservative treatment (ten studies) was 78%. For extraventricular drainage (seven studies) it was 58% [relative risk versus conservative treatment (RR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.99]. For extraventricular drainage with fibrinolytic agents (five studies) the case fatality rate was 6% (RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.02-0.24). The poor outcome rate for conservative treatment was 90%, that for extraventricular drainage 89% (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30) and that for extraventricular drainage with fibrinolytic agents 34% (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.21-0.68). All RR values remained essentially the same after adjusting for age, sex, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale, study design, and year of publication for the studies that provided these data. Outcome is thus poor in patients with intraventricular extension of subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage. This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with ventricular drainage combined with fibrinolytics may improve outcome for such patients, although this impression is derived only from an indirect comparison between observational studies. A randomized clinical trial is warranted.

Cerebral Hemorrhage↗

Carotid balloon occlusion for large and giant aneurysms: evaluation of a new test occlusion protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Validation of a new angiographic test occlusion protocol before carotid balloon occlusion in patients with carotid aneurysms. METHODS: Carotid occlusion was considered for 29 consecutive patients. From 1993 to 1995, test occlusion in four patients consisted of clinical observation for 30 minutes and during electroencephalographic registration. From 1996 onward, test occlusion in 25 patients consisted of clinical observation and angiography of collateral vessels. Permanent balloon occlusion was performed only when the cortical veins in both the occluded and the collateral vascular territories filled synchronously. RESULTS: Two of the four patients with normal clinical and electroencephalographic findings during test occlusion developed delayed hypoperfusion infarction after permanent carotid occlusion. Seventeen of 25 patients (68%) demonstrated both clinical and angiographic tolerance, and no ischemic events occurred after permanent carotid occlusion. In one patient with clinical tolerance but angiographic nontolerance, permanent carotid occlusion had to be performed, which resulted in delayed hypoperfusion infarction. In two patients with angiographic nontolerance, venous filling became synchronous after bypass surgery. Long-term clinical follow-up showed an alleviation of the symptoms of mass effect in 14 of 21 patients (67%). Magnetic resonance imaging follow-up (range, 3-70 mo) revealed a reduction in the size of the aneurysm in 19 of 21 patients (90%). CONCLUSION: Test occlusion with clinical and angiographic control is reliable, safe, and simple to perform.

Adult↗

The notion of "warning leaks" in subarachnoid haemorrhage: are such patients in fact admitted with a rebleed?

OBJECTIVE: Often patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) recall a recent episode of acute severe headache, usually interpreted as a "warning headache" or first SAH. An alternative explanation is recall bias. The clinical and radiological features of patients with SAH were studied in relation to previous headaches or later rebleeding. METHODS: Patients with either a previous headache episode or a subsequent rebleed were selected from the SAH database in Utrecht within 1 month of the index SAH. The clinical condition was graded on the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale. The CT was reviewed and the amounts of subarachnoid blood, hydrocephalus, and intraventricular, intracerebral, and subdural blood were rated. Proportions were compared by unpaired or paired t test. RESULTS: Forty four of 390 patients (11%) had had a severe headache before their index SAH (11 of these had a subsequent rebleed); 31 other patients had a rebleed in hospital but no preceding headache. Patients with and without preceding headache did not differ in level of consciousness (14 of 44 v 11 of 31 were comatose), nor in any of the radiological features. After rebleeding (42 patients), 37 of 42 patients were comatose (v 11 of 42 before), and CT showed higher proportions of intracerebral haemorrhage (17%), intraventricular haemorrhage, (27%), and hydrocephalus (12%) than baseline scans. Intraventricular haemorrhage was twice as frequent after rebleeding than at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and radiological features of patients admitted with SAH after a preceding bout of headache did not differ from those without such an episode, and are clearly dissimilar from those after documented rebleeds. The findings challenge the existence of minor "warning headaches".

Adult↗

Perimesencephalic hemorrhage and CT angiography: A decision analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The method of choice for detecting or excluding a vertebrobasilar aneurysm still is a matter of debate in patients with a characteristically perimesencephalic pattern of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) on CT. We used decision analysis to compare possible diagnostic strategies in these patients. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed to evaluate the effect of 4 different diagnostic strategies following a perimesencephalic pattern of SAH on CT: 1, no further investigation; 2, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) by catheter; 3, CT angiography as initial modality, not followed by DSA if negative; and 4, CT angiography as initial modality, followed by DSA. We used a 4% prevalence of a vertebrobasilar aneurysm given a perimesencephalic pattern of hemorrhage, a 97% sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography, and a 99.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity of DSA. In a prospectively collected series, the complication rate from DSA in patients with a perimesencephalic pattern of hemorrhage was 2.6%. We calculated the expected utility of each of the 4 diagnostic options and used sensitivity analyses to examine the influence of the plausible ranges of the various estimates used. RESULTS: The expected utilities were 99.09 for CT angiography only, 98.96 for no further investigation, 98.22 for DSA, and 96.34 for CT angiography plus DSA. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicate that over a wide range of assumptions, CT angiography only is the most beneficial option. Only when the complication rate of catheter angiography is <0.2% is DSA the preferred strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Our decision analysis shows that in patients with a perimesencephalic pattern of hemorrhage on CT, CT angiography only is the best diagnostic strategy. DSA can be omitted in patients with a perimesencephalic pattern of hemorrhage and a negative CT angiogram.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗

[Acute severe headache: a subarachnoidal hemorrhage?].

Five patients, three women aged 87, 50, and 31 years, and two men aged 31 and 32 years, presented with severe headache of sudden onset. A sudden onset of unusually severe headache is suggestive of an intracranial haemorrhage or other serious disease, even in the absence of focal neurologic deficits. The diagnoses were subdural haematoma, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, idiopathic thunderclap headache, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and viral meningitis, respectively. There are no characteristics from history or examination that accurately discriminate among all these causes; idiopathic thunderclap headache and subarachnoid haemorrhage are commonest. Consultation of a neurologist and further ancillary investigations are necessary for proper diagnosis and treatment.

Adult↗

Follow-up of idiopathic thunderclap headache in general practice.

Follow-up studies of idiopathic thunderclap headache (ITH) have found no subsequent subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or other serious neurological disease, but the effect on life-style has not been studied. To assess the long-term outcome of patients with ITH in general practice we prospectively followed 93 patients with an episode of ITH during 1988-1993, of whom 77 were referred to hospital. ITH was defined as a sudden, unusually severe headache that started within 1 min, lasted at least 1 h, and for which no underlying cause was found. These patients were treated in 252 general practices. Outcome measures were subsequent SAH, subsequent headaches, absence from work, and diminished daily functioning. Patients were followed up by their general practitioner for a median of 5 years (range 1-10). Three patients died, all from non-neurological diseases. No subsequent SAH was diagnosed in any of the 93 patients. Recurrent attacks of ITH occurred in 8 patients, and 13 developed new tension headache or migraine. Absence from work because of headache was recorded in 11 patients, and in the overall group 6 patients were dependent on welfare. In only one-half of patients (n=52) did the general practitioner judge the level of daily functioning to be similar to that before the index episode of ITH. Thus, although no episodes of SAH occurred after ITH during long-term follow-up, one-half of patients with ITH had a lower level of daily functioning, and one-eighth had reduced working capacity, specifically because of headache.

Absenteeism↗

Initial loss of consciousness and risk of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a major cause of death and disability in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We studied the prognostic value for DCI of 2 factors: the duration of unconsciousness after the hemorrhage and the presence of risk factors for atherosclerosis. METHODS: In 125 consecutive patients admitted within 4 days after hemorrhage, we assessed the presence and duration of unconsciousness after the hemorrhage, the neurological condition on admission, the amount of subarachnoid blood, the size of the ventricles, and a history of smoking, hypertension, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The relationship between these variables and the development of DCI was analyzed by means of the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The univariate hazard ratio (HR) for the development of DCI in patients who had lost consciousness for >1 hour was 6.0 (95% CI 3.0 to 12.0) compared with patients who had no loss or a <1-hour loss of consciousness. The presence of any risk factor for atherosclerosis yielded an HR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.6 to 3.5). The HR for unconsciousness remained essentially the same after adjustment for other risk factors for DCI. The HR for a poor World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score (grade IV or V) on admission was 2.9 (95% CI 1.5 to 5. 5); that for a large amount of subarachnoid blood on CT was 3.4 (95% CI 1.6 to 7.3). CONCLUSIONS: The duration of unconsciousness after subarachnoid hemorrhage is a strong predictor for the occurrence of DCI. This observation may contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of DCI and increased attention for patients at risk.

Arteriosclerosis↗

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Embolization with coils is increasingly used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. To assess the percentage of complications, the percentage of aneurysm occlusion, and the short-term outcome, we performed a systematic review of studies on embolization with controlled detachable or pushable coils. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: To find studies on embolization with coils, we performed a MEDLINE search from January 1990 to March 1997, checked all reference lists of the studies found, performed a Science Citation Index search on Guglielmi, and hand searched recent volumes of 25 journals. Two authors independently extracted data by means of a standardized data extraction form from 48 eligible studies totalling 1383 patients. Permanent complications of embolization with controlled detachable coils occurred in 46 of 1256 patients (3.7%; 95% CI, 2.7% to 4.9%); 400 of 744 aneurysms (54%; 95% CI, 50% to 57%) were completely occluded. By means of weighted linear regression, no relation between baseline characteristics and outcome measurements was found. The results in the prespecified subgroups of patients with a ruptured aneurysm, an unruptured aneurysm, or a basilar bifurcation aneurysm were essentially the same as the overall results. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term results indicate that embolization with coils is a reasonably safe treatment for patients with an unruptured aneurysm and for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The effectiveness in terms of complete occlusion of the aneurysm is moderate. Randomized trials are warranted to compare surgical clipping with embolization with coils.

Adolescent↗