Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G H White

Publications and source records attributed to G H White.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the historical aspects and outcome of endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and summarise two studies presented at the 1997 and 1998 meetings of the Society for Vascular Surgery. PATIENTS: Between May 1992 and September 1998 the endoluminal method was used to repair arterial aneurysms in 304 patients at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, a tertiary referral teaching hospital. The study focuses on 243 patients with true AAA who underwent primary repair. There were 17 females and 226 males with a mean age of 72 years. Co-morbidities leading to rejection for conventional open repair were present in 83 patients. The criteria for inclusion included a segment of thrombus-free aorta between the lowermost renal artery and the commencement of the aneurysm of 1.5 cm or greater and iliac arteries that allowed access to the aorta from the groin. The technique involved the delivery of an endograft into the abdominal aorta by means of a sheath inserted through the femoral or iliac artery. Laparotomy associated with conventional open repair was avoided. Outcome measures included clinical examination and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) within 10 days, at 6, 12, 18 months after operation and then annually thereafter. RESULTS: Endografts were successfully deployed in 226 patients. In the remaining 17 patients endoluminal repair was converted to open repair. There were 8 deaths within 30 days of operation giving a perioperative mortality rate of 3.3%. The two studies presented to the Society for Vascular Surgery concern: (i) a concurrent comparison of the endoluminal versus open methods of treating AAA; and (ii) a comparison of adverse events following endoluminal repair of AAA during two consecutive periods of time.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A concurrent comparison of outcome of those occurring after endoluminal repair versus those occurring de novo.

AIM: to compare the outcome of patients whose abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) ruptured following endoluminal repair with those whose AAA ruptured prior to treatment. PATIENTS: over a 4-year period 434 patients underwent treatment for AAA with conventional open (n=253) and endoluminal repair (n=181). Of those having open repair, 216 patients had elective operations while 41 had operations for ruptured AAA. Four patients with ruptured AAA had undergone endoluminal repair previously (Group I) while the remaining 37 patients ruptured de novo (Group II). The patients in both groups were similar in age and sex but differed clinically. All four patients in Group I had major medical co-morbidities versus 56% in Group II (p<0.05). All patients in group I had a known endoleak following endoluminal repair. All patients underwent open repair. RESULTS: the proportion of patients presenting with hypotension in Group I (1/4) was significantly less than in Group II (30/37). The difference in 30-day mortality for Group I (0%) compared with that for Group II (43%) was significant. The four patients in Group I remain alive and well at follow-up 22 months after operation. The outcome for Group I was better than Group II despite the higher incidence of medical co-morbidities. CONCLUSION: endoluminal AAA repair complicated by a persistent endoleak does not protect from rupture, which may not be accompanied by such major haemodynamic changes and high mortality as rupture de novo. Further long-term results in more patients are required to confirm this intermediate level of protection.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Shortening of endografts during deployment in endovascular AAA repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and extent of length changes during implantation of endovascular grafts in a prospective study of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Data regarding the occurrence of intraoperative technical difficulties and device complications were recorded prospectively for the Vanguard or AneuRx self-expanding, bifurcated endovascular grafts in 64 patients (56 males; mean age 75 years). Graft length was measured in the sheath system before deployment and again immediately after deployment by fluoroscopic comparison to a graduated marking catheter. RESULTS: Graft shortening > or = 15 mm was documented in 22 (56%) of 39 Vanguard cases and 11 (44%) of 25 AneuRx endografts. Additional extension grafts were required to correct endoleak caused by inadequate graft length in 9 (14%) patients, but no conversion to open repair was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a high incidence of intraprocedural graft shortening with 2 current designs of self-expanding endoluminal grafts.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Endotension: an explanation for continued AAA growth after successful endoluminal repair.

PURPOSE: To present and analyze several cases that illustrate persistent sac pressurization following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four patients with successful endovascular AAA exclusion presented in follow-up with an expanding aneurysm. Two had initial sac diameter decrease, but by 18 and 24 months, respectively, the AAA had enlarged and become pulsatile. There was no endoleak evident, but the proximal attachment stents had mig rated distally in both cases. One patient developed endoleak with aneurysm expansion at 6 months; contained rupture occurred at 12 months. The last case had slowly evolving aneurysm expansion over 36 months but no endoleak. All endografts were removed and successfully replaced with conventional grafts. Intrasac thrombus was implicated as the means of pressure transmission that precipitated AAA expansion in these cases. CONCLUSIONS: Excluded AAAs can increase in size owing to persistent or recurrent pressurization (endotension) of the sac even when there is no evidence of endoleak. One proposed mechanism is pressure transmission via thrombus that lines the attachment site. Endotension may also represent an indiscernible, very low flow endoleak that allows blood to clot at the source of leakage.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Early and late conversion from endoluminal to open repair.

Conversion from endoluminal to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) may be primary, at the original operation or secondary, at a subsequent operation. The indications for primary conversion include aortic rupture and migration of an endograft resulting in obstructed blood flow and irreversible twisting of an endograft. The indications for secondary conversion include persistent endoleak, sealed endoleak with continued AAA expansion, apparently successful AAA repair, with continued expansion and the presence of an infected endograft. The technique of conversion varies from standard repair through modified standard repair to supraceliac control, depending on the cause of failure leading to conversion. All conversion procedures expose the patient to an increased risk and are best avoided by careful case selection, accurate sizing, and good procedural technique.

Aneurysm, Ruptured↗
PubMed1998

Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life table method.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated concurrently by open operation and endoluminal intervention by the same surgeons during a defined interval. METHODS: Between May 1992 and May 1996, 362 consecutive patients with AAA underwent repair. Fifty-three patients who underwent open operations for ruptured AAA plus two patients who underwent endoluminal repair of false AAA and four patients who underwent secondary endoluminal repair of AAA were excluded, leaving 303 patients who underwent elective repair of true AAA in the study. The elective operations were conventional open repair (OR) in 195 patients (151 men, 44 women; mean age, 69 years) and endoluminal repair (ER) in 108 patients (100 men, 8 women; mean age, 70 years). The decision to perform ERwas based on comorbidities that precluded open repair (n = 48) and patient choice (n = 60). Graft configuration in the open repair group was tubular (n = 180) and bifurcated (n = 15), and in the ER group tubular (n = 48), aortoiliac/femoral (n = 25), and bifurcated (n = 35). All procedures were performed in the operating department, and radiographic guidance was used in the ER group. Follow-up was by interview, examination, and telephone. In addition, contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed within the first 10 days after operation, 6 months and 12 months after operation, and then annually thereafter in the ER group. Outcome measures were successful exclusion of the aneurysm sac from the general circulation and survival. Data were analyzed by the life table method. Other outcome measures were length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and operative blood loss. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the perioperative mortality rate for OR (11 deaths [5.6%] in 195 patients) and ER (six deaths [5.6%] in 108 patients). Three of the six deaths in the latter group occurred in patients with successful ER, and three occurred in 18 patients with failed ER who were converted to OR. Similarly, no significant difference was seen in the survival rate between the endoluminal and open repair groups when analyzed by the log-rank test (p = 0.14). The rate of graft failure, however, was significantly higher in the ER group than in the OR group (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). Success in the ER group was defined as continuing graft function without endoleak or conversion to open repair. Kaplan-Meier curve for graft failure times for the endoluminal group revealed a 3-year graft success probability of 70%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ER is safe, sharing the same perioperative mortality risk as OR despite 44% of the ER group being rejected as unfit for OR. Conventional open repair is the most reliable method of successfully managing AAA. The endoluminal method, however, results in shorter length of hospital stay, shorter length of intensive care unit stay, and less blood loss than the open method. Patients who opt for the endoluminal method of repair should be made aware that the minimally invasive technique carries the disadvantage of a higher failure rate.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Endovascular grafting for abdominal aortic aneurysms: changing incidence and indication for conversion to open operation.

The incidence and indications for conversion from endoluminal to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms are changing. This paper is based on a 5-year experience in which endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms was undertaken in 156 patients. Primary conversion at the original operation was required in 14 patients and secondary conversion at a subsequent operation was required in 9 patients. The reasons for primary conversion were access problems (n = 2), balloon related problems (n = 2), endograft migration (n = 4), endograft thrombosis (n = 1) and failed deployment of a bifurcated endograft (n = 5). Twelve of 14 primary conversions occurred in the first half of the study period, in which 59 endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysms repairs were undertaken. Improvements in technology and interventional techniques for overcoming obstacles, as well as increasing experience, has resulted in primary conversion being limited to two patients in the most recent 2.5-year period in which 97 endoluminal repairs were undertaken. The reasons for secondary conversion were renal arteries covered by the endograft (n = 2), increasing abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter in the absence of endoleak (n = 1) and persistent endoleak (n = 6). The latter group comprised three patients with intact aneurysms and three with known endoleaks who presented with ruptured aneurysms. The current indications for primary conversion include: (i) rupture of the aorta; (ii) complete migration of the endograft resulting in obstruction of the iliac arteries; and (iii) irreversible twisting of a non-modular bifurcated endograft. The current indications for secondary conversion include: (i) persistent endoleak; (ii) sealed endoleak with continued abdominal aortic aneurysms expansion; (iii) apparently successful endoluminal repair without evidence of endoleak but continued abdominal aortic aneurysms expansion; and (iv) infected endograft.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of the risks of using an oversized balloon catheter in the human infrarenal abdominal aorta.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects on the aortic wall of balloon dilatation as utilised in deployment of stent-graft devices during endoluminal repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: Large dilatation balloons were expanded within the aorta of 41 cadavers. Testing was done to evaluate the effect of differing degrees of balloon oversizing, at pressures in the range of 0.15-2.5 atm. The aorta was then open for macroscopic inspection. RESULTS: In group 1 (mild atherosclerosis) no macroscopic abnormalities were detected with up to 6 mm oversized balloon. In group 2 (moderate atherosclerosis) fracture of atherosclerotic plaque occurred in seven of 14 aortas (50%) with 2.5 mm-4mm oversized balloon. In group 3 (severe atherosclerosis) fracture of atherosclerotic plaque occurred in six of seven (85%) with 2.5 mm to 4 mm oversized balloon and rupture of the aorta occurred at 6 mm oversizing. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that balloon overdilatation of the aorta by 2 mm, at pressures less than 2 atmospheres, allows safe deployment even in the presence of severe atheroma. Larger amounts of overdilatation are relatively safe in mildly atherosclerotic aorta. Aortic rupture is unlikely with overdilatation up to 6 mm, especially in less calcified vessels.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Importance of graft configuration in outcome of endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair: a 5-year analysis by the life table method.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of graft configuration on the outcome of endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: The 5-year study period extended from May 1992 to May 1997 and included analysis of patients undergoing endoluminal AAA repair in the first 4.5-year period with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Between May 1992 and November 1996 136 patients underwent endoluminal AAA repair. Two patients who had endoluminal repair of anastomotic AAA and six patients who had secondary endoluminal repair of AAA were excluded, leaving 128 patients in the study group. There were 117 males and 11 females with a mean age for the group of 71 years. The configuration of the grafts was tubular aortic (T) (n = 50), tapered aortoiliac/femoral (AI) (n = 24) and bifurcated (B) (n = 54). Patient characteristics and co-morbidities were similar in the three groups. The procedures were performed in the operating room under radiographic control. Follow-up was complete and consisted of regular physical examination and contrast enhanced computed tomography. Outcome measures were perioperative mortality rate, need for conversion to open repair, presence of early and late endoleaks, successful exclusion of AAA from the circulation, and survival. Data were analysed by the life table method. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality for T (4%), AI (4%) and B (5.5%) configuration of endograft. Outcome for T, AI, and B configurations was respectively: primary conversion (%) 8, 12, 13; early endoleaks (n =) 5, 0, 1; late endoleaks (n =) 7, 0, 1. The overall incidence of failed procedures throughout the study period was higher in tube grafts compared with non-tube (aortoiliac and bifurcated) grafts (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a success probability at 40 months of 50% for tube grafts and 80% for non-tube grafts. However, a comparison of the time to procedure failure between tube versus non-tube after adjusting for competing risks (death without prior graft failure) was non-significant (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The poor mid-term outcome for tube prostheses requires a reassessment of the criteria for selecting this configuration. It would be unwise to abandon the use of tube prostheses entirely in endoluminal repair. With increasing information on mid and long-term outcome of endoluminal AAA repair it is likely that there will be an increasing acceptance of treating smaller AAA while they are still suitable for treatment by the endoluminal method and most likely with tube grafts. A tightening of the criteria for using tube prostheses would seem sensible. In particular, the minimum length of distal neck required for endoluminal tube graft repair should be increased to the 2-2.5 cm range.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

BACKGROUND: The development of devices designed for the endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has led to the emergence of new endovascular techniques. METHODS: Articles and case reports obtained from a Medline search of the English language literature from 1989 to 1997 are reviewed. This search was carried out using the MeSH heading 'aortic aneurysm, abdominal' and the keywords 'endovascular' and 'endoluminal'. RESULTS: Reported mortality and complication rates for endoluminal aneurysm repair are similar to those following conventional repair, with the exception of continued perfusion of the aneurysm sac which remains a major problem following endoluminal repair. CONCLUSION: Successful endoluminal aneurysm exclusion is associated with reduced aneurysm diameter. However, longer term results of endoluminal repair, in particular of sealed endoleaks, are required before randomized controlled trials of endoluminal versus conventional repair can be undertaken.

Angioplasty↗
PubMed1998

Endoluminal repair: a better option for the treatment of complex false aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present paper is to present the utility of endoluminal repair in the management of complex false aneurysms at various sites throughout the body. METHODS: Between May 1992 and May 1997 the endoluminal method was used to repair 183 aneurysms at various sites throughout the body. In six patients the pathology was that of false aneurysm and these are the basis of the present report. In two of the patients the false aneurysm was situated between the renal arteries and the proximal end of a previous aortic graft. The other false aneurysms were situated in the right subclavian, the popliteal and internal carotid arteries, in addition to one situated at the junction of two longstanding bypass grafts in the groin. The technique involved delivery of an endograft into the artery from which the false aneurysm had arisen via a sheath inserted through an artery of access which was superficial and remote from the site of the aneurysm. A laparotomy was avoided in the first two cases and thoracotomy avoided in the third case. Opening of the popliteal fossa, which had been the site of a recent knee replacement in the fourth patient, was also avoided. RESULTS: Post-procedure angiography confirmed exclusion of the false aneurysm from the general circulation in all six patients. There were no deaths and the mean length of hospital stay was 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: Endoluminal repair of false aneurysms is feasible and avoids the difficulty and morbidity associated with laparotomy, thoracotomy and operations at sites with scarring from previous interventions.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair.

In this document the authors continue to refine their seminal categorization of endoleak, a major complication of endovascular aneurysm repair. In addition to type I (related to the graft device itself) and type II (retrograde flow from collateral branches) endoleak, they propose two new categories: endoleak due to fabric tears, graft disconnection, or disintegration would be classified type III, and flow through the graft presumed to be associated with graft wall "porosity" would be categorized as type IV endoleak.

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal↗
PubMed1998

Diameter of large balloons used in endoluminal graft deployment varies with inflation pressure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the characteristics of large-diameter balloon catheters used during endoluminal repair of aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Thirty-three large balloon dilatation catheters in the diameter range of 15 to 30 mm were measured at controlled pressures from 1 to 4 atm. The balloons were inflated with water using an inflation syringe connected to a pressure transducer. Diameters at stable pressure and pressure changes against time were recorded for each balloon. RESULTS: Dilation catheters in the range of 15 to 20 mm in diameter were significantly smaller (p < 0.005) than their nominal diameter at 1 and 2 atm; they reached nominal diameter only at the relatively high pressure of 4 atm. Most larger diameter balloons (25 and 30 mm) did not attain their nominal diameter even with pressures up to 4 atm. All sizes of balloon catheters tested became relatively compliant at pressures > 3 atm. CONCLUSIONS: The large balloon catheters tested in this study were designed for arterial angioplasty or valvuloplasty. They attained a significantly smaller size than their nominal diameter at pressures < 3 atm and became compliant at pressures exceeding 3 atm. Interventionists should be aware of these characteristics when using balloon catheters such as these during endoluminal graft deployment. Large balloons that reach predictable diameter at lower pressures should be designed specifically for use in endoluminal graft procedures.

Aortic Aneurysm↗
PubMed1997

Endoluminal repair of internal carotid artery aneurysm: a feasible but hazardous procedure.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the repair of an aneurysm of the internal carotid artery using the endoluminal method. METHODS: A 70-year-old male patient noted a swelling in the right side of his neck 22 years after endarterectomy of the right internal carotid artery. Duplex ultrasound confirmed the clinical diagnosis of aneurysm of the internal carotid artery. Further investigation included contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) scanning and carotid angiography performed via a retrograde femoral approach. The aneurysm contained thrombus and was 3 cm in diameter and in length. It extended superiorly from a point 0.5 cm above the carotid bifurcation to a point estimated to be 2 cm from the base of the skull. Repair of the aneurysm was undertaken using the endoluminal method. A self-expanding endograft 8 mm in diameter and 4 cm in length was introduced through a 12F sheath in the common carotid artery. An on-table completion angiogram of the right-sided extracranial carotid arteries and the intracranial internal carotid artery and branches was obtained. RESULTS: The completion angiogram and postoperative CT scan confirmed exclusion of the aneurysm sac from the circulation. The patient awoke from anesthesia with complete paralysis of the left arm. Recovery of movement commenced 1 hour later. A brain CT scan demonstrated the event to be an embolic stroke. Strength had returned by 7 days. Function of the arm was good 1 month after operation, but coordination for fine movements was lacking. At the 6-month follow-up, good arm function was maintained. A duplex ultrasound scan demonstrated not only continued exclusion of the aneurysm sac but occlusion of the endograft, also. CONCLUSIONS: Endoluminal repair of aneurysms of the internal carotid artery is feasible but carries the risk of major morbidity as a result of peripheral embolization and early occlusion of the endograft.

Aged↗