Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G H Schlund

Publications and source records attributed to G H Schlund.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

[Principles of physician's liability as it applies to the anesthetist].

Every action taken by a physician comes under the jurisdiction of the courts. The physician is sentenced when he offends against the duties of care, set down by the respective standard, or when he carries out treatment without having first obtained the patient's consent. Using the examples of many decisions made by the chief justice and the supreme court relating to the field of anaesthesia, this paper sets out to indicate which rules on diligence apply in this area. In the second part, 14 guiding principles on the physician's obligation to obtain informed consent are set out. The burden of proof for fulfillment of this obligation lies with the physician. The final part of the paper is a discussion of the documentational obligations, which are important for litigation on the physician's liability. A description of a variety of topics from a physician's everyday work is also given.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed1996

[Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--legal evaluation of medical expert opinion].

The constitutional position of the judge and the medical expert witness during a lawsuit is explained. From this, the demands on a judicial expert witness for the preparation of his expert assessment are derived and the judge's function in the appointment of the expert witness is explained. Additionally, criteria, duties, and rules are worked out, which should be followed by the judge during assessment of the medical expert testimony.

Criminal Law↗
PubMed1996

[Contrast medium incident from the legal viewpoint].

Every activity of a medical practitioner may be subjected to court control. This creates not only uncertainty gut also anger amongst most physicians. However, it is clear that no court judgement against a physician will be made without the competent support of independent medical experts. On the basis of the relevant legal literature and judgments, the present article is an attempt to consider medical errors in the administration of contrast media, to describe the required medical informed consent before such measures, and to discuss the ever increasing importance of adequate documentation in the light of malpractice proceedings. importance of adequate documentation in the light of malpractice proceedings. This is followed by a discussion of the very important medical necessity to inform the patient about recommended behaviour after injections of such contrast media, the responsibility question in both civil and criminal terms in case of an incident, and various tips for steps to be taken in the case of a liability action.

Contrast Media↗