Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Guyatt

Publications and source records attributed to G Guyatt.

106 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

Determining optimal therapy--randomized trials in individual patients.

Although the treatment of an individual patient in routine clinical practice has been likened to an experiment, the method is so susceptible to bias that we have come to demand multi-patient, double-blind, randomized controlled trials on matters of efficacy. Unfortunately, such trials have not or cannot be carried out for many clinical disorders; even when they have been executed their results may be difficult to extrapolate to individual patients. To resolve this problem, we have begun to use double-blind randomized trials in which a single patient undergoes a series of pairs of treatments, consisting of one active and one placebo or alternative treatment per pair, with the order determined by random allocation. Appropriate treatment targets (signs, symptoms, or laboratory tests) are used as the measure of efficacy, and the trial is continued until efficacy is established or disproved. We describe such a trial, which resulted in a dramatically beneficial modification of treatment in a patient with partially reversible airflow limitation. We have established a clinical service that facilitates the widespread use of the method in our community.

Aged↗

Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies.

The health care system is routinely confronted with promising new technologies. In the past, most new technologies have been integrated into clinical practice without a rigorous demonstration of their effectiveness or efficiency. In order to provide a more rational approach to the adoption and utilization of health technology a comprehensive set of guidelines for both clinical and economic evaluation is proposed. While conceived of as an ideal that is unlikely to be universally met in practice, it is argued that decision making can be improved by striving towards this goal. The clinical guidelines stress the advantages of subjecting major new technologies to randomized controlled trials and insisting upon a demonstration of patient benefit in the application of diagnostic technologies. The economic guidelines stress comparisons with relevant alternative uses of the resources and the assessment of the impact on the quality of life. While application of the guidelines will produce rigorous and useful evidence, the final decisions concerning the allocation of health care resources must rest fundamentally on social value judgements and not solely, or even primarily, on informed expert opinion.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

Tests or measures in clinical medicine or the social sciences can be used for three purposes: discriminating between subjects, predicting either prognosis or the results of some other test, and evaluating change over time. The choices made at each stage of constructing a quality of life index will differ depending on the purpose of the instrument. We explore the implications of index purpose for each stage of instrument development: selection of the item pool, item scaling, item reduction, determination of reliability, of validity, and of responsiveness. At many of these stages, not only are the requirements for discriminative, predictive, and evaluative instruments not complementary, they are actually competing. Attention to instrument purpose will clarify the choices both for those developing quality of life measures and for those selecting an appropriate instrument for clinical studies.

Data Collection↗

Computer searching of the medical literature. An evaluation of MEDLINE searching systems.

Although clinicians can now search the medical literature electronically from the clinic, bedside, or operating suite, little is known about the performance characteristics of online information services. Fourteen access routes to the MEDLINE database of journal literature were compared for retrieval quantity and quality, user and online search time, and cost for randomly ordered, standardized searches on common clinical problems. All routes produced the articles we judged to be the most definitive on the clinical problem. However, routes differed significantly (p less than 0.01) for the same searches with respect to online time (range, 5.15 to 18.72 minutes), total search time (8.37 to 20.55 minutes), cost (US $3.38 to $11.62), and proportion of articles relevant to the topic (98% to 75%). "User friendliness" aside, our results showed that the higher the cost, the worse the product. Clinicians should consider these major differences when deciding which search system to use.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Predictors of health-related quality of life with cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments provide valid and responsive outcome measures to assess the impact of disease and the response to interventions. However, they have not been applied widely to studies of rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. PURPOSE: To examine the extent to which baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics predict baseline and change in generic and specific HRQL. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of an 8-week cardiac rehabilitation intervention or usual care, with follow-up for 12 months, in 201 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors of HRQL. RESULTS: Specific HRQL scores and exercise tolerance improved significantly more in rehabilitation patients than usual care patients by the end of the 8-week intervention. All HRQL measures and exercise tolerance in both groups improved significantly during the 12 month follow-up period but the differences between the groups were trivial. A poor baseline HRQL was the predominant predictor of improved generic and specific HRQL. Furthermore, greater improvement in HRQL consistently was associated with lower levels of cardiovascular risks such as absence of a previous MI or coronary artery bypass surgery, absence of angina, less smoking, and higher exercise tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Improved generic and specific HRQL was associated with poorer baseline HRQL and less baseline cardiovascular risk. This reinforces the importance of addressing health behavior changes as soon as possible after MI and the usefulness of assessing both generic and specific HRQL in evaluating treatment effectiveness.

Electrocardiography, Ambulatory↗

Goal attainment in a randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation after myocardial infarction.

PURPOSE: Goal setting is an established strategy in health behavior change programs although its usefulness remains uncertain. The authors investigate the validity of attainment of a patient-identified goal as an outcome measure in cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. METHODS: On entry into a randomized controlled trial of cardiac rehabilitation after an acute myocardial infarction, patients identified one activity that, if and when attained, would reflect their perception of a successful recovery. Patients reported whether they had attained their goal and the time of goal attainment. This was then related to trial outcomes that included generic and specific health-related quality of life and percent predicted exercise tolerance. RESULTS: Goals identified by 180 of the 201 (89.6%) patients, were attained by 51.5% at 8 weeks and by 86.5% at 12 months. At the end of the 8-week intervention, there was a substantial trend for fewer rehabilitation than usual care patients to have attained their identified goal (P < 0.06), although rehabilitation patients demonstrated greater improvement in specific health-related quality of life and exercise tolerance than usual care patients (P < 0.05). Among patients who identified a recreational physical activity goal (26.7%), significantly fewer (P < 0.007) rehabilitation than usual care patients had attained their goal at the end of the intervention with no differences in improvement in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although improvement in outcomes was greater in rehabilitation patients than usual care patients at 8 weeks, goal attainment, particularly for the recreational physical activity goal, was greater among usual care patients. The validity of self-identified activity goal attainment as a measure of the efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation is unclear and might give misleading results.

Exercise Therapy↗

A randomized control trial of right-heart catheterization in critically ill patients. Ontario Intensive Care Study Group.

We investigated the impact of right-heart catheterization (RHC) on physiological status and stay in the intensive care unit. Thirty-three of 148 potentially eligible patients were randomized. Fifty-two otherwise eligible patients were excluded because the attending physician felt that RHC was ethically mandated. Ten of 16 (63%) patients randomized to RHC, and 9 of 17 (53%) to no RHC, died (difference: -10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -43% to 24%). Mean number of days in the intensive care unit were 10.3 for RHC and 8.1 for no RHC (difference, -2.2; CI, -10.2 to 5.8). The lowest modified APACHE score achieved after randomization was 10.8 for RHC and 8.1 for no RHC (difference, -3.8; CI, -7.0 to -0.6), and the mean modified APACHE score was 14.4 for RHC and 11.1 for no RHC (difference, -3.3; CI, -6.47 to -0.2). Physiological measures in this trial showed statistically significant differences in favor of patients not receiving RHC. Confidence intervals around other outcomes include clinically important differences in favor of both RHC and control groups. Although other controlled trials of RHC are crucial, investigators face major practical difficulties.

Canada↗

Questionnaire for measuring oral health-related quality of life in eight- to ten-year-old children.

PURPOSE: This study measured oral health-related quality of life for children, which involved the construction of child perceptions questionnaires (CPQs) for ages 6 to 7, 8 to 10, and 11 to 14. The purpose of this study was to present the development and evaluation of the CPQ for 8- to 10-year-olds (CPQ8-10). METHODS: Questions (N=25) were selected from the CPQ for 11- to 14-year-olds based on the child development literature and input from parents, child psychologist, and teacher of grades 3 and 4. Validity and reliability were evaluated on 68 and 33 children, respectively. RESULTS: There was a positive moderate correlation between the CPQ8-10 score and overall well-being rating (R=.45). The level of impact was slightly higher in the orofacial than in the pediatric dentistry group (mean score=19.1 vs 18.4, respectively). Hypotheses concerning the relationship between the CPQ8-10 score and number of decayed surfaces were confirmed with R=.29, and the mean score higher in caries-afflicted than caries-free children (21.1 vs 14.7). The Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.89 and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest good construct validity, internal consistency, reliability and test-retest reliability, but do not demonstrate discriminative validity. This is consistent, however, with theoretical models of oral disease and its consequences. Further research is required, as these are preliminary findings based on convenience sampling.

Attitude to Health↗

Cost-effectiveness of inhaled beta-agonists v. oral salbutamol in asthma: a randomized double-blind cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: Oral beta-stimulants are widely used in the management of chronic asthma in India, in spite of evidence suggesting the superiority of inhaled medication in achieving maximum bronchodilatation. An economic evaluation was performed in a randomized double-blind cross-over trial to evaluate the role of adjuvant oral beta-stimulants in the treatment of asthma. METHODS: Patients who had seasonal or perennial asthma and were using metered dose inhalers for control of symptoms were randomly selected for the study. They received either 4 mg of oral salbutamol or placebo as adjuvant treatment. During the study they controlled their symptoms by adjusting the dose of the inhaler medication. A cost minimization technique was used to assess the economic impact of this intervention in the treatment and control periods. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the conclusions. RESULTS: The mean cost was significantly greater in the treatment period and a patient lost approximately Rs 20 per month (CI: 13 to 27; p = 0.001) as a result of the adjuvant treatment. There was no significant difference in the quality of life or peak expiratory flow rate during the two periods. The patients also noted mild but significantly increased tremors (p = 0.01) and palpitations (p = 0.001) during the treatment period. There was no treatment-to-period interaction. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant oral beta-agonists do not improve the quality of life or bronchodilatation in asthmatics using an inhaled beta-agonist for control of symptoms.

Administration, Inhalation↗