Biomedical subjects

G Gitnick

Publications and source records attributed to G Gitnick.

58 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1971

Australia antigen and liver function tests following infectious hepatitis. A study of 111 patients in quest of aids in blood donor screening.

An epidemic of infectious hepatitis involving 99 patients and employees of a state mental hospital revealed Australia antigen Au(1) to be absent from the blood of all but one of the subjects when tested at six weeks, three months, nine months and 12 to 18 months after onset of jaundice. The single patient with Au(1) at 12 months had no enzyme abnormality to indicate residual liver disease. If Au(1) is the virus of hepatitis these data would support the concept that persistent or long standing viremia is not a feature of epidemic hepatitis. Moreover, results of this study suggest that the Au(1) test should not be used to establish the absence of a past history of hepatitis in blood donors. These data do not establish the value of the Au(1) test in blood donors with active viremia, but do suggest that of 111 patients with recent hepatitis 1 percent had persistent antigenemia and 4 percent probably had circulating antigen antibody complexes and constituted a potential risk to recipients of their blood. The degree of risk to recipients from transfused blood of post-hepatitis patients without demonstrable Au(1) cannot be assessed.

Blood Donors↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Non-A, non-B hepatitis: a prospective study of a hemodialysis outbreak with evaluation of a serologic marker in patients and staff.

An outbreak of non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) in a hemodialysis unit was prospectively studied and the clinical, biochemical, and serologic events were correlated with an experimental immunodiffusion assay for serum antigen and antibody. One hundred sixteen subjects (76 dialysis patients and 40 staff members) were studied over an 8-month period. Hepatitis was defined as two consecutive SGPT levels greater than two times the upper limit of normal occurring in two separate samples drawn greater than 7 days apart in the absence of other likely causes of liver disease. Weekly serum specimens were obtained and tested for SGPT, SGOT, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs, total anti-HAV, and anti-HAV IgM by commercial reagents, and for antigen and antibody by agar gel diffusion using reference reagents previously obtained from well-documented posttransfusion NANBH patients. Clinical evaluations were performed three times per week. Thirty patients and none of the staff developed NANBH. The NANBH patients were asymptomatic, except for two patients with jaundice. Fifteen of the 30 patients were positive for antigen which was detectable in at least one serum collected during the acute phase. Six patients and 10 staff without clinical NANBH or abnormal serology had antigen. Antigenemia was also observed in three patients with acute hepatitis B, with chronic hepatitis B in one patient and with alcoholic hepatitis in one patient. Thus, an antigen was detected in a high proportion of patients during the acute phase of NANBH, and it was also found in exposed patients who had other liver diseases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Diagnostic usefulness of testing for anti-HBc IgM in acute hepatitis B.

Numerous tests to detect anti-HBc IgM have been developed and shown to have different degrees of sensitivity and specificity. One of these assays, Corzyme-M (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.), recently became commercially available. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical utility of this anti-HBc IgM test in establishing the diagnosis of acute hepatitis B using sera from a group of 42 prospectively followed individuals who had been exposed to hepatitis B virus. The Corzyme-M test was highly sensitive in detecting recent hepatitis B virus infection. All 30 patients with symptomatic and 12 with asymptomatic acute hepatitis B virus infection developed anti-HBc IgM. However, the timing of sample testing relative to onset of symptoms in symptomatic patients was important, inasmuch as 2 of 23 patients were negative for anti-HBc IgM early in the symptomatic period, although all were HBsAg positive. The duration of anti-HBc IgM positivity after acute infection was variable, ranging from 2 to 134 weeks. In 14% of patients, anti-HBc IgM remained detectable for more than 1 year. From the data, recommendations are given regarding the usefulness of anti-HBc IgM testing in the diagnosis of acute hepatitis B virus infection.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Automated RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay: a novel tool for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients.

Hemodialysis (HD) patients remain a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Serological assays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, ELISAs) are the only tests currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States for the diagnosis of HCV. The RIBA HCV Strip Immunoblot Assay (SIA) is an established method for supplemental testing of repeat reactive hepatitis C ELISA patients on HD. However, the current manual procedure is labor intensive, requiring subjective band scoring and result interpretation. Recently, the automated CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System has been designed to perform RIBA supplemental testing. The CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System consists of a bench-top instrument that provides objective evaluation of the RIBA immunoblot strips, by measuring the light differentially reflected from the developed bands and white background, creating a density of reflectance. The CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System assesses the intensity of each of the reactive bands in relation to the intensity of the internal control bands on each RIBA HCV strip. Comparison between processor and manual protocols was performed using a large (n = 200) cohort of ELISA 3.0 HCV negative and positive patients on maintenance HD. The test characteristics of RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA were identical with manual and automated runs. The relative intensity values of antigenic bands by the CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Processor System between anti-HCV positive and negative patients were significantly different; only 15 of 784 (1.9%) antigenic bands had borderline reactivities. The correlation of test results between manual and automated runs was very high (kappa value 0.989). Among positive results by RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, there was a strong concordance between manual and automated runs with regard to the pattern of reactivity (kappa value 0.943). The discordant results between manual and automated protocols were attributable to increased variability of antigen scores close to the cutoff value for both tests. In conclusion, the CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Processor System is capable of performing RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA in the HD population accurately with minimal operator involvement. The test characteristics of RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA were identical by manual and automated runs. There was a strong correlation between the results of the manual and automated runs; the few discordant results between the two procedures were mostly due to increased variability of antigen scores close to the cutoff value for both tests. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the USA have recently included chronic HD patients among those persons for whom routine HCV testing is recommended; HCV-infected patients on HD often have a high rate of indeterminate results by manual RIBA technology which is operator dependent for band scoring and result interpretation. The CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Processor System may be very useful for supplemental anti-HCV testing of ELISA repeat reactive specimens in clinical practice within dialysis units.

Hepatitis C, Chronic↗