Biomedical subjects

G Gandini

Publications and source records attributed to G Gandini.

202 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Carbon disulfide in blood: a method for storing and analysing samples.

Concentrations of free and acid-labile carbon disulfide in human blood were determined by gas chromatography mass-spectrometry. Carbon disulfide was measured in the blood of 62 subjects not occupationally exposed to the solvent, and in 27 subjects treated with disulfiram (which is partially biotransformed into carbon disulfide). In blood, a small part of carbon disulfide is free (it can be analysed without any blood treatment); most carbon disulfide is bound ("acid labile" carbon disulfide), and requires acid hydrolysis to become free and detectable. During the first phase of our study, stored samples of blood (storage at 4 degrees C for 15-40 days) were used. Later, we analysed fresh blood samples. A significant decrease in carbon disulfide was found in stored samples in comparison to fresh samples. During storage, free and acid-labile carbon disulfide in blood decreased respectively to 26% and 27% of the initial concentration within a month. In fresh samples, free carbon disulfide concentrations in blood showed a median of 139 ng/l in normal subjects. Acid-labile carbon disulfide concentrations were much higher (median 2743 ng/l). Free and acid-labile carbon disulfide in blood were closely correlated (r = 0.9358). Blood samples stored at -80 degrees C maintained a constant concentration of carbon disulfide over almost three weeks.

Alcoholism↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Definition of the T parameter in nasosinusal neoplasms: a CT-MR comparison].

This study was aimed at investigating the value of CT and MRI in the staging of sinonasal tumors. The authors report 22 cases of sinonasal tumors: 7 squamous cell carcinomas, 4 adenoid-cystic carcinomas, 1 mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 6 adenocarcinomas, 1 esthesioneuroblastoma, 1 osteosarcoma, 1 small-cell sarcoma and finally 1 non-Hodgkin lymphoma. No significant differences were observed between CT and MR staging: 2 T2 and 15 T4 lesions were diagnosed in the maxillary sinuses and 3 stage-II and 1 stage-III lesions in the naso-ethmoidal region. Tumor spread was similar in 20/22 cases: MRI excluded the involvement of maxillary and sphenoid sinuses in 2 cases. CT was superior in the assessment of bone destruction particularly at the base of the skull, but MRI better demonstrated intracranial spread. MRI detailed the intraorbital muscles and, in the infratemporal fossa, the pterygoid muscles better than CT. High agreement was observed between CT and histology in 5/7 cases and between MRI and histology in 6/7 cases undergoing craniofacial resection. Seventeen of 22 cases had low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted, PD and T2-weighted MR images. Signal was hyperintense in 5 cases: 1 adenocarcinoma with mucinous features, 3 adenoid-cystic carcinomas and 1 esthesioneuroblastoma. In agreement with literature data, this study confirms CT as the examination of choice in staging sinonasal tumors: nonetheless, MRI yields valuable information in the cases with tumor spread to the muscles and soft tissues.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of inter-observer reproducibility between conventional chest radiography and AMBER in the evaluation of silicosis.

The aims of this study were to test inter-observer and intraobserver agreement in the diagnosis of silicosis using conventional chest radiography and AMBER. One hundred and fifteen patients underwent chest x-rays and AMBER for the diagnosis of silicosis. Five readers blindly and independently evaluated the radiograms with standard ILO/UC classification scales. Reproducibility was assessed using ANOVA repeated measurements methods. AMBER showed a better technical quality of radiograms than conventional chest x-rays; interobserver reproducibility was high and similar (R = 0.75); intraobserver agreement between chest x-rays and AMBER was high ranging from 0.62 to 0.86 for the 5 readers. Notwithstanding the absence of standards for profusion classification, the interobserver reproducibility with AMBER was similar to that obtained with chest x-rays. Moreover, the intraobserver agreement in profusion scoring between AMBER and chest radiography was high, suggesting that AMBER and chest radiography provided similar information in the evaluation of silicosis.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Diagnostic imaging and interventional therapy in hepatocarcinoma. Multicenter study of 290 cases].

We report the results of a multicenter study on the diagnosis and interventional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The first aim--diagnosis--was to evaluate the sensitivity of 4 imaging techniques, namely ultrasonography (US), Computed Tomography (CT), digital arteriography (DSA) and Lipiodol CT (LCT), in HCC detection. The accuracy of these techniques was also investigated in tumor staging, which is important for treatment planning. Two hundred ninety patients underwent this imaging protocol. The patients were classified by tumor spread into three groups, namely group 1 (single HCCs < 5 cm), group 2 (multifocal HCCs with max. 3 nodules or tumor volume < 80 cc), group 3 (multifocal HCCs with more than 3 nodules and/or tumor volume > 80 cc). US and CT diagnosed more cases as group 1 and fewer cases as group 3 than DSA and LCT; the latter two techniques gave a similar classification. With LCT as the gold standard, US and CT understaged 27.9% and 26.5% of cases, respectively. Even though LCT is known to have 53% sensitivity, it is currently the most sensitive preoperative investigation and therefore the best tool for treatment planning. In surgical patients, however, intraoperative US, with its nearly 100% sensitivity, is suggested. The second aim--treatment--consisted in assessing the therapeutic efficacy of intraarterial chemoembolization (CEAT) versus percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in non advanced HCC and of CEAT versus no treatment (NT) in advanced HCC. Treatment efficacy was evaluated with the following randomized protocols: PEI versus CEAT in group 1, PEI versus CEAT in group 2 and CEAT versus NT in group 3. The data were analyzed relative to 215 patients for 6 to 30 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, which were, at 24 and 30 months, 72% and 72% for PEI and 72% and 52% for CEAT in group 1, 52% and 28% for PEI and 70% and 50% for CEAT in group 2 and finally 30% and 20% for NT and 45% and 30% for CEAT in group 3. In group 1, PEI appeared markedly superior to CEAT. In group 2, the difference between PEI and CEAT was not statistically significant; the results in this group indicate that CEAT should be considered when three nodules are present because of PEI invasiveness in these cases. In group 3, CEAT results were definitely better in the first two years, but there was no difference with NT patients at the end of the third year. Therefore, CEAT is indicated in advanced HCC because it improves the survival rate in the first 24 months. After this period, the survival time is not modified by treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗