Biomedical subjects

G Gaggini

Publications and source records attributed to G Gaggini.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Comparison of permanent left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: prospective haemodynamic study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and haemodynamic variables between left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure; and to analyse haemodynamic changes during daily life and maximum exercise during chronic left ventricular and biventricular pacing. DESIGN: Prospective single blinded randomised study with crossover. SETTING: University hospital (tertiary referral centre). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 13 patients (mean (SD) age, 62 (6) years) with chronic atrial fibrillation, severe heart failure (mean ejection fraction 24 (8)%), and QRS prolongation of > or = 140 ms had His bundle ablation and installation of a pacemaker providing left ventricular and biventricular pacing. The pacemaker was equipped with a peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) sensor. The PEA pattern was used as a haemodynamic marker during exercise as it is highly correlated with left ventricular dP/dt. After a baseline period of right ventricular pacing, all patients had two months of left ventricular pacing and two months of biventricular pacing in random order. At the end of each phase, an echocardiogram, a haemodynamic analysis at rest and on exercise during a six minute walk test, and a cardiopulmonary exercise test were performed. RESULTS: PEA values were higher with left ventricular pacing (0.58 (0.38) m/s) and biventricular pacing (0.62 (0.24) m/s) than at baseline (0.49 (0.18) m/s) (p < 0.05). The six minute walk test showed similar performance in both pacing modes, but patients had more symptoms with left ventricular pacing at the end of the test (p = 0.035). On cardiopulmonary exercise testing, there was a greater increase in mean percentage variation of PEA with biventricular pacing than with left ventricular pacing (125 (18)% v 97 (36)%, respectively; p = 0.048) and better performance figures (92 (34) W v 77 (23) W; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: During symptom limited and daily life exercise tests, chronic biventricular pacing provides better haemodynamic performance than left ventricular pacing. In heart failure patients with wide QRS complexes, the interventricular dyssynchronisation induced by left ventricular pacing may impair myocardial function during exercise.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Operator independent left ventricular function monitoring during pharmacological stress echo with the new peak transcutaneous acceleration signal.

BACKGROUND: As the myocardium contracts isometrically, it generates vibrations that can be measured with an accelerometer. The vibration peak, peak endocardial acceleration (PEA), is an index of contractility. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of PEA measured by the cutaneous precordial application of the accelerometer sensor; and to assess the usefulness of PEA monitoring during pharmacological stress echocardiography. DESIGN: Feasibility study. SETTING: Stress echo laboratory. PATIENTS: 34 consecutive patients underwent pharmacological stress (26 with dipyridamole; 8 with dobutamine) and PEA monitoring simultaneously. INTERVENTIONS: A microaccelerometer was positioned in the precordial region and PEA was recorded. Dipyridamole was infused up to 0.84 mg/kg in 10 minutes, and dobutamine up to 40 microg/kg/min in 15 minutes. RESULTS: A consistent PEA signal was obtained in all patients. Overall mean (SD) baseline PEA was 0.26 (0.15) g (g = 9.8 m/s(2)), increasing to 0.5 (0.36) g at peak stress (+0.24 g, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.34 g; p < 0.01). PEA increased from 0.26 (0.16) to 0.37 (0.25) g in the dipyridamole group (+0.11 g, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.16 g; p < 0.01), and from 0.29 (0.1) to 0.93 (0.37) g in the dobutamine group (+0.64 g, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.91 g; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using precordial leads this method offers potential for diagnostic application in the short term monitoring of myocardial function. PEA monitoring is feasible during pharmacological stress and documents left ventricular inotropic response quantitatively in a non-invasive and operator independent fashion.

Acceleration↗

PubMed2000

Atrioventricular interval optimization in the right atrial appendage and interatrial septum pacing: a comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.

Interatrial septum pacing (IASP) reduces interatrial conduction time and consequently may interfere with atrioventricular delay (AVD) optimization. We studied 14 patients with an implanted BEST Living system device able to measure peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) signal. The aims of our study were to compare the (1) optimal AVD (OAVD) in right atrial appendage pacing (RAAP) and IASP, and (2) OAVD derived by the PEA signal versus OAVD derived by Echo/Doppler evaluation of the left ventricular filling time (LVFT) and cardiac output (CO). Measurements were performed in DDD VDD modes Eight patients (group A) had RAAP and six patients (group B) had IASP. In group A, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 185 +/- 23 ms, 177 +/- 19 ms, and 192 +/- 23 ms in DDD and 147 +/- 19 ms, 135 +/- 27 ms, and 146 +/- 20 ms in VDD, respectively. OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was significantly longer in DDD mode than in VDD (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.001). In group B, OAVD measured by LVFT, CO, and PEA was 116 +/- 19 ms, 113 +/- 10 ms, and 130 +/- 30 ms in DDD and 106 +/- 16 ms, 96 +/- 15 ms, and 108 +/- 26 ms in VDD, respectively. No statistical differences were observed between DDD and VDD. Significant correlations between OAVDs PEA derived and OAVDs LVFT and CO derived were observed (r = 0.71, r = 0.69, respectively). When new techniques of atrial stimulation, as IASP, are used an OAVD shorter and similar in VDD and DDD has to be considered. The BEST Living system could provide a valid method to ensure, in every moment, the exact required OAVD to maximize atrial contribution to CO.

Atrial Appendage↗

PubMed2000

Peak endocardial acceleration reflects heart contractility also in atrial fibrillation.

Previous studies demonstrated that peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) in sinus rhythm is related to LV dP/dtmax. Until now, PEA was never evaluated during R-R interval variations in AF. The aim of this study was to establish the behavior of PEA in AF and the relationship of PEA versus LV dP/dtmax. Six sheep (65 +/- 6 kg) were instrumented with a LV Millar catheter and with an accelerometer lead. AF was induced and PEA, LV dP/dtmax, and ECG were monitored. AF persisted for 5 +/- 1.3 minutes. From sinus rhythm to AF, the heart rate went from 92 +/- 3 to 130 +/- 35 beats/min (P < 0.05), LV dP/dtmax from 684 +/- 18 to 956 +/- 344 mmHg/s (P = NS) and PEA from 0.82 +/- 0.06 to 0.94 +/- 0.33 g (P = NS). The correlation between PEA and LV dP/dtmax was significative in sinus rhythm (r = 0.7, P < 0.05) and in AF (r = 0.8, P < 0.05). A positive relationship was found between the preceding interval and PEA (r = 0.4 +/- 0.07, P < 0.05) and LV dP/dtmax (r = 0.61 +/- 0.08, P < 0.05), while a negative one was found between the prepreceding interval and both PEA (r = -0.39 +/- 0.11, P < 0.05) and LV dP/dtmax (r = -0.64 +/- 0.05, P < 0.05). At the onset of AF, LV dP/dtmax and PEA showed similar changes: beat-to-beat correlation between PEA and LV dP/dtmax was high. As for LV dP/dtmax, PEA is positively related to the preceding interval and negatively related to the prepreceding interval. These data confirm that PEA reflects heart contractility also during AF and hold promise for the use of this sensor in therapeutic implantable devices.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Hemodynamic assessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing by peak endocardial acceleration and echocardiography in patients with end-stage heart failure.

Multisite ventricular pacing acutely improves the hemodynamic status in heart failure, though longer-term observations require invasive procedures. The hemodynamics of multisite ventricular pacing were assessed by echocardiography and peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) measured by a pacemaker sensor. PEA variations are highly correlated with those of dP/dt. Thirteen end-stage heart failure patients (left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.30) with a QRS > or = 140 ms received a DDD PEA sensor-driven pacemaker allowing right (RV), left (LV) and biventricular (BV) pacing. Ten days after implantation, standard echocardiographic parameters and variations in PEA were measured after 20 minutes at each pacing mode. The aortic systolic preejection time interval was statistically comparable between RV and LV pacing (218 +/- 24 vs 219 +/- 34 ms; P = NS), and significantly shorter with BV pacing (198 +/- 27 ms; P = 0.013). Aortic ejection duration was nonsignificantly shorter during BV pacing than during LV pacing (-.061, P = 0.09). The aortic velocity time integer increased during LV pacing versus RV pacing (+21%, P < 0.05) and during BV pacing versus RV pacing (+37%, P = 0.05). As a result, the values of the PEA variations over a 15-minute period were significantly greater during LV pacing and BV pacing versus RV pacing (+43%, P < 0.05, and +38%, P = 0.05, respectively) and were statistically comparable between BV pacing and LV pacing (9% for LV pacing, P = NS). During various ventricular pacing configurations, PEA measurements were consistent with echocardiographic data, showing comparable hemodynamic effects of BV and LV pacing. The PEA sensor is a promising tool for long-term hemodynamic monitoring and serial evaluation of the effects of multisite ventricular pacing in heart failure patients.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗

PubMed1999

Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.

The goal of this study was to compare two methods determining the optimal atrioventicular delay (AVD) in 19 patients implanted with the BEST-Living system for complete heart block. The definition of the optimal AVD was: the AVD with the echo method that provided the longest diastolic filling time without interruption of the A wave, and the AVD with the peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) method, corresponding to the knee of the PEA curve vs AV delay. The amplitude of the PEA was measured for every AVD programmed via an automatic scanner in steps of 60 to 300 ms (40 ms steps): in the VDD pacing mode with a low base rate, to obtain 100% sensed P waves; in DDD with a base rate = sinus rate + 20%, to obtain 100% paced P waves. Echocardiographic (Echo) measurement of the left ventricular filling time were performed in the same AV delay settings in VDD and DDD as the ones tested in the PEA method, which were manually programmed. The optimal AVDs obtained in DDD and those obtained in VDD were compared in the echo and the PEA tests by a paired Student's t-test. The optimal AVDs obtained by both Echo and by PEA were also compared by a paired Student's t-test in VDD and DDD. The r value of the correlation between the optimal AVDs obtained by Echo and those obtained by PEA was calculated. Similar values of optimal AVD were obtained with both methods. The optimal AVDs given by the Echo technique (179 +/- 25 ms in DDD and 124 +/- 18 ms in VDD) were slightly, but significantly shorter than the ones obtained with the PEA method (202 +/- 21 ms in DDD and 145 +/- 18 ms in VDD, P < 0.05). A highly significant difference between AVD VDD and AVD DDD was found with both methods (P < 0.001). The correlation between the AVDs obtained with the echo and the PEA methods was highly significant (r = 0.78, P < 0.01). Pacemaker software could be modified to determine automatically the optimal AVDs to be applied throughout the heart rate range.

Atrioventricular Node↗

PubMed1992

Mixed microprocessor-random logic approach for innovative pacing systems.

Modern pacing systems are becoming more and more sophisticated. Conversion of the information supplied by a sensor into suitable parameters for a rate controlling algorithm and the management of complex timing are common tasks for an integrated circuit (IC) in cardiac pacing. An effective solution consists of using a microprocessor to implement algorithms and pacing modes in a flexible way. The key point of using the same hardware resources for different tasks on a time sharing basis allows the design of a less complex IC when compared to a random logic structure with the same performances. The major design problems in a full microprocessor solution are its relatively low operating speed due to the low frequency clock necessary for low current drain, and the sequential structure of the machine itself. This can lead to unacceptable timing inaccuracy in all situations requiring the management of complex decision trees. In order to take full benefit from the advantages of a microprocessor structure without these drawbacks, a mixed microprocessor-random logic approach has been investigated. This architecture uses a microprocessor core to perform all high level nonreal-time operations (setup of the pacing cycle, data reduction and processing, data integrity checks) while a set of random logic peripherals is used for all critical timing aspects.

Algorithms↗