Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G G Fillenbaum

Publications and source records attributed to G G Fillenbaum.

71 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Sex differences in the antecedents and consequences of retirement.

The purpose of this paper was to compare the antecedents and consequences of retirement among men and women. Data were analyzed from two surveys: the Retirement History Study (N for analysis = 1845) and the Duke Second Longitudinal Study (N = 235). The predictors and outcomes of retirement used in analyses were those suggested in previous research. The results suggest that (a) the variables that predict retirement for men do not predict retirement for women and (b) retirement affects substantially more outcomes for men than for women. For both sexes, however, retirement had both positive and negative effects. Discussion is focused upon the possible explanations for the sex differences observed.

Aged↗

Predictors of retirement.

Predictors of retirement among men were analyzed using data from seven longitudinal studies, multiple definitions of retirement, multivariate analyses, and unbiased statistical techniques. Results show that the predictors of retirement vary depending on how retirement is defined. The strongest predictors of objective retirement among men over age 65 (i.e., employed less than full-time and receiving a pension) are structural factors such as socioeconomic status and job characteristics. The strongest predictors of early retirement (i.e., retiring before age 65) and of age at retirement include both structural factors and subjective factors, characteristics are more important predictors than all the others combined.

Aged↗

The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire.

This report outlines the development, validity, and reliability of Part A of the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire. Part A permits assessment of individuals' functioning on each of five dimensions (social, economic, mental health, physical health and self-care capacity), the detailed information in each area being summarized on a 6-point rating scale by a rater. Content and consensual validity were ensured by the manner of construction. Information on criterion validity was obtained for all dimensions except social. The criterion used and their associated Kendall's Tau values were: an objective economic scale (.62); ratings based on personal interviews by geropsychiatrists (.60); physician's associates (.82); and physical therapists (.89). For 11 geographically dispersed raters from research and clinic settings, intraclass correlational coefficients, based on 30 subjects, ranged from .66 on physical health to .87 in self-care capacity; 74% of the ratings were in complete agreement, 24% differed by one point.

Aged↗

Change in functional disability of geriatric patients in a family medicine program: implications for patient care.

Multi-dimensional functional impairments of a sample of 130 new patients, aged 60 years and older, at a family medicine center were previously described. Of these, 48 persons representing the combinations of impairment originally present were selected by means of modified random sampling for follow-up 13 to 27 months later (m = 20 months). Patients were assessed both at the time of the initial visit and on follow-up with the Older Americans Resources Services (OARS) Multi-dimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire, an instrument permitting assessment of functional status in five areas of personal functioning: social, economic, mental health, physical health, and the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Fourteen of the 130 initial subjects died during the follow-up interval. Impairments in mental health, physical health, and ADL were associated with increased risk of mortality; but impairments in social and economic functioning did not increase risk. For the survivors there was decline in economic and mental functioning and little, if any, change in social resources or the ability to perform activities of daily living. However, there was notable improvement in their physical functioning.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Determinants of attrition in a natural history study of Alzheimer disease.

The aim of the present study was to identify determinants of attrition in a natural history study of a tertiary care sample of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and control subjects. A longitudinal study was performed with 978 patients with AD and 466 control subjects age 50 years and older enrolled at 25 sites of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease between January 1987 and January 1992; subjects were followed annually for up to 78 months. Both descriptive statistics and polytomous logistic regressions were run to identify determinants of attrition. Of the 1,444 subjects enrolled, 10.5% dropped out after initial evaluation, 31.0% provided at least two waves of data, and 58.4% provided complete follow-up. Inadequate involvement by the site, non-white status, and patient's spouse not enrolled in the study were predictive of dropout; cessation of participation because of death (which may have precluded dropout) predicted continuation in the study. Age, level of education, severity of dementia, and rapidity of progression of disease did not predict dropout. Level-of-site commitment was the most significant determinant of continued participation in this natural history study of AD, followed by white race, and the inclusion of both husband and wife where one is a patient and the other a control subject.

Aged↗

Factors associated with suboptimal analgesic use in community-dwelling elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns and factors associated with overall and suboptimal analgesic use among community-dwelling elderly. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Five-county urban and rural region in Piedmont, NC. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample from the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly of 3973 participants aged 65 years or older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of any analgesic medication, suboptimal analgesic use (taking 2 or more analgesics from the same class, using 3 or more analgesics concurrently, or use of an analgesic that has a major interaction with another drug). RESULTS: Analgesics were used by 60.4% of the participants. Use was more likely for those who had physical functional impairment, a history of cardiovascular disease, one or more health visits in the previous year, or were female. Use was less likely for older participants and for African-Americans with adequate financial status. Suboptimal use occurred in 9.2% of analgesic users. Therapeutic duplication was more likely in those who were depressed, needed help with basic activities of daily living, or used alcohol, and was less likely in those with adequate financial status. Multiple analgesic use was more likely in those who were depressed, had impaired physical functional status, had one or more health visits in the previous year, were African-American (of either sex), or were white women. Only two persons had a potential major analgesic-drug interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal analgesic use is common in community-dwelling elderly, and its risk in consistently increased in those who are depressed or have impaired physical functional status.

Aged↗

An examination of the vulnerability hypothesis.

Follow-up information from three groups of older persons (community residents, clinic clients, the institutionalized) confirms and extends data presented by Yolmans and Yarrow [1] indicating that increasing interdependence among different areas of functioning increases with age, possibly resulting in increased vulnerability in time of loss. Some implications of these findings were indicated.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Predictors of nutritional supplement use by the elderly.

We conducted a population survey to describe patterns and determine predictors of the use of nutritional supplements and single-ingredient vitamins and minerals among elderly living in five adjacent urban and rural counties in the Piedmont area of North Carolina. The stratified random sample consisted of 3939 black and white participants age 65 or older from the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. The use of nutritional supplements within the previous 2 weeks was determined during an in-home interview. Multivariate analyses, using weighted data adjusted for sampling design, were conducted to assess the association between nutritional supplement use and predisposing, need, and enabling factors. Nutritional supplement use was reported by 26.2% of participants and was more likely for those who were white women, were high school educated, were underweight, took prescription drugs, had five or more health visits in the previous year, and had supplemental health insurance. It was less likely for those with poor self-rated health. The majority (71.5%) of nutritional supplement users took at least one single-ingredient supplement. Use of such products was more likely in those who were white, born and raised in an urban area, and high school educated, and was less likely in those with impaired functional status. Nutritional supplement use is prevalent in community-dwelling elderly and is more commonly associated with demographic factors and access to health care than with need factors.

Aged↗