Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Fanelli

Publications and source records attributed to G Fanelli.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Small doses of remifentanil or sufentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation: a double-blind comparison.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects on cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation when small doses of either remifentanil or sufentanil are used in the presence of midazolam. METHODS: Thirty normotensive, ASA physical status I-II patients, receiving general anaesthesia for major abdominal surgery, received an intravenous midazolam premedication (0.05 mg kg-1) 10 min before induction. They were randomly allocated to receive in a double-blind fashion an intravenous bolus of either (a) remifentanil given as a bolus dose 1 microgram kg-1 (n = 15), or else (b) sufentanil 0.1 microgram kg-1 infused over 60 s (n = 15). In each instance this loading dose was followed by a continuous intravenous infusion (0.1 microgram kg-1 min-1 or 0.01 microgram kg-1 min-1 of remifentanil or sufentanil, respectively). General anaesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg kg-1), followed by atracurium besilate (0.5 mg kg-1) to facilitate tracheal intubation. Following intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated with a 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen mixture and a 1% inspired sevoflurane. RESULTS: Arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded before induction of anaesthesia (baseline), immediately before intubation, immediately after tracheal intubation and every minute for the first five minutes thereafter. No differences in systolic and diastolic arterial pressures were observed between the two groups. At the end of the study period, systolic and diastolic pressures slightly decreased from preinduction values in both groups. Four patients in the remifentanil group (26%) and five patients in sufentanil group (33%) showed at least one systolic pressure value < 90 mmHg during the study period (P = not significant); however, the observed decreases in systolic pressure were transient and did not require treatment. Heart rate values were not affected by tracheal intubation in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy normotensive patients without cardiovascular disease the use of a relatively small dose of either remifentanil or sufentanil after standard midazolam premedication results in a similar and clinically acceptable effectiveness in blunting the cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2001

Minimum local anesthetic volume blocking the femoral nerve in 50% of cases: a double-blinded comparison between 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine.

UNLABELLED: Recent studies demonstrated that ropivacaine was nearly 40% less potent than bupivacaine in the first stage of labor, but contrasting results have been reported. We, therefore, conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to determine the effects of the ropivacaine/bupivacaine potency ratio on the minimum volume of local anesthetic required to produce effective block of the femoral nerve in 50% of patients. Fifty adults premedicated with IV midazolam, 0.05 mg/kg, undergoing elective knee arthroscopy received femoral nerve blocks with a multiple-injection technique with a nerve stimulator (contractions of vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, and vastus lateralis were elicited with a 0.5-mA stimulating current). Patients randomly received either 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 25). The anesthetic volume was decided according to Dixon's up-and-down method, starting from 12 mL and being equally divided among the three elicited twitches. Successful nerve block was loss of pinprick sensation in the femoral nerve distribution with concomitant block of the quadriceps muscle within 20 min after injection, as assessed by a blinded observer. Positive or negative responses determined a 3-mL decrease or increase for the next patient, respectively. According to the up-and-down sequences, the minimum local anesthetic volume providing successful nerve block in 50% of cases was 14 +/- 2 mL in the ropivacaine group (95% CI: 12-16 mL) and 15 +/- 2 mL (95% CI: 13-17 mL) in the bupivacaine group (P: = 0.155). We conclude that the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required to produce effective block of the femoral nerve in 50% of patients is similar to that required when using 0.5% bupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Considering the risk for drug-related systemic toxicity, the equipotency ratio between ropivacaine and bupivacaine is crucial for daily practice. Despite the 40% reduction in the analgesic potency of ropivacaine reported during epidural analgesia for labor pain, results of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study demonstrated that the same volume of 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine is required to produce an effective block of the femoral nerve in 50% of cases.

Amides↗
PubMed2001

The effects of single or multiple injections on the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required for femoral nerve blockade.

UNLABELLED: We compared the effects of using a single- or multiple-injection technique on the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required to block the femoral nerve, in a prospective, randomized, blinded fashion in which 50 premedicated patients received a femoral nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine by use of a nerve stimulator and either a single- (n = 25) or multiple- (n = 25) injection technique. Muscular twitches were elicited at < or =0.5 mA before anesthetic injection. The designated volume of local anesthetic was equally divided among contraction of the vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, and vastus lateralis for the multiple injections, or it was injected at the contraction of the vastus intermedius with motion of the patella for the single injection. The local anesthetic volumes were varied for consecutive patients by using an up-and-down staircase method; a blinded observer determined the adequacy of nerve blockade (loss of pinprick sensation in the medial, patellar, and lateral portions of the knee, with concomitant block of the quadriceps muscle) 20 min after injection. The mean (95% confidence interval) volume required for blocking the femoral nerve with the multiple-injection technique (14 [12-16] mL) was significantly smaller than that observed with the single injection (23 [20-26] mL) (P = 0.001). According to logistic regression analyses, the 95% effective volumes of ropivacaine required to block the femoral nerve within 20 min after injection were 29 and 21 mL with a single or multiple injection, respectively. We conclude that searching for multiple muscular twitches reduces the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required to produce blockade of the femoral nerve. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated the effects of using a single- or multiple-injection technique on the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required to block the femoral nerve. The 95%effective concentration values for producing the same degree of sensory and motor blockade of the femoral nerve within 20 min after injection were 29 mL after elicitation of a patella twitch and 21 mL when the three main branches of the femoral nerve were identified, potentially leading to an important benefit for patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

A new posterior approach to the sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison with the classic posterior approach.

UNLABELLED: To evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of a new posterior subgluteus approach to the sciatic nerve, as compared with the classic posterior approach, 128 patients undergoing foot orthopedic procedures were randomly allocated to receive either the classic posterior sciatic nerve block (Group Labat, n = 64) or a modified subgluteus posterior approach (Group subgluteus, n = 64). All blocks were performed with the use of a nerve stimulator (stimulation frequency, 2 Hz; intensity, 1-0.5 mA). In Group subgluteus, a line was drawn from the greater trochanter to the ischial tuberosity; then, from the midpoint of this line, a second line was drawn perpendicularly and extended caudally for 4 cm. The end of this line represented the needle entry. In both groups, a proper sciatic stimulation was elicited at 0.5 mA; then 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine was injected. The time from needle insertion to successful sciatic nerve stimulation was 60 s (range, 10-180 s) with the Labat's approach and 32 s (range, 5-120 s) with the new subgluteus approach (P = 0.0005). The depth of appropriate sciatic stimulation was 45 +/- 13 mm (mean +/- SD) after 2 (range, 1-7) needle redirections in Group subgluteus and 67 +/- 12 mm after 4 (range, 1-10) needle redirections in Group Labat (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.00001, respectively). The failure rate was similar in both groups. Severe discomfort during the procedure was less frequent and acceptance better in Group subgluteus (5 patients [8%] and 60 patients [94%], respectively) than in Group Labat (20 patients [31%] and 49 patients [77%], respectively) (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.005, respectively). We conclude that this new subgluteus posterior approach to the sciatic nerve is an easy and reliable technique and can be considered an effective alternative to the more traditional Labat's approach. IMPLICATIONS: Evaluating the efficacy and acceptance of a new approach to the sciatic nerve block, this prospective, randomized study demonstrated that the new subgluteus posterior approach is an easy and reliable technique and can be considered an useful alternative to the more traditional Labat's approach in patients undergoing foot surgery, facilitating the performance of the sciatic nerve blocks.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Improving postoperative analgesia after axillary brachial plexus anesthesia with 0.75% ropivacaine. A double-blind evaluation of adding clonidine.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the effects of adding 1 microg/kg clonidine to 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% for axillary brachial plexus anesthesia. METHODS: With Ethical Committee approval and written consent, 30 ASA physical status I-II in-patients, undergoing upper extremity orthopedic procedures were randomly allocated to receive axillary brachial plexus block with 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine alone (group ropivacaine, n = 15) or 0.75% ropivacaine + 1 microg/kg clonidine (group ropivacaine-clonidine, n = 15). Nerve blocks were placed using a nerve stimulator with the multiple injection technique (stimulation frequency was 2 Hz; stimulation intensity was decreased to < or = 0.5 mA after each muscular twitch; the anesthetic volume was equally divided among arm flexion, arm extension, wrist flexion, and thumb adduction). A blinded observer recorded the time required to achieve surgical block [loss of pinprick sensation in the innervation areas of the hand (C6-C8) with concomitant inability to move the wrist and hand] and first analgesic request. RESULTS: No differences in demography, degree of sedation, peripheral oxygen saturation, and hemodynamic variables were observed between the two groups. Readiness for surgery required 15 min (5-36 min) with 0.75% ropivacaine and 20 min (5-30 min) with the ropivacaine-clonidine mixture. The degree of pain measured at first analgesic request, and consumption of postoperative analgesics were similar in the two groups; while first postoperative analgesic request occurred after 13.8 h (25th-75th percentiles: 9.1-13 h) in the ropivacaine group and 15.2 h (25th-75th percentiles: 10.7-16 h) in the ropivacaine-clonidine group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Adding 1 microg/kg clonidine to 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% for axillary brachial plexus anesthesia provided a 3 h delay in first analgesic request postoperatively, without clinically relevant effects on the degree of sedation and cardiovascular homeostasis.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2001

[Levobupivacaine for peripheral blocks of the lower limb: a clinical comparison with bupivacaine and ropivacaine].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was the comparison of clinical profile of sciatic nerve block performed with either 0,5% levobupivacaine, 0,5% bupivacaine, or 0,5% ropivacaine. METHODS: With ethical committee approval and written informed consent 45 ASA physical status I-II patients, undergoing elective hallux valgus repair received intravenous premedication with midazolam (0,05 mg/kg) followed by femoral nerve block with 15 ml of 2% mepivacaine. Then patients were randomly allocated to receive a sciatic nerve block with 20 ml of either 0,5% levobupivacaine (n=15), 0,5% bupivacaine (n=15), or 0,5% ropivacaine (n=15). An independent blind observer evaluated the onset time and duration of nerve block and postoperative analgesia. Postoperative analgesia consisted of 100 mg IV ketoprofen every 8 hours with the first administration at request. RESULTS: The onset time of sciatic nerve block was 15 (5-60) min with levobupivacaine, 30 (5-60) min with bupivacaine, and 15 (5-60) min with ropivacaine (P = NS). No differences in the quality of nerve block as well as in the nerve block resolution times were observed among the three groups. The duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 (8-24) hours with levobupivacaine, 14 (8-24) hours with bupivacaine, and 17 (8-24) hours with ropivacaine (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Using 0,5% levobupivacaine for sciatic nerve block results in similar clinical effects as those produced by using the same volume and concentration of either bupivacaine or ropivacaine.

Amides↗
PubMed2001

[Continuous brachial plexus blockade for shoulder surgery].

Continuous brachial plexus block is the technique of choice for postoperative shoulder pain treatment. The localization of the plexus is usually obtained drawing landmarks on the skin and using the electrical nerve stimulator; these and other different modalities are applied in order to reach safely and precisely nerve roots to be blocked with an anaesthetic solution. The Author presents a new anatomical perspective to guide the localization of the brachial plexus. It is shown how it is possible to detect the pathway of the brachial plexus from the cutaneous surface, linking between each other various landmarks: a) the apex of the scalene triangle, at the cross of a line leaving from the cricoid process and directed posterior to the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, b) the midline of the clavicle c)the deltoid-pectoral sulcus d) the midpoint between the coracoid process and the chest profile e) the pulsation of the artery in the axylla. Following the guide of the so formed anesthetic line, is possible to place the needle, with a direction from distal to proximal, in a tangential route towards the interscalenic groove, thus allowing to perform a block of the plexus in a simple and efficacious way.

Brachial Plexus↗
PubMed2001

[Peripheral blocks for the lower limb: lumbar plexus].

BACKGROUND: The techniques of continuous peripheral blockades have shown to be efficient in postoperative pain control, in the various orthopaedic procedures of the limbs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the existing data about the use of a continuous blockade of the lumbar plexus or femoral nerve, together with the indications for technique and therapy. METHODS: We considered the principal results of prospective, randomised studies described in literature about the assessment of a continuous peripheral blockade of the lumbar plexus or the femoral nerve in limb surgery. Furthermore we described the principal techniques for positioning the perinerval catheters in the considered sites, and the advised dosage regimen. RESULTS: The various studies report an adequate costs/benefits relation concerning the used techniques. The analysed studies not only report an adequate efficacy of the postoperative pain control, but often show an important benefit in terms of functional recovery of the operated limbs and on final outcome of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The use of continuous blockades of the lumbar plexus or femoral nerve shows to be an important and effective instrument not only in terms of positive effects on postoperative pain control, but also in terms of relevant advantages concerning final outcome after surgery. Nevertheless these techniques should not be considered as the only approach to postoperative pain in the orthopaedic patient, but have to be included in a global, multidisciplinary and multimodal approach.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Continuous peripheral block in foot surgery.

Peripheral neural blockade techniques are commonly used procedures to provide perioperative anesthesia and analgesia. Several continuous infusion catheter techniques have been described to extend the use of peripheral neural blockade into the postoperative period as an effective method of providing pain management. The analgesic benefit of continuous local anesthetic peripheral block in the management of postoperative pain is primarily related to the properties of providing intense analgesia thereby reducing perioperative opioid requirements and opioid-related side effects and promoting early recovery of postoperative activity. Continuous peripheral nerve blockade seems to be effective in allowing major foot and ankle surgery to be done particularly on an outpatient basis with greater pain relief. The sciatic nerve is the largest nerve in the body and it lies deep in the posterior thigh. According to its anatomy, the sciatic nerve can then be reached at different levels from the parasacral space to the popliteal fossa, ideally identifying a sciatic line running from the inferior border of the gluteus maximus muscle between the greater throcanter and the ischiatic tuberosity to the popliteal fossa. A variety of continuous peripheral blocks have been described in this paper including continuous sciatic block at several levels (para-sacral nerve block, subgluteal sciatic nerve block) and popliteal nerve block.

Foot↗
PubMed2001

Unilateral spinal anesthesia. State of the art.

The possibility to control the spread of intrathecal drugs, restricting the distribution of spinal block to the operated side is still controversial. Various authors reported that we can not predict the distribution of spinal block; however, other authors described how to restrict spinal block at the operated side in patients receiving surgical procedures involving one lower limb. Therefore, we reviewed clinical studies on this topic trying to outline the feasibility and potential clinical benefits of unilateral spinal anesthesia. The main results of studies recently published on peer reviewed journals concerning the clinical use of unilateral spinal anesthesia are reviewed. The main factors we must consider when attempting a unilateral spinal block are the use of small doses of local anesthetic solution injected through directional, pencil-point needles, together with a 15-20 min lateral decubitus position and the use of either hypo- or hyperbaric anesthetic solution. Using 6-8 mg of either hyper- or hypobaric bupivacaine provides a unilateral distribution of sympathetic and sensory blocks in 50 to 70% of patients, while unilateral motor block can be observed in up to 80% of cases. Attempting a unilateral spinal block results in a four-fold reduction in the incidence of clinically relevant hypotension with more stable cardiovascular parameters as compared with conventional bilateral spinal block. The small amount of local anesthetic solution injected, as well as the reduced extent of spinal block, also provide a favourable profile of the resolution of spinal block, which can be useful in the ambulatory setting. With simple technical skill we can reliably provide a preferential distribution of spinal block to the operated side. This results in a minimal delay in preparation time, but provides less hemodynamic side effects with higher cardiovascular stability, and increased autonomy after surgery with better patient acceptance.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗
PubMed2000

Cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: comparison of ropivacaine and mepivacaine.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical plexus block performed with ropivacaine 0.75% or 1%, or mepivacaine 2%. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients received deep cervical plexus block with 0.2 ml x kg(-1) divided among C2-C4 injections using ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%. A blinded observer recorded loss of pin-prick sensation every minute in the C2-C4 dermatomes until readiness for surgery. Then, a superficial cervical block was performed with 0.15 ml x kg(-1) lidocaine 1%. The need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia and degree of pain and time of first postoperative pain medication were also recorded. RESULTS: General anesthesia was not required to complete surgery in any case. No differences in the need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia was observed (7, 6, and 9 patients with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%, respectively). Readiness to surgery required 15 (10-25) min with ropivacaine 0.75%, 18 (8-20) min with ropivacaine 1%, and 15 (5-20) min with mepivacaine 2% (P = NS); while patients asked for first postoperative pain medication after 10 (4-13) hr and 9 (6.5 - 11) hr with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% compared with 5 (0-8) hr with mepivacaine 2% (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine 0.75% or 1% are appropriate choices when performing cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy, providing nerve block characteristics similar to those of mepivacaine 2%, but with the advantage of longer postoperative pain relief.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Italian Study Group on Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia.

PURPOSE: To compare unilateral and conventional bilateral bupivacaine spinal block in outpatients undergoing knee arthroscopy. METHODS: One hundred healthy, premedicated patients randomly received conventional bilateral (n = 50) or unilateral (n = 50) spinal anesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. A lateral decubitus position after spinal injection was maintained in unilateral group for 15 min. Times from spinal injection to readiness for surgery, block resolution, and home discharge were recorded. RESULTS: Three patients in each group were excluded due to failed block. Readiness for surgery required 13 min (5 - 25 min) with bilateral and 16 min (15 - 30) with unilateral spinal block (P = 0.0005). Sensory and motor blocks on the operated limb were T9 (T12 - T2) with a Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 0/2/0/45 in the unilateral group and T7 (T12 - T1) with Bromage score 0/1/2/3: 4/1/6/36 with bilateral block(P = 0.026 and P = 0.016, respectively). Vasopressor was required only in five bilateral patients (P = 0.02). Two segment regression of sensory level and home discharge required 81+/-25 min and 281+/-83 min with bilateral block, and 99+/-28 min and 264+/-95 min with unilateral block (P = 0.002 and P = 0.90, respectively). CONCLUSION: Seeking unilateral distribution of spinal anesthesia provided more profound and longer lasting block in the operated limb, less cardiovascular effects, and similar home discharge compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, with only a slight delay in preparation time.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Patient supplemented epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery with bupivacaine/fentanyl or ropivacaine/fentanyl.

PURPOSE: To compare analgesic efficacy and occurrence of motor block and other side effects during patient supplemented epidural analgesia (PSEA) with either ropivacaine/fentanyl or bupivacaine/fentanyl mixtures. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 32 ASAI-III patients undergoing major abdominal surgery received an epidural catheter at the T8- T10, followed by integrated general epidural anesthesia. Postoperative epidural analgesia was provided using a patient controlled pump with either ropivacaine 0.2%/2 microg x ml(-1) fentanyl (group Ropivacaine, n = 16) or bupivacaine 0.125%/2 microg x ml(-1) fentanyl (group Bupivacaine, n = 16) [background infusion 4-6 ml x hr(-1), 1.5 ml Incremental Doses and 20 min lock out]. Verbal pain rating score, number of incremental doses, consumption of epidural analgesic solution and rescue analgesics, sedation (four-point scale), and pulse oximetry were recorded by a blind observer for 48 hr after surgery. RESULTS: No differences in pain relief, motor block, degree of sedation, pulse oximetry and other side effects were observed between the two groups. The number of incremental doses and the volume of analgesic solution infused epidurally were higher in patients receiving the bupivacaine/fentanyl mixture (10 [0-52] I.D. and 236 [204-340] ml) than in patients receiving the ropivacaine/fentanyl solution (5 [0-50] I.D. and 208 [148-260] ml) (P = 0.03 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using a ropivacaine 0.2%/2 microg x ml(-1) fentanyl mixture for patient supplemented epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery provided similar successful pain relief as bupivacaine 0.125%/2 microg x ml(-1) fentanyl, but patients receiving bupivacaine/fentanyl requested more supplemental.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2000

Bio-morphological events in the development of the human female mammary gland from fetal age to puberty.

Bio-morphological understanding of the developing human mammary glands may clarify some aspects of breast pathology, including cancer. In particular, some epidemiological data suggests that during fetal growth an altered intrauterine hormonal status, especially a change in estrogen status, could predispose to carcinogenesis. In an attempt to achieve new information on early breast growth, a series of developing human breasts have been analyzed, namely: 4 fetal breasts (28-32 weeks of gestational age), 7 infant breasts (7 h to 2 years) and 1 puberal breast (12 years). In addition to the morphological features, we studied the immunohistochemical expression of some markers involved in morphogenesis, such as MIB-1 for cell proliferation, bcl-2 for apoptosis control, CD34 for vasculogenesis, estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors for hormonal profile, and smooth-muscle actin for myoepithelial differentiation. The results were as follows: (a) lobules, absent between 28 weeks and 2 days, were well evident at 2 years of age and at puberty; (b) myoepithelial cells appeared from 28 weeks onward and persisted later with no modification in quantity and distribution; (c) epithelial cell proliferation was constantly low; (d) in all breasts inner epithelial cells showed diffuse bcl-2 positivity, while basal myoepithelial-like cells were generally negative; (e) all breasts were well vascularized with two different patterns: periductal vascularization (PDV) and interductal vascularization (IDV), IDV being always present, whereas PDV was found only in infant breasts; (f) ER and PR were almost absent in fetal and infant breasts, while their expression was high in the epithelial cells of the puberal breast; (g) stromal cells had no hormonal receptors and were heterogeneous for proliferation and bcl-2 expression. Interestingly, two fetal breasts showed high proliferation and high ER expression, respectively, in their epithelial compartment. This could be the expression of an altered hormonal environment in utero, representing a basis for possible subsequent cancer initiation.

Antigens, CD34↗
PubMed2000

0.2% ropivacaine with or without fentanyl for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery: a double-blind study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of adding low concentration of fentanyl to 0.2% ropivacaine when providing patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) outside the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Inpatients at a University Department of Anesthesia. PATIENTS: 32 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, who were scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery, including bowel resection, hepatic resection, and pancreaticoduodenectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received standard general/epidural anesthesia. After surgery patients were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive PCEA with either 0.2% ropivacaine (n = 16) or 0.2% ropivacaine/2 microg/mL fentanyl (n = 16) [background infusion ranging between 4 and 6 mL/hr, with 1.5-mL incremental doses and a 20-min lock-out time]. Dynamic pain during coughing, sedation, pulse oxymetry, hemodynamic variables, and motor block were evaluated at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the end of surgery by a blinded observer. Occurrence of untoward events, including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, need for supplemental oxygen (for SpO(2) < 90%), and respiratory complications, as well as total consumption of PCEA solution and incremental doses given to the patient were also recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No differences in pain relief, motor block, degree of sedation, recovery of gastrointestinal motility, and other side effects were observed between the two groups. Patients receiving 0.2% ropivacaine alone requested far more incremental doses (23 doses [0-60] vs. 5 doses [0-25]) (p = 0.006) and needed far more analgesic solution (230 mL [140-282] vs. 204 [130-228]) (p = 0.003) than patients receiving the ropivacaine/fentanyl mixture. Peripheral oxygen saturation was lower at 12, 24, and 48 hours during ropivacaine/fentanyl infusion than in patients receiving ropivacaine alone (12 h: 91% +/- 2% vs. 95% +/- 2%, p < 0.006; 24 h: 93% +/- 1% vs. 96% +/- 2%, p = 0.003; 48 h: 92% +/- 1.8% vs. 96% +/- 1%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: A thoracic epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine, with or without fentanyl, provided effective pain relief in most patients with a very low degree of motor blockade. Adding 2 microg/ml fentanyl to 0.2% ropivacaine reduced total consumption of local anesthetic solution and need for incremental doses, but did not provide clinically relevant advantages in quality of pain relief and incidence of motor block, leading to a significant decrease in peripheral SpO(2), lasting up to 48 hours after surgery.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2000

Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the time required to perform anaesthesia, achieve surgical block and fulfil standardized discharge criteria in outpatients receiving knee arthroscopy with either spinal anaesthesia or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block. METHODS: After a standard midazolam/ketoprofen premedication and baseline measurement of cardiovascular parameters, 50 ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (group Spinal, n=25), or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 25 ml of mepivacaine 20 mg ml(-1) and a multiple injection technique (15 ml for femoral nerve block and 10 ml for sciatic nerve block). Times lasting from skin disinfection to the end of local anaesthetic injection (preparation time) and then to achieve surgical anaesthesia (readiness for surgery), as well as times required for block resolution, micturition, unassisted ambulation, and home discharge were recorded by a blinded observer. Occurrence of adverse events was also recorded. RESULTS: Preparation time (mean+/-SD) was longer with sciatic-femoral block (8+/-2.7 min) than spinal anaesthesia (5+/-2.1 min) (P=0.0002) while no differences were observed in the time required to achieve readiness for surgery (14+/-5 min and 15+/-6 min in the Spinal and Sciatic-femoral groups, respectively). No differences in haemodynamic side effects and need for intraoperative additional analgesia were observed. Patients receiving spinal anaesthesia showed a faster resolution of nerve block and longer time to micturition (137+/-49 min and 231+/-101 min) than patients receiving peripheral nerve blockade (206+/-51 min and 145+/-36 min) (P<0.0005 and P=0.002, respectively); however, no differences were observed in the time required to fulfil standardized discharge criteria (241+/-101 min in group Spinal and 209+/-70 min in group Sciatic-femoral; P=0.86). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving elective outpatient knee arthroscopy, using a combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 25 ml of mepivacaine 20 mg ml(-1) and a multiple injection technique results in a slightly longer preoperative time but provides similarly effective anaesthesia with no differences in home discharge times as compared to spinal anaesthesia with 8 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 0.75% ropivacaine: effects of adding a systemically inactive dose of fentanyl.

To evaluate the effects of adding low-dose fentanyl to 0.75% ropivacaine during peripheral nerve blocks, 30 ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair under combined sciatic-femoral nerve block were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to receive nerve block placement with 30 mL of either 0.75% ropivacaine alone (group: ropivacaine, n = 15) or 0.75% ropivacaine plus fentanyl 1 microg kg(-1) (group: ropivacaine-fentanyl, n = 15). A blinded observer recorded haemodynamic variables and sedation, as well as the time required to achieve surgical block and the first request for analgesia. Readiness to surgery required 10 min (5-20 min) with 0.75% ropivacaine and 10 min (3-20 min) with the ropivacaine-fentanyl mixture. No differences in the degree of sedation, peripheral oxygen saturation, and haemodynamic variables were observed between the two groups. The degree of pain measured at first analgesic request, and the consumption of postoperative analgesics, was similar in the two groups, while the mean time from block placement to the first request for pain medication was 13.7 h (25-75th percentiles: 11.8-14.5 h) in the ropivacaine group and 13.9 h (25-75th percentiles: 10.5-14.5 h) in the ropivacaine-fentanyl group (P = not significant). We conclude that adding fentanyl 1 microg kg(-1) to 0.75% ropivacaine did not provide clinically relevant advantages in terms of onset time, quality and duration of combined sciatic-femoral nerve block in patients undergoing elective hallux valgus repair.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗