Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Ettlinger

Publications and source records attributed to G Ettlinger.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Confusion of laterally inverted mirror-images: a relationship to brain anatomy?

Whereas in the monkey brain the representation of spatial direction (left/ right) is the same for visual and for tactual inflow, in the human brain visual and tactual lateral directions are not aligned with respect to one another. This anatomical feature of the human brain may account in part for the particular difficulty young sighted children have with laterally inverted forms. A small group of children who were totally blind since birth distinguished mirror pairs by touch significantly more easily than did sighted children of comparable age; and monkeys succeeded at cross-modal recognition of laterally inverted mirror pairs better (relative to control pairs) than did sighted children.

Age Factors↗

Unilateral spatial neglect and defective performance in one half of space.

The performance of 80 unselected patients with unilateral cerebral lesions (verified by CT scan) was compared with that of 34 control subjects on 6 "screening" tests for visual, auditory, tactile, kinaesthetic, motor and conceptual neglect. The performance of all 114 patients was tested comparably on the left and right sides, and (except for motor neglect) also centrally. Cut-off scores were determined so that performance inferior to 95% of the control range could be identified. The criterion for neglect was contralateral defect in the absence of ipsilateral and of central defect. With this procedure 30 patients were identified as showing neglect (5 visual, 6 auditory, 5 tactile and 4 motor--all 20 patients showing only one form of neglect; 10 with various combinations of neglect). In 27 of these 30 patients the lesion was found to be right-sided. The performance of various groups of patients with neglect was then compared with that of the 50 patients without neglect on 26 "evaluative" tests, designed to characterize the different varieties of neglect. For this comparison discriminant analysis was used. The outcome of two discriminant analyses instance a patient with visual and auditory neglect is not similar to a patient either with exclusively visual or with exclusively auditory neglect; (2) mixed, tactile and motor neglect are easy to discriminate from other kinds of neglect, whereas visual and auditory neglect are less easy to discriminate, particularly from patients without neglect; (3) the discriminant functions seem to reflect general spatial defect not confined to one side of space; differential spatial performance to the contralateral/ipsilateral sides; and manipulation. The findings are discussed in relation to previous interpretations of neglect; the defect is regarded as one of local attention.

Adolescent↗

Humans, apes and monkeys: the changing neuropsychological viewpoint.

Four areas (cognitive capacity, cerebral lateralization, the structural basis of amnesia, and disorders of reaching with parietal lesions) are reviewed with respect to comparative differences between human and non-human primates in 1963 and two decades later. It is concluded that in all four areas the discontinuities very clearly evident in 1963 have either been resolved or have become blurred. It is argued that this trend was furthered by Hécaen's editorial policy for Neuropsychologia and that clinical neuropsychology and experimental (animal) neuropsychology can be expected to converge increasingly during the next 20 yr.

Amnesia↗

Visually guided reaching and tactile discrimination performance in the monkey: the effects of removals of parietal cortex soon after birth.

Unilateral removals of parietal cortex were made soon after birth in 5 monkeys. The inferior parietal lobule was removed alone or together with the superior parietal lobule; the second somatosensory area (SII) was removed alone or together with posterior parietal surface cortex. Neurological changes were observed; and the animals were assessed quantitatively for their accuracy of reaching for visual targets and for their ability to discriminate between objects by palpation in the dark. Each hand was evaluated separately. Disorders of reaching (confined to the contralateral hand) were found to persist longer than in animals with comparable removals made at a later age; whereas the ability to make tactile discriminations was not more severely impaired after an early than a late ablation.

Aging↗

A comparative evaluation of the cognitive skills of the chimpanzee and the monkey.

A review of selected aspects of cognitive performance in apes and in monkeys suggests that only rarely can we at this time demonstrate greater cognitive competence in the ape than in the monkey. Instead it seems that the ape's cognitive style differs qualitatively from that of the monkey: not in the direction of greater capacity (using this term as a measure of continuously increasing ability), but in the way that the ape applies itself to a novel situation. From this it would follow that the greater discontinuity lies between man and apes, not between apes and monkeys.

Animals↗

Cross-modal performance in patients with cerebral lesions.

52 patients with circumscribed cerebral lesions, and 35 control patients (lesions in the posterior fossa or in the spinal cord), were assessed for their ability to match spatial configurations: matching was either cross-modal (visual-tactual or tactual-visual). or within-modal (visual-visual or tactual-tactual). They were also tested for cross-modal transfer (visual-tactual or tactual-visual). All materials were "easy" or "hard". Associated defects (e.g. dysphasia, apraxia) were also assessed. It was found that neither site of lesion, nor laterality of lesion, nor presence of any associated defect was significantly and selectively associated with impairment of cross-modal performance.

Adolescent↗

Unilateral removal of the second somatosensory projection cortex in the monkey: evidence for cerebral predominance?

The second somatosensory projection cortex (area SII) was removed unilaterally in 18 monkeys: alone, in 6; with bilateral removals of the supplementary motor area (SMA), in 4; with bilateral removals of anterior parietal association cortex, namely area PF (or 7b), in 4; and with neocortical commissure section, in 4. In half of these monkeys SII was removed from the hemisphere opposite to the preoperatively preferred hand, in half from the hemisphere on the same side as the preferred hand. Histological findings in all 18 monkeys indicated no consistent difference between the lesions (site, extent or depth) of the 9 monkeys with contralateral and the lesions of the 9 monkeys with ipsilateral removals of SII. These 18 monkeys, together with 6 additional unoperated control monkeys, were required to learn to make tactile discriminations, either with their preferred or with their nonpreferred hand. The discriminations were either between pairs of solid objects, or between graded differences in roughness or size. The monkeys with SII removal from the hemisphere contralateral to their preoperatively preferred hand were significantly impaired relative to the ipsilateral group or to the control group irrespective of the hand used (postoperatively preferred or nonpreferred hand). Such impairment was evidenced on the majority (but not all) of the tasks used in this study. In general, removal of SII from the ipsilateral hemisphere did not produce impairment, and bilateral removals of SMA combined with a unilateral removal of SII failed to give rise to additional impairment. However, bilateral removal of area PF, as also commissure section, did produce additional impairment, but only in animals of the ipsilateral group and when the postoperatively nonpreferred hand was required to be used. Certain of the behavior variations within groups can be explained in terms of weak preoperative hand preferences, or by reference to the histological findings for these animals. In general we conclude that the monkey has a degree of cerebral predominance of the hemisphere opposite to the preferred hand, possibly in relation to bilateral somatosensory representation.

Animals↗

Epileptic discharges produced in monkeys by injection of spleen cells from rabbits immunised with monkey brain.

Cell suspension from the spleen of rabbits immunised with monkey brain gave rise to epileptic discharges in the monkey when injected intracortically, except in the case of one injection from a rabbit not recently given a booster treatment. In contrast, cell suspensions from the spleen of unimmunised rabbits, or of a rabbit immunised with a non-brain material, in all cases failed to be effective. The epileptic discharges began about 2 weeks after injection, were variable in frequency, and lasted throughout the period of recording.

Animals↗

Tactile discrimination learning in the monkey: the effects of unilateral or bilateral removals of the second somatosensory cortex (area SII).

The tactile impairment in monkeys with unilateral removals of area SII is seen as possibly analogous to the rare condition of tactile agnosia. The lesions in a new series of animals with SII removals are described. The performance of 3 groups of monkeys is compared: no group differences were obtained on visual tasks (except retrieval of a moving target); minimal if any differences were obtained on inter-manual transfer of tactile learning; significant differences were found between animals with unilateral or bilateral removals of SII relative to unoperated animals at re-learning tactile discrimination tasks, irrespective of the hand being used. These findings suggest that area SII projects to a further neural system involved in somatosensory performance; and that a unilateral removal has its effect through the functional disruption of the intact SII.

Agnosia↗

The development of independent secondary ("mirror") discharges in the monkey: failure to replicate earlier findings.

Various factors that might influence the development of the independent secondary focus ("mirror" focus) in the monkey were investigated. Not 1 of 29 monkeys developed independent secondary discharges when we varied: area and length of boundary of the primary epileptogenic agent; ease of passage of agent through pia; nature of chemical agent; mechanical manipulation of homotopic cortex; or site of application of primary agent. The possible reasons for the discrepancy between this negative outcome and our earlier success in obtaining independent foci are discussed.

Aluminum Hydroxide↗