Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Elkind

Publications and source records attributed to G Elkind.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Determinants of management errors in acute severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesised that, despite recent initiatives to improve asthma self-management including asthma education, detailed investigation of the sequence of events culminating in hospital admission will lead to the identification of important management errors and thus the likelihood that the majority of severe asthma attacks are preventable by currently available strategies, and that psychological, health care and socioeconomic factors are risk factors for such management errors. METHODS: A cross sectional study was undertaken of 138 patients aged 15-50 years admitted to hospital (general ward or intensive care unit) with acute severe asthma who were assessed within 24-72 hours of admission using a number of previously validated instruments. A detailed history of events of the attack was assessed against predetermined criteria for non or delayed use of oral corticosteroids and non or delayed use of emergency ambulance services. RESULTS: Subjects had evidence of severe chronic asthma and had acute severe asthma at presentation (n = 90, pH = 7.3 (0.2), PaCO2 = 7.2 (5.0) kPa) but duration of hospital stay was short (3.7 (2.6) days). Serious management errors occurred very frequently and most were deemed to have been made by the patient. Forward stepwise regression revealed that delayed or non-use of oral corticosteroids was predicted independently by lack of paying job (p = 0.02), high total use of inhaled beta agonists in the 24 hours before index admission (p = 0.04), loss of a job in the last year (p = 0.04), low frequency of use of oral corticosteroids in the last year (p = 0.06), concerns during the index attack about medical expenses (p = 0.07), and delay in the use of ambulance services (p = 0.05)--the model being responsible for 23% of the variance. Delayed or non-summoning of emergency ambulance services was predicted independently by total life events (p = 0.03), having something stolen in the last year (p = 0.003), panic during the index attack (p = 0.01), and concerns during the index attack about taking time off work (p = 0.07)--the model being responsible for 21% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that, despite recent educational advances, serious management errors are common in those admitted to hospital with acute severe asthma and that most management errors relate to patient self-management behaviour. Serious management errors are predicted by a variety of socio-economic and psychological factors. While the results of this study are consistent with the widely held view that most acute severe attacks are theoretically preventable, the challenge for the future is to change patients' behaviour in the face of considerable adverse socioeconomic and psychological factors.

Acute Disease↗

Assessment of practical knowledge of self-management of acute asthma.

AIMS: To develop an instrument for the measurement of, and to determine the level of, practical knowledge of self-management of acute asthma. METHODS: Eighty patients with moderate/severe asthma attending a hospital-based asthma clinic responded to an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Subjects were asked to describe the action they would take in response to each of two hypothetical evolving attacks: (1) one of gradually increasing severity and (2) the other developing rapidly. Responses were scored according to the appropriateness of actions taken relevant to the stage of the attack. Transcripts of the responses were scored independently by three of the investigators according to a system based on Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) and British Thoracic Society (BTS) consensus statements on asthma management. A 25-point scale was used on which 0 represented a total lack of appropriate responses and a score of 25 was an optimal response. RESULTS: Interrater and intrarater reliability were excellent. Mean (+/- SD) scores for the slow and rapid onset attacks were 12.8 +/- 4.0 and 13.9 +/- 4.8, respectively. The scores for the two scenarios were predicted by each other (p = 0.002) and by the interviewer's rating of asthma management knowledge (p = 0.0004, p = 0.0001), but not by age, sex, race, previous asthma morbidity, depression, or anxiety. In both scenarios, most patients indicated that they would increase inhaled beta-agonist (85% for slow-onset scenarios and 94% for rapid-onset scenarios, respectively) and use their action plan and/or seek urgent medical advice at an appropriate time (74% and 70%). Although some would measure peak expiratory flow (PEF) initially (54% and 30%), only a minority would continue to monitor PEF in the context of worsening acute asthma (30% and 24%). When a severe life-threatening situation was described, only 50% and 64%, respectively, indicated that they would call emergency services. CONCLUSIONS: Scenarios describing hypothetical asthma attacks are a useful and reproducible method of assessing practical knowledge of self-management of acute asthma. Patients presented with scenarios frequently made errors in their hypothetical responses. The errors made with scenarios, which parallel errors reported in real clinical situations, occurred despite the fact that this patient population had received considerable education and training about how to manage asthma. Most indicated they would not monitor PEF even in an exacerbation of asthma and would not call emergency services despite life-threatening asthma. These scenarios may allow us to explore the gap between knowledge about treatment and actual practice, and perhaps to help close that gap and thus reduce asthma morbidity and mortality.

Acute Disease↗

Differential influences on asthma self-management knowledge and self-management behavior in acute severe asthma.

AIM: While asthma education increases knowledge, it is less clear whether education influences actual patient behavior. To determine whether there are differences between asthma self-management knowledge and the actual behavior of patients during an acute severe asthma attack and to determine which clinical and psychosocial factors are associated with knowledge and behavior. METHODS: Validated hypothetical scenarios describing the development of life-threatening asthma and patients' reported actual behavior were scored (out of 25) using a system based on Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and British Thoracic Society criteria. RESULTS: In 137 patients admitted to the hospital with severe asthma, the pattern of the index attack was slow onset (> or = 6 h) in 96%. The score for the hypothetical attack (knowledge) was 13.8 +/- 4.6, while that for the timeline (behavior) was 10.2 +/- 3.9 (p < 0.001) with 56% and 84%, respectively, having a score of less than 15 (regarded as inadequate). Certain components showed marked discrepancy (eg, appropriately seeking medical help 82% vs 52% (p < 0.001) and calling ambulance 61% vs 23% (p < 0.001). Factors such as physician-patient relationship, previous asthma morbidity, availability of peak flowmeter, action plan, and oral steroids correlated positively with both measures. Knowledge was negatively associated with being non-European, with anxiety, pessimism, and stigmatization. Behavior (but not knowledge) was negatively associated with lack of knowledge of what to do in the index attack, previous emotional counseling, and business failure. Those factors associated with the difference between knowledge and behavior scores (knowledge-behavior gap) were being non-European, anxiety, pessimism, and stigmatization, concerns about medical costs, and the only income for the household being a Social Security benefit. CONCLUSION: There are marked differences between patients' self-management knowledge and their actual behavior, particularly in terms of potentially life-saving actions. Psychological, health-care, and socioeconomic factors have a powerful and differential influence on knowledge and behavior. Improved understanding of the discrepancies between knowledge and behavior and which factors influence them may lead to more effective asthma educational interventions.

Acute Disease↗