Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G E Fryer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Family physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants are distinctly different in their clinical training, yet they function interdependently. Together, they represent a significant portion of the primary care work force. Training capacity for these professions has increased rapidly over the physician assistant decade, but almost no collaborative work force planning has occurred.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To comprehensively examine both inter- and intrastate variations in Medicare's cost-rate structure for teaching hospitals and to assess the Medicare payment system for graduate medical education (GME), as presently configured, as an instrument to promote physician workforce reform, specifically sufficient public access to primary care physician services. METHOD: Using Public Use Files of hospital cost reports from the Health Care Financing Administration for fiscal year 1997, 648 hospitals that met inclusion criteria for moderate GME volume were identified. The average and range of direct costs of resident training were computed for these teaching hospitals to illustrate differences within and between the 45 states that had at least two teaching hospitals that qualified for comparison. The cost rate upon which direct medical education (DME) payments are based was then correlated with the percentage of a state's counties that were wholly designated primary care health personnel shortage areas (PCHPSAs) in 1997 and with its primary care physician-to-population ratio, as determined from the Area Resource FILE: RESULTS: Variations in inter- and intrastate DME costs exist. In some states, the range in DME rates substantially exceeded the mean cost. DME funding policies are more generous toward teaching hospitals in states with greater primary care physician-to-population ratios and smaller proportions of counties wholly designated PCHPSAS: CONCLUSION: Inherent inequities in DME funding seriously undermine the current Medicare GME payment system's capacity to contribute to U.S. physician workforce reform and to improve access to care. There is actually a financial incentive to train residents in areas in which there is relatively less need for their services.
The purpose of the study was to extend the scope of earlier research on minority physicians attending to the needs of the poor and their own ethnicity by contrasting practice characteristics of Hispanic doctors in Colorado with those of their white, non-Hispanic counterparts. It was found that Hispanic physicians spent more hours per week in direct patient care, were more likely to have a primary care specialty, and were less often specialty board certified than white, non-Hispanic doctors. Hispanic generalists established practices in areas in which the percentages of the population that were (1) below poverty level, (2) Hispanic, (3) Hispanic and below poverty level, and (4) white, non-Hispanic, and below poverty level were greater than in areas in which white, non-Hispanic primary care physicians practiced. These findings argue for special provision to admit ethnic minorities to undergraduate and graduate medical education programs.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Behaviors developed in adolescence influence health later in life. Adolescents seldom visit physicians to discuss health-related behaviors. Instead, physicians must incorporate health counseling into the exams for which the adolescents do come. We studied the frequency and duration of adolescents' consultations with family physicians and pediatricians involving counseling about diet and nutrition, exercise, weight reduction, cholesterol reduction, HIV transmission, injury prevention, and tobacco use. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the 3-year period from 1995 through 1997. This survey uses a multistage national probability sample of patient visits to nonfederal, office-based physicians. We described patterns of counseling provided to adolescents and compared patterns for family physicians/general practitioners and pediatricians. RESULTS: Of 91,395 physician-reported visits analyzed, 4,242 (4.6%) were by adolescents ages 12-19. Visits to family physicians and pediatricians accounted for 1,846 (43.5%) of these visits. Counseling about any of the seven areas studied was included in 15.8% of family physician visits and 21.6% of pediatrician visits. The length of consultation increased from 13.8 to 17.6 minutes if counseling was included. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents visits physicians infrequently. When they do, few receive counseling on critical adolescent health issues. Both family physicians and pediatricians have room for improvement.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The objectives of this study include conducting an analysis of access to primary medical care in rural Colorado through simultaneous consideration of primary care physician-to-population and distance-to-nearest provider indices. Analyses examined the potential development and implications of excessively large, perhaps unmanageable patient caseloads that might result from every rural Coloradoan's exclusive use of the nearest generalist physician as a regular source of care. Using American Medical Association Physician Masterfile data for 1995 and coordinates for latitude and longitude from U.S. Census files (Census of Population and Housing, 1990), the authors calculated distance to the nearest primary care physician for residents of each of the 1,317 block groups in Colorado's 52 rural counties. Caseloads for each generalist physician were computed assuming the population used the nearest provider for care. Straight-line mileage to primary medical care was modest for rural Coloradoans--a median distance of 2.5 miles. Almost two-thirds (65 percent) of the population resided within 5 miles, and virtually all residents (99 percent) were within 30 miles of a generalist physician. However, had everyone traveled the shortest possible distance to care, demand for service from many of the 343 primary care doctors in rural regions of the state would have been overwhelming. The results of simultaneous application of distance-to-care and provider-to-population techniques unrestricted by geographic boundaries depict access to primary medical care and corresponding consumer difficulty more fully than in previous studies. Further combination of methods of needs assessment such as those used in this analysis may better inform the future efforts of organizations mandated to address health care underservice in rural areas.
In this article we describe the creation and role of the Center for Policy Studies in Family Practice and Primary Care established by the American Academy of Family Physicians in Washington, DC, this year. We recount the events leading to the decision to implement the Center, list its guiding assumptions, and explain its initial structure and function. We also identify the 3 themes that will guide the early work of the Center: sustaining the functional domain of family practice and primary care; investing in key infrastructures; and securing universal health coverage.
BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation rates with current therapy are suboptimal. One class of drugs that may improve cessation is the tricyclics. OBJECTIVE: To add nortriptyline hydrochloride to a behavioral smoking cessation program to enhance cessation rates and reduce withdrawal symptoms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at an affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and an Army Medical Center. Subjects were aged 18 through 70 years, smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day, and were without current major depression. Nortriptyline hydrochloride or matched placebo was started at 25 mg before bed 10 days prior to quit day and titrated to 75 mg/d or to the maximal tolerated dose. The behavioral intervention consisted of 2 group sessions and 12 individual follow-up visits. Withdrawal symptoms were measured using a daily diary, and smoking cessation was defined as self-reported abstinence, expired carbon monoxide of 9 ppm or less, and a 6-month urine cotinine level of less than 50 ng/mL. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were randomized (108 to nortriptyline and 106 to placebo). There was a significant reduction in several withdrawal symptoms including anxious/tense, anger/irritability, difficulty concentrating, restlessness, and impatience by day 8 after quit day in the nortriptyline group. The cessation rate at 6 months was 15 (14%) of 108 and 3 (3%) of 106, respectively (P = .003; absolute difference, 11%; 95% confidence interval, -18% to -4%). Nortriptyline caused frequent adverse effects, including dry mouth (64%) and dysgeusia (20%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that nortriptyline led to an increased short-term cessation rate compared with placebo. In addition, there were significant, but relatively small, reductions in withdrawal symptoms. Nortriptyline may represent a new therapeutic approach to smoking cessation.
Managed care organizations increasingly tout clinical outcomes assessment as the mechanism by which we will ensure quality and compare providers. The authors report on their experience with a multisite inpatient outcomes monitoring project by comparing patients who accepted (N = 51), refused (N = 36), or were not asked (N = 110) to participate in the project. The patients who were asked to participate had significantly longer inpatient stays compared with the unasked group (11.2 vs 6.9 days). Patients who agreed to participate in the project were more likely to have a bipolar (43.1% vs 19.2%) or any affective disorder (94.1% vs 79.5%), and less likely to have a schizophrenic disorder (2.0% vs 11.6%) than the refused and unasked groups. The project participants also had higher 90-day readmit rates (27.5% vs 9.6%), more readmissions (0.51 vs 0.16), and more education (14.59 vs 13.51 years) than nonparticipating patients. In this preliminary study, patient-related variables were found to influence who the staff asked and who consented to participate in this clinical outcomes monitoring project. The authors distinguish clinical outcomes monitoring from treatment effectiveness research and discuss the need to develop methodologies that deal with nonrepresentative patient sampling and intersite variability in recruitment practices.
UNLABELLED: This study assesses the impact of shortening the inpatient length of stay on status at discharge in patients with mania. METHODS: The authors performed a chart review on 131 patients with discharge diagnoses of bipolar disorder, current episode manic type, admitted to the private attending service at Colorado Psychiatric Hospital between 1985 and 1995. In 1990, a new program (the alternatives program) that provides a continuum of acute care services and shorter inpatient lengths of stay was instituted. Retrospectively assessed GAF, CGI, treatment outcome rating scores, and length of stay (LOS) were compared for the prealternatives (1985-1989), early alternatives (1990-1992), and recent alternatives (1993-1995) program treatment eras. A progressive decrease in inpatient LOS, duration of the acute care episodes, and total service utilization was seen across eras. Despite the more recent shortening in LOS, no significant differences were seen in GAF and treatment outcome rating scores at discharge. GAF and treatment outcome rating scores on hospital days 3 and 7, however, suggested that patients were improving more rapidly in the more recent eras. Inpatient LOS and duration of the acute care episodes have significantly decreased over the last 10 years, but patients appear no more ill at discharge. The authors postulate that changes in psychopharmacologic practice and the inpatient treatment model may have facilitated the more rapid clinical improvement seen in the more recent eras. The authors caution that we need prospective studies that include postdischarge follow-up to assess further the impact of shorter inpatient stays on the posthospital course of manic patients.
This paper reports the results of an analysis of the American Medical Association Masterfile. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in health care accessibility in rural Colorado from 1992 to 1995, and to describe the pattern of in-migration of physicians to nonmetropolitan statistical area counties of the state during that period. The number of direct patient care providers increased from 532 to 700 (31.6%) during the three-year period vs. a growth of 11.2 percent in the general population of nonmetropolitan statistical area counties. Of the 700 physicians serving residents of Colorado's 52 rural counties, 308 (44%) had been practicing in their community since 1992. The rate of departure from nonmetropolitan statistical area practice sites in 1992 was 26.4 percent (140 of 532). Physicians new to their rural practice locations were younger and proportionally more female, but they were similar in primary medical specialty to doctors who had remained in their 1992 sites. Population to physician and to primary care physician ratios were much more favorable for 1995 than for 1992. Accessibility to care was most improved in counties with fewer than 10,000 inhabitants.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This paper reports results of an analysis of the approximate costs of Colorado school health program screening activities during the 1993/94 school year had they been conducted elsewhere in the public or private sectors. School nurses and health aides performed 1,161,779 screening procedures during the year, an average of 1.93 per child enrolled in school districts throughout the state. Charges for Current Procedures Terminology (CPT) codes, which correspond to school health program screening activities, were used to approximate market value. Conservative assumptions were made regarding provider skill and time requirements as well as student service utilization profiles. The general dimension of the contribution of school health screening activities was found to be impressive.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Much of rural Colorado has been designated a shortage area for primary care health personnel. The state's only medical school and its family practice residency programs are expected to address this long-standing problem. This study identified predictors of rural practice location and contrasted the service profiles of rural versus urban family physicians and general practitioners. METHODS: The Colorado Board of Medical Examiners mailed a questionnaire to all licensed Colorado physicians. Logistic regression analyses were conducted using variables determined to be significantly related to practice location (rural versus urban) by univariate statistical tests. Information from the 986 family physician and general practitioner respondents identified personal and educational variables strongly associated with choice of rural practice location and differentiated between practice tendencies of rural versus urban physicians. RESULTS: Having been raised in rural Colorado was the most powerful predictor of rural practice location in the state. Family physicians and general practitioners serving rural populations spent much more time weekly providing direct patient care and more often cared for Medicaid patients. CONCLUSIONS: Personal characteristics and background may be useful considerations in selecting among applicants for medical schools and family practice residency programs committed to reducing the severe shortage of health care service in rural areas.
BACKGROUND: Managed care advocates suggest that primary care gatekeepers may improve patient care and reduce costs. Training internal medicine residents in these gatekeeping functions has not been emphasized in most internal medicine programs. OBJECTIVE: To determine if residents could perform gatekeeper functions and if patient costs and satisfaction would be favorable. METHODS: Patients (n = 254) followed up by residents (n = 26) in continuity clinics at the Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Denver, Colo, were divided into 2 groups. A control group of 128 was followed up by residents with no restrictions on appointments made for them. An intervention group of 126 patients were followed up by residents who had to approve all referrals made for their patients. A research nurse assisted with the approvals when the residents were rotating through other institutions. Utilization of resources, satisfaction with care, and health status were monitored over a 1-year period. RESULTS: A minor reduction of resource utilization was found in the intervention group, particularly in medication use. Significantly more visits were made to primary care providers in the intervention group (3.01 vs 2.59; P = .03). Patient satisfaction and health status were similar in both groups with a trend toward better satisfaction in the intervention group in some areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that residents can function as gatekeepers of highly complex patients and that satisfaction with care and utilization of resources does not suffer. Drug utilization and costs may be less when a gatekeeper exists.