Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Csaba.
Rats treated neonatally or at four weeks of age with dexamethasone on a single occasion showed a considerable decrease in thymic glucocorticoid reception. It appears that hormonal imprinting can take place in the cells of the cytogenic organs not only perinatally, but also later, owing to the undifferentiated (differentiating) state of the forming cells.
The dexamethasone-induced steroid receptor of Tetrahymena pyriformis specifically binds triamcinolone, which is itself a fluorinated glucocorticoid. It also binds dihydro-epi-androsterone (DHEA) but no or very little testosterone, digoxin or ouabain. It follows that the specificity of the induced steroid receptor of Tetrahymena may only partially be comparable with that of the mammalian steroid receptor.
Live Tetrahymena cells bound 3H-diazepam specifically, as demonstrated by autoradiographic evidence of displacement of about 25% of labeled diazepam in the presence of a 1000-fold amount of cold diazepam. The 3H-diazepam bound to membrane preparations isolated from untreated (control) cells was not displaced by cold diazepam, whereas cells involved in primary interaction (imprinting) with diazepam showed amplification and specificity of diazepam binding in both in vivo (cell suspension) and in vitro (pellicle) systems, as well as displacement of bound label in the presence of 1000-fold cold diazepam. It appears that diazepam induced imprinting and, consequently, also the formation of specific receptors in Tetrahymena.
The cells of the NIH 3T3 fibroblast line responded to primary interaction with insulin by a positive imprinting, i.e. by an increased binding capacity for the hormone on re-exposure. Positive imprinting, although to a lesser degree, was also induced by thyrotropin. However, oncogenic transformation by polyoma virus oncogens resulted in decreased imprinting in both the middle-T-antigen (MT3) and small-T-antigen-expressing (N4) cells.
Studies based on treatment with antibodies to thyrotropic hormone, luteotropic hormone, growth hormone or adrenocorticotropic hormone have shown that although the unicellular Tetrahymena does not possess sui generis receptors to all polypeptide hormones, such binding structures may arise, or become established in the membrane of the unicellular Tetrahymena in the presence of exogenous hormone. The Tetrahymena subjected to hormonal imprinting still contained an increased amount of hormone after six generation changes, which suggested that either hormone production had been induced by treatment, or the internalized hormone had not been degraded intracellularly. Thus the role of hormonal imprinting in receptor formation has also been substantiated by the immunocytochemical approach used in the present study.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
At the age of three weeks the experimental animals received either thyrotropin (TSH), or gonadotropin (FSH + LH), or endotoxin (LPS) alone or in combination. The effectivity of the treatments was evaluated at the age of two months (with or without further hormone treatment). Contrastingly to neonatal TSH treatment, TSH treatment at the age of three weeks did not give rise to imprinting. In female animals, however, TSH treatment increased the sensitivity to the related gonadotropin hormone. At the age of three weeks gonadotropin treatment--on its own--did not cause damages to the TSH receptors of the thyroid gland. While in previous experiments neonatal endotoxin treatment damaged considerably the thyroxin production of the adult thyroid gland, after treatments at the age of three weeks no similar effect could be observed. The treatment, however, decreased the sensitivity of the receptors to TSH. In female animals simultaneous administration of endotoxin and TSH led, even without further hormone treatment, to constant increase in T4 level (the increase could also be detected in the adult animal). Imprinting, however, did not develop. In male animals simultaneous administration of endotoxin and gonadotroph hormone decreased considerably the T4 baseline level, and further TSH or gonadotropin treatment was unable to enhance T4 production.
Tetrahymena cells treated with insulin in mass cultures were separated to single-cell clones or one of the "sister-cells" of dividing Tetrahymena (in single-cell culture) was treated with insulin. In both cases the FITC-insulin binding of sister-cells were compared. The insulin imprinting significantly increased the insulin binding of cells. There was also a significant difference between the imprinted and not imprinted sisters as well as between the not imprinted sisters. This demonstrates the existence of a difference (in hormone binding) between sister-cells and justifies that the information of the first hormone treatment (imprinting) is not equally divided between the sister-cells.
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and Chang liver cells which had already interacted with a hormone (gonadotropin, TSH, insulin) in culture, transmitted hormonal imprinting to virgin cells not previously involved in the interaction. The information associated with imprinting was not mediated by the nutrient medium, because the nutrient medium of the hormone-treated cells did not induce imprinting in virgin cells and even reduced rather than enhanced the hormone binding capacity thereof. Thus the transmission of information is in all probability associated with a direct cell-cell contact.
The primary interaction with insulin accounted for considerable increases in both the calmodulin content and guanylate cyclase activity of Tetrahymena. Both activities were still elevated after 24 h (6-8 generations), but while the calmodulin level showed a decrease, guanylate cyclase activity showed a further significant increase relative to the immediate response. A second treatment with insulin decreased rather than increased both activities, but to dissimilar degrees, in that the calmodulin content returned to the control level, whereas guanylate cyclase activity still increased over the level measured after the first treatment. It appears that insulin imprinting altered the calmodulin-dependent guanylate cyclase regulation in Tetrahymena, and caused a switch-over to an 'energy-saving' system through decelerating the breakdown of cGMP by phosphodiesterase.
Reexposure to insulin after primary interaction (hormonal imprinting) was followed by a binding increase in T. pyriformis and by a binding decrease in T. thermophila. The sec. mutant, MS-1 strain of T. thermophila, which is unable of lysosomal enzyme secretion, also showed a binding increase on a second exposure to insulin, from which it follows that alteration of the enzyme secretion, or other factors associated with mutation, accounted for reversion of the trend of imprinting. Thyrotropic hormone (TSH) also gave rise to a negative imprinting in T. thermophila, but did not alter the binding relations of the MS-1 mutant strain.
Insulin treatment following subtotal hepatectomy caused a long lasting change in the binding capacity of hepatic insulin receptors. The insulin binding increased in females and decreased in males in the insulin treated animals (during regeneration) fourteen days after the operation. The tendency of changes was very similar to those which had been caused by neonatal insulin treatment.
A single neonatal insulin treatment decreased considerably the insulin binding capacity of erythrocytes in adult rats, by analogy of the behaviour of the hepatic insulin receptors in response to insulin exposure during the perinatal period, or during liver regeneration in adulthood. These observations substantitate earlier conclusions on the mechanism of imprinting and strongly suggest the universality of perinatal imprinting in living organisms. In vitro insulin exposure of the erythrocytes of adult rats depressed 48 h later the erythrocytic insulin binding capacity to a similar degree in individuals treated and not treated with insulin when newborn, from which it follows that neonatal exposure had no influence on erythrocytic response to later in vitro treatment. In the light of the present study the use of erythrocytes as model cells for imprinting studies deserves consideration.
Chang liver cells and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were imprinted either with insulin or with thyrotropin (TSH). Chang liver cells responded to insulin but not to TSH. As an effect of imprinting evoked by insulin administration the binding of insulin administered for the second time was enhanced. In the mixed culture of imprinted and intact cells the extent of the binding was similar to that seen in the cultures of the cells having received imprintatory treatment alone. CHO cells also responded to TSH, imprinting developed and was transmitted to the cells which were not in interaction with the hormone (intact cells). In CHO cells also insulin gave rise to imprinting for insulin, whereas TSH gave rise to moderate binding imprinting for insulin. On the other hand, insulin imprinting did not enhance the binding of TSH. The obtained results indicate that both the imprinting itself and the specificity of the transmission of imprinting depend on the characteristics of the cell-type in question. The extent of the transmission, however, is always proportional to the extent of imprinting.
Insulin dimers deprived of biological activity by linking with suberic acid symmetrically in position B29 or B1 were not able to induce imprinting. Lack of N-terminal phenylalanine or even of five C-terminal amino acids did not interfere with imprinting, regardless of whether or not it was associated with an activity loss. It appears that while hormonal imprinting is closely associated with the hormone's ability to bind to the receptor, it may be related as well as unrelated to the hormone's biological activity. The imprinted Tetrahymena and Chang cells bound the insulin and its derivatives in a similar manner.
Treatment of Tetrahymena with DNase considerably reduced the FITC-insulin binding capacity of the unicellular organism, but a normalization of the binding value followed after 24 h. DNase equally prevented imprinting in Tetrahymena when applied before or after insulin. It appears that membrane-associated DNA plays an important role in the hormone binding of Tetrahymena, and also presumably in the development and/or stabilization of hormonal imprinting.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Binding of fluorescein-isothiocyanate-(FITC)-labeled insulin was followed up in the function of time in Chang liver cells pretreated and not pretreated with insulin. The not pretreated cells showed patching, but no capping of the receptors during the period of study (60 min), whereas the insulin-pretreated cells showed indications of capping already after 10 min. Patching of the insulin receptors was particularly conspicuous at the sites of cell-cell contact (at the intercellular junctions). Supra-nuclear patching occurred earlier in the control cultures, and on it followed the fluorescence of the nuclear chromatin.