Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Cowie

Publications and source records attributed to G Cowie.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Membrane inlet mass spectrometric measurement of O2 and CO2 gradients in cultures of Lactobacillus paracasei and a developing Cheddar cheese ecosystem.

Membrane inlet mass spectrometry was used to measure O2 and CO2 as depth profiles in stab cultures of 0.1% agar Man Rogosa Sharpe medium inoculated with Lactobacillus paracasei CI3. Diffusion of CO2 from the central column of growth into the medium was observed to show lower concentrations where bacteria were absent. CO2 profiles developed in a manner similar to those in Cheddar cheese and O2 was undetectable at similar depths. Gases were analysed in Cheddar cheese over a maturation period of 200 d. O2 was detectable to depths of 13, 6 and 2.5 mm on days 2, 9 and 15, respectively, but then became undetectable at depths of 2.5-3 mm. CO2 concentrations measured within the cheese increased 10-fold from day 2 to day 200 to reach a value of around 15 mM. The progress of measured CO2 concentration over time at a given depth in cheese shows a hyperbolic type increase. Coefficient of regression values increase with depth to a maximum value of R2 = 0.93. In both systems, reductions and increases in CO2 were due to the absence or presence of bacterial growth, respectively. Confocal scanning laser and scanning electron microscopy was used to show spatial heterogeneity of microcolonies within the cheese ecosystem. This information can potentially be used as a non-sensory evaluation of cheese maturity status. Measurement of gases in a cheese ecosystem provides the first description of mass spectrometry being used to monitor the processes of microbial gaseous exchange with respect to O2 and CO2 in a cheese ecosystem.

Carbon Dioxide↗

Membrane inlet ion trap mass spectrometry for the direct measurement of dissolved gases in ecological samples.

The use of an ion trap mass spectrometer with three different membrane inlet probes is described. Two methods of removing water from the sample are compared. One is the use of a PTFE-silicone rubber double membrane, PTFE is relatively impermeable to water and so reduces the amount entering with the gas sample (Probe A). The second is the use of a silicone rubber membrane covered long probe, which condenses water out of the sample (Probe B). Response times (100%) for dissolved N2O, O2, Ar and CO2 without He in the chamber vary from between 158 and 684 s with Probe A. For the same probe with He, the response times were between 283 and 551 s. In the gas phase response times were between 99 and 153 s with He and 117 and 122 s without He. Probe B had 100% response of between 122 and 152 s for dissolved gases. Further extension of the probe by 2 m slowed response times as did increasing the ionisation time. Response times for Probe B increased to between 99 and 340 s when ionisation time increased from 1000 to 24,930 microseconds. Plots of output against concentration showed the steepest line of response for the short single membrane covered probe with 1000 microseconds ionisation time. Increasing the ionisation time, extending the probe and the use of a double membrane all reduced the gradient of output against concentration for every gas tested. In an intact sediment core, concentrations of O2, N2O and CO2 rose at the start and the concentration of N2 fell. As the disturbed sediment settled, this was reversed. The initial increase in O2 concentration stimulated respiration and inhibited the final pathway in dentrification producing higher concentrations of N2O and reducing the concentration of N2.

Argon↗

Policy instruments for reducing toxic releases. The effectiveness of state information and enforcement actions.

This article analyzes the extent to which different policy instruments explain toxic reductions among the states. Data from the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and other sources are used to assess the effect of various policy instruments, while holding economic factors constant. State TRI information programs, enforcement action, and direct regulation all matter in reducing toxic releases. Interestingly, the informational tool seems to matter more than both authoritative tools. The findings also support the idea that the interaction of policy instruments as well as the match between policy tools and policy context may account for a portion of the results.

Hazardous Substances↗