The oral administration of 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) at doses ranging from 100 to 300 mg/kg, twice daily, produced a dose-dependent reduction (40 to 85%) in the voluntary ethanol intake in rats selectively bred for high preference for ethanol. Treatment with 1,4-BD did not reduce total fluid intake. Repeated 1,4-BD administration (300 mg/kg twice daily for 7 days) suppressed ethanol intake almost completely. After suspension of 1,4-BD treatment, the inhibitory effect on ethanol intake remained significantly low for 2 days. 1,4-BD failed to inhibit aldehyde dehydrogenase to a concentration of 10 mM in rat liver homogenate.

Alcohol Drinking↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats prefer chocolate and sucrose over ethanol.

The present study was aimed at determining whether the concurrent availability of highly palatable fluids (i.e., a chocolate-flavored drink and a sucrose solution) would alter voluntary ethanol drinking in selectively bred, alcohol-preferring sP and -nonpreferring sNP rats. Ethanol intake occurred under the three-bottle, free choice regimen between 10% (v/v) ethanol solution, tap water, and the palatable fluids for 24 h per day. When rats were given ethanol and water, but no alternative fluids, mean ethanol intake in sP rats ranged between 6 and 7 g/kg per day and mean preference ratio was steadily higher than 80%, whereas mean ethanol intake and preference ratio in sNP rats were constantly lower than 0.3 g/kg and 5%, respectively. In the presence of either the chocolate-flavored drink or sucrose solution, both prepared as isocaloric to the ethanol solution, absolute ethanol intake in sP rats declined by 60-70%; similarly, the preference ratio was reduced by 80-90%. Ethanol intake in sNP rats was unaffected by the simultaneous presentation of either palatable fluids. The results of the present study closely replicate those previously reported in genetically selected, ethanol-preferring HAD rats; however, they differ from those of ethanol-preferring P rats, which were reported to maintain high levels of ethanol intake and preference in the presence of highly palatable fluids. These results are discussed in terms of a) an alternative reinforcement partially substituting for the reinforcing properties of ethanol in sP rats, resulting in a less urgent need of ethanol, and b) genetic animal models of alcoholism diverging in some neurochemical and behavioral traits (e.g., response to the presentation of palatable fluids), which might parallel the different types of alcoholism observed in humans.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Conditioned place preference induced by ethanol in a rat line selected for ethanol preference.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid reducing effect on ethanol intake: evidence in favour of a substitution mechanism.

Experiment 1 in the present study investigated the time course and dose range of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) to reduce voluntary ethanol intake in selectively bred Sardinian ethanol-preferring (sP) rats. Ethanol (10%, v/v) and tap water were offered under the two-bottle free choice regimen with unlimited access. GHB (200, 300, and 400 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered 15 20 min prior to the start of the dark phase of the light-dark cycle. Ethanol and water intakes were recorded at different time intervals during the dark phase. GHB significantly reduced ethanol intake at doses of 300 and 400 mg/kg; statistical significance occurred only at the 15-min and 30-min observation times. The GHB dose of 300 mg/kg was devoid of any sedative effect, as demonstrated in Experiment 2 by the lack of any impairment of spontaneous locomotor activity. Finally, this dose of GHB was also found to exert a robust anxiolytic effect in sP rats tested on the elevated plus maze (Experiment 3). Collectively, the results of the present study demonstrate that a non-sedative and anxiolytic dose of GHB effectively reduced voluntary ethanol intake in sP rats. The rapid onset of the reducing effect of GHB on ethanol intake, as well as its anxiolytic effect, are discussed in terms of adding further support to the hypothesis that GHB may control alcohol craving and consumption in humans by substituting for ethanol's reinforcing effects.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Constant absolute ethanol intake by Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats independent of ethanol concentrations.

The present study was designed to evaluate ethanol drinking behaviour in Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and Sardinian alcohol-non-preferring (sNP) rats in the presence of different ethanol concentrations. Ethanol intake was tested under the two-bottle, free-choice regimen and continuous access schedule. Ethanol-naive sP and sNP rats were initially given ethanol solution at the standard, constant concentration of 10% (v/v) for 8 consecutive days (Phase 1). As expected, daily ethanol intake in sP rats rose from 4 to approximately 6 g/kg; in contrast sNP rats consumed < 10 g/kg/day ethanol. Subsequently, an ascending series of ethanol concentrations, ranging from 3 to 60% (v/v), was presented to sP and sNP rats over a 28-day period (Phase 2). At concentrations varying from 7 to 30%, sP rats consumed constant amounts of absolute ethanol per kg of body weight (approximately 6.0 g/kg/day). Daily ethanol intake in sNP rats remained constantly lower than 1.0 g/kg, irrespective of the ethanol concentration. Data from Phase 2 demonstrate the ability of sP rats to precisely adjust daily ethanol intake and support the hypothesis that voluntary ethanol drinking in sP rats is sustained by specific pharmacological effects of ethanol.

Alcohol Drinking↗