Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Capogna

Publications and source records attributed to G Capogna.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Sensory assessment of epidural block for Caesarean section: a systematic comparison of pinprick, cold and touch sensation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Comparisons between the profile of regional blocks are difficult to make because different methods of testing are used among the studies. The aims of this prospective study were to describe the profile of epidural block by using a scoring system to evaluate the density of the block as assessed by the loss to pinprick, cold and touch sensation; to evaluate the extent of differential block and to determine whether there is any relationship between these three modalities of testing. METHODS: We studied 85 parturients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery with epidural anaesthesia with pH adjusted lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:400,000 and sufentanil 10 microg. Assessment of sensory block was done in each dermatomal level bilaterally for loss to pinprick, cold and light touch sensation and the density of the block was evaluated on an ordinal scale every 5 min for 20 min and thereafter at 30 and 40 min. RESULTS: We observed a two dermatomes differential block between the complete loss of cold sensation being cephalad and the complete loss of both pinprick and light touch sensation being caudal. We established a significant correlation between the scores used to assess the density of the block in the three different modalities by considering the pinprick score as reference (Spearman's rank correlation is 0.94, P<0.001 for pinprick vs. cold, 0.97, P<0.001 for pinprick vs. light touch). CONCLUSIONS: By scoring the density of the block on an ordinal scale, knowing the level of the block to pinprick allows one to predict the level of the block to touch and vice versa.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: determination of ED(50) motor block after spinal administration.

BACKGROUND: When a test is required to detect a possible intrathecal catheter, many would seek to use the same local anaesthetic as that used for epidural analgesia. The rapid onset of inappropriate motor block after a local anaesthetic administered epidurally implies intrathecal spread. Because of claims of greater sensory-motor separation, or because of reduced potency compared with bupivacaine, the efficacy of the new local anaesthetics in intrathecal testing has been questioned. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of a test dose for an inadvertent intrathecal catheter using ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, and to establish the dose required. METHODS: Sixty women undergoing elective Caesarean section with a combined spinal- epidural technique were enrolled into this prospective, double-blind sequential allocation study. The women were randomized to receive plain levobupivacaine 0.5% or ropivacaine 0.5% intrathecally. The dose was determined according to up-down sequential allocation. The end-point was any evidence of lower limb motor block within 5 min of injection. RESULTS: The ED(50) motor block at 5 min was 4.8 mg (95% CI, 4.49, 5.28) for levobupivacaine and 5.9 mg (95% CI, 4.82, 6.98) for ropivacaine (95% CI difference, 0.052, 1.98) (P=0.04). The estimated ED(95) motor block was 5.9 mg (95% CI 5.19, 6.71) for levobupivacaine and 8.3 mg (95% CI, 6.30, 10.44) for ropivacaine. The potency ratio between the two drugs was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69, 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Both local anaesthetics produce evidence of motor block within 5 min of intrathecal injection and could serve as tests of intrathecal administration. Derived ED(95) values suggest 10 mg doses should be effective, but this study did not measure predictive value. Ropivacaine is less potent for motor block than levobupivacaine by a factor of 0.83 (P<0.04).

Amides↗
PubMed2003

Epidural levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combination with sufentanil in early labour: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, delay and duration of analgesia of three equianalgesic epidural doses of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine during the first stage of labour. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine healthy primigravida in spontaneous labour who requested epidural analgesia were enrolled in a randomized observer-blinded study. Parturients were allocated to receive epidural levobupivacaine 0.0625%, ropivacaine 0.1% or bupivacaine 0.06259%. Sufentanil 10 microg was added to all solutions; the total volume of epidural solution was 20 mL. Pain was measured using a 100 mm visual analogue pain scale immediately before the epidural block, and at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min thereafter. Motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage scoring system. The adequacy of motor function for ambulation was also evaluated. Delay of analgesia was the time interval between the injection of the solution and the first painless contraction. Duration of analgesia was the time from the first painless contraction to the parturients' requests for further analgesia. RESULTS: Twelve parturients failed to complete the study. Eleven parturients had inadequate analgesia (four in Group Levobupivacaine, four in Group Ropivacaine and three in Group Bupivacaine; P > 0.05). Data was analysed from 34 parturients in Group Levobupivacaine, from 37 in Group Ropivacaine and from 35 in Group Bupivacaine. There were no differences in the delay of analgesia or in the number of parturients who were able to walk unaided. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine produced more prolonged analgesia than bupivacaine (114 and 119 min, respectively, versus 89 min; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During early labour, equipotent low concentrations of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine, all with the addition of sufentanil 10 microg, produced similar pain relief and motor block, but levobupivacaine and ropivacaine produced a longer lasting analgesia. About 10% of parturients had inadequate analgesia with a single bolus of the tested solutions.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Intraoperative fetal oxygen saturation during Caesarean section: general anaesthesia using sevoflurane with either 100% oxygen or 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to evaluate whether the administration of sevoflurane in 100% oxygen for anaesthesia during Caesarean section would improve fetal and neonatal oxygenation compared with the administration of sevoflurane with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. METHODS: The randomized, single-blind controlled study examined 24 mothers, ASA I-II, at term undergoing Caesarean section who were allocated to receive sevoflurane in either 100% oxygen (n = 13) or 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (n= 11). General anaesthesia was induced in both groups with thiopental 4-5 mg kg(-1) followed by succinylcholine 1.5 mg kg(-1) to facilitate tracheal intubation. Parturients received sevoflurane given either in 100% O2 or in a 50:50 nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture, using 0.5-1.0% progressive incremental dosing up to 1.5-2.0 MAC. Non-invasive fetal oxygen saturation was measured between induction to delivery, and umbilical artery and vein PaO2 were evaluated at birth. RESULTS: Intraoperative fetal oxygen saturation increased in all patients after maternal 100% oxygen administration (P < 0.01). Maternal hyperoxygenation significantly increased the umbilical vein and umbilical artery PaO2 and the umbilical artery SaO2 at birth (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal hyperoxygenation significantly improves fetal as well as neonatal oxygenation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Effect of epidural analgesia on the fetal heart rate.

Fetal heart rate (FHR) changes occasionally follow the use of labor epidurals. Most studies of the phenomenon have focused on specific techniques, but similar timing and appearance suggest a common cause. Induction of analgesia may transiently alter the balance between factors encouraging and inhibiting uterine contractions with subsequent changes of FHR patterns. Regardless the etiology, these changes are transient and do not produce maternal or fetal morbidity. However, they must be promptly recognized and treated if necessary.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2001

Minimum analgesic dose of epidural sufentanil for first-stage labor analgesia: a comparison between spontaneous and prostaglandin-induced labors in nulliparous women.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, double-blind, sequential allocation study was to compare the effects of spontaneous and prostaglandin-induced labor on the minimum analgesic dose of epidural sufentanil in the first stage of labor. METHODS: Seventy healthy, nulliparous women, at more than 37 weeks' gestation with cervical dilatation from 2 to 4 cm, requesting epidural pain relief in labor were enrolled. The subjects were assigned to two different groups according to whether labor was spontaneous or induced with dinoprostone 0.5 mg. Parturients received 10 ml of the study solution through a lumbar epidural catheter. The initial dose was sufentanil 25 microg, and subsequent doses were determined by the response of the previous patient in the same group using up-down sequential allocation. The analgesic effectiveness was assessed using 100-mm visual analog pain scores. The up-down sequences were analyzed using the method of independent paired reversals and probit regression. RESULTS: The minimum analgesic dose of sufentanil in spontaneous labor was 22.2 microg (95% CI: 19.6, 22.8) and 27.3 microg (95% CI: 23.8, 30.9) in induced labor. The minimum analgesic dose of sufentanil in induced labor was significantly greater (P = 0.0014) than that in spontaneous labor (95% CI difference: 2.9, 9.3) by a factor of 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.5). CONCLUSION: Prostaglandin induction of labor produces a significantly greater analgesic requirement than does spontaneous labor.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Levobupivacaine in obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia].

METHODS: Published studies, including abstracts, has been reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Studies in sheep have demonstrated no significant differences in pharmacokinetic and placental transfer of levobuvacaine when compared with bupivacaine. Clinical studies on cesarean section confirmed similar performance between these two drugs. No differences in onset time, sensory and motor block and efficacy of analgesia have been reported. Two multicentre studies on labor analgesia reported again similar analgesic efficacy with a trend toward less motor block in parturients receiving levobupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: This review has shown that levobupivacaine has a similar efficacy and a similar maternal fetal safety to that of bupivacaine. Further studies are needed to determine if the chemical properties of the new agent may influence the sensory and motor characteristics of the block.

Analgesia, Obstetrical↗
PubMed2001

[Motor block determination for the identification of accidental spinal injection of levobupivacaine: a study on the minimum efficient test-dose (ED50)].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the ED50 for the dose of levobupivacaine 0,5% that, if given intrathecally will not cause total spinal anesthesia but will give a reliable and reproducible clinical sign to differentiate intrathecal from epidural injection. METHODS: Thirty women at term undergoing elective cesarean section under a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) were enrolled into this sequential allocation study. The dose in each test dose was determined by the response of the previous patient to the higher or lower dose in her test syringe, according to up-down sequential allocation. The exception to this was the first woman in each group, for whom the starting dose was chosen to be 4 mg. The end point was the occurrence of any motor block, in any side, within 5 minutes from intrathecal injection of the test dose. Test dose efficacy was assessed using a modified Bromage scale every minute for 5 minutes. The median effective dose of levobupivacaine was estimated from the up-down sequences using the formula of Dixon and Massey. RESULTS: The MAD of the test dose for levobupivacaine was of 4,8 mg (4,4 to 5,2; 95% C.I.). DISCUSSIONS: This study may help to determine the appropriate dose for a test dose for inadvertent spinal levobupivacaine.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical↗
PubMed2001

[Prehydratation and anaesthesia in obstetrics: state of the art].

All epidural or spinal techniques using local anaesthetics causes some degree of sympathetic blockade resulting in peripheral vasodilatation and possibly hypotension or reduction in cardiac output. In the practical clinic, administration of fluids intravenously prior spinal and epidural anaesthesia is required to prevent maternal hypotension and fetal hypoxia. We evaluated in this review the efficacy of volume preloading on the incidence of hypotension after spinal or epidural anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Randomized controlled trials investigating volume preloading before the initiation of obstetric anaesthesia were sought by using MEDLINE (1966-2001). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes included: ephedrine use, Apgar scores, umbilical cord pH values, and maternal nausea and vomiting. Crystalloid preload was inconsistent in preventing hypotension, whereas colloid appeared to be effective in all studies. A colloid solution, such as hydro-xyethyl starch (HES) might be preferable considering the capacity to stay intravasculary for a longer period. Few differences in fetal outcomes or maternal nausea and vomiting were reported. Increasing central blood volume by using colloid decreases the incidence of hypotension before loco-regional anaesthesia for cesarean delivery. Implications. We performed a review to determine whether fluid loading reduced the incidence of low blood pressure after spinal or epidural anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. Although no technique totally eliminates the occurrence of hypotension, colloid administration (starch or gelatin containing fluids) was the most effective.

Anesthesia, Local↗
PubMed2000

A comparison between low-dose ropivacaine and bupivacaine at equianalgesic concentrations for epidural analgesia during the first stage of labor.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, onset and duration of analgesia of two equianalgesic epidural doses of ropivacaine and bupivacaine during the first stage of labor. The study included 190 healthy nulliparous parturients who presented spontaneous onset of labor and required epidural analgesia. They were divided randomly to receive epidural analgesia with an initial dose 0.10% ropivacaine or 0.0625% bupivacaine 20 mL both with the addition of 10 microg of sufentanil. There were no significant differences in onset time, quality of analgesia, maternal hypotension and ability to ambulate. Ropivacaine produced more prolonged analgesia then bupivacaine (89 vs 119 min;P<0.0003). The clinical value of this prolonged analgesia after the first dose needs further evaluation when a continuous infusion technique is used.

Clinical Trial↗
PubMed1999

Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour.

We have used the technique of randomized, double-blind sequential allocation to compare the minimum local analgesic concentrations (MLAC) of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine for women in the first stage of labour. The test bolus was 20 ml of local anaesthetic solution. The concentration was determined by the response of the previous woman to a higher or lower concentration of local anaesthetic, according to up-down sequential allocation. Efficacy was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue pain score (VAPS). The test solution had to achieve a VAPS of 10 mm or less to be judged effective. For bupivacaine, MLAC was 0.093 (95% CI 0.076-0.110)% w/v, and for ropivacaine, 0.156 (95% CI 0.136-0.176)%w/v (P < 0.0001, 95% CI difference 0.036-0.090). The analgesic potency of ropivacaine was 0.60 (0.47-0.75) relative to bupivacaine. Claims for reduced toxicity and motor block must be considered with differences in analgesic potency in mind.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour.

We have used the technique of double-blind sequential allocation to quantify the minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC) of extradural bupivacaine for women in early (median cervical dilatation 2 cm) and late (median cervical dilatation 5 cm) labour. The first bolus was 20 ml of the bupivacaine test solution. The concentration was determined by the response of the previous woman to a higher or lower concentration of bupivacaine according to up and down sequential allocation. Efficacy was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue pain score (VAPS). The test solution had to achieve a VAPS of 10 mm or less to be judged effective. In early labour, the MLAC of bupivacaine was 0.048% w/v (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.037-0.058% w/v), and 0.140% w/v (95% CI 0.132-0.150% w/v) in the late group. The MLAC of bupivacaine in late labour was greater by a factor of 2.9 (95% CI 2.7-3.2) compared with the MLAC in early labour (P < 0.0001, 95% CI difference 0.08-0.11). We conclude that advancing labour requires an increased concentration of extradural bupivacaine for pain relief.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Regional blocks for cesarean section.

Recent researches in the field of regional anesthesia for cesarean section have focused on spinal anesthesia, including prophylaxis of maternal hypotension, the use of opioids to improve intra- and postoperative analgesia and the use of ropivacaine.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Anatomy of the lumbar epidural region using magnetic resonance imaging: a study of dimensions and a comparison of two postures.

Many techniques used to investigate the epidural region may alter the anatomy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been introduced as a non-invasive diagnostic technique. The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomy of the lumbar epidural region using MRI, studying the morphology, the dimensions and the modification that may result from a change of position. Ten young, healthy female volunteers were studied to obtain results relevant to obstetric anesthesia. The following measurements were made: anterior epidural space (AES); posterior epidural space (PES); ligamenta flava; distance between the PES and the skin (S-ES); and interspace distance (ISD). All these distances were measured with the subject supine and the lumbar spine either in a neutral or a non-lordotic (flexed) position. The S-ES ranged from 2.7 to 8.1 cm. This distance was greater in the lower than in the upper lumbar segments. No differences were observed in AES, PES and ligamenta flava between the neutral and flexed positions. Flexion of the spine did not affect the S-ES but increased the ISD (P < 0.05). The S-ES at any lumbar segment or interspace and the thickness of ligamenta flava at the L2/3 interspace correlated significantly with body weight (respectively, P < 0.01 and P < 0.02). In conclusion, MRI may clearly reveal the anatomy of the epidural region. The circumferentially and metamerically segmented compartments of the epidural space were clearly noted and measured. Ligamenta flava seem to be thinner in younger than in older subjects. This may partly explain a reduced loss of resistance sometimes perceived in obstetric patients.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain and analgesia: a multicentre study of nulliparous women.

Six hospitals with large maternity units in five different European countries were involved in this multicentre study. At least 100 primiparae for each country were examined. All mothers received two standardized interviews, one during the last month of pregnancy, and one 24 h after delivery. Maternal expectations and experiences of pain, pain relief, and satisfaction with analgesia and childbirth were assessed by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Almost all mothers were seen regularly by an obstetrician or a midwife during pregnancy, had prepared childbirth classes and received antenatal information on labor analgesia techniques. Differences between the five groups were noted in the level of education and socio-economic status. Maternal expectations of labor pain and the answers to the pre-delivery interview varied significantly between the centers, as did maternal knowledge, expectation and ultimate choice of analgesic technique. Generally speaking the level of maternal satisfaction with analgesia and childbirth experience was high; however, epidural analgesia was more effective than other methods of pain relief (P<0.0001). The most satisfied mothers were those who expected more pain, were satisfied with the analgesia received and had good pain relief after analgesia (P<0.001).

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of fentanyl with clonidine as adjuvants for epidural analgesia with 0.125% bupivacaine in the first stage of labor: a preliminary report.

48 primiparae received epidural analgesia in labor with 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:800 000, and then were divided in 4 equal groups (n = 12) to receive one of the following: 5 ml saline (B); 100 mug of fentanyl (BF); 150 microg of clonidine (BC); 75 microg of clonidine and 50 microg of fentanyl (BCF). All the patients had satisfactory analgesia. Onset was similar in the 4 groups but the duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged by the addition of either 100 microg of fentanyl or 150 microg of clonidine (respectively 89.8 min and 92.5 min vs 62.5 min) (P < 0.0001). The addition of both clonidine (75 microg) and fentanyl (50 microg) produced a considerably prolonged analgesia (177.5 min) (P < 0.0001). No episodes of bradycardia were observed. Hypotension, reversed by i.v. ephedrine, occurred in 2 patients of BCF group and in 1 patient of BF and BC groups. Only patients receiving fentanyl had pruritus. Both fentanyl and clonidine produced sedation, but both incidence and severity were greater with the mixture. No differences in neonatal outcome assessed by Apgar scores and NACS, were observed.

Journal Article↗