Measuring light levels with photographic meters.
With proper conversion factors, light meters designed for photographic use may be used to measure clinical light levels. Conversion factors and use of these light meters are discussed.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G C Woo.
With proper conversion factors, light meters designed for photographic use may be used to measure clinical light levels. Conversion factors and use of these light meters are discussed.
Three subjective determinations of the reading addition required by each of 10 subjects were obtained in this study with the use of a cross cylinder grid target, a variable color, near-point, grid target and an ordinary reading card. All three methods gave similar results. In addition, there was no change in the measurement when the color of the horizontal and vertical lines was reversed on the variable color, near-point, grid target.
Stereoscopic tests of 30 subjects by means of diastereo instruments showed a lower threshold for crossed disparities than for uncrossed disparities. These findings support Richards' conclusion that crossed and uncrossed disparity limits are the result of two different mechanisms.
Comparisons between the various types of binocular and monocular visual acuity thresholds are made in this study. The results obtained in monocular resolution and binocular diplopia experiments support LeGrand's view regarding Panum's area. Thus the physiological mechanism which appears to account for both monocular resolution and binocular diplopia thresholds could also account for a spatial tolerance which gives rise to Panum's area.
Subjective measures of refractive error were obtained on 530 eyes using the AO SR III Subjective refraction System (operated by a trained secretary) and using a phoropter (operated by optometrists and optometry students) in a clinical setting. Comparison of these measures from the present study and from a previous study by Bannon leads us to conclude that the SR III instrument is capable of estimating refractive error with good agreement with conventional refractive methods. Comparison with the Acuity Systems 6600 Auto-RefractorTM was also made.
Measurements were made of the amplitude of accommodation for myopes wearing spectacles, rigid contact lenses, and flexible contact lenses. Both forms of contact lenses placed greater accommodative requirements on the myope than did spectacle correction, but no significant difference was found between the 2 types of contact lenses in this respect.
An attempt was made in this study to determine experimentally the relative effects of hard and soft contact lenses on the spherical aberration of the human eye. Results of this study indicate that there is very little difference in the value of spherical aberration between wearing soft or hard contact lenses.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.