Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Boulard

Publications and source records attributed to G Boulard.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Prospective survey of colonization and infection caused by SHV-4 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neurosurgical intensive care unit.

The occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing enterobacteria (ESBLE) has been prospectively surveyed in a neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU). Of the 47 patients examined, 8 were identified as faecal carriers, and 2 of them developed a subsequent urinary tract infection. ESBLE were also detected in the immediate environment of five colonized and/or infected patients. All isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae of a particular biotype which exhibited a similar antibiotype and produced an SHV-4 type beta-lactamase. However, plasmid profiling and ribotyping revealed that strains isolated from seven patients of hall A were a single epidemic clone, whereas strains isolated from the eighth patient of hall B were different. Comparison between the characteristics of patients who carried an ESBLE during the surveillance period, and control patients who did not, showed that a recent surgery, and the length of ICU stay were significantly associated with the acquisition of ESBLE.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1999

[Risk behavior among blood donors: efficacy of a new questionnaire].

The clinical selection of volunteers for blood donation is essential to reduce the risk of viral transmission by blood transfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new questionnaire for a pre-donation medical interview. This questionnaire was developed by transfusion practitioners, epidemiologists and professional investigators, and focused on risk behaviors of blood donors and their partners. Five blood banks in the French Ile-de-France region (around Paris), participated in the study from May 1995 to January 1996. All participating doctors were specifically trained by professional investigators. The sex and the age of donors, the type of collection, the duration of interviews and the reasons for exclusion from donation were recorded. The results were compared to those of a prior study dealing with a sample of 15,000 donors presenting the same characteristics, whose blood was taken of at the same collection sites in 1993. Of the 1,527 volunteers donating blood, 14% were interviewed in fixed centers and 86% by moving teams (38% in firms, 22% in towns, 13% in civil service facilities, 13% in school or academic centers). For 15.9% of the volunteers, this was the first donation (range: 7.3% in fixed centers to 41.5% in school and academic centers). The mean duration of the interview was 11 min (10 min for volunteers included, 14 min for donors excluded from donation). It decreased from 14 min at the beginning of the study to 10 min by the end of the study. The percentage of donors excluded for risk behavior (3.7% in 1995-96 vs 1.5% in 1993, P < 0.001), or medical reasons (12.2% in 1995-96 vs 8.4%, in 1993, P < 0.001) was significantly greater in 1995-96 than in 1993 (15.9% vs 9.9%, P < 0.001). In 1995-96, 35.0% of exclusions for risk behavior were related to male homosexuality, multiple partners or the risk behavior of the partner vs 12% in 1993 (P < 0.001). The risk of exclusion was 5.5 times higher for donors not living in a couple. The results obtained demonstrated the value of this new approach to the medical interview.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[The effect of position on intracranial pressure].

The question as to whether the head and trunk of neurosurgery patients should be elevated remains controversial. This question is particularly important when intracranial hypertension is present. Head up position may have beneficial effects on intracranial pressure (ICP) via changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), airway pressure, central venous pressure and cerebro spinal fluid displacement. However, in some circumstances, head up position may decrease MAP which in turn will result in a paradoxical rise in ICP through autoregulation mechanisms. Therefore, the degree of head elevation has to be titrated by evaluating the most adequate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) for each patient by means of transcranial Doppler or measurement of jugular venous blood oxygen saturation. Head elevation above 30 degrees should be avoided in all cases. In most patients with intracranial hypertension, head and trunk elevation up to 30 degrees is useful in helping to decrease ICP, providing that a safe CPP of at least 70 mmHg or even 80 mmHg is maintained. Patients in poor haemodynamic conditions are best nursed flat. CPP is thus the most important factor in assessment and monitoring when considering head elevation in patients with increased ICP.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

[Cerebral hemodynamics and intracranial hypertension].

Various cerebral aggressions, either primary or secondary, can lead to the development of raised intracranial pressure. The presence of an elevated intracranial pressure often results in cerebral ischaemia/hypoxia and, eventually, neuronal death. In face of this cascade of events, several therapeutic approaches have been suggested. Two management concepts for patients with raised intracranial pressure have retained the most attention in recent years: the first suggests a therapeutic increase in cerebral perfusion pressure with the objectives to improve perilesional collateral perfusion and decreased cerebral blood volume, and consequently intracranial pressure in areas where autoregulation is preserved. The second concept supports the diminution in perilesional capillary pressure with the aim of decreasing vasogenic oedema. Although these two concepts are antagonistic and cannot be used simultaneously, they are probably complementary in the sequence of therapeutic events of patients experiencing severe head injury. This article reviews these therapeutic concepts and their clinical applications.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗
PubMed1996

[Clinical presentation and prognosis of brain tumors].

The diagnosis of a cerebral tumor is received as dramatic by the patient or his family on account of the fonctional and symbolic idea of the brain and the perspectives of neurosurgical and psychological disabilities. Nowadays it is simplified because actual techniques of imagery are atraumatic and reliable. So the first signs are not to be undervaluated. Prognostic depends of identifiable factors. They lead the choice of therapy and help the medical doctor for the treatment follow-up and for answering to the patient's life questions.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Peroperative risks in cerebral aneurysm surgery].

The perioperative complications associated with cerebral aneurysm surgery require a specific anaesthetic management. Four major perioperative accidents are discussed in this review. The anaesthetic and surgical management in case of rebleeding subsequent to the re-rupture of the aneurysm is mainly prophylactic. It includes haemodynamic stability assurance, maintenance of mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 80-90 mmHg during stimulation of the patient such as endotracheal intubation, application of the skull-pin head-holder, incision, and craniotomy. The aneurysmal transmural pressure should be adequately maintained by avoiding an aggressive decrease of intracranial pressure. Once the skull is open, the brain must be kept slack in order to decrease pressure under the retractors and avoid the risks of stretching and tearing of the adjacent vessels. If, despite these precautions, the aneurysm ruptures again. MAP should be decreased to 60 mmHg and the brain rendered more slack, in order to allow direct clipping of the aneurysm, or temporary clipping of the adjacent vessels. The optimal agents in this situation are isoflurane (which decreases CMRO2), intravenous anaesthetic agents (inspite their negative inotropic effect, they may potentially protect the brain) and sodium nitroprusside. Vasospasm occurs usually between the 3rd and the 7th day after subarachnoid haemorrhage. It may be seen peroperatively. The optimal treatment, as well as prophylaxis, is moderate controlled hypertension (MAP > 100 mmHg), associated with hypervolaemia and haemodilution, the so-called triple H therapy, with strict control of the filling pressures. Other beneficial therapies are calcium antagonists (nimodipine and nicardipine), the removal of the blood accumulated around the brain and in the cisternae, and possibly local administration of papaverine. Abrupt MAP increases are controlled in order to maintain adequate aneurysmal transmural pressure. Beta-blockers, local anaesthetics administered locally or intravenously, a carefully titrated level of anaesthesia, a maintained volaemia play a protective role. Cerebral oedema is sometimes already present at the opening of the skull or may arise later, due to a high pressure under the retractors, to the surgical manipulations of the brain or to brain ischaemia subsequent to temporary clipping. Its treatment is aggressive, with intravenous agents, mannitol, deep hypocapnia and/or lumbar drainage. Prophylaxis, according to the "brain homeostasis concept", is the preferred method to avoid these four peroperative accidents. It includes normal blood volume, normoglycaemia, moderate hypocapnia, normotension, soft manipulation of the brain and optimal brain relaxation.

Anesthesia, General↗