Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Bianchetti

Publications and source records attributed to G Bianchetti.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A review of the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of amisulpride in healthy volunteers.

Amisulpride binds selectively to dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors in the limbic system. Low doses of amisulpride preferentially block presynaptic D(2)/D(3)-dopamine autoreceptors, thereby enhancing dopaminergic transmission, whereas higher doses block postsynaptic receptors, thus inhibiting dopaminergic hyperactivity. Amisulpride is clinically effective on the negative symptoms of acute schizophrenia exacerbations at low dosages (50-300 mg/day), and also on the positive symptoms of the disease at high dosages (400-800 mg/day). Nineteen clinical studies involving 358 volunteers have investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of amisulpride. Amisulpride shows linear pharmacokinetics, a bioavailability of 48%, low protein binding (17%) and an elimination half-life of approximately 12 h. It is predominantly eliminated in the urine as the parent compound. It exhibits no significant detrimental effects in psychometric or memory tests up to the dose of 400 mg/day, inducing only mild impairment at high doses, whereas EEG data suggest an alertness-enhancing effect at low doses (<or= 50 mg). Moreover, amisulpride does not potentiate the depressant effects on the central nervous system of alcohol and lorazepam. This tolerability profile is clearly better than that of haloperidol 4 mg/day and is consistent with a weak blocking effect on striatal D(2) receptors. In summary, studies in humans have shown that amisulpride is free of behavioural toxicity at doses exerting clear antipsychotic efficacy and confirm that its CNS effects may vary with the dose administered.

Amisulpride↗

A study comparing biopharmaceutic characteristics of four once daily controlled release diltiazem preparations.

In the present study we have compared the steady state biopharmaceutic characteristics of four diltiazem once daily controlled release capsules: Mono-Tildiem LP 300 (300 mg), Adizem XL (300 mg), Cardizem (300 mg) and Dilacor (240 mg). Sixteen healthy male volunteers (aged 22.9 +/- 3.3 years, range 19-31 years) completed an open label, multiple oral dose, randomized, four-period crossover study without a washout period in between. The volunteers received each diltiazem formulation once daily for four days. Trough diltiazem and metabolites plasma concentrations were determined on days 3 and 4. The 24-h plasma concentration-time profiles were assessed after the dose on day 4 of each period. The following steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for diltiazem were calculated: the minimum plasma concentration (cmin), the maximum plasma concentration (cmax), the time to reach that concentration (tmax), the time interval during which the plasma concentration exceeds 50% of cmax (t50), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC72-96) and the peak-to-trough fluctuation (PTF). For the metabolites of diltiazem, N-mono-desmethyl-diltiazem (NDM) and desacetyldiltiazem (DAD), AUC72-96 (AUCNDM and AUCDAD) and the ratio metabolite/parent compound were calculated. Steady state was achieved on day 3. Except one, all controlled release formulations have satisfactory controlled release properties allowing once daily administration. However, significant (P < 0.05) differences were found between the pharmacokinetic characteristics which do not allow exchange of the various formulations. Concentrations well below 50 ng.mL-1 in the morning hours were observed for Dilacor (240 mg) and Adizem XL (300 mg), which could be a disadvantage of these formulations as it is well-known that ischaemic events occur at a higher rate during that part of the day. The plasma concentration profiles NDM and DAD, the major circulating metabolites, parallel the plasma concentration profiles for the parent compound. From a clinical point of view, all treatments were well tolerated.

Adult↗

Plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics and time course of the effects of oral mizolastine.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics of oral mizolastine in order to determine whether the drug concentration in the fluid of suction-induced skin blisters could better predict the antihistamine activity than the plasma concentration. SETTING: Department of Internal Medicine, Université Paris 6. SUBJECTS: Ten healthy male volunteers. METHODS: The volunteers (mean age 26.8 years, mean weight 75.8 kg) received a single 10-mg oral dose of mizolastine at 1000 hours. The pharmacokinetic study included 11 plasma and 9 blister fluid samples and blister epidermal-roof specimens. Mizolastine was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Each volunteer also received nine intradermal injections of 5 micrograms histamine. Antihistamine activity was assessed as the post-treatment percentages of changes in the histamine-induced relative wheal and flare areas versus baseline. RESULTS: Mizolastine mean Cmax (SD) and median tmax were, respectively, 380 ng.ml-1 and 0.8 h in plasma, and 21.8 ng.ml-1 and 10 h in blister fluid. Mizolastine could not be quantified in the epidermis. The maximal histamine-induced relative flare inhibition was 72.5% and was attained at the median time of 3 h post-dosing and therefore was delayed by 2.2 h with respect to the plasma tmax. Mean relative wheal inhibition, although lower, showed the same time profile. A direct relationship could not be found between drug concentrations in blister fluid and antihistamine activity. Simulated concentrations in the peripheral compartment better explain the maximum inhibition effect on flare, observed 3 h post-dosing, with a flatter hysteresis loop obtained when plotting relative flare inhibition versus plasma or blister-fluid drug concentrations. CONCLUSION: The mizolastine concentrations in the skin suction-blister fluid were not predictive of the antihistamine activity.

Administration, Oral↗

Multicenter studies on the pharmacokinetic profile of sustained-release oral diltiazem (300 mg) after once a day repeated administration: influence of age.

The influence of age on the pharmacokinetics of the oral sustained release diltiazem Mono-Tildiem LP 300 mg was investigated in 12 middle-aged (40-64 years), 12 elderly (65-80 years) patients and compared to a control group of 54 young healthy volunteers (18-36 years). Each subject received daily a single dose of diltiazem slow release (300 mg) in the morning for 5 consecutive days. On the fifth day of treatment, the pharmacokinetic parameters of diltiazem and of 2 of its circulating metabolites (N-monodemethyldiltiazem and deacetyldiltiazem) were evaluated. The mean diltiazem Cmax was 199.3 +/- 117.8 ng/ml, 254.8 +/- 85.2 ng/ml and 154.5 +/- 63.2 ng/ml in middle-aged, elderly, and young healthy subjects, respectively. Mean plasma Cmin concentration was also higher in elderly subjects than in middle-aged and young subjects: 129.7 +/- 77.9 ng/ml versus 66.8 +/- 56.8 and 66.3 +/- 32.3 ng/ml, respectively. The AUC0-24 showed the same trend: 4,042 +/- 1,136 ng/ml.h in elderly, 2,995 +/- 1,905 ng/ml.h in middle-aged, and 2,564 +/- 1,205 ng/ml.h in young subjects. These parameters were statistically higher (p < 0.01) in the elderly subjects than those obtained in younger people. No statistical difference was observed between young volunteers and middle-aged patients. The Tmax did not differ significantly with age (5.1 +/- 4.4, 6.8 +/- 2.8, 6.1 +/- 3.5 hours, respectively). The ratios between the AUC of each metabolite and that of the parent compound did not vary with the age. These results suggest that in elderly people (> 65 y) the bioavailability of diltiazem is increased, probably due to a reduction of the first-pass effect. Based on the pharmacokinetic results, although safety data did not show any specific trend with age, a precautionary reduction of the dose at the start of the treatment seems advisable.

Adolescent↗

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a sustained-release diltiazem formulation (Mono-Tildiem LP 300 MG) after repeated administration in healthy volunteers.

The usual dosage regimen of diltiazem (Tildiem) is 60 mg 3-4 times a day. A sustained-release formulation has been developed (Mono-Tildiem LP 300 mg) in order to allow a single daily administration. Two repeated dosing studies were performed in healthy volunteers. The absolute bioavailability of sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg was investigated using concomitant i.v. administration of 13C-labelled drug: absolute bioavailability of the "once a day" formulation was 35%. The second study compared sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg with the standard formulation of diltiazem. The results showed that the diltiazem plasma concentrations obtained after the LP formulation remained stable between 2 and 14 h after administration and were compatible with a once a day administration. Relative bioavailability of sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg was 79.3% compared with diltiazem. Therefore, a unitary dose of sustained-release diltiazem LP 300 mg was chosen as the dose equivalent to the daily dose administered with the standard diltiazem formulation.

Administration, Oral↗

Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability of diltiazem sustained-release: influence of food and time of administration.

Diltiazem is a calcium channel blocking agent known to be effective in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. To improve the conditions of diltiazem administration in the treatment of hypertensive patients, a sustained-release formulation (Mono-Tildiem LP 300 mg) allowing a single daily oral administration has been developed. The aim of the present study was to first evaluate the influence of food intake and second to evaluate those of the time of administration on the pharmacokinetic parameters and the bioavailability of this sustained-release formulation. The influence of these factors was investigated over two different open, randomized, cross-over studies in 12 healthy volunteers. Although a significant decrease in Tmax and an increase in Cmax occurred when diltiazem sustained-release was administered with food intake, AUC0-48, and therefore the fraction absorbed, were not modified either by concurrent food intake or by different times of administration. The minor modifications of pharmacokinetic parameters of diltiazem sustained release observed were unlikely to induce any clinical consequence.

Administration, Oral↗

EEG profile of intravenous zolpidem in healthy volunteers.

Zolpidem is an imidazopyridine which binds specifically to the omega 1 receptor. Zolpidem demonstrated potent hypnotic activity at a dose of 10 mg. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of zolpidem were studied after daytime administration in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Single doses of zolpidem (10 mg IV as a 3-min infusion and 20 mg orally) and placebo were firstly tested in 12 healthy young male volunteers. Two other doses (5 mg IV and orally) were then evaluated in 6 out of these 12 subjects. EEG (4 leads = Fp2-T4, Fp1-T3, T4-02 and T3-01), and Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) were measured up to 5 h postdosing. Blood samples were also collected up to 24 h. The time course of the hypnotic activity of zolpidem, assessed by the score obtained on SSS, showed a similar profile whatever the route or the dose administered: slightly earlier onset after IV but sedative scores were reached at 30 min and the effect peaked between 1 and 1.5 h and lasted 4 h in both conditions. The EEG profile of zolpidem was characterised by a decrease of alpha activity and an increase in delta and in beta activity. The effect on beta activity was marked within the first hour and then disappeared. The time course of delta and alpha activities indicated a rapid onset (10 min after IV, 30 min after oral route) and a duration of 3-4 h. The amplitude of these relative EEG changes and their duration were independent of the route of administration and the dose administered. AUC and Cmax increased proportionally to the administered dose and elimination half life (2h), clearance and volume of distribution did not change according to the dose or the route of administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

EEG profile of litoxetine after single and repeated administration in healthy volunteers.

1. Litoxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with antidepressant activity in animal models and in depressed patients. 2. This double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 12 healthy young male volunteers. The aim was to assess the EEG profile of litoxetine in parallel with its pharmacokinetics after a single dose or multiple administrations for 4 days (6 doses) of two dosages (10 mg and 25 mg). Spectral analysis of four EEG leads (F4-T4, F3-T3, T4-02 and T3-01) was done up to 12 h post-dose. 3. In single or multiple doses, litoxetine induced EEG changes characterised by a dose-related increase in fast beta energies, mainly beta 2, without any changes in slow waves (delta and theta). A slight reduction in alpha activity occurred only after repeated doses. 4. EEG changes occurred after a single oral administration and lasted at least 12 h with litoxetine blood concentrations ranging from 4 to 10 ng ml-1. With repeated administrations, the pharmacodynamic steady-state was achieved as the increase in beta 2 energies was the same before and 12 h post-dose. These effects occurred with litoxetine blood concentrations ranging from 3 to 7 ng ml-1 with the 10 mg dosage and from 8 to 18 ng ml-1 with the 25 mg dosage. The EEG profile did not change after 4 days of repeated administration, indicating that tolerance did not develop. 5. Cmax and AUC showed proportionality between the administered dosages of 10 and 25 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem following repeated doses in hemodialyzed uraemic patients.

Zolpidem, an imidazopyridine derivative, is a chemically novel, non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent. Many uraemic patients complain of sleep disorders and ask for hypnotic medication which is well tolerated both clinically and biologically in such patients. We studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem in 12 end-stage renal patients regularly treated by hemodialysis three times a week. Zolpidem (10 mg) was given orally for 14 or 21 days. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations were repeated at the end of the study on day 14 or day 21. Cmax, Tmax, t1/2 and the area under the curve were not modified in hemodialyzed patients. After daytime dosing, zolpidem induced the same level of sleepiness after the first and last dose and was well tolerated as a hypnotic agent after the night-time dosing. From these results, it can be said that zolpidem may be administered safely to patients with severe renal impairment without any modification of the dosage regimen.

Adult↗

The effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of single oral doses of alfuzosin.

Alfuzosin is a new alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist particularly effective in the symptomatic treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). The elimination of alfuzosin being almost entirely metabolic, the potential pharmacokinetic interaction with cimetidine (H2-receptor antagonist) was investigated in 10 healthy young subjects. Pharmacokinetics of alfuzosin were appraised as a 5 mg oral dose before, after one day and after 20 days of cimetidine (1 g/d) administration. An inhibition of the hepatic mixed function oxidase system by cimetidine was established by the oral antipyrine clearance test. Under these conditions, alfuzosin pharmacokinetics were only marginally affected by concomitant cimetidine administration. Surprisingly, a significantly shorter elimination half-life was found after 20 days on cimetidine (from 5.1 +/- 0.4 h to 4.4 +/- 0.5 h). This fact must be attributed to the large inter-individual variation in pharmacokinetic parameters reported for alfuzosin. Cmax and AUC increased up to 20% after cimetidine but without statistical significance. No side-effects on the association cimetidine-alfuzosin were reported. In conclusion, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic interaction on cimetidine-alfuzosin co-administration.

Administration, Oral↗

Pharmacokinetics of alfuzosin after single oral administration to healthy volunteers, of three different doses.

The aim of this study was to assess the linearity of pharmacokinetic of alfuzosin, administered by oral route, at the doses of 1, 2.5, and 5 mg to 12 young healthy volunteers. The pharmacokinetic parameters (tmax, Cmax, AUC, t1/2 beta) obtained from plasma alfuzosin concentrations after administration of the three doses show that pharmacokinetics of alfuzosin is linear in the range of doses 1-5 mg. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of alfuzosin observed after 1, 2.5, and 5 mg were, respectively: tmax (h) 1.5 +/- 0.3, 1.1 +/- 0.2, 1.3 +/- 0.1; Cmax (ng ml-1) 2.6 +/- 0.3, 9.4 +/- 1.2, 13.5 +/- 1.0; AUC (ng ml-1 h) 17.7 +/- 2.9, 51.7 +/- 7.1, 99.0 +/- 14.1; t1/2 (h) 3.7 +/- 0.4, 3.9 +/- 0.2, 3.8 +/- 0.3. Cmax (corrected by the dose) obtained after 2.5 mg was significantly higher than those obtained after 1 and 5 mg. This difference seems to be due principally to the intraindividual variability. The absence of statistically significant difference on individual values of AUC corrected by the administered dose, supports the linearity of the pharmacokinetics of alfuzosin in the range of doses between 1 and 5 mg. Some postural hypotension, clinical criterion, was observed with a frequency increasing with the dose in these healthy subjects: 0 volunteers of 12 after 1 mg, 3 volunteers of 12 after 2.5 mg and 4 volunteers of 12 after 5 mg.

Administration, Oral↗

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of mizolastine (SL 85.0324), a new nonsedative H1 antihistamine.

The antihistaminic activity, clinical safety, and pharmacokinetics of mizolastine (SL 85.0324) were studied in a 5-way, double-blind crossover study of ten healthy volunteers with doses of 1 to 75 mg. Inhibition of the histamine-induced wheal and flare showed clear dose-dependent antihistaminic activity beginning from the 2-mg dose with a maximum attained between 10 and 20 mg. The onset of action was rapid (one hour) and the effect persisted for more than 24 hours after a 10-mg dose or more. Mizolastine was well tolerated at doses up to 75 mg; subjective and objective signs of transient sedative activity were not observed at doses below 30 mg. The pharmacokinetic profile (rapid absorption with Tmax congruent to 1 h and elimination T1/2 of about eight hours) parallels the pharmacodynamic activity. Within the considered dose range, the pharmacokinetics was linear with no saturation phenomena.

Adult↗

Bioavailability of diltiazem as a function of the administered dose.

Diltiazem undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism; extrapolation from single to repeated administration thus underestimates plasma concentration values. In order to validate the hypothesis of a partially saturable first-pass effect, four single doses of diltiazem (10, 20, 40, and 120 mg) were administered at weekly intervals to eight healthy volunteers. Results showed that: (a) the inter-subject variability was highest at the lowest dose at the highest dose; (b) bioavailability was almost nil in 3 of 8 of the subjects after the administration of the 10 mg dose; (c) the mean bioavailability increased with the dose from 11.8 +/- 2.5 per cent after 10 mg to 28.2 per cent after 120 mg; (d) the elimination half-life was dose-related; (e) the renal excretion of diltiazem increased with the administered dose from 1.0 +/- 0.3 per cent after 10 mg to 3.0 +/- 0.5 per cent after 120 mg; (f) the greatest amounts of circulating metabolites were present after the lowest doses. These results are consistent with a partially saturable first-pass effect for diltiazem.

Administration, Oral↗

Clonazepam in neonatal seizures: dose regimens and therapeutic efficacy.

The attempt has been made to define the optimal dose regimen of clonazepam in newborns suffering from neonatal convulsions. Results obtained from 22 patients (GA 28-41 weeks; PNA 4 h to 23 days) indicated that a dose of 0.1 mg/kg every 24 h was satisfactory in the majority of the patients. It is recommended as a starting regimen.

Asphyxia Neonatorum↗

Clinical pharmacokinetics and tolerability of alpidem in healthy subjects given increasing single doses.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over experiment in 21 healthy male volunteers, aged 19 to 27 y, the pharmacokinetics and tolerance of the new anxiolytic drug alpidem (SL80.0342) and its three major metabolites were studied after single doses of 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg. Plasma concentrations of alpidem (in 20 subjects) and metabolites (in 6 subjects) were measured by HPLC over a period of 54 h after dosing. Cmax, tmax and AUC(0-54) and, when possible, t1/2 were determined for alpidem and metabolites and the dose linearity of the parameters was investigated. The time to peak of alpidem was dose independent in most subjects and was short (1-4 h); the mean values at the four dosing levels were 1.9, 1.7, 1.6 and 1.8 h. The peak concentration increased with the dose, the mean values being 17, 34, 88 and 115 ng.ml-1, respectively. In 50% of the subjects Cmax tended to stabilize between the 100 and 200 mg dose. Dose linearity was also present for the AUC, which plateaued between the 100 and 200 mg dose in only 3 out of 20 subjects; the mean AUC was 119, 281, 669 and 1117 ng.ml-1.h, respectively. The apparent half-life of elimination appeared to be dose independent, mean values at the increasing dosing levels being 18.7, 19.9, 18.1, and 17.9 h. A similar relationship between the kinetics parameters and dose of the alpidem was observed for the metabolites SL83.0912, SL80.0522 and SL83.0725. The formation of metabolites was not saturated as their AUCs relative to corresponding alpidem AUCs were not dose related.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Nocturnal profile of growth hormone secretion during sleep induced by zolpidem: a double-blind study in young adults and children.

Overnight blood sampling for repeated growth hormone (GH) assays, regarded as the most physiological assessment of GH status, may induce some disturbances in patients' sleep and then in the evaluation of GH secretion. We studied the influence of a hypnotic drug, zolpidem (10 mg), on nocturnal GH profiles (GH peak, time to first and maximum GH peak, area under the curve, mean integrated concentration) over two nights at a 7-day interval, in a double-blind cross-over design in a group of 12 young adult volunteers (27.9 +/- 4.3 years), and in a group of 12 children (10.8 +/- 2.3 years) with short stature, in a parallel double-blind study. Mean GH profiles showed no difference between zolpidem-treated subjects and placebo-treated controls, either in adults or in children. Although in these experimental conditions, sleep onset latency was significantly reduced with zolpidem in the adult volunteers, the mean time to first GH peak remained unchanged. Furthermore, GH profile did not relate with sleep duration, sleep onset latency or number of awakenings. A hypnotic drug, such as zolpidem, given at bedtime, is therefore devoided of effect on nocturnal GH profile and may be used in young children for overnight blood sampling when needed.

Adolescent↗

Determination of mephenesin in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection.

A procedure for the determination of the CNS-active muscle-relaxant mephenesin in plasma samples is described. The method involved a single-step extraction with diethyl ether followed by high-performance liquid chromatography separation and fluorimetric detection. Linearity of the detection response was observed between 1 ng/ml, which is the limit of determination, and 500 ng/ml. Inter-day assays, including quality-control samples, performed over a 4-month period, showed the method to be reproducible and precise, and suitable for routine analysis in pharmacokinetic studies.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗