There is a growing interest in the use of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for allogeneic transplantation. This is due in part to the idea that, as with autologous transplantation, increasing the number of allogeneic hemopoietic progenitors infused may lead to reduced complications. However, introducing the PBSC technique into allogeneic transplants implies theoretical as well as ethical problems involving both patient and donor. We are still uncertain whether the PBSC technique will result in an increase of GVHD or (better) of GVL. G-CSF, necessary for effective PBSC mobilization, is safe but its use in normal subjects should be regarded with caution. For this reason, a Study Committee promoted by the GITMO (Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo) evaluated the key aspects of allogeneic PBSC collection and transplantation. The present paper summarizes the scientific data and suggests some guidelines for the introduction of allogeneic PBSC transplantation into clinical practice. The procedure should be considered experimental and the Committee strongly recommends the use of allogeneic PBSC in experienced centers, initially in patients with advanced disease. The donor should be given a complete explanation of the advantages and risks of G-CSF therapy, leukapheresis and general anesthesia. A careful monitoring of both patient and donor should also be included to watch for short-term and long-term side effects.

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Donor origin of hematopoiesis after a case of allogeneic transplantation with cryopreserved marrow.

In allogeneic marrow transplantation (BMT), fresh donor marrow is generally given like a simple transfusion immediately after collection. Cryopreservation, on the other hand, is extensively used in autologous marrow transplantation (ABMT). However, there could be a few instances in which donor marrow should be cryopreserved for later reinfusion mainly because of the donor's inability, for logistic or medical reasons, to undergo marrow harvesting immediately prior to transplantation. We wish to describe a case of ALL transplanted with donor harvested earlier and cryopreserved. The bone marrow was cryopreserved with 10% DMSO in a controlled rate freezer and stored for 1 month in liquid nitrogen. The VNTR (variation number tandem repeat) technique was used to demonstrate the donor origin of blood cells. Hematological reconstitution was rapidly achieved and we demonstrated the allogeneic origin of the recipient's blood cells. We confirm the possibility of using cryopreserved marrow stem cells for BMT. Cryopreservation of stem cells from other origin may also find a useful application in BMT.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Peripheral blood stem cells for allogeneic transplantation. Recommendations from the GITMO 1996. Gruppo Italiano Trapianti di Midollo Osseo.

Allogeneic transplants with PBSC are rapidly expanding, but a number of problems concerning both donors and recipients are still unsolved. GITMO (Italian Bone Marrow Transplant Group) has established a committee for allogeneic PBSC transplants. We present here an analysis of the main aspects of this evolving area and suggest revised guidelines for the use of allogeneic PBSC transplantation.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Early detection of bone marrow engraftment by amplification of hypervariable DNA regions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) it is important to be able to distinguish between the host and donor origin of cells in order to monitor the engraftment process. However, identifying whether the hematopoietic stem cells are of donor or recipient origin may be a difficult task. DNA studies using Southern blotting techniques or the amplification by PCR of regions in the human genome with high polymorphic neutral sequence variation showing Mendelian inheritance as variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) can detect the origin of host bone marrow after BMT. We have tried to apply these sensitive systems of detection to the early stages of BMT when small numbers of regenerated cells are available for analysis. METHODS: We used in vitro polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of three single-locus simple repetitive DNA sequences, all of which vary extensively in their repeat number among different individuals (VNTR D1S80, ApoB, and D17S5), to evaluate post transplant engraftment in six patients who showed no signs of peripheral blood engraftment at 2-3 weeks after transplant. We tested 2 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), 2 with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), 1 with T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), and 1 with aplastic anemia (SAA), all in prolonged aplasia following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). RESULTS: In a sequential analysis protocol with the different loci, the donor was distinguishable from the recipient in all pairs with at least one of the three markers used. After 16 days (median 16.2; range 15 to 20 days) we found that complete chimerism was present in 5 patients: 4 of donor origin (= engraftment) and one of host origin (= rejection), this last case being one of mixed chimerism. In the 2 cases in which the presence (one complete and one partial) of host DNA was detected, rejection of the donor bone marrow followed, and in 1 patient a second BMT was necessary. The other 4 patients with complete chimerism of donor origin achieved hematological reconstitution and we documented complete engraftment of donor bone marrow a few months later. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing PCR to document early post-transplant engraftment and chimerism in the first month after BMT has the advantage over Southern blotting of being more sensitive and requiring small amounts of sample. It may also be useful for guiding subsequent therapeutic decisions.

Biomarkers↗