Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G B Piccoli

Publications and source records attributed to G B Piccoli.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Education as a clinical tool for self-dialysis.

Therapeutic compliance and patient education are presently considered crucial parts of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapy. In the center where Italian home and self-care dialysis treatment started, an education program was designed as multi-step pathway--following patients from chronic renal failure to dialysis and eventual graft--employing lessons, booklets, and books. Each step was validated in various subsets of patients. Lessons involved two hours of informal discussion on the main aspects of ESRD and renal replacement therapy (RRT); booklets were created from tape recordings of the lessons. Patient participation was good, with 28 of 33 patients on charge in the center for 6 months or more taking part in more than one lesson in 1999. In 16 of 16 patients who answered a questionnaire after two lessons, expressed opinion was "good" to "fair." All asked for further material. With regard to books, 500 copies of the book What does dialysis mean? were given out in the region; this book was validated in 22 patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 18 on hemodialysis (HD). It helped patients to accept dialysis in 65% of cases and to comprehend it in 90%. Four thousand copies of the book Stories, containing 18 interviews on transplantation, were printed, and this book was validated in 21 patients on self-care and 35 on hospital dialysis (potential candidates for graft). Of 56 patients, 53 asked for further material; 19 changed their initial opinion (10 choose transplantation, despite initial skepticism; 9 put off transplantation, despite initial acceptance). On a local scale, the program led 12 of 18 new patients, who followed at least part of the program, to choose self-dialysis (PD, home, and self-care dialysis).

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Research potential of a regional registry].

BACKGROUND: The need for data bank gathering information in dialysis patients is as old as dialysis. Dialysis Registries presently active are characterized by different policies of data gathering (large vs small number of information) and of use (research vs economical or clinical purposes). Aim of the work was a discussion on the use of a Regional Registry (RPDT, Regional Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation of Piedmont, Italy), gathering since 1981 a wide set of information (about 80 items) on all patients treated in a relatively small area (about 4,300,000 inhabitants). METHODS: Two researches were selected: the first includes patients treated for > or = 20 years by RRT. Cases were identified on the basis of RPDT data and an inquiry regarding all patients was performed, with specific interest on comorbidity. The second includes diabetic patients on regular RRT, a sample of which was further analyzed in high detail. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: While a Regional Registry, even gathering a wide set of data is unable to answer to the most qualitative questions, such as quality of life, its archives are a powerful tool to identify cases. Furthermore, ad hoc inquiries may represent a way to control quality of data or to test new fields to be studied. In the case of patients with long RRT follow-up, comorbidity questions were tested before being included on RPDT. In the case of a sample of diabetic patients, type of diabetes and cause of ESRD were controlled. This biunivocal relationship between clinical work-up and epidemiological archives may often interest future perspectives.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Epidemiologic analysis of the incidence of new diabetic patients on dialysis as a basis for a clinical study].

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to analyse the incidence of diabetic patients starting dialysis in Piedmont (Italy) during the period 1981-1996 and to evaluate, in a subgroup of patients, the causes of uremia (diabetic nephropathy or other), and the type and seriousness of comorbid factors, in order to define the clinical conditions and try to explain the causes incidence increase. METHODS: Data are taken from the RPDT (Regional Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation of Piedmont). RESULTS: Total incidence of new patients starting dialysis in this Region increased from 65 pmp in 1981-1982 to 116 pmp in 1995-1996 and the mean age increased from 55.4 +/- 15.5 years in 1981-1982 to 61.5 +/- 15.6 in 1995-1996; 49% of patients had at least one of the 13 conditions of comorbidity considered by the Registry (including severe vascular, cardiac, systemic diseases and diabetes). In the same period the incidence of diabetic patients increased from 6 pmp (1981-1982) to 19 for males and 12 pmp for females (1995-1996); this increase is higher for males and limited to patients with age > or = 60 years (for example: group 70-79 years from 7 to 56 pmp). A study performed in a group of 64 patients (52 type 2 and 12 type 1) showed the incidence of multiple comorbid factors: the most important in type 2 are vascular diseases (44/52) and heart diseases (20/52); blindness and amputations are relatively rare (2 each). An important comorbid factor in type 1 diabetes is blindness (3/12) and in this group the most frequent cause of uremia is diabetic nephropathy (DN) (9/12); in the group of type 2 patients nephroangiosclerosis and a clinical picture of progressive renal failure, without nephrotic syndrome, represents 48% of all diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the necessity of a strict collaboration with diabetologists and of an improvement of dedicated structures in order to meet the increase of this critical population.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Survival of patients starting dialysis at an advanced age in the Piedmont].

BACKGROUND: Patients starting dialysis in old age (age > 70 and > 80) in Piedmont are widely increasing: the survival curves of this group of patients can give very important information to evaluate the quality of both the delivered therapy and our very wide criteria of acceptance to the treatment. To this end, using data from the Piedmont Dialysis and Transplant Register, the survival curves of patients with age over 70 and 80, beginning dialysis in all Piedmont Dialysis Units between 1981 and 1996, have been examined. METHODS: These curves have been considered both in a general way and according to the presence or absence of further high risk conditions; they show results better than expected and improving from 1981 to 1995. RESULTS: If the survival curves of these patients are considered according to the kind of dialytic treatment performed, they do not show any significative difference. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion is drawn that these data strongly support first, the fitness of criteria of very wide acceptance to the treatment and modulated choice of the kind of dialytic treatment at present followed in Piedmont; and second, that dialysis treatment can give very good results also in elderly patients. So, it is suggested that the economic and structural difficulties of dialysis Units must not influence the nephrologist's choice towards elderly patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Comorbidity factors in the dialysis registries and the experience of the Piedmontese Registry].

The parameters used at present by the Dialysis and Transplant Registries of various countries to evaluate dialyzed patients' comorbidity show great differences, mostly owing to the different epidemiological, social and racial characteristics of the studied populations. Moreover, the typology of the dialyzed patient is changing: the mean age is increasing, patients with high-risk conditions as vasculopathy and diabetes are widely accepted to the treatment. Thus the Piedmont Registry will be implemented as follows: new fields about comorbidity for clinical (blindness, cachexy and dementia), social (smoking, alcohol and drugs addiction) and diagnostic (type of diabetes, of neoplasm, of cardiovascular problem) parameters, and questions needing dichotomic response (vasculopathy yes or no) will be added. The exact time of appearance of any risk factor will be requested, and a field for "others" risk factors will be added as well, trying to deeply identify the dialytic population not affected by any comorbidity factor. Finally, a new improved control system of the collected data will be used: our registry needs to be implemented in the future by such evaluations, to go on giving useful informations about epidemiology of the dialyzed patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

[Drugs used in the treatment of arterial hypertension in dialysis patients in the Piedmont. What correlations between personal and clinical data can be made from the registry data?].

The therapeutical approach to arterial hypertension in the general population is now relatively well classified, whereas it remains a controversial problem in dialytic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antihypertensive drugs used in dialytic patients in Piedmont and to identify correlations with other personal and clinical data. The authors analysed the data in the Piedmont Dialysis and Transplant Register concerning new patients admitted to dialysis during the period 1990-1995 (2,664 patients at 31/12/1995) and 1,373 patients who began dialysis during the period 1990-1993. A study of the antihypertensive drugs using in single and combined therapy over the five-year period shows major variations in the 45-65 year-old age bracket (increased ACE-inhibitors in single therapy, 15.5-25.6%, increased vasodilators in combined therapy, 15.3-21%). In patients aged > or = 65 years old a slight increase was found in the use of beta-blockers in monotherapy. Antihypertensive drugs at the 1st control (1990-1995 entries) appeared to be stable over the five-year period. From the 1,373 patients who started dialysis in the period 1990-1993, with at least three subsequent controls, the authors selected those hypertensive or normotensive patients receiving ACE-inhibitor therapy (best survival in general population) and compared their survival with that of patients receiving alternative antihypertensive treatment. No significant differences were found. The stability of the antihypertensive drugs taken by these patients over the past 5 years backs the hypothesis of a greater attention paid by nephrologists to the introduction of new drugs, both because of the frequent onset of collateral effects and owing to the special pharmacokinetics present in dialytic patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

[Cachexia during dialysis].

In the Italian language, the term cachexia is a rather picturesque synonym of "marasma senile", "senile marasmus", an old definition involving not only old-age, but specifically senility, the end of the ageing process and marasmus, a stagnant and hopeless situation in which all superior organised functions have disappeared. The problem of cachexia during dialysis is complex and several discordant opinions exist at this regard, partly accounted by different definitions of this sluggish entity (or non entity). Actually, the basic question is very simple: is cachexia the cause or the effect of failure of dialysis treatment? The aim of this study was an evaluation of epidemiological data from the Dialysis and Transplantation Registry of Piedmont, a northern Italian Region with about 4,350,000 inhabitants, 22 public dialysis Centers, open acceptance to dialysis since the mid seventies, a multiple choice dialysis system developed in the eighties. In the period 1981-1995, 764 patients died in conditions of cachexia. This figure is 20.9% of all deaths recorded, 27.4% over age 65 and 34.7% over age 75. Despite a likewise significant increase in age and presence of comorbid factors, an improvement of patients survival, that reach statistical significance in the old age group (> or = 65 yrs), was observed.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Social rehabilitation, state of the disease and quality of life. What are the parameters to evaluate rehabilitation of the patient under dialysis in the '90s?].

The parameters used at present by the Piedmont Dialysis and Transplant Register to evaluate rehabilitation and quality of life of the dialyzed patients have been useful in the past, but they will no longer be so in the future, as the typology of the dialyzed patient is changing: the mean age is increasing, patients with high-risk conditions as vasculopathy and diabetes are widely accepted to the treatment. Thus, rehabilitation has to be evaluated not only from a social and professional viewpoint, but also as "illness situation" and "quality of life" and this can be done using the Karnofsky scale and the test of Spitzer: our Register needs to be implemented in the future by such evaluations, to go on giving us useful information about rehabilitation of the dialyzed patients.

Female↗
PubMed1996

[Epidemiology and clinical course in hepatitis C-positive patients treated with dialysis in Piemonte. Work group of the RPDT].

The high prevalence of HCV positivity in dialysis patients has recently prompted several studies on this controversial subject. The aim of the study was an evaluation of HCV positivity and of influence on clinical outcome in 2,404 patients on dialysis in Piedmont (Northern Italy Region, about 4,400,000 inhab., 20 Dialysis Centers) at December 1993 (32.7% HCV-positive according to the Regional Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation). As expected, a strong correlation was found with time on dialysis (94.4% in patients with treatment follow-up > or = 20 years) and blood transfusions (41.3% HCV positivity in transfused patients versus 22.6% in not transfused ones; p < 0.0001). Dialysis in a hospital setting is confirmed as at high risk of infection, since HCV positivity was 19.6% in patients always treated by bicarbonate dialysis in hospital versus 8.9% in those treated only by CAPD (start of dialysis in 1992-1993). Despite the high prevalence of HCV positivity, however, death rates for liver disease and for all gastrointestinal causes are very low, regardless of HCV antibody status (1.2% in HCV positive versus 2.3% in HCV negative, NS). Whether this depends upon different clinical features of HCV infection in dialysis patients or merely deflects a relatively short follow-up will be matter of discussion in the future.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of selected long-term survivors undergoing dialysis].

At the end of December, 1993, 389 patients treated by means of dialysis for more than 15 years were registered in the Piedmont Dialysis and Transplantation Register; among them, 183 were alive. Characteristics of these patients as age at the beginning of dialytic treatment, casual nephropathies, causes of death, high risk conditions, dialytic schedules, vascular access, hospitalization requirements, rehabilitation, dialysis efficacy, gross mortality, were compared with those of patients treated for a shorter time, concluding that a very long dialytic survival can be achieved with a good clinical and social rehabilitation.

Cause of Death↗
PubMed1996

[Patients with neoplastic disease or older than 80 years of age: dialysis survival].

In several European countries, including Italy, the resident population is ageing. This process is at the basis of the progressive increase in incidence of new elderly patients starting dialysis and, to a lesser degree, of patients affected by severe comorbid conditions, such a neoplasia. The aim of the study was an analysis of the situation in Piedmont (Northern Italy, 4,400,000 inhabitants): out of 4483 new entries in 1981-1993, 192 were aged 80 years and 87 were affected by renal neoplasia or by multiple myeloma. Incidence of patients aged 80 increased throughout the period; use of high tolerance techniques increased in the meantime allowing an improvement in survival results. The high incidence of vasculopathic patients and the high rates of death from cachexia pinpoint how much still has to be done in the field of prevention, even before dialysis starts.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1996

[Diabetes mellitus is currently one of the most frequent causes or associated causes of uremia. Data from the Piedmont registry of dialysis and transplantation (update, December 1993)].

A regular dialytic treatment of diabetic patients is until accepted from about twenty years in many areas. Aim of this work was a retrospective analysis of main clinical and survival data of diabetic patients (diabetic nephropathy or diabetes as comorbidous factor = 659 cases) admitted for dialysis in Piedmont (Northern Italy Region about 4,400,000 inhabitants) in the period 1981-1993 (functional recovery and follow-up < 1 month excluded). A progressive increment in incidence of diabetic patients was seen mostly in the aged. At 12/31/1993, 263 of 2404 patients admitted for dialysis were diabetics (10.9%); the majority of them was treated in Hospital Centers with bicarbonate haemodialysis (54.4%), while a small group was treated with CAPD (12.9%). During the years ¿80 was seen a progressive leaving of CAPD as first choice method in this population and in the last period the orienteering is the utilization of mixed methods (diffusive-convective as first choice). As regards the survival are not prominent significant differences between this cohort and the cohort affected by vasculopathy as comorbidous factor (86.2 and 54.2% in diabetics vs 78.6 and 55.2% in patients affected by vasculopathy at 1 and 3 years--p = 0.3481; patients aged 45-64 years). In conclusion the cohort of diabetic patients represent a good marker of the clinical problems of the elder population with high clinic risk, in progressive increasing in our Region.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Dialysis in the elderly: improvement of survival results in the eighties.

Analysis of long-term dialysis results is the cornerstone of renal replacement therapy evaluation. Elderly patients may be considered a crucial cohort, since subtle differences may be enhanced in a population of lower life expectancy. The aim of the study was an analysis, from the Piedmont Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation, of the results obtained in 1981-1992 (northern Italy, about 4,400,000 inhabitants, 21 dialysis centres, open acceptance since mid-1970s) in patients aged > or = 65 years (475 patients started treatment in 1981-1985, 1026 in 1986-1992). As a first treatment, during the 12 years considered acetate haemodialysis decreased sharply; bicarbonate haemodialysis is currently the standard treatment (68%). Peritoneal dialysis is stable (21%), and haemodiafiltration is increasing (8%). Shifts between treatments are frequent: 15% of elderly patients changed treatment at least once in 1991-1992. Nephroangiosclerosis/ischaemic renal disease, undefined causes and diabetes mellitus are the major causes of end-stage renal disease; 57.3% of patients have high risk conditions in addition to age. In this cohort of patients, mean age of new cases starting dialysis significantly increased in 1986-1992 (72.7 +/- 5.4 years) versus 1981-1985 (71.3 +/- 4.5; P < 0.001). Despite this, survival at 2 years increased significantly from 54.6% in the period 1981-1985 to 59% in the period 1986-1992 (P < 0.05). Even in an ageing dialysis population, therefore, choice of an open dialysis system with easy changes among treatments allowed improvement of survival results; further technical advances may help in maintaining present trends.

Age Factors↗