Biomedical subjects

G B Piccoli

Publications and source records attributed to G B Piccoli.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Development of kidney scars after acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis: relationship with clinical, laboratory and imaging data at diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Acute pyelonephritis is a potential cause of kidney scars. AIM: To evaluate the relationship between clinical, laboratory and imaging data and the development of kidney scars in acute pyelonephritis. METHODS: All consecutive patients hospitalized for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in our nephrology unit from June 1996 to June 2004 were considered: 58 females, median age 25.6 years (16-52). Diagnosis of pyelonephritis required parenchymal lesions shown by CT or NMR scan. RESULTS: The lesions were bilateral in 17.2% (10/58) patients, unilateral, but multifocal in 81.0% (47/58); at CT or NMR, 65.5% of the lesions were classified as simple, 19% with tendency to colliquation and 15.5% abscessual. The median interval between first symptoms and diagnosis was 5 days (1-25); at referral, only 20.7% had a positive urine culture and 94.8% (55/58) had undergone previous antibiotic treatment. The therapeutic protocol required intravenous therapy for > or = 2 weeks, followed by 2-4 weeks of oral therapy. At 6-8 months, the prevalence of kidney scars was 29.3%. Their development was highly correlated with the type of lesions at diagnosis (highest risk with abscessual lesions; uni- and multivariate analysis). No other clinical or laboratory marker (age, fever, positive cultures, levels of acute phase reactants, interval between onset and diagnosis) was correlated with the outcome (scars). CONCLUSIONS: The type of lesion at diagnosis of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis is highly correlated with the development of kidney scars. Further studies are needed to test the therapeutic schedules tailored according to the imaging data.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2006

Drug use and kidney donation: what are high-risk behaviors today?

BACKGROUND: "Social risk behaviors" are usually considered as contraindications for organ donation. The organ shortage, however, necessitates expansion of the donor pool. Reconsideration of the policy toward substance abusers may be important. Opinions of the overall population may be of use to define this cultural-sensitive issue. METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire on organ donation, including opinions on drug use (cannabis and cocaine), was administered to various groups of the general public and caregivers: high school students (liceo classico: 59 students, median age 18 years; istituto tecnico: 108, age 17); first- and fourth-year medical school (77, age 19; 46, age 22); continuing medical education (44, age 32); third-year nursing school (31, age 23); "senior citizen university" (51, age 63). RESULTS: Cannabis use was mainly accepted for kidney donation (48.6% yes, 26.6% no, 29.8% uncertain/blank), but cocaine use was not (22.1% yes, 44.2% no, 33.7% uncertain/blank). In the univariate analysis, opinions differed according to age, sex, and belonging to the health care teams upon multivariate analysis being a member of the health care team was the strongest predictor of responses (P<.01). CONCLUSION: It is difficult to define social risk behaviors. Since opinions are important for organ donation, further studies and discussion are needed to periodically analyze our policies.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Is male homosexuality still a cultural taboo for kidney donation?

BACKGROUND: Among the so-called social risk behaviors, male homosexuality is probably one of the most interesting and difficult taboos. Because of changing attitudes of the general population toward irregular sexual behaviors, often considered as markers of unhealthy life styles, there is a need to reconsider at least the most important one-homosexuality. METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire included opinions on homosexuality with respect to kidney donation: Would you consider a male homosexual as a kidney donor? If you were on dialysis, would you accept a kidney from a homosexual donor? This instrument was administered to various groups of the general public and caregivers: high school students (Liceo Classico: 59 students, median age 18 years; Istituto Tecnico: n=108, median age 17); first and fourth year of medical school (n=77, age 19; 46, age 22); continuing medical education (n=44, age 32); third year of nursing school (n=31, age 23); "senior citizen university" (n=51, age 63). RESULTS: Male homosexuality was well accepted for kidney donation (71.6% yes, 9.6% no, 18.8% uncertain/blank). However, the opinions were different among the groups with male students of a technical institute showing discrimination against male homosexuals. In the univariate analysis, opinions differed according to age, gender, and belonging to the health care team. In the multivariate analysis, the latter was the strongest predictor (P<.01). The specific threats for the health are not well known, even among the caregiver population. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to define the role of homosexuality among the so-called social risk behaviors. Negative attitudes existed in some subsets of the population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Diffuse vascular damage in a transplanted kidney: an indication for nuclear magnetic resonance?

Vascular lesions are an increasing challenge after renal transplantation due to the wider indications for recipients and acceptance criteria for donors. Diagnostic approach and prognostic interpretation are still matter of controversy. The case reported herein may summarize some of the issues in this regard. A 54-year-old woman, on renal replacement therapy since 1974, and a kidney graft recipient from 1975 to 1999, received a second graft in 2001. The donor age was 65 years (cold ischemia 22 hours; two mismatches). The early posttransplant follow-up was characterized by delayed graft function, hypertension, and diabetes. During the initial hypertension workup, renal graft ultrasound (US) Doppler demonstrated increased vascular resistances, stable over time (resistance index 0.74 to 0.77); renal scintiscan displayed homogeneously parenchymoa and angio-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an homogeneous parenchymal vascularization. Initial immunosuppression with tacrolimus and steroids was modulated by adding mycophenolate mofetil to taper tacrolimus (to reduce nephrotoxicity and hypertension). Despite this, kidney function slowly deteriorated; serum creatinine reached 3 to 3.5 mg/dL by the second year. After a severe hypertensive crisis with unchanged scintiscan and US doppler examinations, angio-MRI revealed the almost complete disappearance of parenchymal enhancement beyond the lobar arteries. A renal biopsy confirmed the severe vascular damage. The patient was switched to rapamycine and a low-dose of an angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. She did relatively well (serum creatinine 2.2 to 3 mg/dL) for 6 months, when rapid functional impairment forced her to restart hemodialysis. This case, almost paradigmatic of the problems occurring when the rigid vasculature of long-term dialysis patients is matched with "marginal kidneys," suggests that MRI may be a sensible good to define vascular damage in the grafted kidney.

Female↗

PubMed2005

CKD patients and erythropoietin: do we need evidence-based informed consent?

BACKGROUND: Consent to therapy is increasingly requested in the form of ''informed consent''. OBJECTIVE: To validate an evidence-based informed consent form for erythropoietin (EPO) therapy and to evaluate patient opinions about the informed consent approach. METHODS: An evidence-based informed consent form was developed as part of the Evidence-Based-Medicine course at the Medical School of Turin, Italy. It was validated by anonymous questionnaires (0-10 analogical scales and open answers) administered to patients at different stages of CKD (19 pre-ESRD, 26 hemodialysis, 12 transplant patients) attending an outpatient unit of the University of Turin, to 8 nurses, and to 26 medical students. RESULTS: All individuals filled in the questionnaire. Interest in a detailed explanation of the therapy was high (median 9), as was comprehension (median 9), with no differences between patients with regard to disease stage (pre-ESRD vs. RRT) or educational level. Prior knowledge of the therapy was affected by the educational level (p=0.013 for the advantages and p=0.004 for the side effects) and the professional role (patients vs caregivers: p=0.009 for the advantages and p<0.001 for side affects); patient knowledge of the advantages (median 6) tended to increase as the disease progressed (p=0.015). The most common response by patients was that informed consent was necessary for all drugs (35.1%); 73.1% of the caregivers considered it necessary only for severe side effects. The preferred modality of consent was discussion with the caregiver during the clinical controls (42% of all cases). CONCLUSIONS: Patient interest in and comprehension of an informed consent form with a detailed explanation of the therapy was high; the caregiver's opinion was still the most valued teaching tool.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Living donor kidney transplant in Italy: is the underutilization justified?

Living donor transplants (LDtx) represent an underutilized resource in Italy. It is, however, a therapeutic option that deserves greater consideration not only due to the increasing gap between the number of uremic patients on waiting lists (6956) and the number (1464) of cadaveric transplants (CADtx), as evidenced in 2002, but also due to the advantages of LDtx over CADtx. The superiority of LDtx include better graft survival, independent of the donor/recipient relationship, less need for dialytic treatment with preemptive transplants and reduced immunogenicity of the graft due to the brain death-related "cytokine storm." Moreover, some emerging procedures namely laparoscopic nephrectomy instead of open surgery and spiral CT instead of renal angiography namely, reduce the physical and socioeconomic burden of the donor. In the light of these considerations, LDtx should be reconsidered in the Italian scenario of kidney transplantation.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

Erectile dysfunction after kidney transplantation: our 22 years of experience.

AIM: To evaluate the results of treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in kidney transplant recipients before and after the advent of sildenafil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1981 through 2002, 971 male patients of mean age 53.4 years received a renal graft. Erectile dysfunction (ED) was investigated in all patients at the first urologic visit posttransplantation. Psycho-sexual support was offered to all patients. Before sildenafil use (1998), our diagnostic approach was complex. From 1998 we tested: serum levels of testosterone, prolactin, and glucose with penile duplex ultrasonography and NPT reserved for selected cases. RESULTS: From 1981 through 1998, 365 male kidney transplant recipients (45%) reported ED. Only 169 patients chose to be treated: 27 responded to psycho-sexual therapy; 3 received testosterone with benefit; 133 had a good results from intracavernosal injection of vasoactive drugs; and 6 received a penile prosthesis. Since 1998, 126 patients reported ED (78.3%). Only 78 chose treatment: 24 patients had a satisfactory response to sildenafil (65% with 50 mg and 35% with 100 mg). PGE1 alone or in combination with papaverine and phentolamine produced a good response in 37 patients; 17 patients did not respond to pharmacotherapy; and 5 received a tricomponent penile prosthesis without complications. The side effects of sildenafil and PGE1 therapy were similar to those reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: ED is an important problem in male renal transplant recipients. Cultural resistance to treatment is common. However, treatment with sildenafil citrate and intracavernosal self-injection of PGE1 are well accepted, and prosthetic devices may help in resistant cases.

Erectile Dysfunction↗

PubMed2004

Preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation: multidisciplinary follow-up starts too late.

BACKGROUND: Preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation is increasingly considered at early stages of nephropathy in type 1 diabetics. A multidisciplinary approach is required, but referral to the nephrologist is often delayed. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the referral pattern of type 1 diabetics to a dedicated nephrology unit and to test the prevalence of indications for pancreas-kidney transplantation in this population, according to early preemptive criteria (creatinine >/= 2 mg/dL and/or nephrotic syndrome). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The setting of study was the first Italian Nephrology Outpatient Unit dedicated to diabetics during 1991 to 2002. The main biochemical and clinical parameters were analyzed at referral. RESULTS: Ninety type 1 diabetics underwent at least one nephrological visit during the period; 85 had data at referral. The referral pattern was stable: 1991 to June 1996 [22 men, 24 women of median age 36 (18 to 65) years; diabetological follow-up 18.0 (3 to 37) years] and July 1996 to March 2002 [26 men, 18 women median age 40 (18 to 65); diabetological follow-up 21.5 (11 to 36) years]. The main biochemical data at referral were superimposable: serum creatinine: 1.2 (0.6 to 3.2) versus 1.3 (0.6 to 7) mg/dL; proteinuria: 0.9 (0 to 11) versus 1.01 (0.05 to 12.3) g/24 hours. Diabetes follow-up was greater in July 1996 to March 2002 [18 (3 to 37) versus 21.5 (11 to 36) years] suggesting an effect of improvements in diabetic care. At referral 76.6% were macroproteinuric 85.6% had signs of end-organ damage other than nephropathy; and 30.6% had indications for pancreas-kidney grafting (creatinine >/= 2 mg/dL: n = 6 cases; nephrotic syndrome: n = 10; or both n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: One new frontier of transplantation is the need for early multidisciplinary evaluation of type 1 diabetic patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Complete reversal of the nephrotic syndrome after preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Nephrotic syndrome due to diabetic nephropathy is presently considered an indication for pancreas-kidney transplantation even in the absence of severe renal failure. Reversal of the nephrotic syndrome has been reported, but the mechanisms of this effect are unclear. AIM: To describe the renal morphofunctional pattern and the pattern of proteinuria before and after preemptive pancreas-kidney transplantation. METHODS: Methods included quantitative and qualitative assessment of proteinuria as well as renal ultrasound and scintiscan. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes since age 24 had widespread end-organ damage. Renal biopsy (2001) showed a mainly nodular pattern of diabetic nephropathy. Following referral (1999), her serum creatinine ranged from 1.6 to 2.2 mg/dL, with nephrotic range proteinuria (glomerular nonselective, tubular complete). Renal scintiscan revealed bilateral, symmetric, well-perfused kidneys. The functional data before pancreas-kidney graft (February 2003) were: serum creatinine 1.6 mg/dL, creatinine clearance 58 mL/min, serum albumin 2.6 g/dL, proteinuria 9.1 g/d. At hospital discharge (March 2003), the creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL, the creatinine clearance 97 mL/min, the proteinuria 0.676 g/d. Two months later, the creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL and proteinuria 0.421 g/d. A renal scintiscan demonstrated the functional prevalence of the grafted kidney (77% of total function), with vital, almost completely excluded native kidneys (functional contribution, 11.5% each). Proteinuria, ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 g/d, showed a physiological pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Functional exclusion of the native kidneys by renal scintiscan gives morphological support to reversal of the nephrotic syndrome.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Opinions on renal transplantation and organ donation in high school students in two large northern (Torino) and southern (Napoli) Italian cities.

UNLABELLED: Organ shortage for transplantation has focused attention on educational interventions. Italy is a nonhomogenous country whose cultural and economic differences are reflected in the health-care system: dialysis is mainly public in the north versus private in the south; and transplantation rates display a wide range from 3.4 to 37.8 per million people in 2002. The aim of the present study was to analyze the opinions of population of high school students (last two years) in two large cities: northern (Torino) and southern (Napoli) Italy, as a knowledge base for a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of educational interventions on renal replacement therapy and organ donation, targeted to high school students. METHODS: This preliminary study included eight public high schools that completed a first and anonymous semistructured questionnaire. Five hundred and eighty nine questionnaires were retrieved in Torino and 539 in Napoli. In both cities most students answered that they would give a kidney to a brother, sister, or partner needing dialysis (Torino: yes 80.6%; no 2.2%, uncertain-blank 17.2%; Napoli: yes 86.1%, no 1.1%; uncertain-blank 12.8%). Only 36.3% of the students in Torino and 37.7% in Napoli answered that they would consent to organ donation, if they had to choose for a strict relative with brain death. Opposition was 28% in Torino and 23.7% in Napoli; 35.7% in Torino and 38.6% in Napoli were blank-uncertain. These data underline the need for detailed information on the opinions of the overall population as basis for tailored educational campaigns.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Efficacy of an educational program on dialysis, renal transplantation, and organ donation on the opinions of high school students: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Organ shortage is a rate-limiting factor for transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational program targeted to high school students on opinions concerning organ donation. METHODS: Sixteen public high schools in Torino, Italy, were randomized (2001 to 2002) as interventions (n = 8) or controls (n = 8). Intervention was composed of first questionnaire, first lesson (one to two classes; 2 hours, by a trained nephrology fellow); second lesson (all classes together; coordinated by a nephrologist, with patients and trainees); second questionnaire. Control included questionnaires. Statistical analysis compared the opinions in the questionnaires after stratification for age, sex, and type of school. RESULTS: Fourteen schools completed the program (seven interventions: 937 first and 808 second questionnaires; controls: 739 and 659). Television (82.5%) and newspapers (43.2%) were the main sources of information; knowledge on renal transplantation (grafts feasible per patient, average duration) was low; only 12.2% of the students gave correct answers. The opinions on living donation were highly positive (76.8%) with no difference in control, intervention schools, first and second questionnaires, according to sex, age, or type of school. The opinions on cadaveric transplantation were affected by the educational intervention with a drop in negative answers (from 33.7% to 16%), with an increase in positive (from 31.5% to 42.9%) and in uncertain ones (from 34.8% to 41.1%) among the intervention schools; 98% of the students appreciated the program. CONCLUSION: The positive effect on student opinions suggests the need to develop educational approaches as a part of our routine clinical work.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

How many organs should one patient receive? The ethics of transplantation in the medical school.

BACKGROUND: Interest in the humanities in the medical school is growing; while several medical schools, mainly of Anglo-Saxon background, have developed dedicated courses, the experience in Italy is limited. METHODS: Since the academic year 2000 to 2001, a discussion of ethical problems was implemented in the nephrology course (fourth year of the Medical School of Torino, Italy; overall 6 years). In 2002 to 2003, a case entitled "Retransplantation of Multiple Organs (Prog Transplant 2002)" was discussed in 2 hours of small-group tutorial teaching: a boy received a renal graft at age 5, failed at age 7 due to recurrent glomerulonephritis, required a heart-kidney graft at age 11, and a second heart-kidney graft at 17. Student opinions were gathered by anonymous semistructured questionnaires at the beginning of the lessons as a basis for discussion. RESULTS: Following the lessons all students returned the questionnaires (n = 104). In the absence of competition for allocation, retransplantation was approved by 76.2%, unacceptable for 1% (22.9% uncertain-blank). With a waiting list of 10 patients, the opinions changed: 32.4% approved transplantation, 6.7% didn't approve it, 60.9% were uncertain. A theoretical categorization into deontological or utilitaristic approaches favored the first (41.9% vs 26.7%), with a high prevalence of blank-uncertain (31.5%); 21.9% of the students would change their opinion was that study head of the Transplant Department. CONCLUSION: Ethical aspects of the medical profession have been discussed with interest by medical school students; the high prevalence of uncertain answers and requests to develop specific tools underline the importance of this educational approach.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

Kidney vending: opinions of the medical school students on this controversial issue.

BACKGROUND: In this era of globalization, in which different cultural and economic barriers are progressively abated, in the context of the development of rapid information networks such as the Internet, physicians are increasingly challenged by clinical and ethical questions. Kidney vending, banned in some countries, legal or tolerated in others, may be the prototype of the ethical aspects of health-care globalization. METHODS: To test the interest and the opinions of medical school students, a simulated case was proposed to students attending a seminar within the nephrology course fourth year of the Medical School of Torino, san Luigi): an Italian patient comes to the nephrologist's office asking for advice on the possibility to legally buy a kidney in a foreign country. The 43 students attending the lesson answered a semistructured questionnaire (15 boys, 28 girls, of median age 23 years). Attendance was within the usual standards (50 students inscribed per year). From the clinical point of view, 11.6% were favorable to kidney vending, 51.2% were contrary, 37.2% were uncertain. From the ethical point of view, no student was pro, 81.4% were contrary, and 18.6% were uncertain. The open comments underline the importance of patient self-determination and of informed consent. Similar opinions were recorded in a nonstructured question: "What should physician's attitude be, in the face of a choice he/she doesn't share?" CONCLUSION: Students' uncertainties and doubts underline the need to discuss ethical scenarios in the clinical teachings of the medical school.

Attitude to Health↗

PubMed2004

To give or to receive? Opinions of teenagers on kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: The attitude toward living donation varies widely in the world, for economic and cultural reasons. In Italy, as in other Mediterranean settings, the role of living kidney donation is minor. AIM: To analyze the reasons for this attitude, we gathered data in a general population sample of high school students in a large northern Italian industrial city (Torino, about 900,000 inhabitants). METHODS: Semistructured questionnaires (n = 1676), gathered in 2001 to 2002 in 14 high schools, in the context of an educational program on dialysis, renal transplantation, and organ donation, were analyzed presumably reflecting opinions gathered before the educational intervention. RESULTS: Most students, in the case of a close relative or partner needing dialysis, answer that they would donate a kidney (yes: 78.2%, no: 2.9%, uncertain-blank: 18.9%); receiving a living donor kidney is felt as disturbing: only 57.5% of the students would accept it (no: 5.9%, uncertain-blank: 36.6%), mainly because of fear of long-term problems for the donor. Donation from an older to a younger person is seen more positively than vice versa. CONCLUSION: In our settings, the attitude of the teenagers on living donation is positive; however, while "giving" is positively seen, the presence of unresolved fears is witnessed by the lower acceptance of the idea of "taking." These data suggest to focus on the risks of kidney donation in educational campaigns and in patient-physician information. The positive attitude shared by the teenagers supports the working hypothesis that lack of information is one of the determinants of the low living donor transplantation rate in our area.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Preparation of candidates for renal transplantation: cost analysis.

While the costs of renal transplantation are lower than those of dialysis, little is known about the costs of managing the waiting list. We performed a cost analysis of admission and clinical management of a waiting list for renal and pancreas-kidney transplantation. Admission to the waiting list included (1) renal graft from cadaver: minimum cost Euros () 1784.56 for men < 55 years, maximum 2127.85 for women >/= 55 years; (2) pancreas-kidney transplantation: minimum 2475.50 for men, maximum 2540.10 for women >/= 35 years. Check of suitability state on waiting list after 2 and 5 years: minimum 1400.15 for men >/= 55 years (check every 2 years), maximum 1467.07 for women >/=40, <55 years (every 5 years). The differences are related to the imaging techniques: from 43.90 (Doppler ultrasonography) to 283.28 (coronary angiography). Maintenance of the waiting list: minimum cost 1885.21 in the first year and 3187.02 in the (fifth year) for men < 55 years; maximum 2228.50 (first year) and 5116.70 (fifth year) for women >/= 55 years. These results show different costs for recipients on the basis of sex and age ranges, due to the different requirements for imaging tests such as cardiac scintiscan at age >/= 55 years) and economic charges that increase with age. Reduced waiting times allow lowered total costs. This evaluation allowed us to calculate for our region (Piemonte, Northern Italy), the management costs of the patients presently on our waiting list (369 patients at December 31, 2002) from preparation to transplantation as 959,179.18.

Cadaver↗

PubMed2004

Tailored dialysis start may allow persistence of residual renal function after graft failure: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Restarting dialysis after kidney transplantation is a critical step with psychological and clinical implications. Maintenance of residual renal function a known factor affecting survival in chronic kidney disease, has so far not been investigated after a kidney transplantation. THE CASE: A 54-year-old woman who started dialysis in 1974 (first graft, 1975-1999) received a second "marginal" kidney graft in February 2001 (donor age, 65 years). Her chronic therapy was tacrolimus and steroids. She had a clinical history as follows: nadir creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL, moderate-severe hypertension, progressive graft dysfunction, nonresponsiveness to addition of mycophenolate, tapering FK levels, and a rescue switch from tacrolimus to rapamycin. From October to December 2003, the creatinine level increased from 2-2.8 to 7 mg/dL. Biopsy specimen showed malignant and "benign" nephrosclerosis, posttransplantation glomerulopathy, and tacrolimus toxicity. Chronic dialysis was started (GFR <3 mL/min). Rapamycin was discontinued. Dialysis was tailored to reach an equivalent renal clearance of >15 mL/min (2 sessions/wk). Blood pressure control improved, nephrotoxic drugs were avoided, and fluid loss was minimized (maximum 500 mL/hr). By this policy, renal function progressively increased to GFR >10 mL/min in May 2004, allowing a once or twice weekly dialysis schedule, with good clinical balance, and obvious advantages for the quality of life. CONCLUSION: This long-term patient, who restarted dialysis with severely reduced renal function, regained sufficient renal function to allow once weekly dialysis. Thus, careful tailoring of dialysis sessions at the restart of dialysis may allow preservation of residual kidney function, at least in individuals for whom a subsequent graft is unlikely.

Female↗

PubMed2004

Asclepiad's cock: a patient-physician association is a useful tool for educational programs in nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The negative impact of the mass media, the lack of information, and the request for in-depth knowledge are the basis for the present need for educational programs on transplantation, brain death, and chronic kidney diseases end-stage renal disease; (ESRD). The aim of the present article was to critically review the activities performed by Il Gallo di Esculapio, a nonprofit association, in the education on the different phases of ESRD. The associates are physicians and patients, and the activities are integrated institutionally. METHODS: This report is a narrative review of the material produced and performed by Il Gallo di Esculapio ONLUS in 1996-2004. RESULTS: The two main activities developed were book writing and an educational program. Eight books for patient education were written on different aspects of dialysis, transplantation, and ESRD. Most were designed as theses of the Medical School. Cooperation with patients was important in all cases and fundamental for the collection of interviews. EDUCATION: A 4-hour educational program on transplantation started in 2000-2001 (1 high school was involved). The checklist originally included only transplantation and organ donation, but progressively gave space also to dialysis, ESRD, and social health care problems. In 2003-2004 the program involved 67 high schools. The association coordinated progressive patient involvement. CONCLUSION: Small, nonprofit patient-physician associations linked with the University allow enrolling resources for educational activities to often-neglected parts of the medical profession.

Books↗

PubMed2004

Renal transplantation from cadaveric donor after myocardial revascularization: still a matter of concern?

Renal transplantation in patients who have undergone coronary revascularization remains a matter of concern, few experiences have been reported in literature. From January 1997 to March 2003, 23 previously revascularized patients underwent renal transplants from cadaveric donors. We analyzed patient survival and cardiac events in this group of patients (group A) versus a similar population of 38 revascularized patients who were still on dialysis (group B) on the active waiting list (awl). After a similar follow-up (29.30 +/- 21.34 months versus 32.98 +/- 31.33 months; P = .56), survival was 100% for renal transplant patients and 94.74% for dialysis patients, two of whom (5.26%) died from acute myocardial infarction and four (10.52%) were excluded from the waiting list because of cardiac problems. The event-person ratio was 0.51 for group A patients (75% of events clustered within the first 6 months) and 0.71 for group B. The need for therapy with nitrates decreased from 11/23 (47.8%) to 6/23 (26%) after transplant. The ejection fraction remained stable (53.82% +/- 10.4% vs pre-Tx value of 54.8% +/- 9.4%). Renal survival was 100% (sCr = 1.4 +/- 0.4 mg/dL). Although no statistical significance has emerged, there was a general trend in favor of transplanted patients. On the basis of this experience we believe that coronary revascularization per se should no longer be a matter of concern for renal transplantation, which could be superior to dialysis for this type of patient.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗