Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G B Biederman

Publications and source records attributed to G B Biederman.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

Methodological issues in drug-drug conditioning in rats: nonassociative factors in heart rate and avfail.

Sodium pentobarbital injections followed 30 min later by d-amphetamine sulfate produce an effect over trials in the form of an increase in heart rate in response to pentobarbital in relation to rats that receive the 2 drugs 24 hr apart (long-delayed control: Revusky, Davey, & Zagorski, 1989). This study found equivalent increases in heart rate in forward and backward groups in relation to a long-delayed control regardless of whether training or testing was carried out in a heart rate recording apparatus or in the home cage, which suggests that a drug interaction due to drug administrations in forward and backward groups has yet to be eliminated in accounting for the heart rate effect. Comparison of backward and long-delayed controls in a drug-drug procedure that used a taste aversion test revealed that both forward and delayed pairings can produce attenuated aversions in relation to a backward group regardless of whether the unconditional stimulus is amphetamine (Experiment 1) or lithium chloride (Experiment 2).

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.

In a procedure intended to determine color preference in pigeons (which partially replicated Catania, Owens, & von Lossberg, 1983), two keys were illuminated by different colors drawn from a set of amber, red, green, or blue stimuli; this was followed by the presentation of grain when either of the two colors was pecked. The grain was illuminated alternately across trials with the colors presented on the keys. In Experiment 1 the intensity of the color stimuli used was not equalized, whereas in Experiment 2 the intensity of the colors was equalized. The low preference for blue found in Experiment 1, as measured by differential key pecking, was not found in Experiment 2. The discriminability of the intensity-equalized colors was confirmed in Experiment 2a, in which equal-intensity color discrimination problems were presented. In Experiment 3, as in Catania et al. (1983), a response-independent reinforcement schedule was used, but with intensity-equalized colors. In contrast to Experiment 2, very low preference for blue was found here and in Experiment 4, which used a within-subject procedure. These findings suggest that pigeon color preference may be a function of intensity, but all controlling variables have not as yet been identified.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Observational learning of two visual discriminations by pigeons: a within-subjects design.

Pigeon's observational learning of successive visual discrimination was studied using within-subject comparisons of data from three experimental conditions. Two pairs of discriminative stimuli were used; each bird was exposed to two of the three experimental conditions, with different pairs of stimuli used in a given bird's two conditions. In one condition, observers were exposed to visual discriminative stimuli only. In a second condition, subjects were exposed to a randomly alternating sequence of two stimuli where the one that would subsequently be used as S+ was paired with the operation of the grain magazine. In a third experimental condition, subjects were exposed to the performance of a conspecific in the operant discrimination procedure. After exposures to conspecific performances, there was facilitation of discriminative learning, relative to that which followed exposures to stimulus and reinforcement sequences or exposures to stimulus sequences alone. Exposure to stimulus and food-delivery sequences enhanced performance relative to exposure to stimulus sequences alone. The differential effects of these three types of exposure were not attributable to order effects or to task difficulty; rather, they clearly were due to the type of exposure.

Animals↗
PubMed1985

Neurobehavioral development following aluminum administration in infant rabbits.

Aluminum (Al) is known to be a neurotoxic agent in some species, inducing neurofibrillary tangles, dendritic atrophy, and behavioral deterioration, and has been implicated as a possible agent in human Alzheimer's disease and dialysis dementia. This study was conducted to assess the neurotoxic effects of Al in infant rabbits, and to compare the effects to those previously observed to follow exposure in the adult animal. Aluminum tartrate (2 microM) or physiologic saline was injected into the right lateral ventricle of 2-day-old (day P3) New Zealand white rabbits. The animals were trained in a step-down active avoidance task on P12 and retested 1 day later. They were killed on P20, and their hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells examined for neurofibrillary tangles or prepared with the rapid Golgi stain for an examination of dendritic development. Additional animals were similarly infused with 1 or 3 microM Al for qualitative and some quantitative observations. No overt neurologic signs were observed in the 1- or 2-microM groups, however, most of the 3-microM group died between P10 and P20. Although there were no significant differences between the 2-microM and control animals on either learning or retention of the active avoidance task, deficits in retention of the task were observed in the 3-microM group. Neurofibrillary tangles in CA1 pyramidal cells were observed with dosages of 1 microM and higher. In the 2-microM group, the pattern of dendritic arborization in CA1 pyramidal cells was consistent with that expected for cells retarded in their development. These results have implications in terms of developmental differences in the neurobehavioral effects of Al.

Aluminum↗
PubMed1968

Stimulus function in simultaneous discrimination.

In discrimination learning, the negativity of the stimulus correlated with nonreinforcement (S-) declines after 100 training trials while the stimulus correlated with reinforcement (S+) is paradoxically more positive with lesser amounts of discrimination training. Training subjects on two simultaneous discrimination tasks revealed a within-subjects overlearning reversal effect, where a more-frequently presented discrimination problem was better learned in reversal than was a discrimination problem presented less frequently during training.

Animals↗