Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Aureli

Publications and source records attributed to G Aureli.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1965

[Carlo Bignardi].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anatomy, Comparative↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[In vitro evaluation of the antibiotic effect of imipenen on bacterial strains isolated mostly from compromised patients].

The antibacterial activity in vitro of Imipenem (N-formimidoyl-thienamycin) was studied on 237 recently-isolated nosocomial bacterial strains and compared with Aztreonam, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Piperacillin, Amikacin and Netilmicin through the determination of susceptibility by the Kirby-Bauer method. Taking into account that 65% bacterial strains, out of the examined ones, came from antibiotic high-pressure departments (45% from bone-marrow transplanted patients in the Hematological Department and 20% from Intensive Care Unit patients), the results obtained in vitro show an activity of Imipenem on Gram-negative bacteria as much as a 92.7% susceptibility and a 75.7% on Gram-positive bacteria; when compared with the activity of the other antibiotics, Imipenem shows a really excellent activity.

Drug Evaluation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Statistic relation between seropositivity to Toxoplasma gondii and several risk factors in a sample of pregnant women].

We analysed, in the period 1984-1986, the serum of 1733 pregnant women. The relation between the positivities and some probable factors of risk, alimentary habits and touch with tame animals has had valued by statistical method. The analysis shows no increase of risk in the group used to eat underdone meats compared with the group in touch tame animals.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Comparison between 2 separation methods of IgM and IgG in serologic diagnosis].

The concentrations of the IgG and IgM fractions have been determined on thirty whole sera and after treatment with protein A, or after chromatographic separation. The analysis of the differences has been effected with Student's t test. No statistically significant differences have been noted between the two methods of separation as far as IgM fraction is concerned, but, on the contrary, significant differences are present for the separation of IgG fraction.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗