Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G A Abell

Publications and source records attributed to G A Abell.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Cell cycle regulation of hepatitis C virus internal ribosomal entry site-directed translation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Translation of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) polyprotein is mediated by an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) that is located within the 5' nontranslated segment of the viral RNA. This RNA segment is known to form binary complexes with isolated 40S ribosome subunits in vitro, but there is little understanding of how the process of virus translation is regulated in vivo. METHODS: We established 2 stably transformed cell lines from Huh-7 cells that constitutively express dicistronic RNA transcripts containing sequences encoding 2 reporter proteins (Renilla luciferase and firefly luciferase) separated by a functional HCV IRES. The translation of the upstream Renilla luciferase reading frame is initiated in these cells by the usual cellular cap-dependent mechanism, whereas translation of the downstream firefly luciferase reading frame is initiated by the IRES. RESULTS: Compared with cap-dependent translation, the activity of the IRES was greatest in actively growing cells and relatively reduced in resting cells. In synchronized cultures of these stably transformed cells, the IRES activity varied with the cell cycle and was greatest during the mitotic (M) phases and lowest during the quiescent (G(0)) phases. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that HCV translation is regulated by cellular proteins that vary in abundance during the cell cycle and that viral translation may be enhanced by factors that stimulate the regeneration of hepatocytes in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

5' Untranslated Regions↗

Dose uniformity from a computerized three-dimensional tissue compensating system.

A verification of dose uniformity of the Huestis Compu-Former, a three dimensional megavoltage tissue compensator, is presented. Tissue compensators were built for three different anthropomorphic phantoms: a head and neck, a mantle, and a breast. Film densitometry was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the tissue compensators by comparing isodose curves generated for a compensated and an uncompensated field. Evaluation of the isodose distributions for the three regions confirmed the use of the Compu-Former as a reliable tissue compensating system.

Breast↗

Effects of proton and gamma radiation on lymphocyte populations and acute response to antigen.

BACKGROUND: The clinical use of proton radiation in the management of cancer, as well as benign disorders, is rapidly increasing. The major goal of this study was to compare the effects of proton and gamma (60Co) radiation on cell-mediated and humoral immunological parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were exposed to a single dose of 3 Gray (Gy) protons or gamma-rays and intraperitoneally injected 1 day later with sheep red blood cells (sRBC). On 4, 10, 15, and 29 days after exposure, subsets from each group were euthanised; nonirradiated controls (with and without sRBC injection) were included. Body and relative spleen weights, leukocyte counts, spontaneous blastogenesis, lymphocyte populations, and anti-sRBC titers were evaluated. RESULTS: The data showed significant depression (p < 0.05) in nearly all assays on days 4 and 10 after irradiation. B lymphocytes (CD19+) were the most radiosensitive, although reconstitution back to normal levels was observed by day 15. T cell (CD3+) and T helper cell (CD4+) recovery was evident by day 29, whereas the T cytotoxic cell (CD8+) count remained significantly below normal. Natural killer cells (NK1.1+) were relatively radioresistant. Anti-sRBC antibody production was slow and low titers were obtained after irradiation. No significant differences were noted between the two types of radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the data show that whole-body irradiation with protons or gamma-rays, at the dose employed, results in marked, but transient, immunosuppression. However, at the time points of testing and with the assays used, little or no differences were found between the two forms of radiation.

Animals↗